Abstract
From a dataset of macrobenthos obtained from 18 cruises from 2004 to 2013 in the Huanghe (Yellow River) Estuary and its adjacent areas, the composition and characteristics of macrobenthos were analyzed, and the applicability of the Shannon-Wiener Index (H′), AZTI’s Marine Biotic Index (AMBI) and multivariate AMBI (MAMBI) for assessing benthic habitat quality was compared. The results showed a total of 203 macrobenthos in the study area. The macrobenthos were dominated by polychaetes, followed by mollusks and crustaceans. The macrobenthic ecological groups were dominated by EGI, EGII and EGIII, which respectively accounted for 31.5%, 36.0% and 21.2% of the total. There were significant differences between the evaluation results of the three indices. The ecological quality status (EQS) levels given by the AMBI were greater than those given by the H′ and M-AMBI. The AMBI could not reflect the differences between 11 sites but the H′ and M-AMBI could do. Moreover, the three indices responded well to the variations in salinity (S) and dissolved oxygen (DO) in the waters. The H′ and M-AMBI also responded sensitively to the differences in physical parameters, such as water depth and sediment texture. The correlation between M-AMBI and environmental pressure gradient data was the strongest. The MAMBI could effectively distinguish degraded conditions from undegraded but the H′ and AMBI could not. Therefore, the M-AMBI reflected benthic habitat health well in the study areas. However, the objectivity of evaluation results of M-AMBI needs further verification by physical, chemical and biological methods. The thresholds also need further discussion.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bazairi H, Bayed A, Hily C. 2005. Structure and bioassessment of benthic communities of a lagoonal ecosystem of the Atlantic Moroccan coast. Comptes Rendus Biologies, 328(10–11): 977–990
Borja A, Dauer D M, Díaz R, et al. 2008. Assessing estuarine benthic quality conditions in Chesapeake Bay: A comparison of three indices. Ecological Indicators, 8(4): 395–403
Borja A, Franco J, Pérez V. 2000. A marine biotic index to establish the ecological quality of soft-bottom benthos within European estuarine and coastal environments. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 40(12): 1100–1114
Borja A, Josefson A B, Miles A, et al. 2007. An approach to the intercalibration of benthic ecological status assessment in the North Atlantic ecoregion, according to the European Water Framework Directive. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 55(1–6): 42–52
Borja A, Miles A, Occhipinti-Ambrogi A, et al. 2009. Current status of macroinvertebrate methods used for assessing the quality of European marine waters: implementing the water framework directive. Hydrobiologia, 633(1): 181–196
Borja A, Muxika I. 2005. Guidelines for the use of AMBI (AZTI’s Marine Biotic Index) in the assessment of the benthic ecological quality. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 50(7): 787–789
Borja A, Muxika I, Franco J. 2003. The application of a Marine Biotic Index to different impact sources affecting soft-bottom benthic communities along European coasts. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 46(7): 835–845
Borja A, Tunberg B G. 2011. Assessing benthic health in stressed subtropical estuaries, eastern Florida, USA using AMBI and MAMBI. Ecological Indicators, 11(2): 295–303
Cai Wenqian, Borja Á, Liu Lusan, et al. 2014. Assessing benthic health under multiple human pressures in Bohai Bay (China), using density and biomass in calculating AMBI and M-AMBI. Marine Ecology, 35(2): 180–192
Cai Lizhe, Hong Huasheng, Huang Yushan. 1997. Spatial and temporal variations of macrobenthic community in Victoria Harbor of Hong Kong. Haiyang Xuebao (in Chinese), 19(2): 65–70
Cai Lizhe, Li Hongmei, Lin Peng, et al. 2001. Analysis of environmental effect and polychaete quantitative variations on intertidal mudflat in Shenzhen estuary. Journal of Xiamen University (Natural Science) (in Chinese), 40(3): 741–750
Cai Wenqian, Liu Lusan, Meng Wei, et al. 2012. The suitability of AMBI to benthic quality assessment on the intertidal zones of Bohai Sea. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae (in Chinese), 32(4): 992–1000
Cai Lizhe, Ma Li, Gao Yang, et al. 2002. Analysis on assessing criterion for polluted situation using species diversity index of marine macrofauna. Journal of Xiamen University (Natural Science) (in Chinese), 41(5): 641–646
Diaz R J, Solan M, Valente R M. 2004. A review of approaches for classifying benthic habitats and evaluating habitat quality. Journal of Environmental Management, 73(3): 165–181
Fan Hui, Huang Haijun. 2008. Response of coastal marine eco-environment to river fluxes into the sea: A case study of the Huanghe (Yellow) River mouth and adjacent waters. Marine Environmental Research, 65(5): 378–387
Forde J, Shin P K, Somerfield P J, et al. 2013. M-AMBI derived from taxonomic levels higher than species allows Ecological Status assessments of benthic habitats in new geographical areas. Ecological Indicators, 34: 411–419
Grall J, Glémarec M. 1997. Using biotic indices to estimate macrobenthic community perturbations in the Bay of Brest. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 44: 43–53
Kennedy R, Arthur W, Keegan B F. 2011. Long-term trends in benthic habitat quality as determined by Multivariate AMBI and Infaunal Quality Index in relation to natural variability: A case study in Kinsale Harbour, south coast of Ireland. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 62(7): 1427–1436
Labrune C, Amouroux J M, Sarda R, et al. 2006. Characterization of the ecological quality of the coastal Gulf of Lions (NW Mediterranean). A comparative approach based on three biotic indices. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 52(1): 34–47
Li Baoquan, Wang Quanchao, Li Bingjun. 2013. Assessing the benthic ecological status in the stressed coastal waters of Yantai, Yellow Sea, using AMBI and M-AMBI. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 75(1–2): 53–61
Liu Ruiyu. 2008. Checklist of Marine Biota of China Seas (in Chinese). Beijing: Science Press, 405–870
Liu Lusan, Li Baoquan, Lin Kuixuan, et al. 2014. Assessing benthic ecological status in coastal area near Changjiang River estuary using AMBI and M-AMBI. Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 32(2): 290–305
Liu Sumei, Li Lingwei, Zhang Guiling, et al. 2012. Impacts of human activities on nutrient transports in the Huanghe (Yellow River) estuary. Journal of Hydrology, 430-431: 103–110
Luo Xianxiang, Zhang Juan, Yang Jianqiang, et al. 2014. Assessing the benthic habitat quality in the Huanghe (Yellow River) Estuary and its adjacent areas using AMBI and M-AMBI. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 33(9): 117–124
Medeiros J P, Chaves M L, Silva G, et al. 2012. Benthic condition in low salinity areas of the Mira estuary (Portugal): lessons learnt from freshwater and marine assessment tools. Ecological Indicators, 19: 79–88
Muniz P, Venturini N, Pires-Vanin A M S, et al. 2005. Testing the applicability of a Marine Biotic Index (AMBI) to assessing the ecological quality of soft-bottom benthic communities, in the South America Atlantic region. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 50(6): 624–637
Muxika I, Borja Á, Bald J. 2007. Using historical data, expert judgement and multivariate analysis in assessing reference conditions and benthic ecological status, according to the European Water Framework Directive. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 55(1–6): 16–29
Pielou E C. 1975. Ecological Diversity. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 165
Pinto R, Patrício J, Baeta A, et al. 2009. Review and evaluation of estuarine biotic indices to assess benthic condition. Ecological Indicators, 9(1): 1–25
Rosenberg R, Blomqvist M, Nilsson H C, et al. 2004. Marine quality assessment by use of benthic species-abundance distributions: a proposed new protocol within the European Union Water Framework Directive. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 49(9–10): 728–739
Valença A P M C, Santos P J P. 2012. Macrobenthic community for assessment of estuarine health in tropical areas (Northeast, Brazil): Review of macrofauna classification in ecological groups and application of AZTI Marine Biotic Index. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 64(9): 1809–1820
Veríssimo H, Neto J M, Teixeira H, et al. 2012. Ability of benthic indicators to assess ecological quality in estuaries following management. Ecological Indicators, 19: 130–143
Wang Houjie, Bi Naishuang, Saito Y, et al. 2010. Recent changes in sediment delivery by the Huanghe (Yellow River) to the sea: Causes and environmental implications in its estuary. Journal of Hydrology, 391(3–4): 302–313
Wang Houjie, Yang Zuosheng, Saito Y, et al. 2007. Stepwise decreases of the Huanghe (Yellow River) sediment load (1950–2005): Impacts of climate change and human activities. Global and Planetary Change, 57(3–4): 331–354
Wells P G. 2003. Assessing health of the Bay of Fundy-concepts and framework. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 46(9): 1059–1077
Wetzel M A, von der Ohe P C, Manz W, et al. 2012. The ecological quality status of the Elbe estuary. A comparative approach on different benthic biotic indices applied to a highly modified estuary. Ecological Indicators, 19: 118–129
Ye Lu, Zhang Luoping, Guo Juan, et al. 2014. Integrated system of marine environmental monitoring and assessment in estuary 1: A case study of water surveillance monitoring in Pearl River Estuary. Marine Environmental Science (in Chinese), 33(1): 105–112
Zettler M L, Schiedek D, Bobertz B. 2007. Benthic biodiversity indices versus salinity gradient in the southern Baltic Sea. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 55(1–6): 258–270
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Foundation item: The National Natural Science Foundation of China—Shandong Joint Fund for Marine Science Research Centers under contract No. U1406403; the National Marine Public Welfare Research Project of China under contract No. 201405007; the Environmental Assessment Projects of State Oceanic Administration People's Republic of China under contract No. DOMEP (MEA)-01-01.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Luo, X., Sun, K., Yang, J. et al. A comparison of the applicability of the Shannon-Wiener index, AMBI and M-AMBI indices for assessing benthic habitat health in the Huanghe (Yellow River) Estuary and adjacent areas. Acta Oceanol. Sin. 35, 50–58 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-016-0842-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-016-0842-9