Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Systematic Literature Review on Lean, Industry 4.0, and Digital Factory

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Today, the growing demand for personalised products is highly challenging for enterprises in terms of productivity and efficiency. At this point, the integration of Industry 4.0 into lean production practices is a very significant development in order to increase companies’ productivity and reduce their wastage. Following the emergence of Industry 4.0, the availability of new technologies draws the attention of companies in order to sustain the applicability of lean production practices in business processes. While the lean production approach aims to bring insight into simplicity and plainness by eliminating operational complexity, Industry 4.0 is to incorporate technologies that seek to facilitate the lives of enterprises and people. While Industry 4.0 and its lean applications attract more and more interest in the developing technology, we have found that number of the studies in this field is limited and there is a considerable shortage in the literature. Therefore, this article is one of the few studies that address the lean philosophy, digital factory, and Industry 4.0 application together and systematically review the literature. In the present study, we tried to provide an overview of the integration of lean and Industry 4.0 and the establishment of digital factories, the challenges and barriers experienced therein, and what the future holds for these practices, which we have noticed to lack in the literature. Accordingly, academic studies were reviewed starting from 1990, when lean thinking came to life, and as a result, 29 articles were identified by conducting a systematic literature review between 2018 and 2022 when the popularity of Industry 4.0 and lean practices has increased, and an inference was reached by determining the topics and contents of the articles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • Adams, R., Jeanrenaud, S., Bessant, J., Denyer, D., & Overy, P. (2016). Sustainability-oriented innovation: A systematic review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(2), 180–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldington, D., Small, C., Edwards, D., Ralph, J., Woods, P., Jagdish, S., & Moore, R. (2014). A survey of post-amputation pains in serving military personnel. BMJ Military Health, 160(1), 38–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agostinho, V., Jr., & Baldo, C. R. (2021). Assessment of the impact of Industry 4.0 on the skills of lean professionals. Procedia Cirp, 96, 225–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amrani, A. Z., Urquia, I., & Vallespir, B. (2022). Industry 4.0 technologies and lean production combination: A strategic methodology based on links quantification. International Journal of Technology, Innovation and Management (IJTIM), 2(2).

  • Bamber, L., & Dale, B. G. (2000). Lean production: A study of application in a traditional manufacturing environment. Production Planning & Control, 11(3), 291–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks, J., Carson, J. S., II., Nelson, B. L., & Nicol, D. M. (2014). Discrete-event simulation (5th ed.). Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bednarek, M., & Luna, L. F. N. (2008). The selected problems of lean manufacturing implementation in Mexican SMEs. In Lean Business Systems and Beyond (pp. 239–247). Springer US.

  • Bhamu, J., & Singh Sangwan, K. (2014). Lean manufacturing: Literature review and research issues. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 34(7), 876–940. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-08-2012-0315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhasin, S. (2012). An appropriate change strategy for lean success. Management Decision, 50(3), 439–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bittencourt, V. L., Alves, A. C., & Leão, C. P. (2021). Industry 4.0 triggered by lean thinking: Insights from a systematic literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 59(5), 1496–1510.

  • Buer, S. V., Strandhagen, J. O., & Chan, F. T. S. (2018). The link between Industry 4.0 and lean manufacturing: Mapping current research and establishing a research agenda. International Journal of Production Research, 56(8), 2924–2940. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1442945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E. G., & Morawska-Jancelewicz, J. (2022). The futures of Europe: Society 5.0 and Industry 5.0 as driving forces of future universities. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13, 3445–3471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00854-2

  • Chakroun, A., Zribi, H., Hani, Y., Elmhamedi, A., & Masmoudi, F. (2022). Facility layout design through integration of lean manufacturing in Industry 4.0 context. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 55(10), 798–803.

  • Ciano, M. P., Pozzi, R., Rossi, T., & Strozzi, F. (2019). How IJPR has addressed ‘lean’: A literature review using bibliometric tools. International Journal of Production Research, in Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1566667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Giovanni, P., & Cariola, A. (2021). Process innovation through Industry 4.0 technologies, lean practices and green supply chains. Research in Transportation Economics, 90, 100869.

  • Dillinger, F., Bernhard, O., & Reinhart, G. (2022c). Competence requirements in manufacturing companies in the context of lean 4.0. Procedia CIRP, 106, 58–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillinger, F., Tropschuh, B., Dervis, M. Y., & Reinhart, G. (2022b). A systematic approach to identify the interdependencies of lean production and Industry 4.0 elements. Procedia CIRP, 112, 85–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillinger, F., Bergermeier, J., & Reinhart, G. (2022a). Implications of Lean 4.0 methods on relevant target dimensions: Time, cost, quality, employee involvement, and flexibility. Procedia CIRP, 107, 202–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dossou, P. E., Torregrossa, P., & Martinez, T. (2022). Industry 4.0 concepts and lean manufacturing implementation for optimizing a company logistics flows. Procedia Computer Science, 200, 358–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enke, J., Glass, R., Kreß, A., Hambach, J., Tisch, M., & Metternich, J. (2018). Industrie 4.0–Competencies for a modern production system: A curriculum for Learning Factories. Procedia Manufacturing, 23, 267–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaddi, M., Garbellini, N., & Garibaldo, F. (2017). Industry 4.0 and its consequences for work and labour. Bologna: Fondazione Claudio Sabattini.

  • Gallo, T., Cagnetti, C., Silvestri, C., & Ruggieri, A. (2021). Industry 4.0 tools in lean production: A systematic literature review. Procedia Computer Science, 180, 394–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goienetxea Uriarte, A., Urenda Moris, M., Ng, A. H. C., & Oscarsson, J. (2016). “Lean, simulation and optimization: A win-win combination.” Winter simulation conference, WSC 2015, Huntington Beach, CA.

  • Grube, D., Malik, A. A., & Bilberg, A. (2019). SMEs can touch Industry 4.0 in the smart learning factory. Procedia Manufacturing, 31, 219–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennig, M., Reisinger, G., Trautner, T., Hold, P., Gerhard, D., & Mazak, A. (2019). TU Wien pilot factory industry 4.0. Procedia Manufacturing, 31, 200–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IMTR. (2000). Integrated manufacturing technology roadmapping project: Modeling & simulation. Integrated Manufacturing Technology Initiative Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, S., Lechevalier, D., Woo, J., & ve Shin, S. J. (2016). “Sanal Fabrika Prototipine Doğru.” Kış simülasyon konferansı, WSC 2015 Huntington Sahili, CA.

  • Kolberg, D., & Zühlke, D. (2015). Lean automation enabled by industry 4.0 technologies. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 48(3), 1870–1875.

  • Langlotz, P., & Aurich, J. C. (2021). Causal and temporal relationships within the combination of lean production systems and Industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP, 96, 236–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liker, J. K. (2004). The Toyota way: 14 management principles from the world’s greatest manufacturer. McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, B., Wu, W., & Song, M. (2019). Industry 4.0: Driving factors and impacts on firm’s performance: An empirical study on China’s manufacturing industry. Annals of Operations Research, 1–21.

  • Lodgaard, E., Torvatn, H., & Sørumsbrenden, J. (2022). Future competence at shopfloor in the era of Industry 4.0-A case study in Norwegian industry. Procedia CIRP, 107, 961–965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marinelli, M., Deshmukh, A. A., Janardhanan, M., & Nielsen, I. (2021). Lean manufacturing and industry 4.0 combinative application: Practices and perceived benefits. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 54(1), 288–293.

  • Marmier, F., Deniaud, I., Rasovska, I., & Michalak, J. L. (2021). Towards a proactive vision of the training for the 4.0 Industry: From the required skills diagnostic to the training of employees. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 54(1), 1144–1149.

  • McKie, M. G., Jones, R., Miles, J., & Jones, I. R. (2021). Improving lean manufacturing systems and tools engagement through the utilisation of Industry 4.0, improved communication and a people recognition methodology in a UK engine manufacturing centre. Procedia Manufacturing, 55, 371–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meissner, A., Müller, M., Hermann, A., & Metternich, J. (2018). Digitalization as a catalyst for lean production: A learning factory approach for digital shop floor management. Procedia Manufacturing, 23, 81–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mofolasayo, A., Young, S., Martinez, P., & Ahmad, R. (2022). How to adapt lean practices in SMEs to support Industry 4.0 in manufacturing. Procedia Computer Science, 200, 934–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mrugalska, B., & Wyrwicka, M. K. (2017). Towards lean production in industry 4.0. Procedia Engineering, 182, 466–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naciri, L., Mouhib, Z., Gallab, M., Nali, M., Abbou, R., & Kebe, A. (2022). Lean and Industry 4.0: A leading harmony. Procedia Computer Science, 200, 394–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Najwa, E., Bertrand, R., Yassine, M., Fernandes, G., Abdeen, M., & Souad, S. (2022). Lean 4.0 tools and technologies to improve companies’ maturity level: The COVID-19 context. Procedia Computer Science, 196, 207–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Queiroz, M. M., Telles, R., & Bonilla, S. H. (2020). Blockchain and supply chain management integration: A systematic review of the literature. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 25(2), 241–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raweewan, M., & Kojima, F. (2020). Digital lean manufacturing-Collaborative university-industry education in systems design for lean transformation. Procedia Manufacturing, 45, 183–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosin, F., Forget, P., Lamouri, S., & Pellerin, R. (2020). Impacts of Industry 4.0 technologies on lean principles. International Journal of Production Research, 58(6), 1644–1661.

  • Rossini, M., Costa, F., Staudacher, A. P., & Tortorella, G. (2019). Industry 4.0 and lean production: An empirical study. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 52(13), 42–47.

  • Sanders, A., Elangeswaran, C., & Wulfsberg, J. P. (2016). Industry 4.0 implies lean manufacturing: Research activities in Industry 4.0 function as enablers for lean manufacturing. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management (JIEM), 9(3), 811–833.

  • Silvestri, L., Gallo, T., & Silvestri, C. (2022). Which tools are needed to implement lean production in an Industry 4.0 environment? A Literature Review. Procedia Computer Science, 200, 1766–1777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, K., & Sala-i-Martín, X. (2016, April). The global competitiveness report 2013–2014: Full data edition. World Economic Forum.

  • Schumacher, S., Bildstein, A., & Bauernhansl, T. (2020). The impact of the digital transformation on lean production systems. Procedia CIRP, 93, 783–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, R., & Ward, P. T. (2003). Lean manufacturing: Context, practice bundles, and performance. Journal of Operations Management, 21, 129–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(02)00108-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjödin, D. R., Parida, V., Leksell, M., & Petrovic, A. (2018). Smart factory implementation and process innovation: A preliminary maturity model for leveraging digitalization in manufacturing research. Technology Management, 61(5), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2018.1471277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skalli, D., Charkaoui, A., Cherrafi, A., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Antony, J., & Shokri, A. (2022). Industry 4.0 and Lean Six Sigma integration in manufacturing: A literature review, an integrated framework and proposed research perspectives. Quality Management Journal, 1–25.

  • Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wan, P. K., Huang, L., & Holtskog, H. (2020). Blockchain-enabled information sharing within a supply chain: A systematic literature review. IEEE Access, 8, 49645–49656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weyer, S., Meyer, T., Ohmer, M., Gorecky, D., & Zühlke, D. (2016). Future modeling and simulation of CPS-based factories: An example from the automotive industry. Ifac-Papersonline, 49(31), 97–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T., & Roos, D. (1990). The machine that changed the world: Based on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 5-million dollar 5-year study on the future of the auto-mobile. Rawson Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Q., Krikke, H., & Caniëls, M. C. (2017). Integrated supply chain risk management: a systematic review. The International Journal of Logistics Management.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Institute of Science, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey

    Fatih Albayrak

  2. Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Technology, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey

    Oğuz Poyrazoğlu

Authors
  1. Fatih Albayrak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Oğuz Poyrazoğlu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oğuz Poyrazoğlu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Albayrak, F., Poyrazoğlu, O. A Systematic Literature Review on Lean, Industry 4.0, and Digital Factory. J Knowl Econ (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01577-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01577-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation