Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Knowledge Collaboration and Benefits of Standard Implementation of Enterprise in Technology Standard Alliance

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As technical standards are increasingly driving the market development, the competition among enterprises is shifting from the traditional product competition to the technical standard competition. The technology standard alliance is an important organizational form for enterprises to participate in the competition of technology standards. In fact, the process of developing and implementing standards is a process of knowledge collaboration. Does knowledge collaboration in the technology standard alliance have an impact on the benefits of standard implementation? What is the impact mechanism? Based on the comprehensive process of knowledge evolution, this study constructs a theoretical model of knowledge collaboration impacting on benefits of standard implementation and introduces strategic flexibility as the intermediary variable to explore the mechanism inside. As for methodology, 203 valid questionnaires filled by 124 enterprises are collected to acquire primary data, and then SPSS 21.0 and SmartPLS 3.0 are applied to build a PLS structural equation model to verify the path relationship between the variables. The results show that the absorption, integration, application, and innovation of enterprise knowledge have a direct impact on the benefits of standard implementation and verify the mediating effect of strategic flexibility in some certain phases of knowledge collaboration. In order to improve the benefits of standard implementation, enterprises should strengthen knowledge collaboration and accelerate the dissemination and diffusion of knowledge, and the government should optimize the governance of market-led standardization organizations and deepen standardization reform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaker, D. A. (1984). Measuring the information content of television advertising. Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 7(1), 93–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 107-136. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250961

  • Anklam, P. (2002). Knowledge management: the collaboration thread. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 28(6), 8–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansoff, I. H. (1968). Corporate strategy: An analytic approach to business policy for growth and expansion. Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. E. (2005). Mansfield’s missing link: The impact of knowledge spillovers on firm growth. In Essays in Honor of Edwin Mansfield (pp. 271–274). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-25022-0_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bahar, N., Bahri, S., & Zakaria, Z. (2022). Knowledge collaboration among tax professionals through the lens of a community of practice. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(10), 439. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15100439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becerra, M., Lunnan, R., & Huemer, L. (2008). Trustworthiness, risk, and the transfer of tacit and explicit knowledge between alliance partners. Journal of Management Studies, 45(4), 691–713. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00766.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binfang, Q., Mingshun, S., Xinghua, F., & Suli, Z. (2012). The empirical research of ISO methods assessing the standards economic benefits. Standard Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomqvist, K., & Levy, J. (2006). Collaboration capability–a focal concept in knowledge creation and collaborative innovation in networks. International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, 2(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMCP.2006.009645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breetzke, D. (2018). Knowledge exchange in improving strategic flexibility in an inter-organisational strategic alliance (Doctoral dissertation. University of Pretoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brozovic, D. (2018). Strategic flexibility: A review of the literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W., Yang, Z. L., & Zhang, Y. C. (2014). The empirical research on the relationship among network structure and core capability: The mediating role of knowledge sharing and knowledge integration. Management Review, 06, 74–82. https://doi.org/10.14120/j.cnki.cn11-5057/f.2014.06.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., & He, Y. B. (2013). Theoretical model of knowledge collaborative of production, teaching and research. Sci-tech Innovation and Productivity, 10, 10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. J. (2010). Development of a method for ontology-based empirical knowledge representation and reasoning. Decision Support Systems, 50(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2010.02.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. M., Chen, Y. J., Wen, C. C., & Chu, H. C. (2009). Ontology-based knowledge integration for distributed product knowledge service. In Proc. World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science (p. 2179).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu, J. W., & Li, Z. C. (2017). Research on the function framework of network collaborative innovation. Information Studies: Theory & Application, 40(6), 57–62. https://doi.org/10.16353/j.cnki.1000-7490.2017.06.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Boer, M., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (1999). Managing organizational knowledge integration in the emerging multimedia complex. Journal of Management Studies, 36(3), 379–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, Z. G., Liu, Y., & Wu, X. B. (2014). Network embeddedness, organizational learning coordination and strategic flexibility. Science Research Management, 35(12), 112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, Z. P., Feng, B., & Yu, Z. C. (2007). The developing and research prospects for knowledge collaboration. Science of Science and Management of S. & T., 11, 85–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng, B. (2006). Research on knowledge collaboration management problems in network environment (pp. 12–23). Northeastern University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng, X. B., & Li, L. Q. (2015). Can external knowledge search facilitate SMEs synergistic innovative capability? An empirical study of the mediating role of complementary knowledge integration and supplementary knowledge integration. Science of Science and Management of S. & T., 8, 107–119 CNKI:SUN:KXXG.0.2015-08-011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galati, F., & Bigliardi, B. (2019). Redesigning the model of the initiation and evolution of inter-firm knowledge transfer in R&D relationships. Journal of Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-05-2018-0326

  • Gao, S., Guo, Y., Chen, J., & Li, L. (2016). Factors affecting the performance of knowledge collaboration in virtual team based on capital appreciation. Information Technology and Management, 17(2), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-015-0248-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerundino, D., & Weissinger, R. (2011). Economic benefits of standards. International case studies (p. 303). ISO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghaznavi, M., Toulson, P., Perry, M., & Logan, K. (2013). Organizational learning and problem solving through cross-firm networking of professionals. In Proc. 10th Int. Conf. Intellectual Capital, Knowl. Manage. Organiz. Learn (pp. 177–186).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimpe, C., & Sofka, W. (2016). Searching for external knowledge: Are relational and transactional search complementary? In Academy of Management Proceedings (2016, 1, p. 12281). : Academy of Management. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2016.12281abstract

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Großmann, A. M., Filipović, E., & Lazina, L. (2016). The strategic use of patents and standards for new product development knowledge transfer. R&D Management, 46(2), 312–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, H., Li, Y., & Duan, Y. (2007). Entrepreneurial orientation, strategic flexibility and indigenous innovation. Science of Science and Management of S. & T., 01, 73–77 CNKI:SUN:KXXG.0.2007-01-014.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, B., & Feng, P. (2013). Research on collaborative conceptual design based on distributed knowledge resource. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 66(5), 645–662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4355-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, G. P. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2(1), 88–115. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, H., Chen, C., Zhao, S., & Wu, Y. (2020). Evolution of a technology standard alliance based on an echo model developed through complex adaptive system theory. Complexity, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8877424

  • Jiang, H., Sun, S. Y., & Wu, Y. H. (2019). Research on the evolution mechanism of knowledge ecosystem in technical standards alliance:Case of IGRS industry alliance. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 21, 1–9 CNKI:SUN:KJJB.0.2019-21-005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, H., Wang, Z., Gao, S., Chen, K., & Sheng, F. (2022). Enhancing technology innovation performance through alliance capability: The role of standard alliance network and political skill of TMTs. Frontiers in Psychology, 6180.

  • Kale, P., & Singh, H. (2007). Building firm capabilities through learning: The role of the alliance learning process in alliance capability and firm-level alliance success. Strategic Management Journal, 28(10), 981–1000. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383–397. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.3.383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, P. J., Salk, J. E., & Lyles, M. A. (2001). Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 22(12), 1139–1161. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei, H. Z. (2008). Knowledge management-research based on organizational learning system (pp. 33–35). Xi’an Jiaotong University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, S. S., & Prietula, M. J. (2012). How knowledge transfer impacts performance: A multilevel model of benefits and liabilities. Organization Science, 23(6), 1748–1766. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, N. S. (2010). Innovation in cross-national alliance ecosystems. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 11(3), 258–263. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEIM.2010.0319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, B. Z., Luo, X. F., & Zhang, Y. (2014). Study on knowledge production mechanism of enterprise original innovation with industry-university-research cooperative mode—the empirical study based on enterprises in high-tech fields. Management Review, 7, 82–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, D. (2009). Research on knowledge collaboration elements and procedural model of enterprise clusters. Library and Information Service, 53(14), 76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, X. D., Wang, L. Y., Zhang, Z. Y., & Wei, X. G. (2017). Research on the impact of interaction orientation on the product innovative performance of enterprises——the mediating effect of knowledge collaboration. Journal of Industrial Technological & Economics, 01, 124–131 CNKI:SUN:GHZJ.0.2017-01-016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Guo, H., Cooper, S. Y., & Wang, H. (2019). The influencing factors of the technology standard alliance collaborative innovation of emerging industry. Sustainability, 11(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11246930

  • Liu, X. Y., Ding, W. J., & Zhao, X. D. (2016). Firm’s strength of ties within innovation network, absorptive capacity and innovation performance in the Chinese manufacturing industries. Nankai Business Review, 19(1), 30–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Y. Q., Zhao, Y. X., Cui, Y. H., & Wang, X. Y. (2014). Organizational unlearning and innovative performance: the mediating role of strategic flexibility. Science Research Management, 35(3), 58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Conesa, I., Soto-Acosta, P., & Carayannis, E. G. (2017). On the path towards open innovation: Assessing the role of knowledge management capability and environmental dynamism in SMEs. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(3), 553–570. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-09-2016-0403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martini, A., Neirotti, P., & Appio, F. P. (2017). Knowledge searching, integrating and performing: Always a tuned trio for innovation? Long Range Planning, 50(2), 200–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, J. A. (2002). Competitive advantages of the latecomer firm: A resource-based account of industrial catch-up strategies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(4), 467–488. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020586223665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesny, A., & Mailhot, C. (2007). The difficult search for compromises in a Canadian industry/university research partnership. The Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers canadiens de sociologie, 203-226. https://doi.org/10.2307/20460632

  • Mu, W. Q., Hao, S. Y., Ren, X. H., & Shi, H. (2016). Empirical study on inverted U-shape effect of dynamic capabilities. Soft Science, 12, 89–94. https://doi.org/10.13956/j.ss.1001-8409.2016.12.20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngulube, P. (2003). Using the SECI knowledge management model and other tools to communicate and manage tacit indigenous knowledge. Innovation, 27(1), 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, B. B. (2005). The role of knowledge embeddedness in the creation of synergies in strategic alliances. Journal of Business Research, 58(9), 1194–1204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, B. B., & Nielsen, S. (2009). Learning and innovation in international strategic alliances: An empirical test of the role of trust and tacitness. Journal of Management Studies, 46(6), 1031–1056. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00840.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating (p. 304).

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, P. M. (2004). Knowledge acquisition, knowledge loss, and satisfaction in high technology alliances. Journal of Business Research, 57(6), 610–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00395-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pei, Y. L., Jiang, X., & Liu, H. (2013). Strategic flexibility, original innovation and firm competitiveness: The moderating effect of organizational legitimacy. Studies in Science of Science, 3, 446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. (2009). The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (2009). The core competence of the corporation. In Knowledge and strategy (pp. 41–59). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qi, Y. H., & Bao, G. M. (2004). Knowledge exploitation & exploration: A learning view of diversification. Science & Technology Progress and Policy., 07, 103–106 CNKI:SUN:KJJB.0.2004-07-041.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randhawa, K., Josserand, E., Schweitzer, J., & Logue, D. (2017). Knowledge collaboration between organizations and online communities: The role of open innovation intermediaries. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(6), 1293–1318. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-09-2016-0423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riccobono, F., Bruccoleri, M., & Perrone, G. (2015). External knowledge sourcing for R&D activities: antecedents and implications of governance mode choice. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 27(2), 142–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2014.953473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacha, D., Stoffel, A., Stoffel, F., et al. (2014). Knowledge generation model for visual analytics. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 20(12), 1604–1613. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2014.2346481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakakibara, M. (2003). Knowledge sharing in cooperative research and development. Managerial and Decision Economics, 24(2-3), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.1080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, R. (1995). Strategic flexibility in product competition. Strategic Management Journal, 16(S1), 135–159. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250160921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, R. (1997). Preparing for an uncertain future: Managing organizations for strategic flexibility. International Studies of Management and Organization, 27(2), 71–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.1997.11656708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, R., & Mahoney, J. T. (1996). Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santoro, G., Bresciani, S., & Papa, A. (2020). Collaborative modes with cultural and creative industries and innovation performance: the moderating role of heterogeneous sources of knowledge and absorptive capacity. Technovation, 92, 102040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarach, L. (2015). Analysis of cooperative relationship in industrial cluster. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 250–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, L. P., & Tang, S. L. (2011). A new explanation of knowledge innovation based on the Bohr atom model. Studies in Science of Science, 12, 1797–1853. https://doi.org/10.16192/j.cnki.1003-2053.2011.12.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, M. K., Gnyawali, D. R., & Hatfield, D. E. (2015). Behavioral implications of absorptive capacity: The role of technological effort and technological capability in leveraging alliance network technological resources. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 92, 346–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.01.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swierczek, F. W., & Ha, T. T. (2003). Entrepreneurial orientation, uncertainty avoidance and firm performance: An analysis of Thai and Vietnamese SMEs. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 4(1), 46–58. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000003101299393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, C. N. L. (2016). Enhancing knowledge sharing and research collaboration among academics: the role of knowledge management. Higher Education, 71(4), 525–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9922-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7%3C509::AID-SMJ882%3E3.0.CO;2-Z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tong, Z. H., Jiang, Z. Y., & Shi, W. D. (2017). Research on the impact of network flexibility on innovation performance: The mediating effect of Id-KCB and T-KCB. Information Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tortoriello, M. (2015). The social underpinnings of absorptive capacity: The moderating effects of structural holes on innovation generation based on external knowledge. Strategic Management Journal, 36(4), 586–597. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu, Z. Z., & Gu, X. (2013). Study on process of industry-university-research institute collaborative innovation based on knowledge flow. Studies in Science of Science, 9, 1381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuomi, I. (2002). The future of knowledge management. Lifelong learning in Europe, 7(2), 69–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Wei, W., Ding, L., & Li, J. (2017). Method for analyzing the knowledge collaboration effect of R&D project teams based on Bloom’s taxonomy. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 103, 158–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2016.11.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, T. N., Chen, T., & Jia, R. X. (2010). On influence of organizational learning and strategic flexibility on enterprise performance: An empirical study. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 07, 42–59 CNKI:SUN:JCYJ.0.2010-07-006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, T. N., Jia, R. X., & Chen, N. (2009). The empirical research on the strategic flexibility effect of organizational learning capacity. China Soft Science, 04, 164–184 CNKI:SUN:ZGRK.0.2009-04-020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, Q., Zhang, Q., Yan, R., & Wu, X. (2019). A theoretical framework for the inter-organizational knowledge collaboration of knowledge network. In International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management (pp. 772–782). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21248-3_58

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wickert, A., & Herschel, R. (2001). Knowledge-management issues for smaller businesses. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(4), 329–337. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270110411751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, S. B., & Gu, X. (2008). Research on the knowledge synergy of knowledge chain’s inter-firm cooperation. Science of Science and Management of S. & T, 8, 83–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y., & Gu, X. (2012). Knowledge collaboration process in industry-university-research institute collaborative innovation. In Forum on Science and Technology in China (Vol. 10, pp. 17–23).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y. H., & Jiang, H. (2021). Research on the governance of technical standards alliances in the context of digital transformation: From the perspective of knowledge Transfer. Journal of Technical Economics & Management, 11, 20–24 CNKI:SUN:JXJG.0.2021-11-004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y. H., Shan, Y. K., & Jiang, H. (2022). Research on the operation and dynamic mechanism of technical standards alliance under digital driving: From the perspective of knowledge field. Journal of Technical Economics & Management, 03, 15–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, W., Zhou, Q., Yu, X., Wang, D., & Li, H. (2019). How to facilitate knowledge collaboration in OCs: An integrated perspective of technological and institutional measures. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 138, 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao, R. (2011). Empirical study on the relationships between innovation networking and knowledge acquisition based on firm resources, Doctoral Dissertation. Jilin University https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CDFD0911&filename=1011095047.nh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao, Y. P., & Zhang, C. P. (2019). Knowledge couplings, knowledge innovation capability and innovation performance——the moderating role of environmental uncertainty and strategic flexibility. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 23, 76–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, X., & Liu, W. T. (2017). Knowledge collaboration research on technical standards alliance. Shanghai Jiaotong University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., & Bogner, W. C. (2000). Technology strategy and software new ventures’ performance: Exploring the moderating effect of the competitive environment. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(2), 135–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(98)00009-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.6587995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zajac, E. J., & Kraatz, M. S. (2001). How organizational resources affect strategic change and performance in turbulent environments: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12(5), 632–657. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.5.632.10088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, H. B. (2015). Impact of knowledge transfer on innovative performance of the alliance enterprises by taking strategic flexibility as a mediating factor. Science Research Management, 07, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2015.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, S. L., Zhang, W., & Wu, X. B. (2010). Knowledge-based dynamic capabilities: Theory and empirical study. Studies in Science of Science, 03, 405–466. https://doi.org/10.16192/j.cnki.1003-2053.2010.03.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Y. X., Zhou, F., & Sha, Z. Q. (2016). A research on relationship between boundary-spanning search and business mode innovation: Perspective from absorptive capacity. Economic Management Journal, 11, 92–104. https://doi.org/10.19616/j.cnki.bmj.2016.11.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge funding from the National Natural Science Fund of China (grant number 71603246), the National Social Science Foundation of China (21BJY222) and the Zhejiang Province Soft Science Research Program Project (2023C35028).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Economics and Management, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, 310018, China

    Xiao Yu, Yangfeng Dai, Qian Xu & Qilin Ye

Authors
  1. Xiao Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yangfeng Dai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Qian Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qilin Ye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qian Xu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, X., Dai, Y., Xu, Q. et al. Knowledge Collaboration and Benefits of Standard Implementation of Enterprise in Technology Standard Alliance. J Knowl Econ (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01340-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01340-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation