Skip to main content
Log in

Prognostic Value of Bone Marrow F-18 FDG Uptake in Patients with Advanced-Stage Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We assessed prognostic implication of bone marrow uptake on baseline F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) in patients with advanced-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 140 patients with stage III and IV DLBCL, who underwent baseline F-18 FDG PET/CT at diagnosis. Bone marrow uptake on F-18 FDG PET/CT (BM FDG) was compared with findings on bone marrow biopsy (BMB), and patients were grouped based on these results: BMB-positive and BM FDG-positive (group 1), BMB-positive and BM FDG-negative (group 2), BMB-negative and BM FDG-positive (group 3), and BMB-negative and BM FDG-negative (group 4). The prognostic value of clinicopathologic factors and BM FDG for predicting progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed using a Cox proportional hazards model. Differences in PFS and OS were examined by the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

BMB was the only significant indicator in predicting PFS, and age, IPI score higher than 3, and BM FDG significantly predicted OS. Group 1 showed inferior PFS than group 2 (median PFS, 7.4 vs. 13.9 months; p = 0.04). In contrast, there was no significant difference either in PFS or OS between group 2 and group 3.

Conclusion

We showed that BM FDG-positive predicted a poorer survival in patients with advanced stage DBLCL. We also found that BMB-negative and BM FDG-positive patients had similar PFS or OS to BMB-positive and BM FDG-negative patients. Further study in a larger population is needed to clarify clinical significance of BM FDG in these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Morra E, Lazzarino M, Castello A, Inverardi D, Coci A, Pagnucco G, et al. Bone marrow and blood involvement by non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a study of clinicopathologic correlations and prognostic significance in relationship to the working formulation. Eur J Haematol. 1989;42:445–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Conlan MG, Bast M, Armitage JO, Weisenburger DD. Bone marrow involvement by non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: the clinical significance of morphologic discordance between the lymph node and bone marrow. Nebraska lymphoma study group. J Clin Oncol. 1990;8:1163–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Campbell J, Seymour JF, Matthews J, Wolf M, Stone J, Juneja S. The prognostic impact of bone marrow involvement in patients with diffuse large cell lymphoma varies according to the degree of infiltration and presence of discordant marrow involvement. Eur J Haematol. 2006;76:473–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sehn LH, Scott DW, Chhanabhai M, Berry B, Ruskova A, Berkahn L, et al. Impact of concordant and discordant bone marrow involvement on outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1452–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tilly H, Gomes da Silva M, Vitolo U, Jack A, Meignan M, Lopez-Guillermo A, et al. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL): ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(Suppl 5):v116–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bain BJ. Morbidity associated with bone marrow aspiration and trephine biopsy - a review of UK data for 2004. Haematologica. 2006;91:1293–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brunetti GA, Tendas A, Meloni E, Mancini D, Maggiore P, Scaramucci L, et al. Pain and anxiety associated with bone marrow aspiration and biopsy: a prospective study on 152 Italian patients with hematological malignancies. Ann Hematol. 2011;90:1233–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Barrington SF, Mikhaeel NG, Kostakoglu L, Meignan M, Hutchings M, Mueller SP, et al. Role of imaging in the staging and response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the international conference on malignant lymphomas imaging working group. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:3048–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheson BD, Fisher RI, Barrington SF, Cavalli F, Schwartz LH, Zucca E, et al. Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:3059–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cheson BD. Role of functional imaging in the management of lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1844–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Berthet L, Cochet A, Kanoun S, Berriolo-Riedinger A, Humbert O, Toubeau M, et al. In newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, determination of bone marrow involvement with 18F-FDG PET/CT provides better diagnostic performance and prognostic stratification than does biopsy. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:1244–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Khan AB, Barrington SF, Mikhaeel NG, Hunt AA, Cameron L, Morris T, et al. PET-CT staging of DLBCL accurately identifies and provides new insight into the clinical significance of bone marrow involvement. Blood. 2013;122:61–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hong J, Lee Y, Park Y, Kim SG, Hwang KH, Park SH, et al. Role of FDG-PET/CT in detecting lymphomatous bone marrow involvement in patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Ann Hematol. 2012;91:687–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Beyer T, Antoch G, Muller S, Egelhof T, Freudenberg LS, Debatin J, et al. Acquisition protocol considerations for combined PET/CT imaging. J Nucl Med. 2004;45(Suppl 1):25S–35S.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Spaepen K, Stroobants S, Dupont P, Vandenberghe P, Thomas J, de Groot T, et al. Early restaging positron emission tomography with ( 18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose predicts outcome in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Ann Oncol. 2002;13:1356–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Barrington SF, Kluge R. FDG PET for therapy monitoring in Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:97–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cortes-Romera M, Sabate-Llobera A, Mercadal-Vilchez S, Climent-Esteller F, Serrano-Maestro A, Gamez-Cenzano C, et al. Bone marrow evaluation in initial staging of lymphoma: 18F-FDG PET/CT versus bone marrow biopsy. Clin Nucl Med. 2014;39:e46–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen-Liang TH, Martin-Santos T, Jerez A, Senent L, Orero MT, Remigia MJ, et al. The role of bone marrow biopsy and FDG-PET/CT in identifying bone marrow infiltration in the initial diagnosis of high grade non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma and Hodgkin lymphoma. Accuracy in a multicenter series of 372 patients. Am J Hematol. 2015;90:686–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cerci JJ, Gyorke T, Fanti S, Paez D, Meneghetti JC, Redondo F, et al. Combined PET and biopsy evidence of marrow involvement improves prognostic prediction in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:1591–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Adams HJ, Kwee TC, Fijnheer R, Dubois SV, Nievelstein RA, de Klerk JM. Bone marrow 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography cannot replace bone marrow biopsy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Am J Hematol. 2014;89:726–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chung R, Lai R, Wei P, Lee J, Hanson J, Belch AR, et al. Concordant but not discordant bone marrow involvement in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma predicts a poor clinical outcome independent of the international prognostic index. Blood. 2007;110:1278–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. A clinical evaluation of the International Lymphoma Study Group classification of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. The Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Classification Project. Blood. 1997;89:3909–18.

  23. Lim ST, Tao M, Cheung YB, Rajan S, Mann B. Can patients with early-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma be treated without bone marrow biopsy? Ann Oncol. 2005;16:215–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Adams HJ, Nievelstein RA, Kwee TC. Opportunities and limitations of bone marrow biopsy and bone marrow FDG-PET in lymphoma. Blood Rev. 2015;29:417–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Alzahrani M, El-Galaly TC, Hutchings M, Hansen JW, Loft A, Johnsen HE, et al. The value of routine bone marrow biopsy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma staged with PET/CT: a Danish-Canadian study. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:1095–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Adams HJ, Kwee TC, Fijnheer R, Dubois SV, Nievelstein RA, de Klerk JM. Diffusely increased bone marrow FDG uptake in recently untreated lymphoma: incidence and relevance. Eur J Haematol. 2015;95:83–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kwee TC, Kwee RM, Nievelstein RA. Imaging in staging of malignant lymphoma: a systematic review. Blood. 2008;111:504–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Adams HJ, Kwee TC, de Keizer B, Fijnheer R, de Klerk JM, Nievelstein RA. FDG PET/CT for the detection of bone marrow involvement in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:565–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the members of the Department of Nuclear Medicine, Severance Hospital for their support and helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hojin Cho.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Jiyoung Wang, Dongwoo Kim, Won Jun Kang, and Hojin Cho declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee.

Informed Consent

The institutional review board of our institute approved this retrospective study, and the requirement to obtain informed consent was waived.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, J., Kim, D., Kang, W.J. et al. Prognostic Value of Bone Marrow F-18 FDG Uptake in Patients with Advanced-Stage Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 54, 28–34 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-019-00630-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-019-00630-w

Keywords

Navigation