Skip to main content
Log in

Self-reported race and ethnicity of US biobank participants compared to the US Census

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Community Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Precision medicine envisions a future of effective diagnosis, treatment, and prevention grounded in precise understandings of the genetic and environmental determinants of disease. Given that the original genome-wide association studies represented a predominately European White population, and that diversity in genomic studies must account for genetic variation both within and across racial categories, new research studies are at a heightened risk for inadequate representation. Currently biological samples are being made available for sequencing in biobanks across the USA, but the diversity of those samples is unknown. The aims of this study were to describe the types of recruitment and enrollment materials used by US biobanks and the diversity of the samples contained within their collection. Biobank websites and brochures were evaluated for reading level, health literacy, and factors known to encourage the recruitment of minorities, such as showing pictures of diverse populations. Biobank managers were surveyed by mail on the methods and materials used for enrollment, recruitment, consent, and the self-reported race/ethnicity of biobank participants. From 51 US biobanks (68% response rate), recruitment and enrollment materials were in English only, and most of the websites and brochures exceeded a fifth-grade reading level. When compared to the 2015 US Census, self-reported race/ethnicity of participants was not significantly different for Whites (61%) and blacks (13%). The percentages were significantly lower for Hispanics and Latinos (18 vs. 7%, p = 0.00) and Hawaiian/Pacific Islanders (0.2 vs. 0.01%; p = 0.01) and higher for Asians (13 vs. 5%, p = 0.01). Materials for recruitment predominantly in English may limit participation by underrepresented populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Nurse Faculty Scholars Program Grant #72375 and National Human Genome Research Institute grant NHGRI P50 HG007257 and the National Institutes of Clinical and Translational Science UL1RR024156. The authors would like to thank the faculty of the Feinstein Institute for Medical Research at Northwell Health System, Dr. Peter Gregersen, and Marlena Kern for guidance in the development of the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth Gross Cohn.

Ethics declarations

All procedures were followed in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. Informed consent was obtained from all participants for being included in this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cohn, E.G., Hamilton, N., Larson, E.L. et al. Self-reported race and ethnicity of US biobank participants compared to the US Census. J Community Genet 8, 229–238 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-017-0308-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-017-0308-6

Keywords

Navigation