Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Foreign Direct Investment and Imports in India: Exploring Institutional Dimensions

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the knowledge economy, globalisation and its various types are increasingly recognised as the substance of competencies. The major two types of globalisation possessing macroeconomic utility, i.e. FDI and trade, are significantly influenced by country-level factors. Given their differing characteristics, they react to macroeconomic factors differently. In this view, this study looks at how institutional variables affected trade and investment from 30 countries into India from 2002 to 2020, as India plays a major role in the global arena, it attracts a sizable amount of international investment and foreign trade. Four institutional factors are considered in the analysis and the results suggest that improved property rights protection and government integrity in India attracts both FDI and imports. The increased government size and high-quality regulatory environment although positively influence FDI and imports, both have an insignificant effect on FDI while both are significant in case of imports. Alternative estimators are applied to obtain an appropriate synchronisation between variables but the Random effect model came out to have optimum utility to be applied in the current study. The study is controlled for the effects of human capital since it is an important regressor of internationalisation behaviour. Based on the results of granger causality, FDI is taken as a control variable for imports. The distinguishing feature of this study is that a comparative analysis between FDI and trade inflow in India from an institutional perspective has been undertaken which is not present in the extant literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohd Nayyer Rahman.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1 Hypothesis testing results

S. no

Alternative hypothesis

Sign (expected)

Sign (actual)

Decision

1

H1a: The host country’s Intellectual Property Rights protection has a significant positive impact on FDI inflows

( +)

( +)

Accepted

2

H1b: The host country’s Intellectual Property Rights protection has a significant positive impact on Imports

( +)

( +)

Accepted

3

H1c: The host country’s Government Integrity has a significant positive impact on FDI inflows

( +)

( +)

Accepted

4

H1d: The host country’s Government Integrity has a significant positive impact on the Imports

( +)

( +)

Accepted

5

H1e: The host country’s Regulatory Quality has a significant positive impact on FDI inflows

( +)

( +)

Rejected

6

H1f: The host country’s Regulatory Quality has a significant positive impact on Imports

( +)

( +)

Accepted

7

H1g: The host country’s Government Size has a significant positive impact on FDI inflows

( +)

( +)

Rejected

8

H1h: The host country’s Government Size has a significant positive impact on Imports

( +)

( +)

Accepted

  1. 5% level of significance is considered to accept or reject the alternate hypothesis

Appendix 2 Description of the sample

No. of countries

30

Period of the study

19

Period range

2002–2020

Host country

India

List of parent countries

 

Australia

 

Belgium

 

Canada

 

China

 

Cyprus

 

Denmark

 

Finland

 

France

 

Germany

 

Hongkong

 

Ireland

 

Israel

 

Italy

 

Japan

 

Luxembourg

 

Malaysia

 

Netherlands

 

Poland

 

Russia

 

Saudi Arabia

 

Singapore

 

South Africa

 

South Korea

 

Spain

 

Sweden

 

Switzerland

 

Thailand

 

United Arab Emirates

 

UK

 

USA

  1. Source: developed by authors
  2. The selection of countries in the sample is based on the consistent availability of data during the sample period for both FDI and imports. Any country having data available for all years (except Poland for which data is missing in 2007 and 2002) is included no matter how much it has traded or invested in India. However, India has almost 90% of the trade or investment transaction with these sample countries

Appendix 3 Description of variables

Variable

Explanation

Sources

FDI

Foreign Direct Investment flow from 30 countries into India

https://dpiit.gov.in/publications/si-news-letters

EXP

Exports of 30 countries into India or Imports of India from 30 countries

https://www.trademap.org/

PRP

Patents Application as a proxy for Property Rights Protection in India

https://ipindia.gov.in/annual-reports-ipo.htm

GOVINT

Corruption perception index as a proxy for Indian government integrity

https://www.transparency.org/en

REGQ

Regulatory quality Index from Fraser Institute as a proxy for regulatory quality in India

https://www.fraserinstitute.org/economic-freedom/dataset?geozone=world&page=dataset&min-year=2&max-year=0&filter=0

GOVS

Government size Index from Fraser Institute as a proxy for the government size in India

https://www.fraserinstitute.org/economic-freedom/dataset?geozone=world&page=dataset&min-year=2&max-year=0&filter=0

HCAP

Secondary school enrolment as a percentage of the total enrolment as a proxy for human capital in India

https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators/Series/NE.GDI.FTOT.ZS

  1. Source: developed by authors

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bhat, M.N., Ikram, F. & Rahman, M.N. Foreign Direct Investment and Imports in India: Exploring Institutional Dimensions. J Knowl Econ (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01136-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01136-9

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation