Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Smart Specialisation—Norwegian Adoptions

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

European regions have become a giant testbed for Research and Innovation strategies for Smart Specialisation (RIS3). Norwegian regions have reacted to this policy concept in different ways, some adopting RIS3, some exploring it without implementation, and others choosing not to engage. This article offers a framework for interpreting regional policy adoption and response. We use a regional adaptation of the Varieties of Capitalism (VoC) approach to illuminate patterns that may affect the implementation of regional innovation policies throughout Europe. We ask: How can the variety of preparedness to and adoption of RIS3 in Norwegian regions be explained? We find patterns of responses from the case regions that corroborate our regional VoC typology. These responses show that regional policy institutions behave as part and parcel of the regional cultures in which they are embedded. Thus, their responses make sense economically, politically and socio-culturally. The framework developed contributes to the literature on regional policy formation and to our general understanding of the institutional preconditions for regional policy adoption and response.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agnew, J. (1987). Place and Politics: The Geographical Mediation of State and Society. Winchester, MA: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert, M. (1993). Capitalism vs Capitalism. New York: Four Wall Eight Windows.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asheim, B., & Grillitsch, M. (2015). Smart specialisation: Sources for new path development in a peripheral manufacturing region. Papers in innovation studies (no. 2015/11). Lund: CIRCLE - Center for Innovation, Research and Competences in the Learning Economy.

  • Asheim, B., & Mariussen, Å. (2010). Den norske innovasjonspolitikken i et nordisk perspektiv. In O. Spilling (Ed.), Perspektiver på norsk innovasjonspolitikk. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asheim, B., Grillitsch, M., & Trippl, M. (2016). Smart specialization as an innovation-driven strategy for economic diversification: Examples from Scandinavian regions. Papers in Innovation Studies ( No. 2016/23). Lund University: CIRCLE - Center for Innovation, Research and Competences in the Learning Economy.

  • Barrett, S., & Fudge, C. (Eds.). (1981). Policy and action: Essays on the implementation of public policy. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson, B., & Hertting, N. (2014). Generalization by mechanism: Thin rationality and ideal-type analysis in case study research. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 44(6), 707–732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borras-Alomar, S., Christiansen, T., & Rodriguez-Pose, A. (1994). Towards a ‘Europe of the regions'? Visions and reality from a critical perspective. Regional & Federal Studies, 4(2), 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colombo, S., & Regini, M. (2016). Territorial differences in the Italian ‘social model’. Regional Studies, 50(1), 20–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P. (1992). Regional innovation systems: Competitive regulation in the new Europe. Geoforum, 23(3), 365–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duranton, G., Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Sandall, R. (2009). Family types and the persistence of regional disparities in Europe. Economic Geography, 85(1), 23–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebner, A. (2016). Editorial: Exploring regional varieties of capitalism. Regional Studies, 50(1), 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2016). Cohesion policy. https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/research-topic/smart-specialisation. Accessed 16th October 2017.

  • Fauve-Chamoux, A., & Ochiai, E. (Eds.). (2009). The stem family in Eurasian perspective: Revisiting house societies, 17th–20th centuries. Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellman, S., Iversen, M., Sjögren, H., & Thue, L. (Eds.). (2008). Creating Nordic capitalism: The business history of a competitive periphery. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flora, P., Kuhnle, S., & Urwin, D. (1999). State formation, nation-building and mass politics in Europe: The theory of stein Rokkan. Based on his collected works. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fløysand, A., & Sjøholt, P. (2007). Rural development and embeddedness: The importance of human relations for industrial restructuring in rural areas. Sociologia Ruralis, 47(3), 205–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foray, D. (2014). From smart specialisation to smart specialisation policy. European Journal of Innovation Management, 17(4), 492–507. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-09-2014-0096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foray, D. (2015). Smart specialisation: Opportunities and challenges for regional innovation policy (Vol. 79). London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government, N. (2016). Meld. St. 22 (2015-2016) Nye folkevalgte regioner - rolle, strukturer og oppgaver. In M. o. L. G. a. Modernisation (Ed.), (Vol. Report to the Storting (White paper)). Oslo.

  • Government, N. (2017). Meld.St. 18 (2016–2017) urban sustainability and rural strenghts. In M. o. L. G. a. Modernisation (Ed.), (Vol. Report to the Storting (White paper)). Oslo.

  • Hajnal, J. (1969). European marriage patterns in perspective. In D. Glass & D. Eversley (Eds.), Population in history (pp. 101–143). London: Edw. Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajnal, J. (1982). Two kinds of preindustrial household formation system. Population and Development Review, 8(3), 449–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (Eds.). (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancké, B., Rhodes, M., & Thatcher, M. (Eds.). (2007). Beyond varieties of capitalism: Conflict, contradictions, and complementarities in the European economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2016). Path development in different regional innovation systems. In M. Parrilli, R. Fitjar, & A. Rodriguez-Pose (Eds.), Innovation drivers and regional innovation strategies (pp. 66–84). New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P. T. (2016). The conduct of inquiry in international relations: Philosophy of science and its implications for the study of world politics (2nd ed.). London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, M. (2010). Long-term persistence: The free and imperial city experience in Germany. Available at SSRN 1616973.

  • Jøssang, L. G. (2004). Industrieventyret på Jæren: 1800–2000. Oslo: Samlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, J. P. (2011). Innovation, culture and politics – An outline for investigating criss-crossing Nordic cleavages. In H. C. Johnsen & Ø. Pålshaugen (Eds.), Hva er innovasjon? Perspektiver i norsk innovasjonsforskning (pp. 314–342, Vol. Bind 1: System og institusjoner). Kristiansand: Høyskoleforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, J. P. (2015). Education and social structure. In H. C. Johnsen, S. Torjesen, & R. Ennals (Eds.), Higher education in a sustainable society. A case for mutual competence building (pp. 29–50). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, J. P. (2016). Innovasjonens sosio-kulturelle grunnlag. In A. Isaksen, R. Fitjar, & J. P. Knudsen (Eds.), Politikk for innovative regioner (pp. 103–137). Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademisk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, J. P. (2018). The socio-cultural basis for innovation. In A. Isaksen, R. Martin, & M. Trippl (Eds.), New avenues for regional innovation systems - theoretical advances, empirical cases and policy lessons (pp. 61–83). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, J. P., Moen, B., Persson, L. O., Skålnes, S., & Steineke, J. M. (2005). Fylkeskommunenes rolle som regional utviklingsaktør og partnerskapenes funksjon i den sammenheng. Stockholm: Nordregio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laslett, P. (1965). The world we have lost: England before the industrial age. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., & Strand, Ø. (2012). Triple-helix relations and potential synergies among technologies, industries, and regions in Norway. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 52, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamadouh, V. (1999). A political-cultural map of Europe. Family structures and the origins of differences between national political cultures in the European Union. GeoJournal, 47(3), 477–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mjøset, L. (2011). The Nordic varieties of capitalism. In L. Mjøset (Ed.), The Nordic varieties of capitalism (comparative social research, volume 28). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G., Campbell, J., Crouch, C., Pedersen, O. K., & Whitley, R. (Eds.). (2010). The Oxford handbook of comparative institutional analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Normann, R. H., & Vasström, M. (2012). Municipalities as governance network actors in rural communities. European Planning Studies, 20(6), 941–960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piore, M. J., & Sabel, C. F. (1984). The second industrial divide: Possibilities for prosperity. New York: Basic books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressman, J., & Wildavsky, A. (1984). How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland. Or, why it's amazing that federal programs work at all, this being a saga of the economic development administration as told by two sympathetic observers who seek to build morals on a foundation. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reher, D. S. (2004). Family ties in Western Europe. Persistent contrasts. In S. G. Dalla & G. A. Micheli (Eds.), Strong Family and Low Fertility: A Paradox? (pp. 45–76). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2013). Do institutions matter for regional development? Regional Studies, 47(7), 1034–1047. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.748978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rokkan, S. (1967). Geography, religion and social class: Cross-cutting cleavages in Norwegian politics. In S. M. Lipset & S. Rokkan (Eds.), Party systems and voter alignments (pp. 363–403). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggles, S. (2010). Stem families and joint families in comparative historical perspective. Population and Development Review, 36(3), 563–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sack, R. D. (1997). Homo Geographicus. London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, M. R., & Paunescu, M. (2012). Changing varieties of capitalism and revealed comparative advantages from 1990 to 2005: A test of the Hall and Soskice claims. Socio-Economic Review, 10, 731–753.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröder, M., & Voelzkow, H. (2016). Varieties of regulation: How to combine sectoral, regional and national levels. Regional Studies, 50(1), 7–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultenover, D. G. (1999). An anthropological view of the modernist crisis. Journal of Religion and Society, 1(1), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze-Krogh, A. C. (2018). Regional Industrial Development: The Role of Firms and Regional Policy Learning (Doctoral dissertations at the University of Agder 196). Kristiansand: University of Agder, School of Business and Law.

  • Sejersted, F. (2002). Demokratisk kapitalisme. Oslo: Pax.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teigen, H. (1999). Regional økonomi og politikk. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thue, L. (2008). Norway: A resource-based and democratic capitalism. In S. Fellman, M. Iversen, H. Sjögren, & L. Thue (Eds.), Creating Nordic capitalism: The business history of a competitive periphery (pp. 394–493). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, E. (1990). L'invention de l'Europe. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, E. (1998). l’illusion économique. Essai sur la stagnation des sociétés développées. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, E. (2011). L'origine des systèmes familiaux. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all?: Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34(8), 1203–1219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trippl, M., Zukauskaite, E., & Healy, A. (2016). Smart specialisation: Opportunities and challenges in different types of European regions. Sweden: CIRCLE, Lund University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werlen, B. (1993). Society action and space: An alternative human geography. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicken, O. (1997). Regionenes industrialisering - et historisk perspektiv. In A. Isaksen (Ed.), Innovasjoner, næringsutvikling og regionalpolitikk. Kristiansand: Høyskoleforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicken, O. (2004). Politikk som konkurranse mellom industrialiseringsformer. In P. Arbo & H. Gammelsæter (Eds.), Innovasjonspolitikkens scenografi. Trondheim: Tapir.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicken, O. (2005). Diverse regional industrialisation: Norway during the first half of the 20th century. In K. Bruland (Ed.), Essays on industrialization in France, Norway and Spain. Oslo: Unipub forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., & Peck, J. (2016). Variegated capitalism, Chinese style: Regional models, multi-scalar constructions. Regional Studies, 50(1), 52–78.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Working Life and Innovation School of Business and Law, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway

    Jon P. Knudsen, Ann Camilla Schulze-Krogh & Roger Normann

  2. NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Kristiansand, Norway

    Roger Normann

Authors
  1. Jon P. Knudsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ann Camilla Schulze-Krogh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Roger Normann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jon P. Knudsen.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

A previous version of this article is included as part of the doctoral dissertation ‘Regional industrial development. The role of firms and regional policy learning’, Schulze-Krogh, AC, 2018.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Knudsen, J.P., Schulze-Krogh, A.C. & Normann, R. Smart Specialisation—Norwegian Adoptions. J Knowl Econ 11, 1382–1402 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-019-00610-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-019-00610-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation