Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Species-diagnostic SNP markers for the black basses (Micropterus spp.): a new tool for black bass conservation and management

  • Methods and Resources Article
  • Published:
Conservation Genetics Resources Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Black basses (genus Micropterus) are apex predators in North American streams, rivers, and lakes and important game fishes. Translocation and introductions for angling, accompanied by intrinsically weak genetic barriers, have led to widespread introgressive hybridization and genetic swamping. Species-diagnostic (fixed allele) SNP markers have been utilized successfully in salmonids to monitor hybridization and genetic integrity. Here, we developed similar resources for black basses through initial genotyping-by-sequencing, followed by validation in additional samples using two panels of 64 SNPs. Results from > 1300 genotyped bass indicated that the developed panels robustly and clearly delineate fifteen species and their hybrids among black basses. The panels represent a flexible, rapid turnaround (~ 1 day), and cost-effective tool that should augment ongoing efforts toward black bass conservation and management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amish SJ, Hohenlohe PA, Painter S, Leary RF, Muhlfeld C, Allendorf FW, Luikart G (2012) RAD sequencing yields a high success rate for westslope cutthroat and rainbow trout species-diagnostic SNP assays. Mol Ecol Resour 12:653–660

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baird NA, Etter PD, Atwood TS, Currey MC, Shiver AL, Lewis ZA, Johnson EA (2008) Rapid SNP discovery and genetic mapping using sequenced RAD markers. PLoS ONE 3:e3376

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Baker WH, Blanton RE, Johnston CE (2013) Diversity within the redeye bass, Micropterus coosae (Perciformes: Centrarchidae) species group, with descriptions of four new species. Zootaxa 3635:379–401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bangs MR, Oswald KJ, Greig TW, Leitner JK, Rankin DM, Quattro JM (2017) Introgressive hybridization and species turnover in reservoirs: a case study involving endemic and invasive basses (Centrarchidae: Micropterus) in southeastern North America. Conserv Genet. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-017-1018-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barwick HK, Oswald K, Quattro J, Barwick R (2006) Redeye bass (Micropterus coosae) and Alabama spotted bass (M. punctulatus henshalli) hybridization in Keowee reservoir. Southeast Nat 5:661–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolnick DI, Near TJ (2005) Tempo of hybrid inviability in Centrarchid fishes (Teleostei: Centrarchidae). Evolution 59:1754–1767

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury PJ, Zhang Z, Kroon DE, Casstevens TM, Ramdoss Y, Buckler ES (2007) TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics 23:2633–2635

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell NR, Harmon SA, Narum SR (2015) Genotyping-in-Thousands by sequencing (GT-seq): a cost effective SNP genotyping method based on custom amplicon sequencing. Mole Ecol Resour 15:855–867

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dakin EE, Porter BA, Freeman BJ, Long JM (2015) Hybridization threatens shoal bass populations in the upper Chattahoochee river basin. In: Tringali MD, Long JM, Birdsong TW, Allen MS (eds) Black bass diversity: multidisciplinary science for conservation, vol 82. American Fisheries Society, Symposium, Bethesda, pp 491–501

    Google Scholar 

  • Elshire RJ, Glaubitz JC, Sun Q, Poland JA, Kawamoto K, Buckler ES, Mitchell SE (2011) A robust, simple genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species. PLoS ONE 6:e19379

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan SP, Jones AG (2017) Substantial differences in bias between single-digest and double-digest RAD-seq libraries: a case study. Mol Ecol Resour. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12734

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman BJ, Taylor AT, Oswald KJ, Wares J, Freeman MC, Quattro JM, Leitner JK (2015) Shoal basses a clade of cryptic identity. In: Tringali MD, Long JM, Birdsong TW, Allen MS (eds) Black bass diversity multidisciplinary science for conservation, vol 82. American Fisheries Society, Symposium, Bethesda, pp 449–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohenlohe PA, Day MD, Amish SJ, Miller MR, Kamps-Hughes N, Boyer MC, Luikart G (2013) Genomic patterns of introgression in rainbow and westslope cutthroat trout illuminated by overlapping paired-end RAD sequencing. Mol Ecol 22:3002–3013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson DA (2002) Ecological effects of Micropterus introductions: the dark side of black bass. In: Phillip DP, Ridgway MS (eds) Black bass ecology conservation and management, vol 31. American Fisheries Society Symposium, Bethesda, pp 221–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson LJ (2017) Molecular tools provide a range of powerful options for the conservationist’s toolbox. Aquat Conserv: Mar Freshw Ecosyst 27:296–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang J, Ma X, He S (2017) Population genetics analysis of the Nujiang catfish Creteuchiloglanis macropterus through a genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphisms resource generated by RAD-seq. Sci Rep 7:2813. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02853-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Li C, Waldbieser G, Bosworth B, Beck BH, Thongda W, Peatman E (2014) SNP discovery in wild and domesticated populations of blue catfish, Ictalurus furcatus, using GBS and subsequent SNP validation. Mol Ecol Resour 14:1261–1270

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li C, Gowan S, Anil A, Beck BH, Thongda W, Kucuktas H, Kaltenboeck L, Peatman E (2015) Discovery and validation of gene-linked diagnostic SNP markers for assessing hybridization between Largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) and Florida bass (M. floridanus). Mol Ecol Resour 15:395–404

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Littrell BM, Lutz-Carrillo DJ, Bonner TH, Fries LT (2007) Status of an introgressed Guadalupe bass population in a central Texas stream. North Am J Fish Manag 27:785–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu F, Lipka AE, Glaubitz J, Elshire R, Cherney JH, Casler MD, Buckler ES, Costich DE (2013) Switchgrass genomic diversity, ploidy, and evolution: novel insights from a network-based SNP discovery protocol. PLoS Genet 9:e1003215

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lutz-Carrillo DJ, Nice CC, Bonner TH, Forstner MRJ, Fries LT (2006) Admixture analysis of Florida largemouth bass and northern largemouth bass using microsatellite loci. Trans Am Fish Soc 135:779–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnelia SJ, Linam G, Saunders K, Parker M, Lutz-Carillo D, Williamson J, Ranft R, Bonner T (2019) Repatriation of Guadalupe Bass Micropterus treculii in the Blanco River, Texas: a case study in the opportunistic use of drought as a fisheries management tool. In: Siepker M, Quinn J (eds) Managing centrarchid fisheries in rivers and streams. Am Fisheries Society, Symposium, Bethesda

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesak F, Tatarenkov A, Earley RL, Avise JC (2014) Hundreds of SNPs vs. dozens of SSRs: which dataset better characterizes natural clonal lineages in a self-fertilizing fish? Front Ecol Evolut. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2014.00074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce PC, Van den Avyle MJ (1997) Hybridization between introduced spotted bass and smallmouth bass in reservoirs. Trans Am Fish Soc 126:939–947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, J. K., Wen, X., & Falush, D. (2010). Documentation for structure software: Version 2.3. Software from http://pritch.bsd.uchicago.edu/structure.html

  • Puechmaille SJ (2016) The program STRUCTURE does not reliably recover the correct population structure when sampling is uneven: subsampling and new estimators alleviate the problem. Mol Ecol Resour 16:608–627

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seyoum S, Barthel BL, Tringali MD, Davis MC, Schmitt SL, Bellotti PS, Porak WF (2013) Isolation and characterization of eighteen microsatellite loci for the largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides, and cross amplification in congeneric species. Conserv Genet Resour 5:697–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafer AB, Wolf JB, Alves PC, Bergström L, Bruford MW, Brännström I, Zieliński P (2015) Genomics and the challenging translation into conservation practice. Trends Ecol Evol 30:78–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw SL (2015) Black bass diversity and conservation: an overview. In: Tringali MD, Long JM, Birdsong TW, Allen MS (eds) Black bass diversity multidisciplinary science for conservation. American Fisheries Society, Symposium, Bethesda, pp 3–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter JE (2015) Black bass diversity: multidisciplinary science for conservation. In: Tringali MD, Long JM, Birdsong TW, Allen MS (eds) Black bass diversity multidisciplinary science for conservation. American Fisheries Society, Symposium, Bethesda, pp 681–685

    Google Scholar 

  • Takamura K (2007) Performance as a fish predator of largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) (Lacepede) invading Japanese freshwaters: a review. Ecol Res 22:940–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor AT, Papeş M, Long JM (2017) Incorporating fragmentation and non-native species into distribution models to inform fluvial fish conservation. Conserv Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor AT, Tringali MD, O’Rourke PM, Long JM (2018) Shoal bass hybridization in the Chattahoochee River Basin near Atlanta, Georgia. J Southeast Assoc Fish Wildl Agencies 5:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Tringali MD, Barthel BL, Seyoum S, Knight JR (2015) The Choctaw bass: an undescribed species of Micropterus in the Gulf Coastal plain rivers of Florida. In: Tringali MD, Long JM, Birdsong TW, Allen MS (eds) Black bass diversity multidisciplinary science for conservation. American Fisheries Society, Symposium, Bethesda, pp 421–448

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Walt JA, Weyl OLF, Woodford DJ, Radloff FGT (2016) Spatial extent and consequences of black bass (Micropterus spp.) invasion in a Cape Floristic Region river basin. Aquat Conserv: Mar Freshw Ecosyst 26:736–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhan L, Paterson IG, Fraser BA, Watson B, Bradbury IR, Nadukkalam Ravindran P, Bentzen P (2017) Megasat: automated inference of microsatellite genotypes from sequence data. Mol Ecol Resour 17:247–256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao H, Li C, Hargrove JS, Bowen BR, Thongda W, Zhang D, Peatman E (2018) SNP marker panels for parentage assignment and traceability in the Florida bass (Micropterus floridanus). Aquaculture 485:30–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was conducted with funding from the Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (ADCNR) and the Southeastern Fish Genetics Cooperative. We are appreciative of collaborators for their assistance in sample collection, including our coauthors, and particularly Steven Sammons and Carol Johnston at School of Fisheries, Aquaculture, and Aquatic Sciences, Auburn University, Steven Rider and Chris McKee at ADCNR, Bud Freeman at Georgia Museum of Natural History and Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, and Patrick Black at the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric Peatman.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

12686_2019_1109_MOESM1_ESM.tiff

Supplementary material 1 STRUCTURE analyses with K = 10 were unable to differentiate Coosa bass, Cahaba bass (A. yellow bars), or Warrior bass (C. yellow bars) while Tallapoosa bass (B) could be distinguished due to the effect of large sample size. STRUCTURE analyses with K = 12 were unable to differentiate Coosa bass, Cahaba bass, or Tallapoosa bass (D. yellow bars) (TIFF 53061 kb)

12686_2019_1109_MOESM2_ESM.tiff

Supplementary material 2 STRUCTURE analyses with K = 9 using the SNP markers demonstrated genetic assignments of each redeye bass species; (A) Coosa bass, (B) Cahaba bass, (C) Tallapoosa bass, and (D) Warrior bass when analyzed with other non-redeye bass species (TIFF 51511 kb)

12686_2019_1109_MOESM3_ESM.tiff

Supplementary material 3 STRUCTURE analyses with K = 5 using the SNP markers revealed hybridization within the Mobile River drainage redeye bass group and outgroup (Alabama bass) (TIFF 17961 kb)

12686_2019_1109_MOESM4_ESM.tiff

Supplementary material 4 STRUCTURE analyses with K = 6 using the SNP markers revealed purity among shoal bass broodstock from GADNR (TIFF 2814 kb)

Supplementary material 5 (XLSX 307 kb)

Supplementary material 6 (XLSX 73 kb)

Supplementary material 7 (XLSX 22 kb)

Supplementary material 8 (XLSX 15 kb)

Supplementary material 9 (XLSX 334 kb)

Supplementary material 10 (XLSX 140 kb)

Supplementary material 11 (XLSX 43 kb)

Supplementary material 12 (XLSX 95 kb)

Supplementary material 13 (XLSX 15 kb)

Supplementary material 14 (XLSX 20 kb)

Supplementary material 15 (XLSX 17 kb)

Supplementary material 16 (XLSX 22 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thongda, W., Lewis, M., Zhao, H. et al. Species-diagnostic SNP markers for the black basses (Micropterus spp.): a new tool for black bass conservation and management. Conservation Genet Resour 12, 319–328 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-019-01109-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-019-01109-8

Keywords

Navigation