Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Revisiting the Factors Driving Firms’ Innovation Performances: the Case of Visegrad Countries

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the various factors that drive firms’ innovations in Visegrad countries. For the empirical analysis, we used data from the Eurostat Community Innovation Survey 2012–2014 and the probit regression model. The probit regression analysis finds that the main drivers of innovations in these countries are competing in foreign markets, engaging in innovation activities such as R&D and in-house training activities. We find that engaging in R&D was probable to improve product innovations by 48%, process and organizational innovations by 27% and market innovations by 22%. The study also finds that public subsidies for innovations from local, central and EU sources significantly influenced firm-level innovations. Lastly, innovations in these countries were also significantly and positively stimulated by certain firm characteristics such as size and ownerships. In this respect, policy makers and industry management should consider increasing their investments for research and development and its related activities inter alia to improve innovation performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, H. J., & Odei, S. A. (2018). The influence of public support on university-industry-government collaboration: the case of the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary and Romania. Statistika – Statistics and Economy Journal, 98(4), 352–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arundel, A., Casali, L., & Hollanders, H. (2015). How European public sector agencies innovate: the use of bottom-up, policy-dependent and knowledge-scanning innovation methods. Research Policy, 44(7), 1271–1282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belderbos, R., Carree, M., Lokshin, B., & Sastre, J. F. (2015). Inter-temporal patterns of R&D collaboration and innovative performance. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(1), 123–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beugelsdijk, S., Klasing, M. J., & Milionis, P. (2018). Regional economic development in Europe: the role of total factor productivity. Regional Studies, 52(4), 461–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bratti, M., & Felice, G. (2012). Are exporters more likely to introduce product innovations? The World Economy, 35(11), 1559–1598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2009). ‘Mode 3’ and ‘Quadruple Helix’: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3–4), 201–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E. G., Rogers, E. M., Kurihara, K., & Allbritton, M. M. (1998). High-technology spin-offs from government R&D laboratories and research universities. Technovation, 18(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, Y. L., Rau, P. R., & Stouraitis, A. (2010). Helping hand or grabbing hand? Central vs. local government shareholders in Chinese listed firms. Review of finance, 14(4), 669–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chun, H., & Mun, S. B. (2012). Determinants of R&D cooperation in small and medium-sized enterprises. Small Business Economics, 39(2), 419–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D. The Economic Journal, 99(397), 569–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2002). Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowling, M. (2016). You can lead a firm to R&D but can you make it innovate? UK evidence from SMEs. Small Business Economics, 46(4), 565–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crespi, G., & Zuniga, P. (2012). Innovation and productivity: evidence from six Latin American countries. World Development, 40(2), 273–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damijan, J. P., Kostevc, Č., & Polanec, S. (2010). From innovation to exporting or vice versa? The World Economy, 33(3), 374–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Plessis, M. (2007). The role of knowledge management in innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(4), 20–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forés, B., & Camisón, C. (2016). Does incremental and radical innovation performance depend on different types of knowledge accumulation capabilities and organizational size? Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 831–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, X., Mohnen, P., & Zanello, G. (2018). Innovation and productivity in formal and informal firms in Ghana. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 131, 315–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Quevedo, J., Segarra-Blasco, A., & Teruel, M. (2018). Financial constraints and the failure of innovation projects. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 127, 127–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez, J., Salazar, I., & Vargas, P. (2016). Sources of information as determinants of product and process innovation. PLoS One, 11(4), e0152743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henttonen, K., Kianto, A., & Ritala, P. (2016). Knowledge sharing and individual work performance: An empirical study of a public sector organisation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(4), 749–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hervas-Oliver, J. L., Sempere-Ripoll, F., & Boronat-Moll, C. (2014). Process innovation strategy in SMEs, organizational innovation and performance: a misleading debate? Small Business Economics, 43(4), 873–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudec, O. (2015). Visegrad countries and regions: innovation performance and efficiency. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 19(2), 55–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J., & Mattsson, L. G. (2015). Internationalisation in industrial systems—a network approach. In Knowledge, networks and power (pp. 111–132). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Klímová, V., Žítek, V., & Králová, M. (2019). How public R&D support affects research activity of enterprises: evidence from the Czech Republic. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1–20.

  • Kroll, H., & Kou, K. (2019). Innovation output and state ownership: empirical evidence from China’s listed firms. Industry and Innovation, 26(2), 176–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, N. (2019). R&D accounting treatment, R&D state and tax avoidance: with a focus on biotech firms. Sustainability, 11(1), 44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S., Park, G., Yoon, B., & Park, J. (2010). Open innovation in SMEs—an intermediated network model. Research Policy, 39(2), 290–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y. (2019). Navigating the purchasing power gap in new product development in multinational corporations. R&D Management, 49(5), 819–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maietta, O. W. (2015). Determinants of university–firm R&D collaboration and its impact on innovation: a perspective from a low-tech industry. Research Policy, 44(7), 1341–1359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norbäck, P. J., & Persson, L. (2012). Entrepreneurial innovations, competition and competition policy. European Economic Review, 56(3), 488–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odei, S. A., & Stejskal, J. (2018). The influence of knowledge sources on firm-level innovation: the case of Slovak and Hungarian manufacturing firms. Central European Business Review, 7(2), 61–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odei, S. A., & Stejskal, J. (2019). Do firms R&D collaborations with the science system and enterprise group partners stimulate their product and process innovations? Economies, 7(2), 43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onetti, A., Zucchella, A., Jones, M. V., & McDougall-Covin, P. P. (2012). Internationalization, innovation and entrepreneurship: business models for new technology-based firms. Journal of Management & Governance, 16(3), 337–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pece, A. M., Simona, O. E. O., & Salisteanu, F. (2015). Innovation and economic growth: an empirical analysis for CEE countries. Procedia Economics and Finance, 26, 461–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, G. O. (2018). Innovation and technology transfer in Japan and Europe: industry-academic interactions. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pierre, A., & Fernandez, A. (2018). Going deeper into SMEs’ innovation capacity: an empirical exploration of innovation capacity factors. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 25(1), 139–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pietrobelli, C., & Rabellotti, R. (2011). Global value chains meet innovation systems: are there learning opportunities for developing countries? World Development, 39(7), 1261–1269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pino, C., Felzensztein, C., Zwerg-Villegas, A. M., & Arias-Bolzmann, L. (2016). Non-technological innovations: market performance of exporting firms in South America. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4385–4393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prokop, V., Odei, S. A., & Stejskal, J. (2018). Propellants of university-industry-government synergy: comparative study of Czech and Slovak manufacturing industries. Ekonomický časopis, 66(10), 987–1001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salavou, H., Baltas, G., & Lioukas, S. (2004). Organisational innovation in SMEs: the importance of strategic orientation and competitive structure. European Journal of Marketing, 38(9/10), 1091–1112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasidharan, S., & Kathuria, V. (2011). Foreign direct investment and R&D: substitutes or complements—a case of Indian manufacturing after 1991 reforms. World Development, 39(7), 1226–1239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shefer, D., & Frenkel, A. (2005). R&D, firm size and innovation : an empirical analysis. Technovation, 25, 25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stejskal, J., & Hajek, P. (2015). The influence of public expenditure on innovation activity in Czech manufacturing industry. In Proceedings of the 25th international business information management association conference—innovation vision (Vol. 2020, pp. 1820-1827).

  • Tether, B. S. (1998). Small and large firms: sources of unequal innovations? Research Policy, 27(7), 725–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tether, B. S. (2002). Who co-operates for innovation, and why: an empirical analysis. Research Policy, 31(6), 947–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veugelers, R., Ferrando, A., Lekpek, S., & Weiss, C. T. (2019). Young SMEs as a Motor of Europe’s innovation machine. Intereconomics, 54(6), 369–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vieites, A. G., & Calvo, J. L. (2011). A study on the factors that influence innovation activities of Spanish big firms. Technology and Investment, 2(1), 8–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, J., & Bogers, M. (2014). Leveraging external sources of innovation: a review of research on open innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4), 814–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, K. Z., Gao, G. Y., & Zhao, H. (2017). State ownership and firm innovation in China: an integrated view of institutional and efficiency logics. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62(2), 375–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Economics and Administration, University of Pardubice, Studentska 95, Pardubice, Czech Republic

    Samuel Amponsah Odei, Jan Stejskal & Viktor Prokop

Authors
  1. Samuel Amponsah Odei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jan Stejskal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Viktor Prokop
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Stejskal.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Odei, S.A., Stejskal, J. & Prokop, V. Revisiting the Factors Driving Firms’ Innovation Performances: the Case of Visegrad Countries. J Knowl Econ 12, 1331–1344 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00669-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00669-7

Keywords

JEL Code

Search

Navigation