Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Farmers’ management of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) diversity, their varietal preference traits and uses in Southern and Central Benin

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is one of the major oilseed legumes contributing to food security in Benin. Unfortunately, several constraints hamper its production leading to a low yield. A good knowledge of on-farm management of peanut diversity and uses that allow its maintenance in traditional Beninese agriculture are prerequisites to establish an efficient breeding programme. Therefore, this study aims to document peanut varietal diversity, folk nomenclature, seed system, storage constraints, pest management practices, varietal preference criteria, cultural taboos and uses in southern and central Benin. Two hundred and sixteen farmers were surveyed through 32 villages in southern and central Benin using rural appraisal tools. Fifty-four peanut local varieties grouped into eight morphotypes based on the seed characteristics were registered. The number of local varieties maintained per village ranged from 1 to 11 and varied between 1 and 4 per household. The drop in yield was the main reason of peanut varietal abandonment. Rodent attacks were the most important constraints of peanut production. Varietal preference criteria varied from ethnic groups with seed size and many pod/seeds per plant as the main preferred traits. Peanut seed system was mainly informal. To alleviate pest problems in stored peanut, producers used biocidal plants and synthetic chemicals. Some cultural taboos and various uses of peanuts have been recorded. Our results suggest that for boosting peanut production in central and southern Benin, breeders must create high-yielding peanut varieties. However, it is important to take into account the preference varietal criteria of each ethnic group for their adoption. For a good estimation of peanut diversity in the study area, morphological and molecular characterizations were recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Raw and treated data generated during study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Abady S, Shimelis H, Janila P (2019) Farmers’ perceived constraints to groundnut production, their variety choice and preferred traits in eastern Ethiopia: implications for drought-tolerance breeding. J Crop Improv. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427528.2019.1625836

    Google Scholar 

  • Adarsh KK (2016) Estimation of population density of different species of rodents in groundnut. Adv Life Sci 5(6):2356–2365

    Google Scholar 

  • Adjou ES, Soumanou MM (2013) Efficacité des extraits de plantes contre les moisissures toxinogènes isolées da l’arachide. J Appl Biosci 70:5555–5566

    Google Scholar 

  • Adjou ES, Yehouenou B, Sossou CM, Soumanou MM, de Souza CA (2012) Occurrence of mycotoxins and associated mycoflora in peanut cake product (kulikuli) marketed in Benin. Afr J Biotechnol 11(78):14354–14360

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Adomou M, Ntare BR, Williams JH (1997) Stability of pod yields and parameters of a simple physiological model for yield among peanut lines in Northern Benin. Peanut Sci 24:107–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguoru CU, Kombur DS, Olasan JO (2015) Comparative efficacy of different species of pepper (Capsicum spp.) in the control of stored groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.) damage by pest of groundnut amongst the TIV speaking people of the north central Nigeria. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci 4(3):1018–1023

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Allotey J, Azalekor W (2000) Some aspects of the biology and control using botanicals of the rice moth, Corcyra cephalonica (Stainton), on some pulses. J Stored Prod Res 36(3):235–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-474x(99)00045-4

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Allotey J, Goswami L (1994) Damage caused to maize and groundnuts by the moths Plodia interpunctella (Hubn.) and Ephestia cautella (Wlk.) and control using local plant materials. Int J Trop Insect Sci 15(03):323–329. https://doi.org/10.1017/s174275840001763x

    Google Scholar 

  • Assogba P, Ewedje E-EBK, Dansi A, Loko YL, Adjatin A, Dansi M, Sanni A (2015) Indigenous knowledge and agromorphological evaluation of the minor crop Kersting’s groundnut (Macrotyloma geocarpum (Harms) Maréchal et Baudet) cultivars of Benin. Genet Resour Crop Evol 63(3):513–529

    Google Scholar 

  • Awad AB, Chan KC, Downie AC, Fink CS (2000) Peanuts as a source of B-sitosterol, a sterol with anticancer properties. Nutr Cancer 36:238–241

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bakoye O, Baoua I, Sitou L, Moctar RM, Amadou L, Njoroge AW, Murdock LL, Baributsa D (2019) Groundnut production and storage in the sahel: challenges and opportunities in the Maradi and Zinder Regions of Niger. J Agric Sci 11(4):25–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Banla EM, Dzidzienyo DK, Beatrice IE, Offei SK, Tongoona P, Desmae H (2018) Groundnut production constraints and farmers’ trait preferences: a pre-breeding study in Togo. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 14:75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-018-0275-y

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Baributsa D, Baoua IB, Bakoye ON, Amadou L, Murdock LL (2017) PICS bags safely store unshelled and shelled groundnuts in Niger. J Stored Prod Res 72:54–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2017.03.007

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Borokini TI, Ighere DA, Clement M, Ajiboye TO, Alowonle AA (2013) Ethnobiological survey of traditional medicine practices in Oyo State. J Med Plants Stud 1(5):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucheyeki TL, Shenkalwa EM, Mapunda TX, Matata LW (2008) On-farm evaluation of promising groundnut varieties for adaptation and adoption in Tanzania. Afr J Agric Res 3(8):531–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Cisse A, Kane A, Souleymane DIA, Sembene M (2018) Evaluation of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) storage methods and Caryedon serratus (Oliver) pest management in the Senegalese Groundnut Basin (Fatick, Kaolack and Kaffrine). J Entomol Zool Stud 6(2):3079–3086

    Google Scholar 

  • Dansi A, Adoukonou-Sagbadja H, Vodouhe R (2010) Diversity, conservation and related wild species of Fonio millet (Digitaria spp.) in the northwest of Benin. Genet Resour Crop Evol 57(6):827–839

    Google Scholar 

  • Daudi H, Shimelis H, Laing M, Okori P, Mponda O (2018) Groundnut production constraints, farming systems, and farmer-preferred traits in Tanzania. J Crop Improv. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427528.2018.1531801

    Google Scholar 

  • Delobel A, Malonga P (1987) Insecticidal properties of six plant materials against Caryedon serratus (Ol.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). J Stored Prod Res 23(3):173–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Didagbe OY, Houngnandan P, Dedehouanou H, Sina H, Bello DO, Toukourou F, Baba ML (2015) Characterization of the peanut production systems in their main agroecological regions in Benin. Eur Sci J 11(33):1857–7881

    Google Scholar 

  • dos Santos F, Medina PF, Lourenção AL, Parisi JJD, de Godoy IJ (2016) Damage caused by fungi and insects to stored peanut seeds before processing. Bragantia 75(2):184–192. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.182

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2018) FAOSTAT database Roma: food and agriculture organization. www.fao.org. Accessed 20 Dec 2019

  • Forsythe L, Nyamanda M, Mwangwela AM, Bennett B (2015) Beliefs taboos and minor crop value chains. Food Cult Soc 18(3):501–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/15528014.2015.1043112

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu X, Xing S, Xiong H, Min H, Zhu X, He J, Feng J, Mu H (2018) Effects of packaging materials on storage quality of peanut kernels. PLoS ONE 13(3):e0190377. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190377

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gbaguidi AA, Faouziath S, Orobiyi A, Dansi M, Akouègninou BA, Dansi A (2015) Connaissances endogènes et perceptions paysannes de l’impact des changements climatiques sur la production et la diversité du niébé (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) et du voandzou (Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc.) au Bénin. Int J Biol Chem Sci 9(5):2520–2541

    Google Scholar 

  • Gbaguidi AA, Dansi A, Loko LY, Dansi M, Sanni A (2013) Diversity and agronomic performances of the cowpea (Vigna unguiculata Walp.) landraces in Southern Benin. Int Res J Agric Sci Soil Sci 3(4):121133

    Google Scholar 

  • Golob P (1997) Current status and future perspectives for inert dusts for control of stored product insects. J Stored Prod Res 33(1):69–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-474x(96)00031-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulluoglu L, Bakal H, Onat B, El Sabagh A, Arioglu H (2016) Characterization of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) seed oil and fatty acids composition under different growing season under Mediterranean environment. J Exp Biol Agric Sci 4(5S):564–571

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hemendra S, Singh NK, Kardam DK (2014) Economic analysis of groundnut crop in Jaipur district of Rajasthan. Agric Update 9(1):59–63

    Google Scholar 

  • IBPGR and ICRISAT (1992) Descriptors for groundnut. In: International Board Plant Genetic Resources, Rome, Italy, and Int. Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru

  • Isanga J, Zhang G-N (2007) Biologically active components and nutraceuticals in peanuts and related products: review. Food Rev Int 23(2):123–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/87559120701224956

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kassa MT, Yeboah SO, Bezabih M (2009) Profiling peanut (Arachis hypogea L.) accessions and cultivars for oleic acid and yield in Botswana. Euphytica 167:293–301

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khan AA, Munir S, Hussain I (2012a) Evaluation of in-burrow baiting technique for control of rodents in groundnut crop. Pak J Zool 44(4):1035–1039

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan MT, Khan NA, Bezabih M, Qureshi MS, Rahman A (2012b) The nutritional value of peanut hay (Arachis hypogaea L.) as an alternate forage source for sheep. Trop Anim Health Prod 45(3):849–853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-012-0297-8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krapovickas A, Vanni RO, Pietrarelli JR, Williams DE, Simpson CE (2009) The peanut landraces from Bolivia. Bonplandia 18(2):95–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim TK (2012) Edible medicinal and non-medicinal plants: fruits, vol 2. Springer Science & Business Media, New York, p 1100

    Google Scholar 

  • Loko YLE, Toffa J, Adjatin A, Akpo AJ, Orobiyi A, Dansi A (2018) Local taxonomy and traditional uses of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces by the sociolinguistic groups in the central region of the Republic of Benin. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 14:52

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Naik MI, Adarsh KK, Hugar SV (2017) Burrow ecology of rodents in and around Groundnut field. J Soil Biol Ecol 37(1):263–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Ndibuagu EO, Arinze OSU, Igweagu PC (2016) Knowledge of causes and complications of malaria, among residents of a rural community in Enugu state, southeast Nigeria. Int Res J Med Sci 4(11):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Ndjeunga J, Ntare BR, Waliyar F, Ramouch M (2006) Groundnut seed systems in West Africa: current practices, constraints and opportunities. Technical Report. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru

  • Obidiegwu JE, Akpabio EM (2017) The geography of yam cultivation in southern Nigeria: exploring its social meanings and cultural functions. J Ethnic Foods 4(1):28–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jef.2017.02.004

    Google Scholar 

  • Odeyemi OO, Ashamo MO (2016) Efficacy of neem plant (Azadirachta indica) extracts in the control of Trogoderma granarium, a pest of stored groundnuts. J Plant Dis Prot 112:586–593

    Google Scholar 

  • Okello DK, Biruma M, Deom CM (2010) Overview of groundnuts research in Uganda: past, present and future. Afr J Biotechnol 9(39):6448–6459

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebei K, Gnouma A, Herchi W, Sakouhi F, Boukhchina S (2013) Lipids, proteins, phenolic composition, antioxidant and antibacterial activities of seeds of peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) cultivated in Tunisia. Biol Res 46(3):257–263

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sridhara S, Tripathi RS (2005) Recent trends in coordinated research on rodent control. Rodent Newslett 34:2–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanzubil PB (2016) Incidence of arthropod pests and diseases of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in Northern Ghana. J Entomol Zool Stud 4(4):29–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiaw C, Gueye S, Gueye A, Samb A, Sembène M (2007) Ovicid and adulticid effect of powders and extracts of Calotropis procera AIT. and Senna occidentalis L. on Caryedon serratus (OL.) destroyer of groundnuts stocks. J Sci 7(3):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsusaka TW, Msere HW, Gondwe L, Madzonga O, Clarke S, Siambi M, Okori P (2016) Assessing the post-harvest constraints in smallholders’ groundnut production: a survey in central Malawi. Agric Sci Res J 6(9):213–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Veeraiah A, Shilpakala V, Ramalakshmi Devi S, Ankaiah Kumar K (2019) Constraint analysis of groundnut cultivation in YSR District of Andhra Pradesh, India. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci 8(07):1488–1493

    Google Scholar 

  • Videgla EG, Floquet A, Mongbo RL, Tossou HS, Adjovi G (2016a) Prospects for a geographical indication (GI): evaluation of the willingness to pay (WTP) of two food products: peanut oil (Agonlinmi) and wafers (Kwlikwli) of the agonlin areas of Benin. Bus Manag Econ Res 2(3):46–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Videgla EG, Floquet A, Mongbo R, Garba K, Tossou HS, Toukourou F (2016b) Liens à l’origine et qualité spécifique d’un produit de l’artisanat agroalimentaire du Bénin—le kluiklui d’Agonlin. Cah Agric 25:35003

    Google Scholar 

  • Vorster HJ, Stevens JB, Steyn GJ (2008) Production systems of traditional leafy vegetables: challenges for research and extension. S Afr Tydskr Landbouvoorl/S Afr J Agric Ext 37:85–96

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization [WHO] (2005) The WHO recommended classification of pesticides by hazard and guidelines to classification: 2004. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahran HA, Tawfeuk HZ (2019) Physicochemical properties of new peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) varieties. OCL 26(19):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Zekarias E, Haile A (2017) Effect of some botanicals and table salt against Zabrotes subfasciatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) on stored field pea (Pisum sativum L.) grain. Int J Trop Insect Sci 38(01):16–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1742758417000194

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We express our sincere gratitude to all village chiefs and surveyed farmers for their contributions to the success of this study.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LYLE designed and funded the study. OA, HE and GD carried out interview work. LYLE analysed, interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript. LYLE, MD, TJ, Z-TM, and DA corrected the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yêyinou Laura Estelle Loko.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Ethics approval

All data were collected under previous consent of each participant.

Informed consent

Not applicable.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Loko, Y.L.E., Montcho, D., Zandjanakou-Tachin, M. et al. Farmers’ management of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) diversity, their varietal preference traits and uses in Southern and Central Benin. J. Crop Sci. Biotechnol. 23, 259–272 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-020-00034-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-020-00034-9

Keywords

Navigation