Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Sustainability Through Scrutiny: Enhancing Transparency in Chinese Corporations via Environmental Audits

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study comprehensively examines the impact of government environmental audits on real earnings management among Chinese A-share listed firms between 2012 and 2021. Employing a time-varying Difference-in-Differences (DID) methodology, the research investigates how these audits affect various forms of earnings manipulation, including production, sales, and expense manipulation. The findings reveal that government environmental audits effectively curb these practices, particularly in environmentally sensitive companies. The severity of audit enforcement correlates positively with reductions in real earnings management techniques, underscoring the pivotal role of robust regulatory frameworks in advancing corporate transparency, sustainability, and governance objectives. Furthermore, the study elucidates mechanisms through which environmental audits deter earnings manipulation, offering insights into the broader implications for environmental stewardship and corporate sustainability. By highlighting the relationship between environmental auditing and corporate behavior, this study contributes to a deeper understanding of how regulatory oversight can promote financial integrity and environmental responsibility, laying the groundwork for sustainable economic development. The research also provides practical insights for policy makers, emphasizing the importance of targeted regulatory measures to mitigate manipulative activities and foster a more sustainable corporate landscape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Sharing Agreement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Al Doghan, M. A., Abdelwahed, N. A. A., Soomro, B. A., & Ali Alayis, M. M. H. (2022). Organizational environmental culture, environmental sustainability and performance: The mediating role of green HRM and green innovation. Sustainability, 4(12), 7510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Haddad, L., & Whittington, M. (2019). The impact of corporate governance mechanisms on real and accrual earnings management practices: Evidence from Jordan. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 19(6), 1167–1186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, A. M., Green, T., Brady, M. K., & Peloza, J. (2020). Can corporate social responsibility deter consumer dysfunctional behavior? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 37(7), 729–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alon, A., Mennicken, A., & Samsonova-Taddei, A. (2019). Dynamics and limits of regulatory privatization: Reorganizing audit oversight in Russia. Organization Studies, 40(8), 1217–1239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alrazi, B., De Villiers, C., & Van Staden, C. J. (2015). A comprehensive literature review on, and the construction of a framework for, environmental legitimacy, accountability and proactivity. Journal of Cleaner Production, 102, 44–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amoako, G. K., Adam, A. M., Tackie, G., & Arthur, C. L. (2021). Environmental accountability practices of environmentally sensitive firms in Ghana: Does institutional isomorphism matter? Sustainability, 13(17), 9489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anning, A. A., & Adusei, M. (2022). An analysis of financial statement manipulation among listed manufacturing and trading firms in Ghana. Journal of African Business, 23(1), 165–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aragón-Correa, J. A., Marcus, A., & Hurtado-Torres, N. (2016). The natural environmental strategies of international firms: Old controversies and new evidence on performance and disclosure. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(1), 24–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, C. S., Guay, W. R., & Weber, J. P. (2010). The role of information and financial reporting in corporate governance and debt contracting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2–3), 179–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asif, M., Searcy, C., & Castka, P. (2022). Exploring the role of Industry 4.0 in enhancing supplier audit authenticity, efficacy, and cost effectiveness. Journal of Cleaner Production, 331, 129939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battese, G. E., & Coelli, T. J. (1995). A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Economics, 20, 325–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernauer, T., Engel, S., Kammerer, D., & Sejas Nogareda, J. (2007). Explaining green innovation: Ten years after Porter’s win-win proposition: How to study the effects of regulation on corporate environmental innovation? Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 39, 323–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilinski, A., & Hatfield, L. A. (2018). Nothing to see here? Non-inferiority approaches to parallel trends and other model assumptions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.03273.

  • Boo, E. F., & Sharma, D. (2008). Effect of regulatory oversight on the association between internal governance characteristics and audit fees. Accounting & Finance, 48(1), 51–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P., Preiato, J., & Tarca, A. (2014). Measuring country differences in enforcement of accounting standards: An audit and enforcement proxy. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 41(1–2), 1–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burby, R. J., & Paterson, R. G. (1993). Improving compliance with state environmental regulations. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 12(4), 753–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, C., Zheng, K. F., & Wang, P. (2021). The research on the effect of government environmental auditing on corporate environment governance. Auditing Research, 4, 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai, X., Zhu, B., Zhang, H., Li, L., & Xie, M. (2020). Can direct environmental regulation promote green technology innovation in heavily polluting industries? Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Science of the Total Environment, 746, 140810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, H., Zhang, L., Qi, Y., Yang, Z., & Li, X. (2022). Government auditing and environmental governance: Evidence from China’s auditing system reform. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 93, 106705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carballo-Penela, A., & Castromán-Diz, J. L. (2015). Environmental policies for sustainable development: An analysis of the drivers of proactive environmental strategies in the service sector. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(8), 802–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chabé-Ferret, S., & Subervie, J. (2013). How much green for the buck? Estimating additional and windfall effects of French agro-environmental schemes by DID-matching. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 65(1), 12–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., Cumming, D., Hou, W., & Lee, E. (2013). Executive integrity, audit opinion, and fraud in Chinese listed firms. Emerging Markets Review, 15, 72–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., Cumming, D., Hou, W., & Lee, E. (2016). Does the external monitoring effect of financial analysts deter corporate fraud in China? Journal of Business Ethics, 134, 727–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, L., Tang, O., & Feldmann, A. (2015). Applying GRI reports for the investigation of environmental management practices and company performance in Sweden, China and India. Journal of Cleaner Production, 98, 36–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X., Li, W., Chen, Z., & Huang, J. (2022). Environmental regulation and real earnings management—Evidence from the SO2 emissions trading system in China. Finance Research Letters, 46, 102418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z., Zhang, X., & Chen, F. (2021). Do carbon emission trading schemes stimulate green innovation in enterprises? Evidence from China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 168, 120744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D. A., Dey, A., & Lys, T. Z. (2008). Real and accrual-based earnings management in the pre-and post-Sarbanes-Oxley periods. The Accounting Review, 83(3), 757–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commerford, B. P., Hermanson, D. R., Houston, R. W., & Peters, M. F. (2016). Real earnings management: A threat to auditor comfort? Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 35(4), 39–56.

  • Costanza, R., & Perrings, C. (1990). A flexible assurance bonding system for improved environmental management. Ecological Economics, 2(1), 57–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, R., Liu, M., Wang, T., & Wu, Z. (2021). The impact of climate risk on earnings management: International evidence. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 40(2), 106818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dragomir, V. D. (2010). Environmentally sensitive disclosures and financial performance in a European setting. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 6(3), 359–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, X., Jian, W., Zeng, Q., & Chang, Y. (2018). Do auditors applaud corporate environmental performance? Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 151, 1049–1080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duque-Grisales, E., Aguilera-Caracuel, J., Guerrero-Villegas, J., & García-Sánchez, E. (2020). Does green innovation affect the financial performance of Multilatinas? The moderating role of ISO 14001 and R&D investment. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3286–3302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elzahaby, M. A. (2021). How firms’ performance mediates the relationship between corporate governance quality and earnings quality? Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 11(2), 278–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, J. P., Wong, T. J., & Zhang, T. (2007). Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance, and Post-IPO performance of China’s newly partially privatized firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 84(2), 330–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, L., & Wu, F. (2020). Can water rights trading scheme promote regional water conservation in China? Evidence from a time-varying DID analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18), 6679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernando, Y., Jabbour, C. J. C., & Wah, W. X. (2019). Pursuing green growth in technology firms through the connections between environmental innovation and sustainable business performance: Does service capability matter? Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 141, 8–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filatotchev, I., & Nakajima, C. (2014). Corporate governance, responsible managerial behavior, and corporate social responsibility: Organizational efficiency versus organizational legitimacy? Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(3), 289–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, J., Gao, B., & Wang, X. (2017). Trade-off between real activities earnings management and accrual-based manipulation-evidence from China. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 29, 66–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ge, W., & Kim, J. B. (2014). Boards, takeover protection, and real earnings management. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 43, 651–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerged, A. M., Al-Haddad, L. M., & Al-Hajri, M. O. (2020). Is earnings management associated with corporate environmental disclosure? Evidence from Kuwaiti listed firms. Accounting Research Journal, 33(1), 167–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenstone, M. (2002). The impacts of environmental regulations on industrial activity: Evidence from the 1970 and 1977 clean air act amendments and the census of manufactures. Journal of Political Economy, 110(6), 1175–1219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunny, K. A. (2010). The relation between earnings management using real activities manipulation and future performance: Evidence from meeting earnings benchmarks. Contemporary Accounting Research, 27(3), 855–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habib, A., Ranasinghe, D., Wu, J. Y., Biswas, P. K., & Ahmad, F. (2022). Real earnings management: A review of the international literature. Accounting & Finance, 62(4), 4279–4344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haque, F., & Ntim, C. G. (2018). Environmental policy, sustainable development, governance mechanisms and environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(3), 415–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, L. C. J., Liao, Q., & Taylor, M. (2015). Real and accrual-based earnings management in the pre-and post-IFRS periods: Evidence from China. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 26(3), 294–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, M. A., & McSwain, D. (2013). Financial disclosure management in the nonprofit sector: A framework for past and future research. Journal of Accounting Literature, 32(1), 61–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, C. C., Quang-Thanh, N., Chien, F., Li, L., & Mohsin, M. (2021). Evaluating green innovation and performance of financial development: Mediating concerns of environmental regulation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(40), 57386–57397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Y., Sun, S., & Dai, Y. (2021). Environmental regulation, green innovation, and international competitiveness of manufacturing enterprises in China: From the perspective of heterogeneous regulatory tools. PLoS ONE, 16(3), e0249169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C. L., & Kung, F. H. (2010). Drivers of environmental disclosure and stakeholder expectation: Evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 96, 435–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, R. (2023). Auditing the environmental accountability of local officials and the corporate green response: Evidence from China. Applied Economics, 55(34), 3950–3970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Z., Wang, Z., & Zeng, Y. (2020). Can voluntary environmental regulation promote corporate technological innovation? Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(2), 390–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, Y., Jin, Q., & Xuan, Y. (2016). To be inactive or overactive: Political incentives in firm investment. Economic Research Journal, 51(10), 126–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S., & Cooper, R. (1998). Cost & effect: Using integrated cost systems to drive profitability and performance. Harvard Business Press.

  • Karkkainen, B. C. (2019). Information as environmental regulation: TRI and performance benchmarking, precursor to a new paradigm? In Environmental Law (pp. 191–304). UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchler, E., Kogler, C., & Muehlbacher, S. (2014). Cooperative tax compliance: From deterrence to deference. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(2), 87–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotabe, M. M., & Helsen, K. (2022). Global marketing management. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, K. H., & Wong, C. W. (2012). Green logistics management and performance: Some empirical evidence from Chinese manufacturing exporters. Omega, 40(3), 267–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenard, M. J., Petruska, K. A., Alam, P., & Yu, B. (2016). Internal control weaknesses and evidence of real activities manipulation. Advances in Accounting, 33, 47–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leuz, C. (2010). Different approaches to corporate reporting regulation: How jurisdictions differ and why. Accounting and Business Research, 40(3), 229–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Li, X., Xiang, E., & Djajadikerta, H. G. (2020). Financial distress, internal control, and earnings management: Evidence from China. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 16(3), 100210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lihua, W. U., Tianshu, M. A., Yuanchao, B. I. A. N., Sijia, L. I., & Zhaoqiang, Y. I. (2020). Improvement of regional environmental quality: Government environmental governance and public participation. Science of the Total Environment, 717, 137265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lisic, L. L., Silveri, S. D., Song, Y., & Wang, K. (2015). Accounting fraud, auditing, and the role of government sanctions in China. Journal of Business Research, 68(6), 1186–1195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litt, B., Sharma, D., & Sharma, V. (2013). Environmental initiatives and earnings management. Managerial Auditing Journal, 29(1), 76–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., & Lin, B. (2012). Government auditing and corruption control: Evidence from China’s provincial panel data. China Journal of Accounting Research, 5(2), 163–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., & Xiao, Y. (2022). China’s environmental protection tax and green innovation: Incentive effect or crowding-out effect. Economic Research Journal, 57(01), 72–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W., & Xie, B. (2018). Do the local governors’ accountability audit of natural resources assets affect earnings, management for listed companies. J Zhongnan Univ Econ Law, 1, 13–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., She, Y., Liu, S., & Tang, H. (2022). Can the Leading Officials’ Accountability Audit of Natural Resources policy stimulate Chinese heavy-polluting enterprises’ green behavior? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(31), 47772–47799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, C. W. H., Fryxell, G. E., & Wong, W. W. H. (2006). Effective regulations with little effect? The antecedents of the perceptions of environmental officials on enforcement effectiveness in China. Environmental Management, 38, 388–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundqvist, L. J. (2001). Implementation from above: The ecology of power in Sweden’s environmental governance. Governance, 14(3), 319–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, W., Tian, Z., Fang, X., & Deng, M. (2023). Can good ESG performance reduce stock price crash risk? Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2646

  • Mendoza, J. P., Wielhouwer, J. L., & Kirchler, E. (2017). The backfiring effect of auditing on tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 62, 284–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohd Nor, J., Ahmad, N., & Mohd Saleh, N. (2010). Fraudulent financial reporting and company characteristics: Tax audit evidence. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 8(2), 128–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muttakin, M. B., Khan, A., & Azim, M. I. (2015). Corporate social responsibility disclosures and earnings quality: Are they a reflection of managers’ opportunistic behavior? Managerial Auditing Journal, 30(3), 277–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadeem, M., Bahadar, S., Gull, A. A., & Iqbal, U. (2020). Are women eco-friendly? Board gender diversity and environmental innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3146–3161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narassimhan, E., Gallagher, K. S., Koester, S., & Alejo, J. R. (2018). Carbon pricing in practice: A review of existing emissions trading systems. Climate Policy, 18(8), 967–991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J., & Ehrenfeld, J. (1997). Codes of environmental management practice: Assessing their potential as a tool for change. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 22(1), 487–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owusu, A., Zalata, A. M., Omoteso, K., & Elamer, A. A. (2020). Is there a trade-off between accrual-based and real earnings management activities in the presence of (fe) male auditors?. Journal of Business Ethics, 175, 815–836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04672-5

  • Pacheco Paredes, A. A., & Wheatley, C. (2017). Real earnings management or “just business.” Journal of Financial Economic Policy, 9(3), 268–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, J. L., Goodwin, K. N., & McGarry, J. L. (2018). Understanding and mitigating supply chain fraud. Journal of Marketing Development & Competitiveness, 12(1), 70–83.

  • Peters, G. F., & Romi, A. M. (2014). Does the voluntary adoption of corporate governance mechanisms improve environmental risk disclosures? Evidence from greenhouse gas emission accounting. Journal of Business Ethics, 125, 637–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piotroski, J. D., & Wong, T. J. (2012). Institutions and information environment of Chinese listed firms. Capitalizing China, 2, 201–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Vanderlinde, C. (1995). Toward new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 97–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potoski, M., & Prakash, A. (2004). The regulation dilemma: Cooperation and conflict in environmental governance. Public Administration Review, 64(2), 152–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potoski, M., & Prakash, A. (2005). Covenants with weak swords: ISO 14001 and facilities’ environmental performance. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management: The Journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, 24(4), 745–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power, M. (1997). Expertise and the construction of relevance: Accountants and environmental audit. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22(2), 123–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi, Y., & Zhang, L. (2014). Local environmental enforcement constrained by central–local relations in China. Environmental Policy and Governance, 24(3), 216–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roychowdhury, S. (2006). Earnings management through real activities manipulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(3), 335–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruban, A., & Rydén, L. (2019). Introducing environmental auditing as a tool of environmental governance in Ukraine. Journal of Cleaner Production, 212, 505–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saha, A. K., & Khan, I. (2024). Regulatory influence, board characteristics and climate change disclosures: Evidence from environmentally sensitive firms in developing economy context. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-06-2023-0262

  • Saleh, I., Afifa, M. A., & Haniah, F. (2020). Financial factors affecting earnings management and earnings quality: New evidence from an emerging market. ACRN Journal of Finance and Risk Perspectives, 9(1), 198–216. https://doi.org/10.35944/jofrp.2020.9.1.014

  • Sharma, D. S., Sharma, V. D., & Litt, B. A. (2018). Environmental responsibility, external assurance, and firm valuation. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 37(4), 207–233.

  • Simmons, O. S. (2013). The corporate immune system: Governance from the inside out. U. Ill. L. Rev., Forthcoming, Wake Forest Univ. Legal Studies Paper No. 2263552, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2263552

  • Sohn, B. C. (2016). The effect of accounting comparability on the accrual-based and real earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 35(5), 513–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, D., Zeng, S., Chen, H., Meng, X., & Jin, Z. (2019). Monitoring effect of transparency: How does government environmental disclosure facilitate corporate environmentalism? Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(8), 1594–1607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, J., Lan, G., & Liu, G. (2014). Independent audit committee characteristics and real earnings management. Managerial Auditing Journal, 29(2), 153–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, L., & Rath, S. (2010). Earnings management research: A review of contemporary research methods. Global Review of Accounting and Finance, 1(1), 121–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tourais, P., & Videira, N. (2016). Why, how and what do organizations achieve with the implementation of environmental management Systems?—Lessons from a comprehensive review on the eco-management and audit scheme. Sustainability, 8(3), 283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tregidga, H., Milne, M. J., & Kearins, K. (2018). Ramping up resistance: Corporate sustainable development and academic research. Business & Society, 57(2), 292–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., Qi, S., Zhou, C., Zhou, J., & Huang, X. (2022). Green credit policy, government behavior and green innovation quality of enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production, 331, 129834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., Chen, C., & Zhu, B. (2023). Earnings pressure, external supervision, and corporate environmental protection investment: Comparison between heavy-polluting and non-heavy-polluting industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 385, 135648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., & Hou, S. (2024). The impact of digital transformation and earnings management on ESG performance: Evidence from Chinese listed enterprises. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q., Wong, T. J., & Xia, L. (2008). State ownership, the institutional environment, and auditor choice: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 46(1), 112–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, R., Wijen, F., & Heugens, P. P. (2018). Government’s green grip: Multifaceted state influence on corporate environmental actions in China. Strategic Management Journal, 39(2), 403–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S., Jia, M., Zhou, Y., & Fan, F. (2020). Impacts of changing urban form on ecological efficiency in China: A comparison between urban agglomerations and administrative areas. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 63(10), 1834–1856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. (2019). The national ecological accounting and auditing scheme as an instrument of institutional reform in China: A discourse analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(3), 587–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welford, R. (Ed) (2016). Corporate environmental management 1: Systems and strategies (2nd ed). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315825120

  • Wong, C. W., Miao, X., Cui, S., & Tang, Y. (2018). Impact of corporate environmental responsibility on operating income: Moderating role of regional disparities in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 149, 363–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xi, J., & Xiao, H. (2022). Relation among corporate environmental disclosure, earnings management and accounting conservatism: Evidence from Chinese listed firms. Managerial Auditing Journal, 37(5), 565–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Z., Dai, Y., & Liu, W. (2022). Does environmental audit help to improve water quality? Evidence from the China National Environmental Monitoring Centre. Science of the Total Environment, 823, 153485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao, S., Pan, L., & Zhang, Z. (2020). Does environmental disclosure have an auditing effect? Managerial Auditing Journal, 35(1), 43–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye, J., Wei, F., Liu, X., & Li, J. (2022). Urban spatial structure and environmental efficiency: Empirical analysis from prefecture-level cities in China. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 1058585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, F. N., Askarany, D., Shirzad, A., & Faghani, M. (2023). Audit committee features and earnings management. Heliyon, 9(10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20825

  • Zeng, H., Yang, L., & Shi, J. (2021). Does the supervisory ability of internal audit executives affect the occurrence of corporate fraud? Evidence from small and medium-sized listed enterprises in China. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 29(1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, D., Mohsin, M., Rasheed, A. K., Chang, Y., & Taghizadeh-Hesary, F. (2021). Public spending and green economic growth in BRI region: Mediating role of green finance. Energy Policy, 153, 112256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, X., Zhao, Y., Zeng, S., & Zhang, S. (2015). Corporate behavior and competitiveness: Impact of environmental regulation on Chinese firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 86, 311–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Key Project of the National Social Science Fund: “Research on the Theory, Mechanism, and Promotion Countermeasures of ESG Responsible Investment Promoting the High-Quality Development of Private Enterprises” (No. 23AJL007).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China

    Xintu Lei, Honghua Wang & Fang Deng

  2. School of Business, Jinhua Polytechnic, Jinhua, China

    Honghua Wang

  3. School of Business, Central South University, Changsha, China

    Shihui Li

  4. Graduate School of Business, Universiti Sains Malaysia, George Town, Penang, Malaysia

    Wenting Chang

Authors
  1. Xintu Lei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Honghua Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fang Deng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shihui Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Wenting Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Honghua Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Xintu Lei and Honghua Wang contributed equally to this work; they are both first authors.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lei, X., Wang, H., Deng, F. et al. Sustainability Through Scrutiny: Enhancing Transparency in Chinese Corporations via Environmental Audits. J Knowl Econ (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02106-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02106-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation