Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Implementation of the REACH model of dementia caregiver support in American Indian and Alaska Native communities

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Translational Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

The Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer’s Caregivers Health in the VA (REACH VA) dementia caregiving intervention has been implemented in the VA, in community agencies, and internationally. As identified in the 2013 and 2015 National Plan to Address Alzheimer’s Disease, REACH is being made available to American Indian and Alaska Native communities. Implementation activities are carried out by local Public Health Nursing programs operated by Indian Health Service and Tribal Health programs, and Administration for Community Living/Administration on Aging funded Tribal Aging program staff already working in each community. The implementation is described using the Fixsen and Blasé implementation process model. Cultural, community, health system, and tribe-specific adaptations occur during the six implementation stages of exploration and adoption, program installation, initial implementation, full operation, innovation, and sustainability. Adaptations are made by local staff delivering the program. Implementation challenges in serving AI/AN dementia caregivers include the need to adapt the program to fit the unique communities and the cultural perceptions of dementia and caregiving. Lessons learned highlight the importance of using a clinically successful intervention, the need for support and buy-in from leadership and staff, the fit of the intervention into ongoing routines and practices, the critical role of modifications based on caregiver, staff, and organization needs and feedback, the need for a simple and easily learned intervention, and the critical importance of community receptivity to the services offered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cuijpers, P. (2005). Depressive disorders in caregivers of dementia patients: A systematic review. Aging & Mental Health, 9(4), 325–330.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dassel, K. B., & Carr, D. C. (2016). Does dementia caregiving accelerate frailty? Findings from the health and retirement study. The Gerontologist, 56(3), 444–450.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kneebone, I. I., & Martin, P. R. (2003). Coping and caregivers of people with dementia. British Journal of Health Psychology, 8(1), 1–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Martindale-Adams J, Nichols LO, Zuber J, Burns R, Graney M. Dementia caregivers’ use of services for themselves. Gerontologist. 2015; geront/gnv121.

  5. Mausbach, B. T., Patterson, T. L., Rabinowitz, Y. G., Grant, I., & Schulz, R. (2007). Depression and distress predict time to cardiovascular disease in dementia caregivers. Health Psychology, 26(5), 539–544.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vitaliano, P. P., Jianping, Z., & Scanlan, J. M. (2003). Is caregiving hazardous to one’s physical health? A meta-analysis. Psychol Bull., 129(6), 946–972.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang, X., Robinson, K. M., & Hardin, H. K. (2015). The impact of caregiving on caregivers’ medication adherence and appointment keeping. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 37, 1548–1562.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Browne, C. V., Ka’opua, L. S., Jervis, L. L., Alboroto, R., & Trockman, M. L. (2016). United States indigenous populations and dementia: Is there a case for culture-based psychosocial interventions. Gerontologist, gnw059.

  9. John, R., Hennessy, C. H., Dyson, T. B., & Garrett, M. D. (2001). Toward the conceptualization and measurement of caregiver burden among Pueblo Indian family caregivers. The Gerontologist, 41(2), 210–219.

  10. Spencer, S. M., Goins, R. T., Henderson, J. A., Wen, Y., & Goldberg, J. (2013). Influence of caregiving on health-related quality of life among American Indians. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 61(9), 1615–1620.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Health and Human Services (HHS). National Plan to Address. Alzheimer’s Disease: 2015 . http://aspe.hhs.gov/daltcp/napa/NatlPlan2013.shtml. http://aspe.hhs.gov/daltcp/napa/ Accessed May 15, 2015.

  12. Nichols, L. O., Martindale-Adams, J., Burns, R., Zuber, J., & Graney, M. (2016). REACH VA: Moving from translation to system implementation. The Gerontologist, 56(1), 135–144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jervis LL. (2013). American Indian and Alaska native perspectives on dementia. National Institute on Aging/Administration for Community Living Alzheimer’s Series Webinar #3: Diverse populations, health disparities and dementia. Washington, DC: Administration on Community Living.

  14. Jervis, L. L., Beals, J., Fickenscher, A., & Arciniegas, D. (2007). Performance on the mini-mental state examination and Mattis dementia rating scale among older American Indians. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 19, 173–178.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Trends in Indian Health 2002–2003 http://www.ihs.gov/dps/index.cfm?module=hqPubTrends03 Accessed July 25, 2014.

  16. Workload data derived from the IHS National Data Warehouse, accessed July 25, 2104, for fiscal years 2007–2013.

  17. Goins, R. T., Spencer, M., McGuire, L. C., Goldberg, J., Wen, Y., & Henderson, J. A. (2011). Adult caregiving among American Indians: The role of cultural factors. The Gerontologist, 51(3), 310–320.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McGuire, L. C., Okoro, C. A., Goins, R. T., & Anderson, L. A. (2008). Characteristics of American Indian and Alaska native adult caregivers, behavioral risk factor surveillance system, 2000. Ethnicity & Disease, 18(4), 477–482.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jervis, L. L., & Manson, S. M. (2002). American Indians/Alaska natives and dementia. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 16(suppl 2), S89–S95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hennessy, C. H., & John, R. (1995). The interpretation of burden among Pueblo Indian caregivers. Journal of Aging Studies, 9, 215–229.

  21. Jervis, L. L., Boland, M. E., & Fickenscher, A. (2010). American Indian family caregivers’ experiences with helping elders. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 25(4), 355–369.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Belle, S. H., Burgio, L., Burns, R., et al. (2006). Enhancing the quality of life of dementia caregivers from different ethnic or racial groups: A randomized, controlled trial. Annals of Internal Medicine, 145(10), 727–738.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Health and Human Services (HHS). National Plan to Address. Alzheimer’s Disease: 2013. http://aspe.hhs.gov/daltcp/napa/NatlPlan2013.shtml. http://aspe.hhs.gov/daltcp/napa/ Accessed May 15, 2015.

  24. Gitlin, L. N., Belle, S. H., Burgio, L. D., et al. (2003). Effect of multicomponent interventions on caregiver burden and depression: The REACH multisite initiative at 6-month follow-up. Psychology and Aging, 18, 361–374.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Nichols, L. O., Martindale-Adams, J., Burns, R., Graney, M. J., & Zuber, J. (2011). Translation of a dementia caregiver support program in a health care system: REACH VA. Archives of Internal Medicine, 171(4), 353–359.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nichols, L. O., Chang, C., Lummus, A., et al. (2008). The cost-effectiveness of a behavior intervention with caregivers of Alzheimer’s patients. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 56(3), 413–420.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fixsen DL, Naoom SF, Blasé KA, Friedman RM, Wallace F. Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network (FMHI Publication #231), 2005.

  28. Fixsen, D. L., Blasé, K. A., Naoom, S. F., & Wallace, F. (2009). Core implementation components. Research on Social Work Practice, 19(5), 531–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hennessy, C. H., & John, R. (1996). American Indian family caregivers’ perceptions of burden and needed support services. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 15, 275–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Napoles, A. M., Chadiha, L., Eversley, R., & Moreno-John, G. (2010). Developing culturally sensitive dementia caregiver interventions: Are we there yet? American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias, 25(5), 389–406.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. van der Veen, Y. J. J., de Zwart, O., Mackenbach, J., & Richardus, J. H. (2010). Cultural tailoring for the promotion of hepatitis B screening in Turkish Dutch: A protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health, 10(1), 674.

  32. Kreuter, M. W., Sugg-Skinner, C., Holt, C. L., et al. (2005). Cultural tailoring for mammography and fruit and vegetable intake among low-income African-American women in urban public health centers. Preventive Medicine, 41(1), 53–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Gitlin, L. N., Jacobs, M., & Earland, T. V. (2010). Translation of a dementia caregiver intervention for delivery in homecare as a reimbursable Medicare service: Outcomes and lessons learned. The Gerontologist, 50(6), 847–854.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Apesoa-Varano, E. C., Tang-Feldman, Y., Rodgers, J., Reinhard, S., Choula, R., & Young, H. M. (2015). Multicultural caregiving and caregiver interventions: Where we have been, where we should go next. AARP Policy Brief. http://www.aarp.org/ppi/issues/caregiving.

  35. Edwards, R. W., Jumper-Thurman, P., Plested, B. A., Oetting, E. R., & Swanson, L. (2000). Community readiness: Research to practice. Journal of Community Psychology, 28(3), 291–307.

  36. Felner, R. D. (1997). The project on high performance learning communities: Applying the land-grant model to school reform. Journal of School Psychology, 78(7), 520–528.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Marshall Graney, PhD, Memphis VA Medical Center and University of Tennessee Health Science Center for his insightful comments.

The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the views of the Administration for Community Living/Administration on Aging, the Department of Veterans Affairs, Indian Health Service, the University of Tennessee Health Sciences University, the United States government or any Tribal organization.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda O. Nichols Ph.D.

Ethics declarations

Animal welfare

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Funding

This study was supported by the Rx Foundation (no grant number), with additional support from the University of Tennessee Health Sciences University and the Memphis Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Data

The findings reported have not been previously published and the manuscript is not being simultaneously submitted elsewhere. There has been no previous reporting of data. The authors have full control of all primary data and agree to allow the journal to review their data if requested.

Human rights

The University of Tennessee Health Science Center was the institutional review board of record. The project was judged to be exempt and in accord with 45 CFR 46.116(d), informed consent was waived. The application was determined by IRB to comply with proper consideration for the rights and welfare of human subjects and the regulatory requirements for the protection of human subjects. The implementation of the REACH program reported in this manuscript was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards, in that the health, well-being and rights of individuals participating in the intervention were promoted and safeguarded. Privacy and confidentiality were protected with no personally identifiable information being provided to the authors.

Additional information

Implications

Practice: To implement an intervention successfully, even if staff and organizations are engaged, the community must recognize and identify the problem as a concern.

Policy: Sharing of successful caregiving programs across federal and local agencies is an efficient and effective way to serve caregivers, reduce start-up time, and maximize resources, but programs should be targeted to address local community and cultural factors by the individuals implementing the programs.

Research: Future research conducted in partnership with Tribes and local communities is needed to evaluate ways to increase community awareness of dementia and caregiving and different models of providing support to AI/AN caregivers.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martindale-Adams, J., Tah, T., Finke, B. et al. Implementation of the REACH model of dementia caregiver support in American Indian and Alaska Native communities. Behav. Med. Pract. Policy Res. 7, 427–434 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-017-0505-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-017-0505-1

Keywords

Navigation