Skip to main content
Log in

Relationship Between Dual Time Point FDG PET/CT and Clinical Prognostic Indexes in Patients with High Grade Lymphoma: a Pilot Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study investigated the correlative relationship between metabolic parameters estimated from dual time point 2-deoxy-2-[18F] fluoro-D-glucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (PET/CT) and the clinical tools predicting the outcome of a lymphoma. We also measured metabolic and volumetric alterations between early and delayed 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with high grade lymphoma (HGL).

Methods

The samples were 122 lymph nodes and extralymphatic lesions from 26 patients diagnosed with HGL. All patients were applied to the International Prognostic Index (IPI), Ann Arbor stage, and revised IPI as clinical prognostic parameters. 18F-FDG dual time point PET/CT (DTPFP) consisted of an early scan 1 h after 18F-FDG injection and a delayed scan 2 h after the early scan. Based on an analysis of DTPFP, we estimated the standardized uptake value (SUV) of tumors from the early and delayed scans, retention index (RI) representing the percentage change between early and delayed SUV, and metabolic volume different index (MVDI) calculated using metabolic tumor volumes (MTV).

Results

RImax showed a multiple positive correlative relationship with stage and IPI in lesion-by-lesion analysis (p < 0.01). In the case of IPI, the high risk group exhibited higher RImax than the low risk group (p = 0.004). In the case of revised IPI, the RImax of the low risk group were significantly lower than the intermediate and high risk groups, respectively (p < 0.01). The MVDIs of the best outcome group were decreased in comparison to the moderate outcome group (p = 0.029). There was a significant negative correlative relationship between RImax and MVDI, and the inclinations for decreased MVDIs were slightly associated with increased RIs.

Conclusions

RImax extracted from DTPFP had a significant relationship to extranodal involvement, staging, IPI, and revised IPI. MVDI showed significant negative correlation with RImax. Further large scale studies are warranted to support and extend these preliminary results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Huh J. Epidemiologic overview of malignant lymphoma. Korean J Hematol. 2012;47:92–104.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63:11–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wilder RB, Rodriguez MA, Medeiros LJ, Tucker SL, Ha CS, Romaguera JE, et al. International prognostic index‐based outcomes for diffuse large B‐cell lymphomas. Cancer. 2002;94:3083–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Coiffier B, Lepage E, Briere J, Herbrecht R, Tilly H, Bouabdallah R, et al. CHOP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CHOP alone in elderly patients with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:235–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhou Z, Sehn LH, Rademaker AW, Gordon LI, Lacasce AS, Crosby-Thompson A, et al. An enhanced International Prognostic Index (NCCN-IPI) for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated in the rituximab era. Blood. 2014;123:837–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Cheson BD, Horning SJ, Coiffier B, Shipp MA, Fisher RI, Connors JM, et al. Report of an international workshop to standardize response criteria for non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. NCI Sponsored International Working Group. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:1244.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Salles G, de Jong D, Xie W, Rosenwald A, Chhanabhai M, Gaulard P, et al. Prognostic significance of immunohistochemical biomarkers in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a study from the Lunenburg Lymphoma Biomarker Consortium. Blood. 2011;117:7070–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sehn LH, Berry B, Chhanabhai M, Fitzgerald C, Gill K, Hoskins P, et al. The revised International Prognostic Index (R-IPI) is a better predictor of outcome than the standard IPI for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP. Blood. 2007;109:1857–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ziepert M, Hasenclever D, Kuhnt E, Glass B, Schmitz N, Pfreundschuh M, et al. Standard International prognostic index remains a valid predictor of outcome for patients with aggressive CD20+ B-cell lymphoma in the rituximab era. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2373–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Matthies A, Hickeson M, Cuchiara A, Alavi A. Dual time point 18F-FDG PET for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:871–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Uesaka D, Demura Y, Ishizaki T, Ameshima S, Miyamori I, Sasaki M, et al. Evaluation of dual-time-point 18F-FDG PET for staging in patients with lung cancer. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:1606–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kumar R, Loving VA, Chauhan A, Zhuang H, Mitchell S, Alavi A. Potential of dual-time-point imaging to improve breast cancer diagnosis with (18)F-FDG PET. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1819–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sanghera B, Wong WL, Lodge MA, Hain S, Stott D, Lowe J, et al. Potential novel application of dual time point SUV measurements as a predictor of survival in head and neck cancer. Nucl Med Commun. 2005;26:861–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nakayama M, Okizaki A, Ishitoya S, Sakaguchi M, Sato J, Aburano T. Dual-time-point F-18 FDG PET/CT imaging for differentiating the lymph nodes between malignant lymphoma and benign lesions. Ann Nucl Med. 2013;27:163–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shinya T, Fujii S, Asakura S, Taniguchi T, Yoshio K, Alafate A, et al. Dual-time-point F-18 FDG PET/CT for evaluation in patients with malignant lymphoma. Ann Nucl Med. 2012;26:616–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Orlhac F, Soussan M, Maisonobe JA, Garcia CA, Vanderlinden B, Buvat I. Tumor texture analysis in 18F-FDG PET: relationships between texture parameters, histogram indices, standardized uptake values, metabolic volumes, and total lesion glycolysis. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:414–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hoekstra OS, Ossenkoppele GJ, Golding R, Van Lingen A, Visser G, Teule G, et al. Early treatment response in malignant lymphoma determined by planar fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose scintigraphy. J Nucl Med. 1993;34:1706.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Surbone A, Longo DL, DeVita Jr VT, Ihde DC, Duffey PL, Jaffe ES, et al. Residual abdominal masses in aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma after combination chemotherapy: significance and management. J Clin Oncol. 1988;6:1832–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bodet-Milin C, Eugène T, Gastinne T, Bailly C, Le Gouill S, Dupas B, et al. The role of FDG-PET scanning in assessing lymphoma in 2012. Diag int Imaging. 2013;94:158–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Haioun C, Itti E, Rahmouni A, Brice P, Rain JD, Belhadj K, et al. [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in aggressive lymphoma: an early prognostic tool for predicting patient outcome. Blood. 2005;106:1376–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Weber WA. 18F-FDG PET in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: qualitative or quantitative? J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1580–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mikhaeel NG, Hutchings M, Fields PA, O’Doherty MJ, Timothy AR. FDG-PET after two to three cycles of chemotherapy predicts progression-free and overall survival in high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Ann Oncol. 2005;16:1514–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chan W, Ramsay SC, Szeto ER, Freund J, Pohlen JM, Tarlinton LC, et al. Dual‐time‐point 18F‐FDG‐PET/CT imaging in the assessment of suspected malignancy. J Med imaging Radiation Oncol. 2011;55:379–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Xiu Y, Bhutani C, Dhurairaj T, Yu JQ, Dadparvar S, Reddy S, et al. Dual-time point FDG PET imaging in the evaluation of pulmonary nodules with minimally increased metabolic activity. Clin Nucl Med. 2007;32:101–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zytoon A, Murakami K, El-Kholy M, El-Shorbagy E. Dual time point FDG-PET/CT imaging… Potential tool for diagnosis of breast cancer. Clin Radiol. 2008;63:1213–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fuster D, Lafuente S, Setoain X, Navales I, Perissinotti A, Pavia J, et al. Dual-time point images of the liver with 18 F-FDG PET/CT in suspected recurrence from colorectal cancer. Revista Española de Medicina Nuclear e Imagen Molecular (English Edition). 2012;31:111–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Higashi T, Saga T, Nakamoto Y, Ishimori T, Mamede MH, Wada M, et al. Relationship between retention index in dual-phase (18)F-FDG PET, and hexokinase-II and glucose transporter-1 expression in pancreatic cancer. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:173–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ma SY, See LC, Lai CH, Chou HH, Tsai CS, Ng KK, et al. Delayed (18)F-FDG PET for detection of paraaortic lymph node metastases in cervical cancer patients. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:1775–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Costantini DL, Vali R, Chan J, McQuattie S, Charron M. Dual–time-point FDG PET/CT for the evaluation of pediatric tumors. Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200:408–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kim DH, Jung JH, Son SH, Kim CY, Hong CM, Oh JR, et al. Prognostic significance of intratumoral metabolic heterogeneity on 18F-FDG PET/CT in pathological N0 non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Nucl Med. 2015;40:708–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tixier F, Le Rest CC, Hatt M, Albarghach N, Pradier O, Metges JP, et al. Intratumor heterogeneity characterized by textural features on baseline 18F-FDG PET images predicts response to concomitant radiochemotherapy in esophageal cancer. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:369–78.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Kitao T, Hirata K, Shima K, Tamaki N. Influence of uptake time on metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) on FDG PET in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Soc Nuclear Med. 2014;55 Suppl 1:1597.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Liu H, Chen P, Wroblewski K, Hou P, Zhang CP, Jiang Y, et al. Consistency of metabolic tumor volume of non-small-cell lung cancer primary tumor measured using 18F-FDG PET/CT at two different tracer uptake times. Nucl Med Commun. 2016;37:50–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. SK Park for his assistance with the data acquisition.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jai Hyuen Lee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Jai Hyuen Lee and Do Hyoung Lim declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Statement

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional Review Board of Dankook University Hospital and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

The institutional review board of our institute approved this retrospective study, and the requirement to obtain informed consent was waived.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lim, D.H., Lee, J.H. Relationship Between Dual Time Point FDG PET/CT and Clinical Prognostic Indexes in Patients with High Grade Lymphoma: a Pilot Study. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 51, 323–330 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-017-0480-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-017-0480-y

Keywords

Navigation