Skip to main content
Log in

GGE Biplot Analysis of Genotype by Environment Interaction in Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Genotypes in Northwestern Ethiopia

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ten field pea genotypes were evaluated in randomized complete block design with four replications for three consecutive years (2010-2012) main cropping seasons at four locations in each year. The objectives were to determine magnitude of genotype by environment interaction and to identify stable field pea genotype with high grain yield to be released as a cultivar to producer for Northwestern Ethiopia. The GGE [genotype main effect (G) and genotype by environment interaction (GE)] biplot graphical tool was used to analyze yield data. The combined analysis of variance revealed a significant difference (P<0.01) among genotypes, environments and genotype-by-environment interaction for grain yield. The average environment coordinate biplot revealed that EH99005-7 (G2) was the most stable and the highest yielding genotype. Polygon view of GGE-biplot showed the presence of three mega-environments. The first section includes the test environments E1 (Adet 2010), E3 (Debretabor 2010), E5 (Adet 2011), E6 (Motta 2011), E7 (Debretabor 2011), E8 (Dabat 2011), E9 (Adet 2012) and E12 (Dabat 2012) which had the variety G1 (EH99009-1) as the winner; the second section contains the environments E4 (Dabat 2010), E10 (Motta 2012) and E11 (Debretabor 2012) with G2 as the best grain yielder and the third section contains the E2 (Motta 2010) with G4 (Tegegnech X EH90026-1-3-1) as the best grain yielder. The comparison GGE- biplot of field pea genotypes with the ideal genotype showed that G2 was the closest genotype for the ideal cultivar. Among the twelve environments, E2, E6 and E10 were more discriminating and E3, E9 and E12 were less discriminating. Genotype EH99005-7 was the most stable and the highest yielding genotype. As a result it is released officially for Northwestern Ethiopia. Therefore, it is recommended to use genotype EH99005-7 for wider cultivation in Northwestern Ethiopia and similar areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asfaw T, Tesfaye G, Beyene D. 1994. Genetics and breeding of field pea. In: A Telaye, G Bejiga, S. Mohan, S. Mohmoud, eds, Cool Season Food Legumes of Ethiopia. Procedings of the First National Cool-Season Food Legumes review Conference, 16-20 December, 1993, Addis Abeba Ethiopia. ICARDA/Institute of Agricultural Research. ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria, pp 285–214

  • Butrón A, Velasco P, Ordás A, Malvar RA. 2004. Yield evaluation of maize cultivars across environments with different levels of pink stem borer infestation. Crop Sci. 44: 741–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Central Statistical Agency (CSA). 2015. Agricultural Sample survey, 2008/9. Report on area and production of crops. Statistical Bulletin No. 446, Volume I, Addis Ababa, 12 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceyhan E, Kahraman A, Ates MK, Karadas S. 2012. Stability analysis on seed yield and its components in peas. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci. 18: 905–911

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan XM, Kang MS, Chen H, Zhang Y, Tan J, Xu C. 2007. Yield stability of maize hybrids evaluated in multi–environment trials in Yunnan, China. Agron. J. 99: 220–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauch HG, Zobel RW. 1997. Identifying mega-environments and targeting genotypes. Crop Sci. 37: 311–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girma T, Getachew T, Geletu B. 2000. AMMI adjestement for yield estimate and classification of genotypes and environments in field pea (Pisum sativum L.). J. Genet. Breed. 54, 183–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez KA, Gomez AA. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, 2nd edn. John Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroonenberg PM. 1995. Introduction to biplots for GXE tables. Research Report No. 51, Centre for Statistics, The University of Queensland, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulusew F, Edoossa F, Tadele T, and Teshome L. 2009. Parametric Stability in field pea (Pisum sativum L.) under South Eastern Ethiopia Conditions. World J. Agric. Sci. 5: 146–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulusew F, Tadele T, Setegn G, Bekele H. 2010. Agronomic performances, disease reaction, yield stability of field pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes in Bale Highlands, Ethiopia. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 4: 238–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Mussa J, Tezera W, Gemechu K. 2006. Review of field pea (Pisum sativum L.) genetics and breeding research in Ethiopia: A review. In: A Kemal, K Gemechu, A Seid, R Malhotra, S Beniwal, K Makkouk, MH Halila, eds., Food and Forage Legumes of Ethiopia: Progress and Prospects. Proceedings of a Workshop on Food and Forage Legumes, 22-26 Sept. 2003, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria, pp 67–79

  • Samonte SOPB, Wilson LT, McClung AM, Medley JC. 2005. Targeting cultivars onto rice growing environments using AMMI and SREG GGE biplot analysis. Crop Science 45: 2414–2424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tezera W. 2000. Genotype by Environment interaction in field pea (Pisum sativum L.) for yield and other traits across central and southern Ethiopia. M.Sc. Thesis. Alemaya University of Agriculture, Dire Dewa

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolossa TT, Kenani G, Sefera T, Jarso M and Bekele Y. 2013. Genotype x environment interaction and performance stability for grain yield in field pea (Pisum Sativum L.) genotypes. Int. J. Plant Breed. 7: 116–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan W. 2001. GGEBiplot―A Windows application for graphical analysis of multi-environment trial data and other types of two-way data. Agron. J. 93: 1111–1118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan W. 2002. Singular-value partitioning in biplot analysis of multi-environment trial data. Agron. J. 94: 990–996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan W, Hunt LA. 2001. Genetic and environmental causes of genotype by environment interaction for winter wheat yield in Ontario. Crop Sci. 41: 19–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan W, Kang MS. 2003. GGE biplot analysis: a graphical tool for breeders, In: MS Kang, eds., Geneticists, and Agronomist. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL

  • Yan W, and Rajcan I. 2002. Biplot evaluation of test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario. Crop Sci. 42: 11–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yan W, Tinker NA. 2006. Biplot analysis of multi-environment trial data: Principles and applications. Can. J. Plant Sci. 86: 623–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan W, Hunt LA, Sheng Q, Szlavnics Z. 2000. Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on GGE biplot. Crop Sci. 40: 596–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tazebachew Asres Yihunie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yihunie, T.A., Gesesse, C.A. GGE Biplot Analysis of Genotype by Environment Interaction in Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Genotypes in Northwestern Ethiopia. J. Crop Sci. Biotechnol. 21, 67–74 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-017-0099-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-017-0099-0

Key words

Navigation