Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Investing with Purpose: The Role of CSR in Enhancing Chinese Firms’ Performance in Japan

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research paper delves into the intricate dynamics of Chinese firms’ foreign direct investment (FDI) in Japan, shedding light on the “China model” of foreign investment. While previous studies have extensively explored Chinese FDI in resource-rich sectors, this paper focuses on the unique challenges and opportunities in a developed country like Japan, which shares similar technological capabilities with China. In particular, we investigate the role of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in mediating the efficiency of Chinese companies’ investments in Japan. As China’s economy continues to grow globally, understanding the effectiveness of its FDI activities has become increasingly important. This study employs a comprehensive approach, drawing insights from various academic perspectives, including digital finance, product market competition, education systems, energy intensity, logistical capability, and green credit policies, to provide a holistic view of Chinese FDI in Japan. Our findings emphasize the pivotal role of CSR in enhancing investment efficiency and mitigating challenges faced by Chinese firms in Japan. We highlight how CSR positively influences organizational trust, credibility, and risk management, ultimately improving investment effectiveness. Additionally, resource-based theory studies reveal the connection between CSR, technological innovation, and corporate growth, further enhancing investment efficiency. This research, grounded in stakeholder and information asymmetry theories, utilizes robust statistical methods and a rich dataset to establish and validate hypotheses. The results underscore the significance of CSR as a mediating factor and its positive impact on Chinese companies’ FDI efficiency in Japan. This study aligns with the principles of the knowledge economy and provides practical insights for policymakers in China and Japan. Both nations can foster a conducive environment for sustainable and mutually beneficial international collaborations in the global marketplace by promoting CSR practices and recognizing their influence on investment efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

References

  • Abad-Segura, E., Cortés-García, F. J., & Belmonte-Ureña, L. J. (2019). The sustainable approach to corporate social responsibility: A global analysis and future trends. Sustainability, 11(19), 5382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alam, S. S., & Islam, K. Z. (2021). Examining the role of environmental corporate social responsibility in building green corporate image and green competitive advantage. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 6(1), 8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardy, R., Drew, S., & Kennedy, T. F. (2012). Foreign investment and ethics: How to contribute to social responsibility by doing business in less-developed countries. Journal of Business Ethics, 106, 267–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benlemlih, M., & Bitar, M. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and investment efficiency. Journal of Business Ethics, 148, 647–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergh, D. D., Ketchen, D. J., Jr., Orlandi, I., Heugens, P. P., & Boyd, B. K. (2019). Information asymmetry in management research: Past accomplishments and future opportunities. Journal of Management, 45(1), 122–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blowfield, M., & Frynas, J. G. (2005). Editorial setting new agendas: Critical perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility in the developing world. International Affairs, 81(3), 499–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boubaker, S., Dang, V. A., & Sassi, S. (2022). Competitive pressure and firm investment efficiency: Evidence from corporate employment decisions. European Financial Management, 28(1), 113–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouichou, S. I., Wang, L., & Zulfiqar, S. (2022). How corporate social responsibility boosts corporate financial and non-financial performance: The moderating role of ethical leadership. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 871334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brammer, S., Millington, A., & Rayton, B. (2007). The contribution of corporate social responsibility to organizational commitment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(10), 1701–1719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branco, M. C., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2006). Corporate social responsibility and resource-based perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 69, 111–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. J. (2018). Towards a theoretically-based global foreign direct investment policy regime. Journal of International Business Policy, 1, 184–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, J., Liang, H., & Zhan, X. (2019). Peer effects of corporate social responsibility. Management Science, 65(12), 5487–5503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., & Ji, Y. (2022). Do corporate social responsibility categories distinctly influence innovation? A Resource-Based Theory Perspective. Sustainability, 14(6), 3154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheynel, E., & Levine, C. B. (2020). Public disclosures and information asymmetry: A theory of the mosaic. The Accounting Review, 95(1), 79–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, S. J., Chung, C. Y., & Young, J. (2019). Study on the relationship between CSR and financial performance. Sustainability, 11(2), 343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, K. A., Romi, A. M., Sánchez, D., & Sánchez, J. M. (2019). The influence of corporate social responsibility on investment efficiency and innovation. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 46(3–4), 494–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corlu, C. G., Goyal, A., Lopez-Lopez, D., Torre, R. D. L., & Juan, A. A. (2021). Ranking enterprise reputation in the digital age: A survey of traditional methods and the need for more agile approaches. International Journal of Data Analysis Techniques and Strategies, 13(4), 265–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhar, B. K., Sarkar, S. M., & Ayittey, F. K. (2022). Impact of social responsibility disclosure between implementation of green accounting and sustainable development: A study on heavily polluting companies in Bangladesh. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(1), 71–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djalilov, K. (2022). A contingent resource-based perspective on corporate social responsibility and competitive advantage: A focus on transition countries. Business Ethics and Leadership, 6(1), 92–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., ... & Williams, M. D. (2021). Artificial intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 101994.

  • Eberle, D., Berens, G., & Li, T. (2013). The impact of interactive corporate social responsibility communication on corporate reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 731–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eweje, G., & Sakaki, M. (2015). CSR in Japanese companies: Perspectives from managers. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(7), 678–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falck, O., & Heblich, S. (2007). Corporate social responsibility: Doing well by doing good. Business Horizons, 50(3), 247–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazzari, S. M., & Variato, A. M. (1994). Asymmetric information and Keynesian theories of investment. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 16(3), 351–369.

  • Fukukawa, K., & Teramoto, Y. (2009). Understanding Japanese CSR: The reflections of managers in the field of global operations. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 133–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallego-Álvarez, I., Manuel Prado-Lorenzo, J., & García-Sánchez, I. M. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and innovation: A resource-based theory. Management Decision, 49(10), 1709–1727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, G. Y., Wang, D. T., & Che, Y. (2018). Impact of historical conflict on FDI location and performance: Japanese investment in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 49, 1060–1080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gazzola, P., & Mella, P. (2012). Corporate performance and corporate social responsibility (CSR). A necessary choice? Economia Aziendale Online-, 3, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, N. A., Aboobaker, N., & Edward, M. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and organizational commitment: Effects of CSR attitude, organizational trust and identification. Society and Business Review, 15(3), 255–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, N. A., Aboobaker, N., & Edward, M. (2021). Corporate social responsibility, organizational trust and commitment: A moderated mediation model. Personnel Review, 50(4), 1093–1111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goyal, A. (2006). Corporate social responsibility as a signalling device for foreign direct investment. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 13(1), 145–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan, Y., Zhai, Z., Wang, Y., Wu, D., Yu, L., & Lei, Z. (2022). Foreign direct investment, environmental regulation, and haze pollution: Empirical evidence from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(18), 27571–27584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunby, P., Jin, Y., & Reed, W. R. (2017). Did FDI really cause Chinese economic growth? A meta-analysis. World Development, 90, 242–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, F., Liu, R., & Chen, L. (2020). Will fulfilling environmental responsibility improve corporate economic benefits?—From the perspective of stakeholders. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (social Sciences Edition), 22(6), 32–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heslin, P. A., & Ochoa, J. D. (2008). Understanding and developing strategic corporate social responsibility. Organizational Dynamics, 37, 125–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Z., Tao, Y., Luo, X., Ye, Y., & Lei, T. (2023). Regional digital finance and corporate investment efficiency in China. Applied Economics, 55(43), 5115–5134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamali, D., Safieddine, A. M., & Rabbath, M. (2008). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility synergies and interrelationships. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(5), 443–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoerich, J. (2016). Has outward foreign direct investment contributed to the development of the Chinese economy. Transnational Corporations, 23(2), 1–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kölbel, J. F., & Busch, T. (2021). Signaling legitimacy across institutional contexts—The intermediary role of corporate social responsibility rating agencies. Global Strategy Journal, 11(2), 304–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, A., & Pinkse, J. (2006). Stakeholder mismanagement and corporate social responsibility crises. European Management Journal, 24(1), 59–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kong, Q., Peng, D., Ruijia, Z., & Wong, Z. (2021). Resource misallocation, production efficiency and outward foreign direct investment decisions of Chinese enterprises. Research in International Business and Finance, 55, 101343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnaswami, S., & Subramaniam, V. (1999). Information asymmetry, valuation, and the corporate spin-off decision. Journal of Financial Economics, 53(1), 73–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krukowska, M. (2014). Determinants of corporate social responsibility in Japanese companies. Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, 127(4), 39–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, G., Li, L., Choi, T. M., & Sethi, S. P. (2020). Green supply chain management in Chinese firms: Innovative measures and the moderating role of quick response technology. Journal of Operations Management, 66(7–8), 958–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Wang, J., Mu, Z., & Li, L. (2023). The impact of corporate environmental responsibility on green technological innovation: A nonlinear model including mediate effects and moderate effects. Economic Analysis and Policy, 80, 754–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Y. E., Li, Y. W., Cheng, T. Y., & Lam, K. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and investment efficiency: Does business strategy matter? International Review of Financial Analysis, 73, 101585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, M., Marshall, A., & McColgan, P. (2021). Foreign direct investments: The role of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 59, 100663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, D., Hong, F., & Li, G. (2016). Assessing the role of inward foreign direct investment in Chinese economic development, 1990–2007: Towards a synthesis of alternative views. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 37, 107–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lock, I., & Seele, P. (2016). The credibility of CSR (corporate social responsibility) reports in Europe. Evidence from a quantitative content analysis in 11 countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 122, 186–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lojpur, A., & Draskovic, V. (2013). The institutional context of corporate governance and corporate social responsibility. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 9(1), 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lou, Z., Chen, S., Yin, W., Zhang, C., & Yu, X. (2022). Economic policy uncertainty and firm innovation: Evidence from a risk-taking perspective. International Review of Economics & Finance, 77, 78–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madueno, J. H., Jorge, M. L., Conesa, I. M., & Martínez-Martínez, D. (2016). Relationship between corporate social responsibility and competitive performance in Spanish SMEs: Empirical evidence from a stakeholders’ perspective. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 19(1), 55–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maskrey, A., Jain, G., & Lavell, A. (2023). The social construction of systemic risk: towards an actionable framework for risk governance. Disaster Prevention and Managment, 32(1), 4-26

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng, M., Tao, Q., & Lei, J. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and corporate growth: The intermediary effect of technological innovation. Research and Development Management, 31, 27–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menshawy, I. M., Basiruddin, R., Mohd-Zamil, N. A., & Hussainey, K. (2023). Strive towards investment efficiency among Egyptian companies: Do board characteristics and information asymmetry matter? International Journal of Finance & Economics, 28(3), 2382–2403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miningou, E. W., & Tapsoba, S. J. (2020). Education systems and foreign direct investment: Does external efficiency matter? Journal of Applied Economics, 23(1), 583–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, T. (2011). Foreign direct investment and development: Launching a second generation of policy research: Avoiding the mistakes of the first, reevaluating policies for developed and developing countries. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naseem, T., Shahzad, F., Asim, G. A., Rehman, I. U., & Nawaz, F. (2020). Corporate social responsibility engagement and firm performance in Asia Pacific: The role of enterprise risk management. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 501–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, T., Pham, T., Le, Q., & Bui, T. (2020). Impact of corporate social responsibility on organizational commitment through organizational trust and organizational identification. Management Science Letters, 10(14), 3453–3462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nurlia, N., Daud, I., & Rosadi, M. E. (2023). AI implementation impact on workforce productivity: The role of ai training and organizational adaptation. Escalate: Economics and Business Journal, 1(01), 01–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N., & Bansal, P. (2016). The long-term benefits of organizational resilience through sustainable business practices. Strategic Management Journal, 37(8), 1615–1631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, Y., Park, Y., Hong, P. C., & Yang, S. (2017). Clarity of CSR orientation and firm performance: Case of Japanese SMEs. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 24(6), 1581–1596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, G. Z., & Beamish, P. W. (2008). The effect of national corporate responsibility environment on Japanese foreign direct investment. Journal of Business Ethics, 80, 677–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehman, I. U., Shahzad, F., Latif, K. F., Nawab, N., Rashid, A., & Hyder, S. (2021). Does corporate social responsibility mediate the influence of national culture on investment inefficiency? Firm-level evidence from Asia Pacific. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26(3), 3484–3503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaede, U. (2020). The business reinvention of Japan: How to make sense of the new Japan and why it matters. Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scholtens, B. (2006). Finance as a driver of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 68, 19–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. D. (2007). Making the case for the competitive advantage of corporate social responsibility. Business Strategy Series, 8(3), 186–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soh, K. L., Wong, W. P., & Tang, C. F. (2021). The role of institutions at the nexus of logistic performance and foreign direct investment in Asia. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 37(2), 165–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su, Y., & Liu, Z. (2016). The impact of foreign direct investment and human capital on economic growth: Evidence from Chinese cities. China Economic Review, 37, 97–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, C., Guo, Z., & Wang, Z. (2023). Outward foreign direct investment and energy intensity: Evidence from the listed companies in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(10), 27056–27072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, W., & Cui, K. (2014). Linking corporate social responsibility to firm default risk. European Management Journal, 32(2), 275–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suto, M., & Takehara, H. (2016). The link between corporate social performance and financial performance: Empirical evidence from Japanese firms. International Journal of Corporate Strategy and Social Responsibility, 1(1), 4–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, K., Tanimoto, K., & Kokko, A. (2010). Does foreign investment matter? Effects of foreign investment on the institutionalisation of corporate social responsibility by Japanese firms. Asian Business & Management, 9, 379–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, S., Sasaki, H., & Davis, S. (2021). Corporate social responsibility in Japan: Responsible business in a changing Japan. Current Global Practices of Corporate Social Responsibility: In the Era of Sustainable Development Goals, 1(1), 745–775.

  • Tokoro, N. (2007). Stakeholders and corporate social responsibility (CSR): A new perspective on the structure of relationships. Asian Business & Management, 6, 143–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uduji, J. I., & Okolo, E. N. (2023). Ecotourism for transformative and youth development in sub-Saharan Africa: the role of corporate social responsibility in Nigeria's oil host communities. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change, 21(6), 629–656.

  • Uribe, D. F., Ortiz-Marcos, I., & Uruburu, Á. (2018). What is going on with stakeholder theory in project management literature? A Symbiotic Relationship for Sustainability. Sustainability, 10(4), 1300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, D., Zhu, W., Zhang, C., Li, H., & Wu, Y. (2020). Stakeholder symbiosis in the context of corporate social responsibility. Symmetry, 12(11), 1897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wokutch, R. E. (1990). Corporate social responsibility Japanese style. Academy of Management Perspectives, 4(2), 56–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfolds, S. E., & Siegel, J. (2019). Misaccounting for endogeneity: The peril of relying on the Heckman two-step method without a valid instrument. Strategic Management Journal, 40(3), 432–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xuemei, X., Ruoyi, W., & Jiage, H. (2020). Green process innovation and corporate performance in the context of government’s financial incentive: An empirical study based on content analysis. Management Review, 32(5), 109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye, J., & Dela, E. (2023). The effect of green investment and green financing on sustainable business performance of foreign chemical industries operating in Indonesia: The mediating role of corporate social responsibility. Sustainability, 15(14), 11218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, B., & Cao, X. (2022). Do corporate social responsibility practices contribute to green innovation? The mediating role of green dynamic capability. Technology in Society, 68, 101868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., & Garvis, D. M. (2000). International corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance: The moderating effect of international environmental hostility. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5–6), 469–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Luo, Y., & Ding, X. (2022). Can green credit policy improve the overseas investment efficiency of enterprises in China? Journal of Cleaner Production, 340, 130785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Zhang, J., & Cheng, Z. (2021). Stock market liberalization and corporate green innovation: Evidence from China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(7), 3412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, J. (2021). Reimagining corporate social responsibility in the era of COVID-19: Embedding resilience and promoting corporate social competence. Sustainability, 13(12), 6548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Q., & Lai, K. H. (2019). Enhancing supply chain operations with extended corporate social responsibility practices by multinational enterprises: Social capital perspective from Chinese suppliers. International Journal of Production Economics, 213, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimon, G., Arianpoor, A., & Salehi, M. (2022). Sustainability reporting and corporate reputation: The moderating effect of CEO opportunistic behavior. Sustainability, 14(3), 1257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This article was supported by the Scientific Research Program Funded by Shaanxi Provincial Education Department: Research on China’s National Image Reported by Japanese Media in the Post-epidemic Era (Program No. 21JK0289).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Foreign Languages, Xi’an Shiyou University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China

    Xu Chen

  2. College of Foreign Studies, Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, China

    Xuyang Dong

  3. Pan Tianshou College of Architecture and Art Design, Ningbo University, Ningbo, China

    Chao Ma

Authors
  1. Xu Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xuyang Dong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chao Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Xu Chen is responsible for writing the paper, building the framework, logical analysis, and data analysis. Xuyang Dong is responsible for coordinating and planning research papers, writing papers, proofreading language, and analyzing data. Chao Ma is responsible for date analysis the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xuyang Dong or Chao Ma.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Innovation Management in Asia

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, X., Dong, X. & Ma, C. Investing with Purpose: The Role of CSR in Enhancing Chinese Firms’ Performance in Japan. J Knowl Econ (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-01875-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-01875-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation