Skip to main content
Log in

Short versus prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy duration after bare-metal stent implantation: 2-month landmark analysis from the CREDO-Kyoto registry cohort-2

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One-month duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has widely been adopted after bare-metal stent (BMS) implantation in the real clinical practice. However, it has not been adequately addressed yet whether DAPT for only 1-month could provide sufficient protection from ischemic events beyond 1-month after BMS implantation. We assessed the effects of short DAPT relative to prolonged DAPT on clinical outcomes with the landmark analysis at 2 month after BMS implantation. Among 13,058 consecutive patients enrolled in the CREDO-Kyoto registry cohort-2, this study population consisted of 4905 patients treated with BMS only in whom the information on the status of antiplatelet therapy was available at 2 month after stent implantation [single-antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) group: N = 2575 (acute myocardial infarction (AMI): N = 1257, and non-AMI: N = 1318), and DAPT group: N = 2330 (AMI: N = 1304, and non-AMI: N = 1026)]. Cumulative 3-year incidence of the primary outcome measure (a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, definite stent thrombosis, and GUSTO moderate/severe bleeding) was not significantly different between the SAPT and DAPT groups (9.8 versus 10.6 %, P = 0.34). After adjusting confounders, the risk of SAPT relative to DAPT for the primary outcome measure remained insignificant in the entire cohort (HR 0.97, 95 % CI 0.79–1.19, P = 0.77), and in both AMI and non-AMI strata without any significant interaction between clinical presentation (AMI versus non-AMI) and the effect of SAPT relative to DAPT (P interaction = 0.56). In conclusion, short DAPT <2 month after BMS implantation was as safe as prolonged DAPT ≥2-month in both AMI and non-AMI patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Leon MB, Baim DS, Popma JJ, Gordon PC, Cutlip DE, Ho KK, et al. A clinical trial comparing three antithrombotic-drug regimens after coronary-artery stenting. Stent anticoagulation restenosis study investigators. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1665–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schomig A, Neumann FJ, Kastrati A, Schuhlen H, Blasini R, Hadamitzky M, et al. A randomized comparison of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy after the placement of coronary-artery stents. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:1084–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, Bailey SR, Bittl JA, Cercek B, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention: Executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines and the society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions. Circulation. 2011;124:2574–609.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, Collet JP, Cremer J, Falk V, Authors/Task Force members, et al. ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J. 2014;2014(35):2541–619.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stefanini GG, Siontis GC, Cao D, Heg D, Juni P, Windecker S. Short versus long duration of DAPT after DES implantation: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:953–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kimura T, Morimoto T, Furukawa Y, Nakagawa Y, Kadota K, Iwabuchi M, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in real world clinical practice in Japan. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2011;26:234–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kimura T, Morimoto T, Nakagawa Y, Tamura T, Kadota K, Yasumoto H, et al. Antiplatelet therapy and stent thrombosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. Circulation. 2009;119:987–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Iannaccone M, D’Ascenzo F, Templin C, Omede P, Montefusco A, Guagliumi G et al. Optical coherence tomography evaluation of intermediate-term healing of different stent types: systemic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016. doi:10.1093/ehjci/jew070.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wilson GJ, Marks A, Berg KJ, Eppihimer M, Sushkova N, Hawley SP, et al. The synergy biodegradable polymer everolimus eluting coronary stent: porcine vascular compatibility and polymer safety study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;86:E247–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yusuf S, Zhao F, Mehta SR, Chrolavicius S, Tognoni G, Fox KK. Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:494–502.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Goldstein JA, Demetriou D, Grines CL, Pica M, Shoukfeh M, O’Neill WW. Multiple complex coronary plaques in patients with acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:915–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Alexander JH, Lopes RD, James S, Kilaru R, He Y, Mohan P, et al. Apixaban with antiplatelet therapy after acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:699–708.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yamaji K, Natsuaki M, Morimoto T, Ono K, Furukawa Y, Nakagawa Y, et al. Long-term outcomes after coronary stent implantation in patients presenting with versus without acute myocardial infarction (an observation from coronary revascularization demonstrating outcome study-Kyoto registry cohort-2). Am J Cardiol. 2015;116:15–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim BK, Hong MK, Shin DH, Nam CM, Kim JS, Ko YG, et al. A new strategy for discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy: the RESET trial (real safety and efficacy of 3-month dual antiplatelet therapy following endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent implantation). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:1340–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Feres F, Costa RA, Abizaid A, Leon MB, Marin-Neto JA, Botelho RV, et al. Three vs 12 months of dual antiplatelet therapy after zotarolimus-eluting stents: the OPTIMIZE randomized trial. JAMA. 2013;310:2510–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nishio R, Shinke T, Morino Y, Tanabe K, Furuya J, Takizawa K, et al. Early phase arterial reaction following drug-eluting and bare-metal stent implantation in patients with st-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Int Heart J. 2015;56:389–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Palmerini T, Benedetto U, Bacchi-Reggiani L, Della Riva D, Biondi-Zoccai G, Feres F, et al. Mortality in patients treated with extended duration dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stent implantation: a pairwise and bayesian network meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet. 2015;385:2371–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Genereux P, Giustino G, Witzenbichler B, Weisz G, Stuckey TD, Rinaldi MJ, et al. Incidence, predictors, and impact of post-discharge bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:1036–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mauri L, Kereiakes DJ, Yeh RW, Driscoll-Shempp P, Cutlip DE, Steg PG, et al. Twelve or 30 months of dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stents. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:2155–66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Anderson PG, Bajaj RK, Baxley WA, Roubin GS. Vascular pathology of balloon-expandable flexible coil stents in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:372–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ueda Y, Nanto S, Komamura K, Kodama K. Neointimal coverage of stents in human coronary arteries observed by angioscopy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:341–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Natsuaki M, Morimoto T, Yamamoto E, Shiomi H, Furukawa Y, Abe M, et al. One-year outcome of a prospective trial stopping dual antiplatelet therapy at 3 months after everolimus-eluting cobalt-chromium stent implantation: ShorT and OPtimal duration of Dual AntiPlatelet Therapy after everolimus-eluting cobalt-chromium stent (STOPDAPT) trial. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2015. doi:10.1007/s12928-015-0366-9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Urban P, Meredith IT, Abizaid A, Pocock SJ, Carrie D, Naber C, et al. Polymer-free drug-coated coronary stents in patients at high bleeding risk. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2038–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kolandaivelu K, Swaminathan R, Gibson WJ, Kolachalama VB, Nguyen-Ehrenreich KL, Giddings VL, et al. Stent thrombogenicity early in high-risk interventional settings is driven by stent design and deployment and protected by polymer-drug coatings. Circulation. 2011;123:1400–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Palmerini T, Biondi-Zoccai G, Della Riva D, Stettler C, Sangiorgi D, D’Ascenzo F, et al. Stent thrombosis with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: evidence from a comprehensive network meta-analysis. Lancet. 2012;379:1393–402.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Valgimigli M, Sabate M, Kaiser C, Brugaletta S, de la Torre Hernandez JM, Galatius S, et al. Effects of cobalt-chromium everolimus eluting stents or bare metal stent on fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events: patient level meta-analysis. BMJ. 2014;349:g6427.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Tada T, Byrne RA, Simunovic I, King LA, Cassese S, Joner M, et al. Risk of stent thrombosis among bare-metal stents, first-generation drug-eluting stents, and second-generation drug-eluting stents: results from a registry of 18,334 patients. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6:1267–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We appreciate the supports of the co-investigators participating in the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG registry cohort-2.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takeshi Kimura.

Ethics declarations

The relevant review boards or ethics committees in all participating centers approved the research protocol. Because of retrospective enrollment, written informed consents from the patients were waived; however, we excluded those patients who refused participation in the study when contacted for follow-up. This strategy is concordant with the guidelines for epidemiological studies issued by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan.

Conflict of interest

Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) is the funding source of this study. All authors have no conflict of interests.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 40 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Natsuaki, M., Morimoto, T., Furukawa, Y. et al. Short versus prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy duration after bare-metal stent implantation: 2-month landmark analysis from the CREDO-Kyoto registry cohort-2. Cardiovasc Interv and Ther 33, 23–34 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-016-0429-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-016-0429-6

Keywords

Navigation