Skip to main content
Log in

Investigating the applicability and effects of hydraulic fracturing technology on well productivity in one of the Iranian gas condensate reservoirs

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Carbonates and Evaporites Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hydraulic fracturing is an important method utilized to enhance oil and gas recovery from reservoirs, especially for low-permeability formations. It has been broadly used in gas reservoirs, especially tight formations. Gas condensate reservoirs (GCR) experience a noticeable loss of productivity after achieving dew point pressure and condensate drop out formation around the wellbore, and could be suitable candidates for hydraulic fracturing operations. The aim of this study is to determine the effect of hydraulic fracturing on well productivity of GCR. A single well reservoir model corresponding to the GCR in the South of Iran and another model with similar conditions for hydraulic fracturing were created and validated. Reservoir model simulation was performed using a commercial compositional simulator. Sensitivity analysis was performed on fracture geometry parameters including the fracture length and width, flow parameters such as positive coupling and inertia effect, and reservoir properties namely permeability and fluid condensate gas ratio (CGR). The results demonstrated that hydraulic fracturing in GCR, especially in this case study, noticeably increases the productivity and production plateau time as well as decreases condensate formation, which increasing the fracture length and width intensifies this effect. Moreover, the optimized fracture length was obtained. It was found that the negative inertia effect in low hydraulic fracture widths and positive coupling in high fracture widths are dominant. Hydraulic fracturing is most effective in low-permeability and high-CGR conditions. These results pave the hydraulic fracturing road not only from industrial viewpoint, but also as a guideline for field-scale projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BHP:

Bottom hole pressure

P d :

Dew point pressure

Perm:

Permeability

P i :

Initial reservoir pressure

PI:

Well gas deliverability

PI@P r :

Gas deliverability of well at reservoir pressure, P r

PI@P i :

Well gas deliverability at initial reservoir pressure, P i

P r :

Reservoir pressure

P r/P d :

Ratio of reservoir pressure to dew point pressure

P wf :

Flowing wellbore pressure

Q g :

Gas rate of well

Rela_PI:

Relative gas deliverability of well

S wi :

Initial water saturation

CGR:

Condensate gas ratio

µ :

Viscosity

ρ :

Density

N c :

Capillary number

σ :

IFT

References

  • Adachi J, Siebrits E, Peirce A, Desroches J (2007) Computer simulation of hydraulic fractures. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 44:739–757. doi:10.1016/j.ijrmms.2006.11.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Afidick D, Kaczorowski NJ, Bette S (1994) Production performance of a retrograde gas reservoir: a case study of the Arun field. In: SPE 28749, SPE Asia Pacific oil and gas conference, Melbourne, Australia, 7–10 November. doi:10.2118/28749-MS

  • Ahmed T, Evans J, Kwan R, Vivian T (1998) Wellbore liquid blockage in gas-condensate reservoirs. In: SPE 51050, SPE eastern regional meeting, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 9–11 November. doi:10.2118/51050-MS

  • Ali JK, Butler S, Allen L, Wardle P (1993) The influence of interfacial tension on liquid mobility in gas condensate systems. In: SPE 26783 Offshore European conference, Aberdeen, 7–10 September. doi:10.2118/26783-MS

  • Boom W, Wit K, Zeelenberg JPW, Weeda HC, Maas JG (1996) On the use of model experiments for assessing improved gas-condensate mobility under near-wellbore flow condition. In: SPE 36714, SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, Denver, Colorado, 6–9 October. doi:10.2118/36714-MS

  • Butula KK, Maniere J, Shandrygin A, Rudenko D (2005) Analysis of production enhancement related to optimization of propped hydraulic fracturing in GAZPROM’s Yamburskoe Arctic gas condensate field, Russia. In: SPE 94727, SPE European formation damage conference, Scheveningen, Netherlands, 25–27 May. doi:10.2118/94727-MS

  • Carter BJ, Desroches J, Ingraffea AR, Wawrzynek PA (2000) Simulating fully 3D hydraulic fracturing, modeling in geomechanics. Wiley, Berlin, pp 525–557

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvajal GA, Danesh A, Jamiolahmady M, Sohrabi M (2005) The impact of pertinent parameters on the design of hydraulic fracturing in gas condensate reservoirs. In: SPE 94074, SPE Europe/EAGE annual conference, Madrid, Spain, 13–16 June. doi:10.2118/94074-MS

  • Du Y, Guan L, Li D (2004) Deliverability of wells in the gas condensate reservoir. In: SPE 88796, Abu Dhabi international petroleum conference and exhibition, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 10–13 October. doi:10.2118/88796-MS

  • Fevang O, Whitson CH (1995) Modeling gas condensate well deliverability. In: SPE 30714, SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, Dallas, TX, 22–25 October. doi:10.2523/IPTC-10692-MS

  • Gringarten AC, Al-Lamki A, Daungkaew S, Mott R, Whittle T (2000) Well test analysis in gas-condensate reservoirs. In: SPE 62920, SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, Dallas, 1–4 October. doi:10.2118/62920-MS

  • Henderson GD, Danesh A, Tehrani DH, Al-Kharusi B (2000) The relative significance of positive coupling and inertial effects on gas condensate relative permeabilities at high velocity. In: SPE 62933, SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, Dallas, TX, 1–4 October. doi:10.2118/62933-MS

  • Mavaddat M, Soleimani A, Rasaei MR, Mavaddat Y, Momeni, A (2011) Well test analysis of multiple hydraulically fractured horizontal wells (MHFHW) in gas condensate reservoirs. In: SPE 144345, SPE/IADC middle east drilling technology conference and exhibition, Muscat, Oman, 24–26 October. doi:10.2118/144345-MS

  • Mott R, Cable A, Spearing M (2000) Measurements and simulation of inertial and high capillary number phenomena in gas-condensate relative permeability. In: SPE 62932, SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, Dallas, TX, 1–4 October. doi:10.2118/62932-MS

  • Putthaworapoom N, Miskimins JL, Kazemi H (2012) Numerical investigation of hydraulic fracturing process and sensitivity to reservoir properties and operation variables. In: SPE 151060, SPE/EAGE European unconventional resources conference and exhibition, Vienna, Austria, 20–22 March

  • Whitson CH, Kuntadi A (2005) Khuff gas condensate development. In: International Petroleum Technology Conference, Doha, Qatar, 21–23 November. doi:10.2523/IPTC-10692-MS

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Moslem Fattahi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bagherzadeh, A., Shahbazi, K., Fattahi, M. et al. Investigating the applicability and effects of hydraulic fracturing technology on well productivity in one of the Iranian gas condensate reservoirs. Carbonates Evaporites 33, 637–650 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13146-017-0374-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13146-017-0374-1

Keywords

Navigation