Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Environmental Sustainability in Sub-Saharan Africa: the Case of Production and Consumption Activities

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Environmental pollution studies are fast gathering momentum in trying to find a solution to the global climate change problem. However, while several causes of environmental degradation have been analysed in the past, the roles of production and consumption activities remain undiscussed. The identified literature gap informs the conduct of this panel analysis covering 31 sub-Saharan African (SSA) nations from 1996 to 2019, using the system of the generalised methods of moments as the estimation technique. Findings confirm that production activities are the main problem of environmental degradation in SSA while consumption activities have a beneficial but insignificant impact on the region’s environment. Also, trade openness exerts a positive and significant effect on environmental degradation, while foreign direct investment reduces pollution. Thus, ensuing policies from the study provide the means to lower environmental degradation by focusing on domestic productive activities within the region. It is also imperative for the region to consider supporting production plants that are environmentally friendly while producing their tradable goods. As such, the region can then leverage the beneficial effects of foreign investment inflow and consumption to promote environmental sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data available on request from the author.

Notes

  1. This is used to describe the level of exposure of the people living in sub-Saharan Africa to the high degree of ozone depletion, which is usually caused by pollution of the region’s environment. This inference is drawn from the World Development Indicators’ (WDI) description of particulate emissions damage (see World Development Indicators, 2020).

References

  • Abdulai, A., & Ramcke, L. (2009). The impact of trade and economic growth on the environment: revisiting the cross-country evidence (No. 1491). Kiel working paper.

  • Achike, A. I., & Onoja, A. O. (2014). Greenhouse gas emission determinants in Nigeria: Implications for trade, climate change mitigation and adaptation policies. British Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 4(1), 83–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anouliès, L. (2016). Are trade integration and the environment in conflict? The decisive role of countries’ strategic interactions. International Economics, 148, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arminen, H., & Menegaki, A. N. (2019). Corruption, climate and the energy-environment-growth nexus. Energy Economics, 80, 621–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayadi, F. S. (2014). Economic integration, growth and the environment in Africa: A study of Nigeria. Journal of Emerging Issues in Economics Finance and Banking, 3, 1274–1289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhutta, M. K. S., Omar, A., & Yang, X. (2011). Electronic waste: A growing concern in today’s environment. Economics Research International. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/47230. Accessed 15 Aug 2020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blomquist, G. C., & Cave, L. A. (2008). Environmental policy in the European Union: Fostering the Development of Pollution Havens? Ecological Economics, 65, 253–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boutabba, M. A. (2014). The impact of financial development, income, energy and trade on carbon emissions: Evidence from the Indian economy. Economic Modelling, 40, 33–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J. H., & Huang, Y. F. (2013). The study of the relationship between carbon dioxide (CO2) emission and economic growth. Journal of International and Global Economic Studies, 6(2), 45–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Wang, Z., & Zhong, Z. (2019). CO2 emissions, economic growth, renewable and non-renewable energy production and foreign trade in China. Renewable Energy, 131, 208–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherniwchan, J. (2017). Trade liberalization and the environment: Evidence from NAFTA and U.S Manufacturing. Journal of International Economics, 105, 130–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clapp, J. (2017). The trade-ification of the food sustainability agenda. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 44(2), 335–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, B. R., & Taylor, M. S. (1994). North-South trade and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(3), 755–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, B. R., & Taylor, M. S. (2013). Trade and the environment: Theory and evidence. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, J. M., & Lovely, M. E. (2010). Trade growth, production fragmentation, and China’s environment. In China's growing role in world trade (pp. 429–469). University of Chicago Press.

  • Dinda, S., & Coondoo, D. (2006). Income and emission: A panel data-based cointegration analysis. Ecological Economics, 57(2), 167–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, Q., Khattak, S. I., & Ahmad, M. (2021). Towards sustainable production and consumption: Assessing the impact of energy productivity and eco-innovation on consumption-based carbon dioxide emissions (CCO2) in G-7 nations. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 254–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eregha, P. B., & Nwokoma, N. I. (2014). FDI and the environment: Evidence from the fully modified and dynamic OLS approaches in WAMZ. West African Financial and Economic Review, 11(1), 81–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertugrul, H. M., Cetin, M., Seker, F., & Dogan, E. (2016). The impact of trade openness on global carbon dioxide emissions: Evidence from the top ten emitters among developing countries. Ecological Indicators, 67, 543–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feridun, M., Ayadi, F. S., & Balouga, J. (2006). Impact of trade liberalization on the environment in developing countries: The case of Nigeria. Journal of Developing Societies, 22(1), 39–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Amador, O., Francois, J. F., & Tomberger, P. (2016). Carbon dioxide emissions and international trade at the turn of the millennium. Ecological Economics, 125, 14–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, J. A., & Rose, A. K. (2005). Is trade good or bad for the environment? Sorting out the causality. Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(1), 85–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Güney, T. (2019). Renewable energy, non-renewable energy and sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 26(5), 389–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. M. (2004). Trade and the environment. Medford, MA: Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University. www.ase.tufts.edu/gdae/education_materials/.../Trade_and_the_Environment.pdf. Accessed 10 Aug 2020.

  • Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. C. (2003). Testing for units roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115, 53–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund. (2016). Sub-Saharan Africa time for a policy retest. Regional economic outlook. International Monetary Fund, Washington D.C. Available at: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/REO/SSA/Issues/2016/04/05/Time-for-a-Policy-Reset. Accessed 28 May 2021.

  • Isola, W. A., & Mesagan, P. E. (2014). Impact of oil production on human condition in Nigeria. West African Journal of Monetary and Economic Integration, 14(1), 84–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isola, W. A., Mesagan, P. E., & Alimi, O. I. (2017). Energy crisis in Nigeria: Evidence from Lagos state. Ovidius University Annals Economic Sciences Series, 17(2), 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayanthakumaran, K., Verma, R., & Liu, Y. (2012). CO2 emissions, energy consumption, trade and income: A comparative analysis of China and India. Energy Policy, 42, 450–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le, T. H., Chang, Y., & Park, D. (2016). Trade openness and environmental quality: International evidence. Energy Policy, 92, 45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Z., Xu, N., & Yuan, J. (2015). New evidence on trade-environment linkage via air visibility. Economics Letters, 128, 72–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loi, N. (2012). The impact of trade liberalisation on the environment in some East Asian countries: An empirical study. Oxford University CEA Annual Conference Paper No CARE-EA 2260, EMR.

  • Mesagan, E. P. (2021). Efficiency of financial integration, foreign direct investment and output growth: Policy options for pollution abatement in Africa. Economic Issues, 26(1), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesagan, E. P., Ajide, K. B., & Vo, X. V. (2020). Dynamic heterogeneous analysis of pollution reduction in SANEM countries: Lessons from the energy-investment interaction. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(5), 5417–5429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesagan, E. P., Akinyemi, A. K., & Yusuf, I. A. (2021). Financial integration and pollution in Africa: The role of output growth and foreign direct investment. International Journal of Big Data Mining for Global Warming. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2630534821500029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesagan, P. E., & Nwachukwu, I. M. (2018). Determinants of environmental quality in Nigeria: Assessing the role of financial development. Econometric Research in Finance, 3(1), 55–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesagan, P. E., & Olunkwa, N. C. (2020). Energy consumption, capital investment and environmental degradation: The African experience. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 8(1), 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesagan, P. E. (2015). Economic growth and environment nexus: The role of foreign direct investment. A Research Journal on Contemporary Issues and Development, Rivers State University of Education, 4(3), 44–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesagan, P. E., Omojolaibi, J. A., & Umar, D. I. (2018). Trade intensity, energy consumption and environment in Nigeria and South Africa. Ovidius University Annals Economic Sciences Series, 18(1), 33–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nkonya, E., Mirzabaev, A., & Von Braun, J. (Eds.). (2016). Economics of land degradation and improvement: a global assessment for sustainable development. Springer Open. Available Online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19168-3. Accessed 28 May 2021.

  • Osibanjo, O. (2009). Electronic waste: A major challenge to sustainable development in Africa. In Conference on Chemicals Management (ICCM2) held in Geneva during (vol. 11, p. 15).

  • Partzsch, L., Zander, M., & Robinson, H. (2019). Cotton certification in sub-Saharan Africa: promotion of environmental sustainability or greenwashing? Global Environmental Change, 57, 101924.

  • Qu, W. H., Xu, L., Qu, G. H., Yan, Z. J., & Wang, J. X. (2017). The impact of energy consumption on environment and public health in China. Natural Hazards, 87(2), 675–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raheem, I. D., Tiwari, A. K., & Balsalobre-Lorente, D. (2020). The role of ICT and financial development in CO 2 emissions and economic growth. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(2), 1912–1922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramondo, N., & Rodríguez-Clare, A. (2013). Trade, multinational production, and the gains from openness. Journal of Political Economy, 121(2), 273–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roodman, D. (2009). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. The Stata Journal, 9(1), 86–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saibu, O. M., & Mesagan, E. P. (2016). Environmental quality and growth effects of foreign direct investment in Nigeria. Iranian Economic Review, 20(2), 125–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salahuddin, M., Alam, K., Ozturk, I., & Sohag, K. (2018). The effects of electricity consumption, economic growth, financial development and foreign direct investment on CO2 emissions in Kuwait. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, 2002–2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saleem, H., Khan, M. B., & Shabbir, M. S. (2020). The role of financial development, energy demand, and technological change in environmental sustainability agenda: Evidence from selected Asian countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(5), 5266–5280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saud, S., Chen, S., Haseeb, A., Khan, K., & Imran, M. (2019). The nexus between financial development, income level, and environment in central and eastern European countries: A perspective on belt and road initiative. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(16), 16053–16075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, P., Chakrabarti, D., & Bhattacharjee, S. (2020). Globalization, financial development and economic growth: Perils on the environmental sustainability of an emerging economy. Journal of Policy Modeling, 42(3), 520–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz, M., Haouas, I., Sohag, K., & Ozturk, I. (2020). The financial development-environmental degradation nexus in the United Arab Emirates: The importance of growth, globalisation and structural breaks. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 10685–10699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz, M., Nasreen, S., Ahmed, K., & Hammoudeh, S. (2017). Trade openness–carbon emissions nexus: The importance of turning points of trade openness for country panels. Energy Economics, 61, 221–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, J., Wei, Y. D., & Yang, Z. (2017). The impact of environmental regulations on the location of pollution-intensive industries in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 148, 785–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SMEP. (2020). Manufacturing pollution in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia: implications for the environment, health and future work. Published in: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Available Online at: https://www.smepprogramme.org/s/files. Accessed 24 May 2021.

  • Solarin, S. A., Al-Mulali, U., Musah, I., & Ozturk, I. (2017). Investigating the pollution haven hypothesis in Ghana: An empirical investigation. Energy, 124, 706–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, D. I. (2004). The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Development, 32(8), 1419–1439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, C. F., & Tan, B. W. (2015). The impact of energy consumption, income and foreign direct investment on carbon-dioxide emissions in Vietnam. Energy, 79, 447–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Alstine, J., & Neumayer, E. (2010). The environmental Kuznets Curve. In K. Gallagher (Ed.), Handbook on Trade and the Environment (pp. 49–59). Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z., Li, C., Liu, Q., Niu, B., Peng, S., Deng, L., & Zhang, X. (2019). Pollution haven hypothesis of domestic trade in China: A perspective of SO2 emissions. Science of the Total Environment, 663, 198–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, R. A., Nichols, R., Lam, V. W., & Sumaila, U. R. (2017). Global seafood trade flows and developing economies: Insights from linking trade and production. Marine Policy, 82, 41–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Development Indicators. (2020). The World Bank Data Bank. Available Online at: https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators. Assessed 11 Aug 2020.

  • Xu, Y., Fan, X., Zhang, Z., & Zhang, R. (2020). Trade liberalization and haze pollution: Evidence from China. Ecological Indicators, 109, 105825.

  • Yasmeen, R., Li, Y., & Hafeez, M. (2019). Tracing the trade–pollution nexus in global value chains: Evidence from air pollution indicators. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(5), 5221–5233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Y., & Chen, F. (2016). Research on carbon emissions embodied in trade between China and South Korea. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 8(1), 56–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author appreciates the anonymous reviewers and the journal handling editors whose review contribution and handling greatly improve the content of the work.

Funding

The author received review support provided by the African Economic Research Consortium (AERC), which also provides the research grant to complete this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ekundayo Peter Mesagan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author.

Disclaimer

The paper is an offshoot of the completed Ph.D. thesis; hence, the results reflect the views of the author alone.

Conflict of Interest

The author received research grants from the AERC.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mesagan, E.P. Environmental Sustainability in Sub-Saharan Africa: the Case of Production and Consumption Activities. J Knowl Econ 13, 2840–2867 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00842-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00842-6

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation