Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Unraveling Systemic Risk Transmission: An Empirical Exploration of Network Dynamics and Market Liquidity in the Financial Sector

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The banking industry, as a cornerstone of the economy, plays a pivotal role in the efficient allocation of funds. However, it is not immune to the peril of systemic risk, a threat that can trigger a domino effect, jeopardizing the entire financial system. This research paper delves into the complexities of systemic risk within the banking sector, focusing on the transmission mechanisms through interbank networks and market liquidity. By conducting an empirical analysis based on the 2011 EU-wide stress test, the study reveals the significant roles that network and market liquidity channels play in the dissemination of systemic risk. The paper highlights how the market liquidity channel potentially has a more substantial impact on contagion compared to the network channel, challenging pre-existing beliefs that have predominantly emphasized network structures in systemic risk propagation. The study meticulously analyzes the interplay between financial institutions, interbank lending, borrowing, and the impacts of leverage and market liquidity, offering a comprehensive view of the systemic risk landscape in banking. It provides insights into the complexities of risk dynamics, leveraging the methodology proposed by Chen et al. (Oper. Res. 64(5):1089–1108, 2016) for a detailed balance sheet examination and network modeling. The findings underscore the importance of understanding and controlling risk channels, notably the network and market liquidity channels, to maintain the stability and resilience of the banking system. Policy implications are profound, suggesting that regulators and policymakers need to focus on enhancing market liquidity during economic strains and adopt targeted regulatory approaches to mitigate vulnerabilities stemming from interconnectedness and leverage. The study also emphasizes the need for ongoing monitoring and proactive management of systemic risk channels, recommending regular stress tests and the development of flexible regulatory measures that adapt to changing systemic risk factors. This research contributes significantly to the ongoing discussion on systemic risk in the financial sector, filling gaps in the literature by integrating various elements like network topologies and market liquidity in a comprehensive framework. It provides a novel perspective on the complex relationship between network interconnectedness and liquidity dynamics and offers practical guidance for optimizing banking structures for enhanced efficiency and resilience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Acemoglu, D., Ozdaglar, A., & Tahbaz-Salehi, A. (2015). Systemic risk and stability in financial networks. American Economic Review, 105(2), 564–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acharya, V. V., & Ryan, S. G. (2016). Banks’ financial reporting and financial system stability. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(2), 277–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N., Webber, L., Noss, J., Beale, D., & Crowley-Reidy, L. (2018). The resilience of financial market liquidity. Bank of England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arner, D. W., Avgouleas, E., Busch, D., & Schwarcz, S. L. (Eds.). (2019). Systemic risk in the financial sector: Ten years after the great crash. McGill-Queen’s Press-MQUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avgouleas, E. (2015). Bank leverage ratios and financial stability: A micro-and macroprudential perspective. Levy Economics Institute Working Paper No. 849. Annandale-on-Hudson, NY: Levy Economics Institute of Bard College. Available at SSRN: http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2682675, 2015.

  • Babu, D. G. S. (2018). Role of financial system in economic development of a country. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 5(8), 100–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besar, D., Booth, P., Chan, K. K., Milne, A. K., & Pickles, J. (2011). Systemic risk in financial services. British Actuarial Journal, 16(2), 195–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisias, D., Flood, M., Lo, A. W., & Valavanis, S. (2012). A survey of systemic risk analytics. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 4(1), 255–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, L., Correa, R., Huang, X., & Zhou, H. (2016). The systemic risk of European banks during the financial and sovereign debt crises. Journal of Banking & Finance, 63, 107–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bluhm, M., & Krahnen, J. P. (2014). Systemic risk in an interconnected banking system with endogenous asset markets. Journal of Financial Stability, 13, 75–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, N., Liu, X., & Yao, D. D. (2014). Modeling financial systemic risk—The network effect and the market liquidity effect. Available at SSRN: http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2463545, 2014.

  • Chen, N., Liu, X., & Yao, D. D. (2016). An optimization view of financial systemic risk modeling: Network effect and market liquidity effect. Operations Research, 64(5), 1089–1108.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chinazzi, M., & Fagiolo, G. (2015). Systemic risk, contagion, and financial networks: A survey. In Banking integration and financial crisis: Some recent developments. Fundacion BBVA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cont, R., & Moussa, A. (2010). Network structure and systemic risk in banking systems. Available at SSRN: http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1733528, 2010.

  • Cont, R., & Wagalath, L. (2016). Fire sales forensics: Measuring endogenous risk. Mathematical Finance, 26(4), 835–866.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Demange, G. (2018). Contagion in financial networks: A threat index. Management Science, 64(2), 955–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duarte, F., & Eisenbach, T. M. (2021). Fire-sale spillovers and systemic risk. The Journal of Finance, 76(3), 1251–1294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dungey, M., & Gajurel, D. (2015). Contagion and banking crisis–International evidence for 2007–2009. Journal of Banking & Finance, 60, 271–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eboli, M. (2019). A flow network analysis of direct balance-sheet contagion in financial networks. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 103, 205–233.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, M., & Golub, B. (2022). Networks and economic fragility. Annual Review of Economics, 14, 665–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsinger, H., Lehar, A., & Summer, M. (2013). Network models and systemic risk assessment. Handbook on Systemic Risk, 1(1), 287–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falato, A., Hortacsu, A., Li, D., & Shin, C. (2021). Fire-sale spillovers in debt markets. The Journal of Finance, 76(6), 3055–3102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glasserman, P., & Young, H. P. (2016). Contagion in financial networks. Journal of Economic Literature, 54(3), 779–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R., Landier, A., & Thesmar, D. (2015). Vulnerable banks. Journal of Financial Economics, 115(3), 471–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, A. G., & May, R. M. (2011). Systemic risk in banking ecosystems. Nature, 469(7330), 351–355.

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • He, Q. M. (2014). Fundamentals of matrix-analytic methods (Vol. 365). Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • He, Z., & Wei, W. (2023). China’s financial system and economy: A review. Annual Review of Economics, 15, 451–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellwig, M. F. (2009). Systemic risk in the financial sector: An analysis of the subprime-mortgage financial crisis. De Economist, 157, 129–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homar, T., Kick, H., & Salleo, C. (2016). Making sense of the EU wide stress test: A comparison with the SRISK approach. ECB Working Paper, No. 1920, ISBN 978-92-899-2168-8, European Central Bank (ECB), Frankfurt, https://doi.org/10.2866/10852.

  • Hurd, T. R. (2016). Contagion!: Systemic risk in financial networks (Vol. 42). Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hüser, A. C. (2015). Too interconnected to fail: A survey of the interbank networks literature. SAFE Working Paper, No. 91, Goethe University Frankfurt, SAFE - Sustainable Architecture for Finance in Europe, Frankfurt, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2577241.

  • Joshi, M., Cahill, D., Sidhu, J., & Kansal, M. (2013). Intellectual capital and financial performance: An evaluation of the Australian financial sector. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14(2), 264–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidwell, D. S., Blackwell, D. W., & Whidbee, D. A. (2016). Financial institutions, markets, and money. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, A., & Giansante, S. (2012). Interbank lending and the spread of bank failures: A network model of systemic risk. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 83(3), 583–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, Y., & Hu, Y. (2021). A study of systemic risk of global stock markets under COVID-19 based on complex financial networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 566, 125613.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lenz, R. (2016). Peer-to-peer lending: Opportunities and risks. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 7(4), 688–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, F., & Perez-Saiz, H. (2018). Measuring systemic risk across financial market infrastructures. Journal of Financial Stability, 34, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, W., Hommel, U., & Paterlini, S. (2018a). Network topology and systemic risk: Evidence from the Euro Stoxx market. Finance Research Letters, 27, 105–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Hao, A., Zhang, X., & Xiong, X. (2018b). Network topology and systemic risk in peer-to-peer lending market. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 508, 118–130.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, J., & Battiston, S. (2008). Systemic risk in a network fragility model analyzed with probability density evolution of persistent random walks. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 3(2), 185.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, I., Schomberg, N., & Couturier, F. A. (2013). Impact of liquidity crunch on interbank network. International Journal of Economics and Management Engineering, 7(10), 2733–2738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne, A., & Parboteeah, P. (2016). The business models and economics of peer-to-peer lending. European Credit Research Institute.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moloney, N. (2023). EU securities and financial markets regulation. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monnet, E., Riva, A., & Ungaro, S. (2021). The real effects of bank runs. Evidence from the French Great Depression (1930–1931). Available at SSRN: http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3846142, 2021.

  • Morrison, W. M. (2019). China’s economic rise: History, trends, challenges, and implications for the United States. Current Politics and Economics of Northern and Western Asia, 28(2/3), 189–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasini, S., & Erdemlioglu, D. (2019). Multiple channels of financial contagion: An empirical analysis of stock price dynamics. Finance, 40(1), 87–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neveu, A. R. (2018). A survey of network-based analysis and systemic risk measurement. Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, 13, 241–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, T. N. M. (2014). Competition, liquidity and stability: International evidence at the bank and systemic levels (Doctoral dissertation,. Monash University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowicki, J. P. (2015). Mortgage crisis: Exploring incentives prevalent during the boom and bust of the 2001-2007 mortgage market (Doctoral dissertation,. University of Denver).

    Google Scholar 

  • Paltalidis, N., Gounopoulos, D., Kizys, R., & Koutelidakis, Y. (2015). Transmission channels of systemic risk and contagion in the European financial network. Journal of Banking & Finance, 61, S36–S52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rostásy, C. (2019). European integration and cross-border financial governance in the aftermath of the global financial crisis: Challenges and prospects of post-crisis policy responses to systemic risk in the European Union (Doctoral dissertation,. Zeppelin Universität).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smaga, P. (2014). The concept of systemic risk. In Systemic Risk Centre Special Paper, (5). The London School of Economics and Political Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somarakis, C., Siami, M., & Motee, N. (2016). Interplays between systemic risk and network topology in consensus networks. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 49(22), 333–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (2010). Risk and global economic architecture: Why full financial integration may be undesirable. American Economic Review, 100(2), 388–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Summer, M. (2013). Financial contagion and network analysis. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 5(1), 277–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Upper, C., & Worms, A. (2004). Estimating bilateral exposures in the German interbank market: Is there a danger of contagion? European Economic Review, 48(4), 827–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z., Gao, X., Huang, S., Sun, Q., Chen, Z., Tang, R., & Di, Z. (2022). Measuring systemic risk contribution of global stock markets: A dynamic tail risk network approach. International Review of Financial Analysis, 84, 102361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, S., & Weske, K. (2017). The joint impact of bankruptcy costs, fire sales and cross-holdings on systemic risk in financial networks. Probability, Uncertainty and Quantitative Risk, 2, 1–38.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, F., Zhang, D., & Ji, Q. (2021). Systemic risk and financial contagion across top global energy companies. Energy Economics, 97, 105221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yarovaya, L., Brzeszczyński, J., Goodell, J. W., Lucey, B., & Lau, C. K. M. (2022). Rethinking financial contagion: Information transmission mechanism during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions and Money, 79, 101589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This article was supported by the Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China Humanities and Social Sciences Youth Foundation grant number (20YJC630089); and Philosophy and Social Science Fund of Education Department of Jiangsu Province grant number (2019SJA1807).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Business School, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225000, Jiangsu, China

    Xin Liu

Authors
  1. Xin Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xin Liu.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, X. Unraveling Systemic Risk Transmission: An Empirical Exploration of Network Dynamics and Market Liquidity in the Financial Sector. J Knowl Econ (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-01861-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-01861-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation