Skip to main content
Log in

The physical and psychological effects of breast reconstruction in breast cancer patients. A retrospective quantitative analysis between 2009 and 2011 at Mater Dei Hospital, Malta

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hellenic Journal of Surgery

Abstract

Breast cancer is a devastating disease afflicting many women. The aim of this retrospective review was to assess the physical and psychological effects of patients who underwent breast reconstruction after breast cancer surgery.

Methods

Clearance from the patients’ consultants, data protection officer and medical ethics committee was sought and granted. A participation letter was sent to 67 eligible patients who had reconstructive breast surgery between 2009 and 2011. Forty-two (63%) patients agreed to participate. These patients had a short personal interview during which two questionnaires (SF-36v2 health survey and one on the physical aspects) were completed.

Results

The patients’ mean age was 53.9 years (range 31-75). Reconstructive breast surgery using implant-only was performed in twenty-eight (66.7%) cases. Twenty-three (54.8%) of the forty-two patients had complications, with 1.35 complications/per person affected. The complication rate did not differ significantly amongst the different reconstruction groups (p=0.196). Patients who underwent autologous and oncoplastic reconstructive procedures scored significantly higher satisfaction scores than the prosthesis and prosthesis/autologous group (p= 0.01). Whether or not the reconstruction was immediate or delayed or the patients had complications, did not have statistically significant effects on the patients’ health domain scores (p>0.05). The difference of two proportions between the sample studied and the norm showed that the sample studied had a statistically significant higher depression risk than the norm population (p=0.0154).

Major conclusions

Complication rates were comparable amongst the different reconstruction techniques. A higher than normal depression risk was found in the sample studied and therefore improvement of the support services given to patients is recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kataja V, Catsiglione M. Primary breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. On Behalf of the ESMO Guidelines Working Group. Annals of Oncology 20 (Supplement 4): iv10–iv14, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hanwright PJ, Davila AA, Hirsch EM, et al. The differential effect of BMI on prosthetic versus autogenous breast reconstruction: A multivariate analysis of 12, 986 patients. Breast 2013; 22:938–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Veronesi P, De Lorenzi F, Ballardini B, et al. Immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy. The Breast 2011; 20:S104–S7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Elder EE, Brandberg Y, Bjorlund T, et al. Quality of life and patient satisfaction in breast cancer patients after immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective study. Breast 2005; 14:201–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Thomson HJ, Winters ZE, Brandberg Y, et al. The early development phases of a European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) module to assess patient reported outcomes (PROs) in women undergoing breast reconstruction. Eur J of Cancer 2013; 49:1018–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Malta National Cancer Registry compiled by Dr. Miriam Dalmas 2002 https://ehealth.gov.mt/HealthPortal/chief_medical_officer/healthinfor_research/registries/cancers. aspx (online access via provided web link)

  7. American Joint Committee of Cancer: Breast Cancer Staging 7th Version https://cancerstaging.org/references-tools/quickreferences/Pages/default.aspx

  8. International Diabetes Federation http://www.idf.org/membership/eur/malta

  9. Joseph M. Serletti. Breast Reconstruction of Autogenous Tissue. In: Butler CE, Fine NA, editors. Principles of Cancer and Reconstructive Surgery. 2008, Springer, New York USA.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hagen AI, Maehle L, Veda N, et al. Risk Reducing Mastectomy, breast reconstruction and patient satisfaction in Norwegian BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. The Breast 2014; 23:38–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Heneghan HM, Prichard RS, Lyons R, et al. Quality of life after immediate breast reconstruction and skin-sparing mastectomy-a comparison with patients undergoing breast conserving surgery. European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO) 2011; 37:937

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rubino C, Figus A, Lorettu L, et al. Post-mastectomy reconstruction: a comparative analysis on psychological and psychopathological outcomes. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2007; 60:509–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marija Agius.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Agius, M., Camilleri, L. & Galea, J. The physical and psychological effects of breast reconstruction in breast cancer patients. A retrospective quantitative analysis between 2009 and 2011 at Mater Dei Hospital, Malta. Hellenic J Surg 88, 79–84 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13126-016-0291-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13126-016-0291-0

Key words

Navigation