Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Unraveling the Institutional Logic in China: an Examination of the Institutional Logic Behind Separation of Ownership, Contract Rights, and Operational Rights

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The separation of ownership, contract rights, and operation rights within China’s land rights system marks a pivotal juncture in the nation’s agricultural and rural development. This research paper delves into the intricate dimensions of this transformation, emphasizing policy interpretations, legal aspects, and challenges in policy implementation. The study underscores the gap between policy intent and practical implementation, highlighting the complexities inherent in this separation of rights. Grounded in the principles of new institutional economics, the paper explores two central themes: the multifaceted nature of agricultural land, which serves both economic and social roles, and the historical evolution of the “disposition separately of three rights” concept aimed at optimizing land resource allocation. Normative standards rooted in new institutional economics provide a framework to evaluate the current land rights system, revealing issues in ownership, contract, and operation rights. The findings carry significant theoretical implications, shedding light on the complexities of land rights transformation and the growing importance of agricultural land's economic function. From a policy perspective, the research emphasizes the need for a balanced system that optimizes land use, supports collective and individual interests, and fosters economic growth in rural areas while protecting farmers’ rights. These insights provide valuable guidance for managers and policymakers involved in crafting and implementing land reform policies in China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Adamowicz, M., & Zwolińska-Ligaj, M. (2020). The ‘smart village’ as a way to achieve sustainable development in rural areas of Poland. Sustainability, 12(16), 6503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahani, S., & Dadashpoor, H. (2021). Urban growth containment policies for the guidance and control of peri-urbanization: A review and proposed framework. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23, 14215–14244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alban Singirankabo, U., & Willem Ertsen, M. (2020). Relations between land tenure security and agricultural productivity: Exploring the effect of land registration. Land, 9(5), 138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrosino, A., Cedrini, M., & Davis, J. B. (2021). The unity of science and the disunity of economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 45(4), 631–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antoszewski, M. (2020). Macroeconomic, sectoral and fiscal consequences of decreasing energy intensity in the Polish economy. Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics303(3), 53–81.

  • Antwi-Agyei, P., & Stringer, L. C. (2021). Improving the effectiveness of agricultural extension services in supporting farmers to adapt to climate change: Insights from northeastern Ghana. Climate Risk Management, 32, 100304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azadi, H. (2020). Monitoring land governance: Understanding roots and shoots. Land Use Policy, 94, 104530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barzel, Y., & Allen, D. W. (2023). Economic analysis of property rights. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Briassoulis, H. (2019). Combating land degradation and desertification: The land-use planning quandary. Land, 8(2), 27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. G. (2023). Laws of the Land: Fengshui and the state in Qing Dynasty China. Princeton University Press.

  • Chen, H. (2022). Linking institutional function with form: Distributional dynamics, disequilibrium, and rural land shareholding in China. Land Use Policy, 120, 106283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Ming, W., & Xiaolong Liu, Z. (2014). Tenure awareness, local knowledge and land right confirmation practice: An empirical study on the confirmation of rural land contracting and management rights in hilly and mountainous areas of Guizhou Province. Economic Issues in Agriculture, 02, 65–74. https://doi.org/10.13246/j.cnki.iae.2014.02.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chenyang, L. (2023). Property theory, land use law, and climate change (Doctoral dissertation).

  • Cong, S. (2022). The impact of agricultural land rights policy on the pure technical efficiency of farmers’ agricultural production: Evidence from the largest wheat planting environment in China. Journal of Environmental and Public Health2022.

  • Dobeson, A., & Kohl, S. (2023). The moral economy of land: From land reform to ownership society, 1880–2018. Socio-Economic Review, mwad048.

  • Ellemers, N. (2021). Science as collaborative knowledge generation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, B. C., & Liu, H. (2022). What do we need to do? The sustainable development of Chinese marine fisheries: A legal perspective. Fishes, 8(1), 16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriele, A. (2020). Enterprises, industry and innovation in the People’s Republic of China. Questioning Socialism from Deng to the Trade and Tech War. Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

  • Geng, L., Yan, S., Lu, Q., Liang, X., Li, Y., & Xue, Y. (2023). A rural land share cooperative system for alleviating the small, scattered, and weak dilemma in agricultural development: The cases of Tangyue, Zhouchong, and Chongzhou. Agriculture, 13(9), 1675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giller, K. E., Delaune, T., Silva, J. V., van Wijk, M., Hammond, J., Descheemaeker, K., ... & Andersson, J. A. (2021). Small farms and development in sub-Saharan Africa: Farming for food, for income or for lack of better options?. Food Security13(6), 1431–1454.

  • Gong, Y. (2021). The policy effect of the national modern agricultural demonstration zones on the growth of local agricultural economy—Empirical analysis based on county data in Sichuan Province. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 253, p. 03042). EDP Sciences.

  • Guo, J., Jin, L., & Yang, Y. (2022). China’s urban transformation in the shadow of regulatory centralism: The revitalization of old industrial cities as a Case. Land, 11(11), 1945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, Y., & Liu, Y. (2021). Poverty alleviation through land assetization and its implications for rural revitalization in China. Land Use Policy, 105, 105418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, B., Jin, X., Wang, J., Yin, Y., Liu, C., Sun, R., & Zhou, Y. (2022). Identifying inefficient urban land redevelopment potential for evidence-based decision making in China. Habitat International, 128, 102661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatab, A. A., Cavinato, M. E. R., Lindemer, A., & Lagerkvist, C. J. (2019). Urban sprawl, food security and agricultural systems in developing countries: A systematic review of the literature. Cities, 94, 129–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, L. (2019). Microfinance assemblages in China: Production, maintenance, transformation and deterioration. Columbia University.

  • Head, B. W. (2022). Wicked problems in public policy: Understanding and responding to complex challenges (p. 176). Springer Nature.

  • Hernández-Alemán, A., Cruz-Pérez, N., & Santamarta, J. C. (2022). Rethinking legal criteria for assessing compensation for rural land expropriation: Towards a European Institutional Framework. Land, 11(2), 194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann-Pillath, C. (2019). Power, ideas and culture in the ‘longue durée’ of institutional evolution: Theory and application on the revolutions of property rights in Russia. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 29(5), 1483–1506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, Y. (2019). The logic of four decades of economic reform and major breakthroughs in political economy in China. China Political Economy, 2(1), 2–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, Z., & Sun, Y. (2020). Power, capital, and the poverty of farmers’ land rights in China. Land Use Policy, 92, 104471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inoua, S. M., & Smith, V. L. (2022). Economics of markets: Neoclassical theory, experiments, and theory of classical price discovery. Springer Nature.

  • Jarvela, J. (2022). The politics of responsibility: States, rights and dialogue in mining governance (Doctoral dissertation, City, University of London).

  • Ji, X., Liu, S., Yan, J., & Li, Y. (2021). Does security of land operational rights matter for the improvement of agricultural production efficiency under the collective ownership in China? China & World Economy, 29(1), 87–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia, K., Qiao, W., Chai, Y., Feng, T., Wang, Y., & Ge, D. (2020). Spatial distribution characteristics of rural settlements under diversified rural production functions: A case of Taizhou. China. Habitat International, 102, 102201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, H., & Sirena, P. (Eds.). (2023). The making of the Chinese civil code: Promises and persistent problems. Cambridge University Press.

  • Jiang, M., Paudel, K. P., Mi, Y., & Li, J. (2023). Farmland transfer and rural financial structure: Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 90, 102897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kan, K. (2021). Creating land markets for rural revitalization: Land transfer, property rights and gentrification in China. Journal of Rural Studies, 81, 68–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le, T. N., Bregt, A. K., van Halsema, G. E., Hellegers, P. J., & Ngo, T. T. T. (2023). Multi-scale drivers of land-use changes at farm level I: Conceptual framework and application in the highly flooded zone of the Vietnamese Mekong Delta. Land, 12(7), 1273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, F. Z. (2010). “Counter-rights” through “empty rights”: The nature of collective land ownership and its transformation. Legal System and Social Development, (05), 16–28.

  • Li, S., Shao, Y., Hong, M., Zhu, C., Dong, B., Li, Y., ... & Zhang, J. (2023). Impact mechanisms of urbanization processes on supply-demand matches of cultivated land multifunction in rapid urbanization areas. Habitat International131, 102726.

  • Li, K. (2020). Land dispossession and women’s rights contention in rural China. China Law and Society Review, 5(1), 33–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, P., Tian, Y., Wu, J., & Xu, W. (2021). The Great Western Development policy: How it affected grain crop production, land use and rural poverty in Western China. China Agricultural Economic Review, 13(2), 319–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, Y., Wu, G., & Huang, J. (2023). The impact of rural e-commerce environment development on orchard expansion from the perspective of tele-coupling: Case of Pinghe County in Southeast China.

  • Liao, W., Zeng, F., & Chanieabate, M. (2022). Mechanization of small-scale agriculture in China: Lessons for enhancing smallholder access to agricultural machinery. Sustainability, 14(13), 7964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., Jin, X., Xu, W., Sun, R., Han, B., Yang, X., ... & Zhou, Y. (2019). Influential factors and classification of cultivated land fragmentation, and implications for future land consolidation: A case study of Jiangsu Province in eastern China. Land Use Policy88, 104185.

  • Liu, P., Han, A., & Ravenscroft, N. (2023). Improving farming practice through localized land tenure reform: A study of the ‘Three Rights Separation Reform’ implemented in a Shanghai suburb, China. Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography, 1–14.

  • Liu, Y., Zang, Y., & Yang, Y. (2020). China’s rural revitalization and development: Theory, technology and management. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 30, 1923–1942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, H., Kong, X., Hu, S., & Li, Y. (2021). Land use transitions under rapid urbanization: A perspective from developing China. Land, 10(9), 935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, X., Peng, W., Huang, X., Fu, Q., & Zhang, Q. (2020). Homestead management in China from the ‘separation of two rights’ to the ‘separation of three rights’: Visualization and analysis of hot topics and trends by mapping knowledge domains of academic papers in China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). Land Use Policy, 97, 104670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meramveliotakis, G. (2020). Surveying the methodological and analytical foundations of the new institutional economics: A critical comparison with neoclassical and (old) institutional economics. Economic and Business Review, 22(3), 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murtazashvili, J. B., & Murtazashvili, I. (2021). Land, the state, and war: Property institutions and political order in Afghanistan. Cambridge University Press.

  • Olawuyi, D. (2020). Sustainable development and the water-energy-food nexus: Legal challenges and emerging solutions. Environmental Science & Policy, 103, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, P., & Zhou, L. (2021). Reforming land mortgages in rural China and the incentives for application of environment-friendly formula fertilizers on farm. Agricultural Finance Review, 81(5), 617–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qu, X. (2021). Compulsory land acquisition reform in China: A comparative analysis with the United States and Australia (Doctoral dissertation, UNSW Sydney).

  • Ran, H., & Yuan, Z. (2019). Issues in land circulation through contractual land management systems in Rural China. Rule of Law in China: A Ten-Year Review, 2002–2012, 209–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, S., Wilmsen, B., Han, X., Wang, Z. J. H., Duan, Y., He, J., ... & Wong, C. (2021). Scaling up agriculture? The dynamics of land transfer in inland China. World Development146, 105563.

  • Roth, D., Boelens, R., & Zwarteveen, M. (2015). Property, legal pluralism, and water rights: The critical analysis of water governance and the politics of recognizing ‘local’ rights. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 47(3), 456–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao, Z., Xu, J., Chung, C. K. L., Spit, T., & Wu, Q. (2020). The state as both regulator and player: The politics of transfer of development rights in China. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 44(1), 38–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, C., & Zhang, Z. (2021). Institutional diversity of transferring land development rights in China—Cases from Zhejiang, Hubei, and Sichuan. Sustainability, 13(23), 13402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sine, W. D., Cordero, A. M., & Coles, R. S. (2022). Entrepreneurship through a unified sociological neoinstitutional lens. Organization Science, 33(4), 1675–1699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speckbacher, G. (2023). Values, performance, or both? How values-focused work can benefit from results-based management. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 08997640231184810.

  • Tao, S., Chen, S., & Pan, Z. (2019). Current status, challenges, and policy suggestions for coalbed methane industry development in China: A review. Energy Science & Engineering, 7(4), 1059–1074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirumala, R. D., & Tiwari, P. (2022). Importance of land in SDG policy instruments: A study of ASEAN developing countries. Land, 11(2), 218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Aaken, A., & Kurtz, J. (2019). Beyond rational choice: International trade law and the behavioral political economy of protectionism. Journal of International Economic Law, 22(4), 601–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wabelo, T. S. (2020). Legal and institutional frameworks regulating rural land governance in Ethiopia: Towards a comparative analysis on the best practices of other African countries. Beijing Law Review, 11, 64.

  • Wang, J., Xu, Y., Zou, L., & Wang, Y. (2021a). Does culture affect farmer willingness to transfer rural land? Evidence from Southern Fujian. China. Land, 10(6), 594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S., Yang, C., & Li, Z. (2021b). Spatio-temporal evolution characteristics and spatial interaction spillover effects of new-urbanization and green land utilization efficiency. Land, 10(10), 1105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whiting, S. H. (2023). Authoritarian legality and state capitalism in China. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 19, 357–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, X., Zhang, A., Wen, L., & Bin, P. (2019). How horizontal integration affects transaction costs of rural collective construction land market? An empirical analysis in Nanhai District, Guangdong Province, China. Land Use Policy, 82, 138–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Y., Lyu, J., Xue, Y., & Liu, H. (2022). Intentions of farmers to renew productive agricultural service contracts using the theory of planned behavior: An empirical study in Northeastern China. Agriculture, 12(9), 1471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, J., Yang, Y., & Xia, F. (2021). Subjective land ownership and the endowment effect in land markets: A case study of the farmland ‘three rights separation’ reform in China. Land Use Policy, 101, 105137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C., & Qian, Z. (2021). ‘Resettlement with Chinese characteristics’: The distinctive political-economic context,(in) voluntary urbanites, and three types of mismatch. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 13(3), 496–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C., Zeng, W., & Yang, X. (2020). Coupling coordination evaluation and sustainable development pattern of geo-ecological environment and urbanization in Chongqing municipality. China. Sustainable Cities and Society, 61, 102271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • You, H., Wu, S., Wu, X., Guo, X., & Song, Y. (2021). The underlying influencing factors of farmland transfer in urbanizing China: Implications for sustainable land use goals. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23, 8722–8745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhan, S. (2019). The land question in China: Agrarian capitalism, industrious revolution, and East Asian development. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, D., Wang, W., Zhou, W., Zhang, X., & Zuo, J. (2020). The effect on poverty alleviation and income increase of rural land consolidation in different models: A China study. Land Use Policy, 99, 104989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., & Li, H. (2020). The evolving process of the land urbanization bubble: Evidence from Hangzhou. China. Cities, 102, 102724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Long, H., Tu, S., Ge, D., Ma, L., & Wang, L. (2019). Spatial identification of land use functions and their tradeoffs/synergies in China: Implications for sustainable land management. Ecological Indicators, 107, 105550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Q., Bao, H. X., & Zhang, Z. (2021). Off-farm employment and agricultural land use efficiency in China. Land Use Policy, 101, 105097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, C., Liang, Y., & Fuller, A. (2021). Tracing agricultural land transfer in China: Some legal and policy issues. Land, 10(1), 58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Y., Li, X., & Liu, Y. (2020). Rural land system reforms in China: History, issues, measures and prospects. Land Use Policy, 91, 104330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zikos, D. (2020). Revisiting the role of institutions in transformative contexts: Institutional change and conflicts. Sustainability, 12(21), 9036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xinyuan He.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Y., He, X. Unraveling the Institutional Logic in China: an Examination of the Institutional Logic Behind Separation of Ownership, Contract Rights, and Operational Rights. J Knowl Econ (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01670-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01670-6

Keywords

Navigation