Skip to main content
Log in

Developing the Framework for Mergers and Acquisitions Success: Evidence from the Indian Banking Sector

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The consistently high failures reveal that scholars need to thoroughly comprehend the intricacies of the Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) process due to a lack of connectedness across various independent schools. This indicates the necessity to study the parameters affecting the overall M&A performance and explore linkages between them. The primary aim is to develop an integrative framework to comprehend better the interdependencies of M&A intentions, M&A phases, and their impacts on M&A performance grounded on a questionnaire survey of 100 management personnel of post-merged Indian banks. Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) is used. Results reveal that M&A intentions significantly impact the Pre-M&A planning phase. The Pre-M&A planning phase significantly impacts the Post-M&A planning phase and Post-M&A performance. The Post-M&A planning phase significantly impacts the Post-M&A performance. The current study has various implications. It is one of the pioneering initiatives to develop and examine an integrated framework to encourage interdisciplinary research from an emerging market context. It highlights the need for an integrative approach to advance our knowledge about the intertwined dynamic relationships and M&A performance through cross-disciplinary collaboration. It claims that a multi-factor, multi-phasic, and multidisciplinary approach is essential to overcome methodological hindrances and understand the intricacies of the M&A phenomenon. The significance of intentions in structuring the Pre-M&A planning phase is also analyzed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Achim, S. A. (2015). Recent trends in the study of mergers and acquisitions. Ekonomie a Management, 18(1), 123–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aggarwal-Gupta, M., Kumar, R., & Upadhyayula, R. S. (2012). Success of a merger or acquisition-a consideration of influencing factors. International Journal of Management Practice, 5(3), 270–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahammad, M. F., & Glaister, K. W. (2013). The pre-acquisition evaluation of target firms and cross border acquisition performance. International Business Review, 22(5), 894–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aljadani, A., & Toumi, H. (2019). Causal effect of mergers and acquisitions on EU bank productivity. Journal of Economic Structures, 8, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amel, D., Barnes, C., Panetta, F., & Salleo, C. (2004). Consolidation and efficiency in the financial sector: A review of the international evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance, 28(10), 2493–2519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aminova, E. (2016). Forecasting potential innovation activities in high-tech industries triggered by merger and acquisition deals: a framework of analysis. European journal of futures research, 4(1), 1–18.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Angwin, D. N., Paroutis, S., & Connell, R. (2015). Why good things Don’t happen: The micro-foundations of routines in the M&A process. Journal of Business Research, 68(6), 1367–1381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angwin, D. N., Mellahi, K., Gomes, E., & Peter, E. (2016). How communication approaches impact mergers and acquisitions outcomes. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(20), 2370–2397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum, S. H., Gandell, J., Shapiro, B. T., Belisle, P., & Hoeven, E. (2000). Anatomy of a merger: Behavior of organizational factors and processes throughout the pre-during-post-stages (part 2). Management Decision, 38(10), 674–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, M., & Parker, D. (2009). Stock market perceptions of the motives for mergers in cases reviewed by the UK competition authorities: An empirical analysis. Managerial and Decision Economics, 30(4), 211–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babajide, A. A., Olokoyo, F. O., & Taiwo, J. N. (2016). Evaluation of effects of banking consolidation on small business finance in Nigeria. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Business Information Management Association Conference, 13–14 May, 2014 (pp. 12522–12540). International Business Information Management Association (IBIMA).

  • Bari, M. W., Fanchen, M., & Baloch, M. A. (2016). Management practices and performance of mergers and acquisitions in Pakistan: Mediating role of psychological contract. SpringerPlus, 5, 1–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, F., & Matzler, K. (2014). Antecedents of M&A success: The role of strategic complementarity, cultural fit, and degree and speed of integration. Strategic management journal, 35(2), 269–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, F., Matzler, K., & Wolf, S. (2016). M&A and innovation: The role of integration and cultural differences—A central European targets perspective. International Business Review, 25(1), 76–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, D. R. (2005). Resource fit in M&A transactions: Conceptualization, operationalization and impact on success based on the resource-based view. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Völckner, F. (2015). How collinearity affects mixture regression results. Marketing Letters, 26(4), 643–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. N., Demsetz, R. S., & Strahan, P. E. (1999). The consolidation of the financial services industry: Causes, consequences, and implications for the future. Journal of Banking & Finance, 23(2–4), 135–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertoncelj, A., & Kovač, D. (2007). An integrated approach for a higher success rate in mergers and acquisitions. Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci, časopis za ekonomsku teoriju i praksu-Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, Journal of Economics and Business, 25(1), 167–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J., Bresman, H., & Håkanson, L. (2000). Managing the post-acquisition integration process: How the human integration and task integration processes interact to foster value creation. Journal of management studies, 37(3), 395–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodner, J., & Capron, L. (2018). Post-merger integration. Journal of Organization Design, 7, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, R. F. (2004). Applied mergers and acquisitions. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

  • Caiazza, R., Shimizu, K., & Yoshikawa, T. (2017). Cross-border M&A: Challenges and opportunities in global business environment. Thunderbird International Business Review, 59(2), 147–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calipha, R., Tarba, S., & Brock, D. (2010). Mergers and acquisitions: A review of phases, motives, and success factors. Advances in Mergers and Acquisitions, 9, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, S., & Schoenberg, R. (2006). Thirty years of mergers and acquisitions research: Recent advances and future opportunities. British Journal of Management, 17(S1), S1–S5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, A. W., & Cheung, H. Y. (2016). Extraversion, individualism and M&A activities. International Business Review, 25(1), 356–369.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z., Kale, P., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2018). Geographic overlap and acquisition pairing. Strategic Management Journal, 39(2), 329–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M., Alton, R., Rising, C., & Waldeck, A. (2011). The new M&A playbook. Harvard Business Review, 89(3), 48–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christofi, M., Vrontis, D., Thrassou, A., & Shams, S. R. (2019). Triggering technological innovation through cross-border mergers and acquisitions: A micro-foundational perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 148–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cording, M., Christmann, P., & King, D. R. (2008). Reducing causal ambiguity in acquisition integration: Intermediate goals as mediators of integration decisions and acquisition performance. Academy of Management Journal, 51(4), 744–767.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2004). Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2), 173–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dao, M. A., & Bauer, F. (2021). Human integration following M&A: Synthesizing different M&A research streams. Human Resource Management Review, 31(3), 100746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dash, G., & Paul, J. (2021). CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 121092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denison, D. R. (1996). What is the difference between organizational culture and organizational climate? A native’s point of view on a decade of paradigm wars. Academy of Management Review, 21(3), 619–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denison, D. R., Adkins, B., & Guidroz, A. M. (2011). Managing cultural integration in cross-border mergers and acquisitions. In Advances in global leadership (Vol. 6, pp. 95–115). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

  • DePamphilis, D. (2010). Mergers and acquisitions basics: Negotiation and deal structuring. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeYoung, R., Evanoff, D. D., & Molyneux, P. (2009). Mergers and acquisitions of financial institutions: A review of the post-2000 literature. Journal of Financial Services Research, 36(2), 87–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, M. J. (2005). The determinants and evaluation of merger success. Business Horizons, 48(1), 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faulkner, D., Teerikangas, S., & Joseph, R. J. (Eds.). (2012). The handbook of mergers and acquisitions. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelos, R. G., & Roldós, J. (2004). Consolidation and market structure in emerging market banking systems. Emerging markets review, 5(1), 39–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghauri, P. N., & Park, B. I. (2012). The impact of turbulent events on knowledge acquisition. Management International Review, 52(2), 293–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes, E. (2020). Mergers, acquisitions, and strategic alliances as collaborative methods of strategic development and change. Strategic Change, 29(2), 145–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes, E., Angwin, D. N., Weber, Y., & Yedidia Tarba, S. (2013). Critical success factors through the mergers and acquisitions process: Revealing pre-and post-M&A connections for improved performance. Thunderbird International Business Review, 55(1), 13–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes, E., Alam, S., Tarba, S. Y., & Vendrell-Herrero, F. (2020). A 27-year review of mergers and acquisitions research in 27 leading management journals. Strategic Change, 29(2), 179–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goold, M., Campbell, A., & Alexander, M. (1994). Corporate level strategy: Creating value in the multibusiness company. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R., Hinings, C. R., & Brown, J. (1994). Merging professional service firms. Organization Science, 5(2), 239–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Planning, 46(1–2), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Jr., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, D., & Rouse, T. (2007). Human due diligence. Harvard Business Review, 85(4), 124.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haspeslagh, P. C., & Jemison, D. B. (1991). Managing acquisitions: Creating value through corporate renewal (p. 416). Free Press, Vol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, I., Chidlow, A., & Romero-Martínez, A. M. (2016). Selection, valuation and performance assessment: Are these truly inter-linked within the M&A transactions? International Business Review, 25(1), 255–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, I., Ghauri, P. N., & Mayrhofer, U. (2018). Merger and acquisition motives and outcome assessment. Thunderbird International Business Review, 60(4), 709–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, M. L. (2002). When do firms learn from their acquisition experience? Evidence from 1990 to 1995. Strategic Management Journal, 23(1), 21–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heeley, M. B., King, D. R., & Covin, J. G. (2006). Effects of firm R&D investment and environment on acquisition likelihood. Journal of Management Studies, 43(7), 1513–1535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modelling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernando, I., Nieto, M. J., & Wall, L. D. (2009). Determinants of domestic and cross-border bank acquisitions in the European Union. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(6), 1022–1032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homburg, C., & Bucerius, M. (2006). Is speed of integration really a success factor of mergers and acquisitions? An analysis of the role of internal and external relatedness. Strategic Management Journal, 27(4), 347–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M. A., Harrison, J. S., & Ireland, R. D. (2001). Mergers & acquisitions: A guide to creating value for stakeholders. Oxford University Press.

  • IMAA Institute for Mergers, Acquisitions and Alliances (2021). M&A Statistics. Available at: https://imaa-institute.org/mergers-and-acquisitions-statistics/ (accessed 15 January, 2023)

  • Indian Brand Equity Foundation (2023). Banking Industry Report. Available at: https://www.ibef.org/industry/banking-india (accessed 18 August, 2023)

  • Inkpen, A. C., Sundaram, A. K., & Rockwood, K. (2000). Cross-border acquisitions of US technology assets. California Management Review, 42(3), 50–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasrotia, S. S., & Agarwal, T. (2021). Consolidation of Indian PSU banks and the way forward. Journal of Public Affairs, 21(1), 2133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalra, N., Gupta, S., & Bagga, R. (2013). A wave of mergers and acquisitions: Are Indian banks going up a blind alley? Global Business Review, 14(2), 263–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaul, A., & Wu, B. (2016). A capabilities-based perspective on target selection in acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, 37(7), 1220–1239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, D. R., Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., & Covin, J. G. (2004). Meta-analyses of post-acquisition performance: Indications of unidentified moderators. Strategic Management Journal, 25(2), 187–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, D. R., Wang, G., Samimi, M., & Cortes, A. F. (2021). A meta-analytic integration of acquisition performance prediction. Journal of Management Studies, 58(5), 1198–1236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotarba, M. (2018). Impact of digitalization on M&a Transactions in banking. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Poznańskiej. Organizacja i Zarządzanie.

  • Kovela, S., & Skok, W. (2012). Mergers and acquisitions in banking: understanding the IT integration perspective. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(18), 69–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroon, D. P., Noorderhaven, N. G., Corley, K. G., & Vaara, E. (2022). Hard and soft integration: Towards a dynamic model of post-acquisition integration. Journal of Management Studies, 59(5), 1132–1161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, R., & Finkelstein, S. (1999). Integrating strategic, organizational, and human resource perspectives on mergers and acquisitions: A case survey of synergy realization. Organization Science, 10(1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. H., Mauer, D. C., & Xu, E. Q. (2018). Human capital relatedness and mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Financial Economics, 129(1), 111–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, M. L., & Mirvis, P. H. (2001). Making mergers and acquisitions work: Strategic and psychological preparation. Academy of Management Perspectives, 15(2), 80–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, M. L., & Mirvis, P. H. (2011). Merge ahead: A research agenda to increase merger and acquisition success. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26(2), 161–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meglio, O., & Risberg, A. (2010). Mergers and acquisitions—Time for a methodological rejuvenation of the field? Scandinavian Journal of Management, 26(1), 87–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Migliore, L. A. (2011). Relation between big five personality traits and Hofstede’s cultural dimensions: Samples from the USA and India. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 18(1), 38–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mollick, E. (2012). People and process, suits and innovators: The role of individuals in firm performance. Strategic management journal, 33(9), 1001–1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, H. T., Yung, K., & Sun, Q. (2012). Motives for mergers and acquisitions: Ex-post market evidence from the US. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 39(9–10), 1357–1375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, B. C. (1994). Scale in distributed systems. In T. Casavant & M. Singhal (Eds.), Readings in distributed computing systems. (Vol. 68, pp. 463–489). IEEE Computer Society.

  • Papadakis, V. M., & Thanos, I. C. (2010). Measuring the performance of acquisitions: An empirical investigation using multiple criteria. British Journal of Management, 21(4), 859–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porrini, P. (2004). Can a previous alliance between an acquirer and a target affect acquisition performance? Journal of Management, 30(4), 545–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ransbotham, S., & Mitra, S. (2010). Target age and the acquisition of innovation in high-technology industries. Management Science, 56(11), 2076–2093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinartz, W., Haenlein, M., & Henseler, J. (2009). An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26(4), 332–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renneboog, L., & Vansteenkiste, C. (2019). Failure and success in mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Corporate Finance, 58, 650–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter, N. F., Cepeda-Carrion, G., Roldán Salgueiro, J. L., & Ringle, C. M. (2016). European management research using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). European Management Journal, 34(6), 589–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarala, R. M., & Vaara, E. (2010). Cultural differences, convergence, and crossvergence as explanations of knowledge transfer in international acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(8), 1365–1390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Henseler, J., & Hair, J. F. (2014). On the emancipation of PLS-SEM: A commentary on Rigdon (2012). Long Range Planning, 47(3), 154–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, R., & Jackson, S. (2001). HR issues and activities in mergers and acquisitions. European Management Journal, 19(3), 239–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S. (2021). Post-merger, little to cheer for public sector banks. available at: https://www.newindianexpress.com/business/2021/jul/25/post-merger-little-to-cheer-for-public-sector-banks-2334934.html (accessed 14 February 2023)

  • Shimizu, K., Hitt, M. A., Vaidyanath, D., & Pisano, V. (2004). Theoretical foundations of cross-border mergers and acquisitions: A review of current research and recommendations for the future. Journal of International Management, 10(3), 307–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. K., Mendenhall, M., & Weber, Y. (2005). Research on sociocultural integration in mergers and acquisitions. In G. K. Stahl & M. Mendenhall (eds.) Mergers and acquisitions: Managing culture and human resources (pp. 401–411). Stanford University Press.

  • Stahl, G. K., & Voigt, A. (2008). Do cultural differences matter in mergers and acquisitions? A tentative model and examination. Organization Science, 19(1), 160–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subiyanto, E. (2020). A failure innovation strategy of acquisition during excess capacity: financial approach based on case study at the state-owned cement holding PT Semen Indonesia (Persero) Tbk. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 9(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Vaara, E. (2003). Post-acquisition integration as sensemaking: Glimpses of ambiguity, confusion, hypocrisy, and politicization. Journal of Management Studies, 40(4), 859–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wangerin, D. (2019). M&A due diligence, post-acquisition performance, and financial reporting for business combinations. Contemporary Accounting Research, 36(4), 2344–2378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Y. (2011). Guest Editor’s introduction: Managing mergers and acquisitions implementation and integration. International Studies of Management & Organization, 41(3), 3–8.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Y., Yedidia Tarba, S., & Reichel, A. (2009). International mergers and acquisitions performance revisited – The role of cultural distance and post. In C. L. Cooper & S. Finkelstein (Ed.), Advances in Mergers and Acquisitions (Advances in Mergers and Acquisitions, Vol. 8, pp. 1–17). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

  • Weber, Y., Tarba, S. Y., & Rozen-Bachar, Z. (2011a). Mergers and acquisitions performance paradox: The mediating role of integration approach. European Journal of International Management, 5, 373–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Y., Teerikangas, S., Rouzies, A., & Tarba, S. Y. (2011b). Cross cultural management in mergers and acquisitions. European Journal of International Management, 5, 319–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, X., Pavićević, S., Keil, T., & Laamanen, T. (2020). The pre-deal phase of mergers and acquisitions: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 46(6), 843–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C. W., & Reuer, J. J. (2021). Acquirers’ reception of signals in M&A markets: Effects of acquirer experiences on target selection. Journal of Management Studies, 58(5), 1237–1266.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, M., & Peng, Z. (2020). Stock mispricing differentiate the motives for mergers and acquisitions: Based on the post-acquisition market evidence from china. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202002.0355.v2

  • Zhang, J., Ahammad, M. F., Tarba, S., Cooper, C. L., Glaister, K. W., & Wang, J. (2015). The effect of leadership style on talent retention during merger and acquisition integration: Evidence from China. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(7), 1021–1050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the management personnel of the Indian banking industry who contributed to this study and gave their valued contributions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gurkirandeep Kaur.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaur, G., Sharma, R.K. Developing the Framework for Mergers and Acquisitions Success: Evidence from the Indian Banking Sector. J Knowl Econ (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-01746-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-01746-x

Keywords

Navigation