Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Percutaneous endoscopic colostomy/caecostomy - A minimally invasive approach to certain colonic disorders: Report of five cases and review of the literature

  • Case Series
  • Published:
Hellenic Journal of Surgery

Abstract

Aim-Background

Percutaneous endoscopic colostomy/caecostomy (PEC) has recently been introduced as an alternative to surgery in selected patients for the treatment of various colonic disorders, including colonic pseudoobstruction, recurrent sigmoid volvulus or severe slow transit constipation.

Methods

We report our experience of five cases with colonic pseudo-obstruction managed with PEC to allow decompression of the colon and review the literature.

Results

The procedure was effective in relieving the symptoms in all patients and to date, surgical treatment has been avoided in all cases.

Conclusion

Percutaneous endoscopic colostomy/caecostomy is a safe and effective management option for selected patients with certain colonic disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ponsky J, Aszodi A, Perse D. Percutaneous endoscopic cecostomy: a new approach to nonobstructive colonic dilation. Gastrointest Endosc 1986; 32:108–111

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Baraza W, Brown S, McAlindon M, et al. Prospective analysis of percutaneous endoscopic colostomy at a tertiary referral centre. Br J Surg 2007; 94:1415–20

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ennis O, Feroz A, Stephenson B. Percutaneous endoscopic colostomy: An alternative treatment of acute colonic pseudoobstruction. Colorectal Dis 2001; 3:205–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Thompson A, Pearson T, Ellul J, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic colostomy in patients with chronic intestinal pseudoobstruction. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59:113–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Saunders M, Kimmney M. Systematic review: acute colonic pseudo-obstruction. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005; 22:917–25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cowman S, Watson C, Elltringham M, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic colostomy of the left side of the colon. Gastrointst Endosc 2007; 65:1007–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lal K, Morgenstern R, Vinjiraeyer P, et al. Sigmoid volvulus an update. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2006; 16:175–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mullen R, Church N, Yalamarthi S. Volvulus of the sigmoid colon treated by percutaneous endoscopic colostomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2009; 19:e64–e6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Al-Alawi IK. Percutaneous endoscopic colostomy: A new technique for the treatment of recurrent sigmoid volvulus. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2010; 16:120–2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Percutaneous endoscopic colostomy: interventional procedure guidance (IPG 161), 2006

  11. Sheers R, Chapman S. The buried bumper syndrome: a complication of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Gut 1998; 43:586

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Heriot A, Tilney H, Simson J. The application of percutaneous endoscopic colostomy to the management of obstructed defecation. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45:700–2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chr. Koundouris.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koundouris, C., Thivaios, I., Chrysoulas, G. et al. Percutaneous endoscopic colostomy/caecostomy - A minimally invasive approach to certain colonic disorders: Report of five cases and review of the literature. Hellenic J Surg 88, 93–96 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13126-016-0293-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13126-016-0293-y

Key words

Navigation