Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of the applicability of the Shannon-Wiener index, AMBI and M-AMBI indices for assessing benthic habitat health in the Huanghe (Yellow River) Estuary and adjacent areas

  • Published:
Acta Oceanologica Sinica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

From a dataset of macrobenthos obtained from 18 cruises from 2004 to 2013 in the Huanghe (Yellow River) Estuary and its adjacent areas, the composition and characteristics of macrobenthos were analyzed, and the applicability of the Shannon-Wiener Index (H′), AZTI’s Marine Biotic Index (AMBI) and multivariate AMBI (MAMBI) for assessing benthic habitat quality was compared. The results showed a total of 203 macrobenthos in the study area. The macrobenthos were dominated by polychaetes, followed by mollusks and crustaceans. The macrobenthic ecological groups were dominated by EGI, EGII and EGIII, which respectively accounted for 31.5%, 36.0% and 21.2% of the total. There were significant differences between the evaluation results of the three indices. The ecological quality status (EQS) levels given by the AMBI were greater than those given by the H′ and M-AMBI. The AMBI could not reflect the differences between 11 sites but the H′ and M-AMBI could do. Moreover, the three indices responded well to the variations in salinity (S) and dissolved oxygen (DO) in the waters. The H′ and M-AMBI also responded sensitively to the differences in physical parameters, such as water depth and sediment texture. The correlation between M-AMBI and environmental pressure gradient data was the strongest. The MAMBI could effectively distinguish degraded conditions from undegraded but the H′ and AMBI could not. Therefore, the M-AMBI reflected benthic habitat health well in the study areas. However, the objectivity of evaluation results of M-AMBI needs further verification by physical, chemical and biological methods. The thresholds also need further discussion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bazairi H, Bayed A, Hily C. 2005. Structure and bioassessment of benthic communities of a lagoonal ecosystem of the Atlantic Moroccan coast. Comptes Rendus Biologies, 328(10–11): 977–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borja A, Dauer D M, Díaz R, et al. 2008. Assessing estuarine benthic quality conditions in Chesapeake Bay: A comparison of three indices. Ecological Indicators, 8(4): 395–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borja A, Franco J, Pérez V. 2000. A marine biotic index to establish the ecological quality of soft-bottom benthos within European estuarine and coastal environments. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 40(12): 1100–1114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borja A, Josefson A B, Miles A, et al. 2007. An approach to the intercalibration of benthic ecological status assessment in the North Atlantic ecoregion, according to the European Water Framework Directive. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 55(1–6): 42–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borja A, Miles A, Occhipinti-Ambrogi A, et al. 2009. Current status of macroinvertebrate methods used for assessing the quality of European marine waters: implementing the water framework directive. Hydrobiologia, 633(1): 181–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borja A, Muxika I. 2005. Guidelines for the use of AMBI (AZTI’s Marine Biotic Index) in the assessment of the benthic ecological quality. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 50(7): 787–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borja A, Muxika I, Franco J. 2003. The application of a Marine Biotic Index to different impact sources affecting soft-bottom benthic communities along European coasts. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 46(7): 835–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borja A, Tunberg B G. 2011. Assessing benthic health in stressed subtropical estuaries, eastern Florida, USA using AMBI and MAMBI. Ecological Indicators, 11(2): 295–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai Wenqian, Borja Á, Liu Lusan, et al. 2014. Assessing benthic health under multiple human pressures in Bohai Bay (China), using density and biomass in calculating AMBI and M-AMBI. Marine Ecology, 35(2): 180–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai Lizhe, Hong Huasheng, Huang Yushan. 1997. Spatial and temporal variations of macrobenthic community in Victoria Harbor of Hong Kong. Haiyang Xuebao (in Chinese), 19(2): 65–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai Lizhe, Li Hongmei, Lin Peng, et al. 2001. Analysis of environmental effect and polychaete quantitative variations on intertidal mudflat in Shenzhen estuary. Journal of Xiamen University (Natural Science) (in Chinese), 40(3): 741–750

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai Wenqian, Liu Lusan, Meng Wei, et al. 2012. The suitability of AMBI to benthic quality assessment on the intertidal zones of Bohai Sea. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae (in Chinese), 32(4): 992–1000

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai Lizhe, Ma Li, Gao Yang, et al. 2002. Analysis on assessing criterion for polluted situation using species diversity index of marine macrofauna. Journal of Xiamen University (Natural Science) (in Chinese), 41(5): 641–646

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz R J, Solan M, Valente R M. 2004. A review of approaches for classifying benthic habitats and evaluating habitat quality. Journal of Environmental Management, 73(3): 165–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan Hui, Huang Haijun. 2008. Response of coastal marine eco-environment to river fluxes into the sea: A case study of the Huanghe (Yellow) River mouth and adjacent waters. Marine Environmental Research, 65(5): 378–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forde J, Shin P K, Somerfield P J, et al. 2013. M-AMBI derived from taxonomic levels higher than species allows Ecological Status assessments of benthic habitats in new geographical areas. Ecological Indicators, 34: 411–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grall J, Glémarec M. 1997. Using biotic indices to estimate macrobenthic community perturbations in the Bay of Brest. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 44: 43–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy R, Arthur W, Keegan B F. 2011. Long-term trends in benthic habitat quality as determined by Multivariate AMBI and Infaunal Quality Index in relation to natural variability: A case study in Kinsale Harbour, south coast of Ireland. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 62(7): 1427–1436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labrune C, Amouroux J M, Sarda R, et al. 2006. Characterization of the ecological quality of the coastal Gulf of Lions (NW Mediterranean). A comparative approach based on three biotic indices. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 52(1): 34–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Baoquan, Wang Quanchao, Li Bingjun. 2013. Assessing the benthic ecological status in the stressed coastal waters of Yantai, Yellow Sea, using AMBI and M-AMBI. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 75(1–2): 53–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Ruiyu. 2008. Checklist of Marine Biota of China Seas (in Chinese). Beijing: Science Press, 405–870

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Lusan, Li Baoquan, Lin Kuixuan, et al. 2014. Assessing benthic ecological status in coastal area near Changjiang River estuary using AMBI and M-AMBI. Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 32(2): 290–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Sumei, Li Lingwei, Zhang Guiling, et al. 2012. Impacts of human activities on nutrient transports in the Huanghe (Yellow River) estuary. Journal of Hydrology, 430-431: 103–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo Xianxiang, Zhang Juan, Yang Jianqiang, et al. 2014. Assessing the benthic habitat quality in the Huanghe (Yellow River) Estuary and its adjacent areas using AMBI and M-AMBI. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 33(9): 117–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medeiros J P, Chaves M L, Silva G, et al. 2012. Benthic condition in low salinity areas of the Mira estuary (Portugal): lessons learnt from freshwater and marine assessment tools. Ecological Indicators, 19: 79–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muniz P, Venturini N, Pires-Vanin A M S, et al. 2005. Testing the applicability of a Marine Biotic Index (AMBI) to assessing the ecological quality of soft-bottom benthic communities, in the South America Atlantic region. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 50(6): 624–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muxika I, Borja Á, Bald J. 2007. Using historical data, expert judgement and multivariate analysis in assessing reference conditions and benthic ecological status, according to the European Water Framework Directive. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 55(1–6): 16–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pielou E C. 1975. Ecological Diversity. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 165

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto R, Patrício J, Baeta A, et al. 2009. Review and evaluation of estuarine biotic indices to assess benthic condition. Ecological Indicators, 9(1): 1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg R, Blomqvist M, Nilsson H C, et al. 2004. Marine quality assessment by use of benthic species-abundance distributions: a proposed new protocol within the European Union Water Framework Directive. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 49(9–10): 728–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valença A P M C, Santos P J P. 2012. Macrobenthic community for assessment of estuarine health in tropical areas (Northeast, Brazil): Review of macrofauna classification in ecological groups and application of AZTI Marine Biotic Index. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 64(9): 1809–1820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veríssimo H, Neto J M, Teixeira H, et al. 2012. Ability of benthic indicators to assess ecological quality in estuaries following management. Ecological Indicators, 19: 130–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Houjie, Bi Naishuang, Saito Y, et al. 2010. Recent changes in sediment delivery by the Huanghe (Yellow River) to the sea: Causes and environmental implications in its estuary. Journal of Hydrology, 391(3–4): 302–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Houjie, Yang Zuosheng, Saito Y, et al. 2007. Stepwise decreases of the Huanghe (Yellow River) sediment load (1950–2005): Impacts of climate change and human activities. Global and Planetary Change, 57(3–4): 331–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells P G. 2003. Assessing health of the Bay of Fundy-concepts and framework. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 46(9): 1059–1077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetzel M A, von der Ohe P C, Manz W, et al. 2012. The ecological quality status of the Elbe estuary. A comparative approach on different benthic biotic indices applied to a highly modified estuary. Ecological Indicators, 19: 118–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye Lu, Zhang Luoping, Guo Juan, et al. 2014. Integrated system of marine environmental monitoring and assessment in estuary 1: A case study of water surveillance monitoring in Pearl River Estuary. Marine Environmental Science (in Chinese), 33(1): 105–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Zettler M L, Schiedek D, Bobertz B. 2007. Benthic biodiversity indices versus salinity gradient in the southern Baltic Sea. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 55(1–6): 258–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xianxiang Luo.

Additional information

Foundation item: The National Natural Science Foundation of China—Shandong Joint Fund for Marine Science Research Centers under contract No. U1406403; the National Marine Public Welfare Research Project of China under contract No. 201405007; the Environmental Assessment Projects of State Oceanic Administration People's Republic of China under contract No. DOMEP (MEA)-01-01.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luo, X., Sun, K., Yang, J. et al. A comparison of the applicability of the Shannon-Wiener index, AMBI and M-AMBI indices for assessing benthic habitat health in the Huanghe (Yellow River) Estuary and adjacent areas. Acta Oceanol. Sin. 35, 50–58 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-016-0842-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-016-0842-9

Keywords

Navigation