Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Early experience with coronary debulking devices in a newcomer facility after introducing revised facility criteria in Japan

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Coronary debulking devices are essential in obtaining optimal results in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for severely calcified lesions. However, since the introduction of these devices in Japan, the presence of full-time cardiovascular surgeons in their own facilities has been an essential condition (on-site surgical back-up) as the facility criteria for their use. The criteria were revised in April 2020, making their implementation possible at our hospital. Between May 2020 and January 2022, we administered PCIs using rotational atherectomy (RA) for 33 lesions in 28 patients and orbital atherectomy system (OAS) for 36 lesions in 27 patients. The most preferred strategy in our hospital is OAS via the distal radial approach using a 6Fr Glide sheath or RA via the femoral approach using a 7Fr sheath. The percentages of usable imaging modality as an initial device without lesion modification were 57.1 and 66.7% in the RA and OAS groups, respectively. In the RA procedure, 1.5- and 2.0-mm Rota burrs were more frequently adopted for the initial and second sessions, respectively. In the OAS procedure, the debulking was always initiated at a low speed. Nineteen of the 27 patients underwent additional high-speed debulking. Pre-procedural quantitative coronary angiographic analysis revealed that the minimal lumen diameter was significantly smaller in the RA than in the OAS group. Debulking procedures were successful in all patients excluding two instances of procedure-related complications in the RA group, one of which was coronary perforation safely treated via covered stent deployment without any resulting hemodynamic instability. Our early experience with coronary debulking devices with off-site surgical back-up clearly reveals the safety and feasibility of this procedure in a newcomer facility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guedeney P, Claessen BE, Mehran R, Mintz GS, Liu M, Sorrentino S, Giustino G, et al. Coronary calcification and long term outcomes according to drug-eluting stent generation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13:1417–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Copeland-Halperin RS, Baber U, Aquino M, Rajamanickam A, Roy S, Hasan C, et al. Prevalence, correlates, and impact of coronary calcification on adverse events following PCI with newer-generation DES: findings from a large multiethnic registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;91:859–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sakakura K, Inohara T, Kohsaka S, Amano T, Uemura S, Ishii H, et al. Incidence and determinants of complications in rotational atherectomy. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9: e004278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Redfors B, Sharma SK, Saito S, Kini AS, Lee AC, Moses JW, et al. Novel micro crown orbital atherectomy for severe lesion calcification. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13: e008993.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Saito Y, Kobayashi Y, Fujii K, Sonoda S, Tsujita K, Hibi K, et al. Clinical expert consensus document on standards for measurements and assessment of intravascular ultrasound from the Japanese association of cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2020;35:1–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fujii K, Kubo T, Otake H, Nakazawa G, Sonoda S, Hibi K, et al. Expert consensus statement for quantitative measurements and morphological assessment of optical coherence tomography. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2020;35:13–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yoshioka K, Nomura T, Kikai M, Kiera N, Tatsumi T. Different types of vascular response to stent implantation in lesion with calcified nodule. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2019;34:279–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kubo T, Shimamura K, Ino Y, Yamaguchi T, Matsuo Y, Shiono Y, et al. Superficial calcium fracture after PCI as assessed by OCT. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:1228–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sakakura K, Ito Y, Shibata Y, Okamura A, Kashima Y, Nakamura S, et al. Clinical expert consensus document on rotational atherectomy from the Japanese association of cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2021;36:1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mehanna E, Abbott JD, Bezerra HG. Optimizing percutaneous coronary intervention in calcified lesions. Insights from optical coherence tomography of atherectomy. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11:006813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Editage (www. Editage.com) for English language editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tetsuya Nomura.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

Written informed consents were obtained from all the study patients.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nomura, T., Wada, N., Ota, I. et al. Early experience with coronary debulking devices in a newcomer facility after introducing revised facility criteria in Japan. Cardiovasc Interv and Ther 38, 104–112 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-022-00885-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-022-00885-9

Keywords

Navigation