Abstract
An analytical solution of deformation of a homogeneous, isotropic elastic layer of uniform thickness overlying a homogeneous, isotropic viscoelastic half-space of Burger medium due to movement of an infinite fault for different types of crack surface has been studied. The deformation by this fault has been compared with the deformation by an infinite fault situated in viscoelastic half-space of Burger medium. The expressions of displacement, stress and strain have been obtained in aseismic period (period in between two major seismic events) by using Green’s function technique and Laplace transform by applying suitable boundary conditions and initial conditions. Finally these displacement, stress and strain components are numerically computed with suitable values of the model parameters and the results thus obtained are presented graphically. A detailed study of these expressions may give some idea about the amount of displacement due to different types of fault movement and the nature of stress-strain accumulation across the earthquake fault. A Comparison of these results has also been analysed and the effect of change of inclinations and velocities of the fault movement has been studied. Such theoretical models may be used for obtaining greater insight into the earthquake processes in seismically active region.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrews, D.J.: Evaluation of static stress on a fault plain from a Green’s function. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 64, 1629–1633 (1974)
Clift, P., Lin, J., Baarckhausen, U.: Evidence of low flexural rigidity and low viscosity lower continental crust during continental break-up in the South. China Mar. Pet. Geol. 19, 951–970 (2002)
Chinnery, M.A.: The deformation of the ground around surface faults. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am 51, 355–372 (1961)
Chinnery, M.A.: The strength of the Earth’s crust under horizontal shear stress. J. Geophys. Res. 6, 2085–2089 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ069i010p02085
Chinnery, M.A.: The vertical displacements associated with transcurrent faulting. J. Geophys. Res. 70, 4627–4632 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ070i018p04627
Fukahata, Y., Matsu’ura, M.: General expressions for internal deformation fields due to a dislocation source in a multilayered elastic halfspace. Geophys. J. Int. 161, 507–521 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2005.02594.x
Godara, R., Sahrawt, R.K., Sing, M.: Static elastic deformation in an orthotropic half-space with rigid boundary model due to non uniform long strike-slip fault. J. Earth Syst. Sci. 126(97), 1–10 (2017)
Hetland, E.A., Hager, B.H.: Postseismic and interseismic displacements near a strike-slip fault: a two dimensional theory for general linear viscoelastic rheologies. J. Geophys. Res. 110, B10401 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JB003689
Hetland, E.A., Hager, B.H.: The effects of rheological layering on post-seismic deformation. Geophys. J. Int. 166, 277–292 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.02974.x
Hofion, M.A., Rundle, J.B., Foulger, G.R.: Horizontal surface deformation due to dike emplacement in an elastic-gravitational layer overlying a viscoelastic-gravitational half-space. Geophys. Res. 100, 6329–6338 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1029/94JB03266
Hu, Y., Burmann, R., Banerjee, P., Feng, L., Hill, M.E., Ito, T., Tabei, T., Wang, K.: Asthenosphere rheology inferred from observations of the 2012 Indian Ocean Earthquake. Nature 538, 368–372 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19787
Iwasaki, T., Matsu’ura, M.: Quasi-static strain and tilt due to faulting in a layered half-space with an intervenient viscoelastic layer. J. Phys. Earth 29, 499–518 (1981). https://doi.org/10.4294/jpe1952.29.23
Karato, S.: Rheology of the Earth’s mantle, A historical review. Gondwana Res. 18(1), 5 (2010)
Kundu, P., Sarkar (Mondal), S.: Deformation analysis of a viscoelastic half-space due to a finite and an infinite interacting faults. Physica Scripta 95(5) (2020), https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ab6f94
Kumar, P., Mahanty, M., Singh, A.K., Chattopadhyay, A.: Analytical study on stress intensity factor due to the propagation of Griffth crack in a crystalline monoclinic layer subjected to punch pressure. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.13374
Lee, E.H.: Stress analysis in visco-elastic bodies. Q. Appl. Math. 13, 183–190 (1955)
Maruyama, T.: On two dimensional dislocations in an infinite and semi-infinite medium. Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst. Tokyo Univ. 44(part 3), 811–871 (1966)
Matsu’ura, M., Sato, T.: Loading mechanism and scaling relations of large interplate earthquakes. Tectonophysics 277, 189–198 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1951(97)00085-1
Mondal, D., Kundu, P., Sarkar (Mondal), S.: Accumulation of stress and strain due to an infinite strike-slip fault in an elastic layer overlying a viscoelastic half space of standard linear solid (SLS). Pure Appli. Geophys. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-020-02536-7
Mukhopadhyay, A., Mukherji, P.: On stress accumulation and fault slip in lithosphere. Indian J. Meteorol. Hydro. Geophys. (Mausam) 30, 353–358 (1979b)
Pollitz, F.F.: Transient Rheology of the Uppermost Mantle beneath the Moja-ve Desert, California. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 215, 89–104 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(03)00432-1
Radok, J.R.M.: Visco-elastic stress analysis. Q. Appl. Math. 15, 198–202 (1957)
Rybicki, K.: The elastic residual field of a very long strike-slip fault in the presence of a discontinuity. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 61(19), 79–92 (1971)
Rundle, J.B., Jackson, D.D.: A three dimensional viscoelastic model of a strike-slip fault. Geophys. J. Int. 49(3), 575–591 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1977.tb01305.x
Rundle, J.B.: Viscoelastic crustal deformation by finite, quasi-static sources. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 83, 5937–5945 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1029/JB083iB12p05937
Rundle, J.B.: Static elastic-gravitational deformation of a layered halfspace by point couple sources. J. Geophys. Res. 85, 5354–5363 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1029/JB085iB10p05355
Rundle, J.B.: Vertical displacements from a rectangular fault in layered elastic-gravitational media. J. Phys. Earth 29, 173–186 (1981)
Savage, J.C.: Equivalent strike-slip earthquake cycles in half-space and lithosphere-asthenosphere earth models. J. Geophys. Res. 95, 4873–4879 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1029/JB095iB04p04873
Savage, J.C., Prescott, W.H.: Asthenosphere readjustment and the earthquake cycle. J. Geophys. Res. 83, 3369–3376 (1978)
Segall, P.: Earthquake and volcano deformation, Princeton University Press, 6 Oxford Street, Woodstock. U.K (2010), ISBN 978-0-691-13302-7, https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691133027/earthquake-and-volcano-deformation
Singh, A.K., Yadav, R.P., Mistri, K.C., Chattopadhyay, A.: Influence of anisotropy, porosity and initial stresses on crack propagation due to Love-type wave in a poroelastic medium. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 39, 624–636 (2016)
Singh, A.K., Negi, A., Yadav, R.P., Verma, A.K.: Dynamic stress concentration in pre-stressed poroelastic media due to moving punch influenced by shear wave. J. Seismol. 22, 1263–1274 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-018-9766-5
Singh, A.K., Singh, A.K., Yadav, R.P.: Stress intensity factor of dynamic crack in double-layered dry sandy elastic medium due to shear wave under different loading conditions. Int. J. Geomech. 20(11), 04020215 (2020)
Steketee, J.A.: On Volterra’s dislocations in a semi-infinite medium. Can. J. Phys. 36, 192–205 (1958a). https://doi.org/10.1139/p58-024
Steketee, J.A.: Some geophysical applications of the theory of dislocations. Can. J. Phys. 36, 1168–1198 (1958b). https://doi.org/10.1139/p58-123
Thatcher, W.: Nonlinear strain buildup and the earthquake cycle on the San Andreas fault. J. Geophys. Res. 88, 5893–5902 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1029/JB088iB07p05893
Turcotte, D.L., Spence, D.A.: An analysis of strain accumulation on a strike-slip fault. J. Geophys. Res. 79, 4407–4412 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1029/JB079i029p04407
Funding
This study is funded by DST - INSPIRE, INDIA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix-I
1.1 For the fault situated in an elastic layer overlying viscoelastic half-space of Burger medium
Since \(\bar{u_1}\) and \(\bar{u'_1}\) are linear (from 11 and 12) and independent on \(y_1\) and dependent on \(y_2\) and \(y_3\) then for solving the boundary value problem, we assume that \(\bar{u_1}\) and \({\bar{u}}'_1\) is of the form
Now taking Laplace transform on all constitutive equations and boundary conditions, we get
For elastic layer
Similarly
Now \(\bar{e_{12}} = \frac{1}{2}\left[ \frac{\partial \bar{u_1}}{\partial y_2} + \frac{\partial \bar{u_2}}{\partial y_1}\right] \)
=\(\frac{1}{2} \left[ \frac{1}{s} (\frac{\partial u_1}{\partial y_2})_0 + A_1\right] \)
\((e_{12})_0 + g(s) = (e_{12})_0 + \frac{1}{2} A_1\)
Therefore \(A_1 = g(s)\)
Now \(\bar{\tau _{12}} = \frac{1}{s} (\tau _{12})_0 + g(s) \mu _1\)
Taking inverse Laplace transform we get, \(\tau _{12} = (\tau _{12})_0 + g(t) \mu _1\)
Taking Laplace transform on boundary condition we get \(\bar{\tau _{13}} =0\)
Then from Eq. (36) it is found that \(A_2 =0\)
Therefore \(\bar{u_1} = \frac{(u_1)_0}{s} + g(s) y_2\)
Taking inverse Laplace transform we get \(u_1 = (u_1)_0 + g(t)y_2\)
Substituting the value of \(A_1\) and \(A_2\) in Eqs. (35) and (36) and by inverse Laplace transform we get
\(\tau _{12} = (\tau _{12})_0 + g(t) \mu _1\) and \(\tau _{13} = (\tau _{13})_0\)
Therefore \(e_{12} = (e_{12})_0 + g(t)\) and \(e_{13} = (e_{13})_0\)
For viscoelastic half-space
and
By using boundary conditions we get \(A'_1 = g(s)\) and \(A'_2 =0\)
Therefore \({\bar{u}}'_1 = \frac{(u'_1)_0}{s} + g(s) y_2\)
By taking inverse Laplace transform we get
\(u'_1 = (u'_1)_0 + g(t) y_2\)
From Eqs. (37) and (38) it is found that
and
Taking inverse Laplace transform
\(e'_{12} = (e'_{12})_0 + g(t)\)
Similarly
\(e'_{13} = (e'_{13})_0\)
To solve the boundary value problem after the fault movement a suitable modified form of Green’s function technique has been developed by Maruyama (1966) and Rybicki (1971) and following them we get,
For elastic layer
where \(Q_1(y_1,~y_2,~y_3)\) is the field point in the layer and \(P_1(x_1, ~ x_2,~ x_3)\) is any point on the fault \(F_1\) and \([(\bar{u_1})_2 (P_1)]\) is the magnitude of discontinuity in \((\bar{u_1})_2\) across \(F_1\) at \(P_1\).
For viscoelastic half-space
where \(Q'_1(y_1,~y_2,~y_3)\) is any point in the half-space.
In Eq. (39), \(G_{13} (Q_1, P_1) = \mu _1 \frac{\partial }{\partial x_3} G_1 (Q_1, P_1)\)
and \(G_{12} (Q_1, P_1) = \mu _1 \frac{\partial }{\partial x_2} G_1 (Q_1, P_1)\)
where
\(G_1 (Q_1, P_1){=}-\frac{1}{2\pi \mu _1} [\ln \sqrt{(x_2 {-} y_2)^2 {+} (x_3 {-} y_3)^2} {+} \ln \sqrt{(x_2 - y_2)^2 + (x_3{+}y_3)^2}{+} \sum _{m=1}^{\infty } (\frac{\mu _1 - \mu _2}{\mu _1{-}\mu _2})^m \{ln \sqrt{(x_2{-}y_2)^2{+}(x_3{-}2mH-y_3)^2}{+}\ln \sqrt{(x_2{-}y_2)^2{+} (x_3 -2mH+y_3)^2}{+} \ln \sqrt{(x_2{-}y_2)^2{+} (x_3{+}2mH-y_3)^2}{+} \ln \sqrt{(x_2 - y_2)^2 + (x_3 + 2mH+ y_3)^2} \} ]\)
For half-space
and
where
\(G'_1 (Q'_1, P_1)=-\frac{1}{\pi (\mu _1 + \mu _2)}[\ln \sqrt{(x_2 - y_2)^2 + (x_3 - y_3)^2} + \ln \sqrt{(x_2{-}y_2)^2{+} (x_3{+}y_3)^2} {+} \sum _{m=1}^{\infty } (\frac{\mu _1 - \mu _2}{\mu _1 - \mu _2})^m \{\ln \sqrt{(x_2 - y_2)^2 + (x_3 +2mH-y_3)^2} + \ln \sqrt{(x_2 - y_2)^2 + (x_3 +2mH+y_3)^2} \} ]\)
Now \(P(x_1, x_2, x_3)\) being a point on the fault \(F_1\). Since the fault inclined at an angle \(\theta _1=\theta \) then \( 0 \le x_2 \le D \cos \theta , ~0 \le x_3 \le D \sin \theta ~\text {and}~ x_2 = x_3~ \cot \theta \). To perform the integration along the fault plane, a change in co-ordinate from \((x_1, x_2, x_3)\) to \((x'_1, x'_2, x'_3) \) is introduced which is shown in Fig. 17.
By Fig. 17b, using projection technique
From Fig. 17c, \(\frac{x_2}{h}=\sin (90^\circ -\theta )=\cos \theta \) and \(\frac{x_3}{h}=\sin \theta \)
We get \(x_2 = x_3 \cot \theta \)
Then \(x'_2 = 0\) and \( 0 \le x'_3 \le D\) on the fault \(F_1\).
A change in co-ordinate axes from \((x_1,~x_2,~x_3)\) to \((x'_1,~x'_2,~x'_3)\) connected by the relations
From \(x_2 = x_3 \cot \theta \) we get \(x'_2 = 0\)
Then for elastic layer (\(0 \le y_3 \le H\))
\((\bar{u_1})_2(Q_1) = \frac{U_1(s)}{2 \pi } \frac{1}{s} \int _0^D f(x'_3)[\frac{y_2 \sin \theta - y_3 \cos \theta }{A_1} + \frac{y_2 \sin \theta + y_3 \cos \theta }{A_2}] d x'_3 + \sum _{m=1}^{\infty } (\frac{\alpha }{\beta })^m A_m(t_1) \int _0^D f(x'_3) [\frac{y_2 \sin \theta - y_3 \cos \theta - 2mH \cos \theta }{A_3} + \frac{y_2 \sin \theta + y_3 \cos \theta - 2mH \cos \theta }{A_4} + \frac{y_2 \sin \theta - y_3 \cos \theta + 2mH \cos \theta }{A_5} + \frac{y_2 \sin \theta + y_3 \cos \theta + 2mH \cos \theta }{A_3}] dx'_3\)
Taking inverse Laplace transform we get,
\((u_1)_2 = \frac{U_1(t_1)}{2 \pi } H(t_1) \psi (y_2, y_3, t)\)
where \(\psi {=} \int _0^D f(x'_3)[\frac{y_2 \sin \theta - y_3 \cos \theta }{A_1} + \frac{y_2 \sin \theta + y_3 \cos \theta }{A_2}] d x'_3 + \sum _{m{=}1}^{\infty } (\frac{\alpha }{\beta })^m A_m(t_1) \int _0^D f(x'_3) [\frac{y_2 \sin \theta - y_3 \cos \theta - 2mH \cos \theta }{A_3} + \frac{y_2 \sin \theta + y_3 \cos \theta - 2mH \cos \theta }{A_4} + \frac{y_2 \sin \theta - y_3 \cos \theta + 2mH \cos \theta }{A_5} +\frac{y_2 \sin \theta + y_3 \cos \theta + 2mH \cos \theta }{A_3}] dx'_3\)
For viscoelastic half-space (\(y_3 >H\))
\(({\bar{u}}'_1)_2 (Q'_1) = \frac{\mu _1}{(\mu _1 + \mu _2)} \frac{U_1(s)}{\pi } [\int _0^D f(x'_3)[\frac{y_2 \sin \theta - y_3 \cos \theta }{A_1} + \frac{y_2 \sin \theta + y_3 \cos \theta }{A_2} dx'_3 + \sum _{m = 1}^{\infty } (\frac{\mu _1 - \mu _2}{\mu _1 + \mu _2})^m \int _0^D f(x'_3) \{\frac{y_2 \sin \theta + 2mH \cos \theta - y_3 \cos \theta }{A_5} + \frac{y_2 \sin \theta + 2mH\cos \theta + y_3 \cos \theta }{A_6}\} dx'_3] \)
\(=\frac{U_1(s)}{\pi } \phi \)
Taking inverse Laplace transform we get,
\((u'_1)_2 = \frac{U_1(t_1)}{\pi } H(t_1) \phi \)
where \(\phi {=} \frac{\mu _1}{\pi (\mu _1 {+} \mu _2)}[\int _0^D f(x'_3)[\frac{y_2 \sin \theta - y_3 \cos \theta }{A_1} + \frac{y_2 \sin \theta + y_3 \cos \theta }{A_2} dx'_3 + \sum _{m = 1}^{\infty } (\frac{\mu _1 - \mu _2}{\mu _1 + \mu _2})^m \int _0^D f(x'_3) \{\frac{y_2 \sin \theta + 2mH \cos \theta - y_3 \cos \theta }{A_5} + \frac{y_2 \sin \theta + 2mH\cos \theta + y_3 \cos \theta }{A_6}\} dx'_3]\)
and
Appendix-II
1.1 For the fault situated in viscoelastic half-space of Burger medium
We are found from 24 that \(\bar{V_1}\) is linear and independent on \(z_1\) and dependent on \(z_2\) and \(z_3\) then for solving the boundary value problem before the fault movement, it is customary to assume that
Taking Laplace transform on all constitutive equations and then by using Eq. (42) we get,
Taking Laplace transform on boundary conditions we get,
\(\bar{\chi _{12}} \rightarrow \chi _{\infty } (s) = \chi _{\infty }(0) (\frac{1}{s} + \frac{k}{s^2})~ \text {as} |z_2| \rightarrow 0\)
\(\bar{\chi _{13}} = 0\) on \(z_3 =0\) and \(\bar{\chi _{13}} \rightarrow 0\) as \(z_3 \rightarrow \infty \)
Using boundary conditions and then from Eqs. (43)and (44) we get,
\(B_1 = \frac{(1+p'_1s + p'_2s^2)}{2s (q'_1 + q'_2 s)} \left[ \chi _{\infty }(s) - \frac{(p'_1 + p'_2 s) \chi _{\infty } (0)}{(1 + p'_1 s + p'_2 s^2)}\right] \) and \(B_2 = 0\)
Therefore Eq. (42) becomes
\(\bar{v_1} = \frac{(v_1)_0}{s} + \frac{(1+p'_1s + p'_2s^2)}{2s (q'_1 + q'_2 s)} \left[ \chi _{\infty }(s) - \frac{(p'_1 + p'_2 s) \chi _{\infty } (0)}{(1 + p'_1 s + p'_2 s^2)}\right] z_2\)
whose inverse Laplace transform results in the following:
From Eqs. (43) and (44) it is found that
and
\(\chi _{13} = \frac{(\chi _{13})_0}{A'}\left[ (p'_1 - p'_2 r'_1)e^{-r'_1 t} - (p'_1 - p'_2 r'_2) e^{-r'_2 t}\right] \)
and \(\omega _{13} = \frac{(\omega _{13})_0}{2}\)
To solve the boundary value problem after the fault movement a suitable modified form of Green’s function technique has been developed by Maruyama (1966) and Rybicki (1971). From this Greens function technique,
Let \(Q_2 (z_1, z_2, z_3)\) be the observational point in the medium and \(P_1\) be dislocation point on the fault \(F_2\).
Now \(P(x_1, x_2, x_3)\) being a point on the fault \(F_2\). Since the fault inclined at an angle \(\theta _2=\theta \) then \( 0 \le x_2 \le D \cos \theta , ~0 \le x_3 \le D \sin \theta ~\text {and}~ x_2 = x_3~ \cot \theta \). To perform the integration along the fault plane, a change in co-ordinate from \((x_1, x_2, x_3)\) to \((x'_1, x'_2, x'_3) \) is introduced which is shown in Fig. 18.
By Fig. 18b, using projection technique
From Fig. 18c, \(\frac{x_2}{h}=\sin (90^\circ -\theta )=\cos \theta \) and \(\frac{x_3}{h}=\sin \theta \)
We get \(x_2 = x_3 \cot \theta \)
Then \(x'_2 = 0\) and \( 0 \le x'_3 \le D\) on the fault \(F_2\). A change in co-ordinate axes from \((x_1,~x_2,~x_3)\) to \((x'_1,~x'_2,~x'_3)\) connected by the relations
From \(x_2 = x_3 \cot \theta \) we get \(x'_2 = 0\)
Then \(\bar{(v_1)}_2 (Q_2)= \frac{V'_1(s)}{2 \pi } \int _0^D \left[ \frac{z_2 \sin \theta - z_3 \cos \theta }{L^2} + \frac{z_2 \sin \theta + z_3 \cos \theta }{M^2}\right] f(x'_3) d x'_3\) \(\bar{(v_1)}_2 (Q_2)\) = \(\frac{V'_1(p)}{2 \pi } \xi (z_2, z_3 t)\)
Taking inverse Laplace transform
\((v_1)_2 = \frac{V'_1(t_1)}{2 \pi } H(t_1) \xi (z_2, z_3 t)\)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kundu, P., Sarkar (Mondal), S., Rashidi, A. et al. Comparison of ground deformation due to movement of a fault for different types of crack surface. Int J Geomath 12, 3 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13137-021-00171-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13137-021-00171-5
Keywords
- Infinite strike-slip fault
- Creeping movement
- Different types of crack surface of the fault
- Green’s function technique
- Burger’s Rheology