Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Homeopathy: from tradition to science?

  • Homeopathy and Integrative Medicine
  • Published:
Journal of Medicine and the Person

Abstract

Homeopathy is a form of therapy based on the similarity (“similia similibus curantur”, like cures like), whose popularity is increasing but whose scientific basis is still under discussion. Starting from the premise that it is a “holistic” medicine, programmatically aimed at the whole person in its entirety and individuality, here we go through an overview of his history, basic concepts and scientific evidence. This therapy was founded by Samuel Hahnemann in the late 18th century, although similar concepts existed previously. It has spread around the world in the 19th century, in part because of its success in epidemics outbreaks, but declined during most of the 20th century. Its popularity was increased in the late 20th and early 21st century in many parts of the world and today stands the problem of its integration with conventional medicine. There are different schools of homeopathy. Homeopathy is controversial mainly because of its use of highly diluted medicines, but there is growing evidence that is not a mere placebo. There is a significant body of clinical research including randomized clinical trials suggesting that homeopathy has an effectiveness in curing many symptoms and in improving the quality of life of patients. Cohort studies, observational and economic have produced favorable results. Despite the long history of scientific controversy, homeopathy is an “anomaly” of modern medicine that deserves further investigation for its potential scientific and ethical merits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bellavite P, Conforti A, Lechi A, Menestrina F, Pomari S (2000) Le medicine complementari: definizioni, applicazioni, evidenze scientifiche disponibili. Utet-periodici, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hahnemann CFS, Reves Joseph (eds) (1842) Organon of Medicine, 5, 6 edn. Homeopress Ltd, Haifa

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kent JT (1919) Lectures on homoeopathic philosophy, Memorial edn. Ehrhart and Karl, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  4. A Carrel (1945) Le ròle futur de la médécine. In: A Carrel, A Lumiere (eds) Médecine officielle et médecines hérétiques. Plon Presences, Paris

  5. Oberbaum M, Singer SR, Vithoulkas G (2005) The colour of the homeopathic improvement: the multidimensional nature of the response to homeopathic therapy. Homeopathy 94:196–199

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schmidt JM (2009) Is homeopathy a science?–Continuity and clash of concepts of science within holistic medicine. J Med Humanit 30:83–97

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bell IR, Koithan M, Pincus D (2012) Methodological implications of nonlinear dynamical systems models for whole systems of complementary and alternative medicine. Forsch Komplementmed 19(Suppl 1):15–21

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. L.J. Boyd (1936)A Study of the Simile in Medicine (edizione italiana a cura di P. Bellavite: Il Simile in Medicina. Medicina Ippocratica, omeopatia e scienza, Ed. Cortina, Verona, 2001). Boericke and Tafel, Philadelphia

  9. Hahnemann CFS (1796) Versuch über ein neues Princip zur Auffindung der Heilkrafte der Arzneisubstanzen (Essay on a new principle for ascertaining the curative powers of drugs), and some examinations of the previous principles. Hufeland’s J 2:391–439

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hahnemann CFS (1810) Organon der rationellen Heilkunde. Arnoldschen Buchhandlung, Dresden

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hahnemann CFS (1828) Die chronischen krankheiten. Ihre eigenthümliche natur und homöopathische heilung. Arnold, Dresden

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bellavite P (2003) Complexity science and homeopathy: a synthetic overview. Homeopathy 92:203–212

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Paley J (2007) Complex adaptive systems and nursing. Nurs Inq 14:233–242

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mezzich JE, Salloum IM (2008) Clinical complexity and person-centered integrative diagnosis. World Psychiatry 7:1–2

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Miles A (2009) Complexity in medicine and healthcare: people and systems, theory and practice. J Eval Clin Pract 15:409–410

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Guajardo G, Bellavite P, Wynn S, Searcy R, Fernandez R, Kayne S (1999) Homeopathic terminology: a consensus quest. Br Homeopath J 88:135–141

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bellavite P, Pettigrew A (2004) Miasms and modern pathology. Homeopathy 93:65–66

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. CFS Hahnemann (1851) The lesser writings of Samuel Hahnemann (trans: Dudgeon RE). W Headland Publishers, London

  19. Vannier L (1965) La typologie et ses applications thérapeutiques. Doin-Darren & Cie, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  20. Garattini S, Bertele’ V (2010) Alternative medical practices: flashbacks from the dark ages. Eur J Intern Med 21:245–246

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ernst E (2008) The truth about homeopathy. Br J Clin Pharmacol 65:163–164

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Milgrom LR (2008) Homeopathy and the new fundamentalism: a critique of the critics. J Altern Complement Med 14:589–594

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rutten L, Mathie RT, Fisher P, Goossens M, Van WM (2013) Plausibility and evidence: the case of homeopathy. Med Health Care Philos 16:525–532

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Poitevin B, Davenas E, Benveniste J (1988) In vitro immunological degranulation of human basophils is modulated by lung histamine and Apis mellifica. Br J Clin Pharmacol 25:439–444

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Davenas E, Beauvais F, Amara J, Robinson M, Miadonna A, Tedeschi A, Pomeranz B, Fortner P, Belon P, Sainte-Laudy J, Poitevin B, Benveniste J (1988) Human basophil degranulation triggered by very dilute antiserum against IgE. Nature 333:816–818

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rossi E, Bartoli P, Panozzo M, Bianchi A, Da Fré M (2010) Outcome of homeopathic treatment in paediatric patients: an observational study from 1998 to 2008. Eur J Integr Med 2:115–122

    Google Scholar 

  27. Steinsbekk A, Bentzen N, Brien S (2006) Why do parents take their children to homeopaths?—an exploratory qualitative study. Forsch Komplement Med 13(2006):88–93

    Google Scholar 

  28. Du Y, Knopf H (2009) Paediatric homoeopathy in Germany: results of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS). Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 18:370–379

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Marian F, Joost K, Saini KD, von Ammon K, Thurneysen A, Busato A (2008) Patient satisfaction and side effects in primary care: an observational study comparing homeopathy and conventional medicine. BMC Complement Altern Med 8:52

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ekins-Daukes S, Helms PJ, Taylor MW, Simpson CR, McLay JS (2005) Paediatric homoeopathy in general practice: where, when and why? Br J Clin Pharmacol 59:743–749

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Picart CJ (1994) Scientific controversy as farce: the Benveniste–Maddox counter trials. Soc Stud Sci 24:7–37

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Maddox J, Randi J, Stewart WW (1988) “High-dilution” experiments a delusion. Nature 334:287–290

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Benveniste J (1994) Memory of water revisited (letter). Nature 370:322

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Chaplin MF (2007) The memory of water: an overview. Homeopathy 96:143–150

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Poitevin B (2008) The continuing mystery of the memory of water. Homeopathy 97:39–41

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Elia V, Napoli E, Germano R (2007) The ‘memory of water’: an almost deciphered enigma. Dissipative structures in extremely dilute aqueous solutions. Homeopathy 96:163–169

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Betti L, Trebbi G, Olioso D, Marzotto M, Bellavite P (2013) Basic research in homeopathy and ultra-high dilutions: what progress is being made? Homeopathy 102:151–154

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Rey L (2007) Can low-temperature thermoluminescence cast light on the nature of ultra-high dilutions? Homeopathy 96:170–174

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Rey LR (2003) Thermoluminescence of ultra-high dilutions of lithium chloride and sodium chloride. Physica A 323:67–74

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Van Wijk R, Bosman S, van Wijk EP (2006) Thermoluminescence in ultra-high dilution research. J Altern Complement Med 12:437–443

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Belon P, Elia V, Elia L, Montanino M, Napoli E, Niccoli M (2008) Conductometric and calorimetric studies of the diluted and agitated solutions. On the combined anomalous effect of time and volume parameters. J Therm Anal Calorim 92:459–469

    Google Scholar 

  42. Elia V, Baiano S, Duro I, Napoli E, Niccoli M, Nonatelli L (2004) Permanent physico-chemical properties of extremely diluted aqueous solutions of homeopathic medicines. Homeopathy 93:144–150

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Bell IR, Lewis DA, Brooks AJ, Lewis SE, Schwartz GE (2003) Gas discharge visualization evaluation of ultramolecular doses of homeopathic medicines under blinded, controlled conditions. J Altern Complement Med 9:25–38

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Assumpcao R (2008) Electrical impedance and HV plasma images of high dilutions of sodium chloride. Homeopathy 97:129–133

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Lenger K, Bajpai RP, Spielmann M (2013) identification of unknown homeopathic remedies by delayed luminescence. Cell Biochem Biophys 2:321–334

    Google Scholar 

  46. Mahata CR (2013) Dielectric dispersion studies of some potentised homeopathic medicines reveal structured vehicle. Homeopathy 102:262–267

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Widakowich J (1997) Microdose therapy: dilution versus potentiation? Med Hypotheses 49:437–441

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Yinnon CA, Yinnon TA (2009) Domains in aqueous solutions: theory and experimental evidence. Mod Phys Lett B 23:1959

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Smith CW (2004) Quanta and coherence effects in water and living systems. J Altern Complement Med 10:69–78

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Marchettini N, Del GE, Voeikov V, Tiezzi E (2010) Water: a medium where dissipative structures are produced by a coherent dynamics. J Theor Biol 265:511–516

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Bellavite P, Marzotto M, Olioso D, Moratti E, Conforti A (2014) High-dilution effects revisited. 1. Physicochemical aspects. Homeopathy 103:4–21

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Calabrese EJ (2010) Hormesis is central to toxicology, pharmacology and risk assessment. Hum Exp Toxicol 29:249–261

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Calabrese EJ, Blain RB (2011) The hormesis database: the occurrence of hormetic dose responses in the toxicological literature. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 61:73–81

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Van Wijk R, Wiegant FA (2011) Postconditioning hormesis and the similia principle. Front Biosci (Elite Ed) 3:1128–1138

    Google Scholar 

  55. Wiegant FA, Prins HA, Van WR (2011) Postconditioning hormesis put in perspective: an overview of experimental and clinical studies. Dose Response 9:209–224

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Bell IR, Koithan M (2012) A model for homeopathic remedy effects: low dose nanoparticles, allostatic cross-adaptation, and time-dependent sensitization in a complex adaptive system. BMC Complement Altern Med 12:191

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Bellavite P, Chirumbolo S, Marzotto M (2010) Hormesis and its relationship with homeopathy. Hum Exp Toxicol (BELLE Newsl) 16:11–18

    Google Scholar 

  58. Bernardini S (2010) Homeopathy: clarifying its relationship to hormesis by EJ Calabrese and WB Jonas. Hum Exp Toxicol 29:537–538

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Calabrese EJ, Jonas WB (2010) Homeopathy: clarifying its relationship to hormesis. Hum Exp Toxicol 29:531–536

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Witt CM, Bluth M, Albrecht H, Weisshuhn TE, Baumgartner S, Willich SN (2007) The in vitro evidence for an effect of high homeopathic potencies–a systematic review of the literature. Complement Ther Med 15:128–138

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Sainte-Laudy J, Belon P (1993) Inhibition of human basophil activation by high dilutions of histamine. Agent Actions (Inflamm Res) 38:C245–C247

    Google Scholar 

  62. Sainte-Laudy J, Sambucy JL, Belon P (1991) Biological activity of ultra low doses I. Effect of ultra low doses of histamine on human basophil degranulation triggered by D. pteronissinus extract. In: Doutremepuich C (ed) Ultra low doses. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 127–138

    Google Scholar 

  63. Cherruault Y, Guillez A, Sainte-Laudy J, Belon P (1989) E’tude mathematique et statistique des effets de dilutions successives de chlorhydrate d’histamine sur la réactivité des basophiles humains. Bio-Sciences 7:63–72

    Google Scholar 

  64. Brown V, Ennis M (2001) Flow-cytometric analysis of basophil activation: inhibition by histamine at conventional and homeopathic concentrations. Inflamm Res 50(2):S47–S48

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Lorenz I, Schneider EM, Stolz P, Brack A, Strube J (2003) Sensitive flow cytometric method to test basophil activation influenced by homeopathic histamine dilutions. Forsch Komplementarmed Klass Naturheilkd 10:316–324

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Chirumbolo S, Brizzi M, Ortolani R, Vella A, Bellavite P (2009) Inhibition of CD203c membrane up-regulation in human basophils by high dilutions of histamine: a controlled replication study. Inflamm Res 58:755–764

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Mannaioni PF, Mastroianni R, Mastrangelo D (2010) Adrenaline inhibits the immunological activation of human basophils at pharmacological and ultra-low doses. Med Sci Monit 16:BR227–BR232

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Guggisberg AG, Baumgartner SM, Tschopp CM, Heusser P (2005) Replication study concerning the effects of homeopathic dilutions of histamine on human basophil degranulation in vitro. Complement Ther Med 13:91–100

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Bellavite P, Marzotto M, Chirumbolo S, Conforti A (2011) Advances in homeopathy and immunology: a review of clinical research. Front Biosci (Schol Ed) 3:1363–1389

    Google Scholar 

  70. Kleijnen J, Knipschild P, ter Riet G (1991) Clinical trials of homoeopathy. BMJ 302:316–323

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Linde K, Clausius N, Ramirez G, Melchart D, Eitel F, Hedges LV, Jonas WB (1997) Are the clinical effects of homeopathy placebo effects? A meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials. Lancet 350:834–843

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Shang A, Huwiler-Müntener K, Nartey L, Jüni P, Dörig S, Sterne JAC, Pewsner D, Egger M (2005) Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy and allopathy. Lancet 366:726–732

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Peters D (2005) Shang et al. carelessness, collusion, or conspiracy? J Altern Complement Med 11:779–780

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Kiene H, Kienle GS, Schon-Angerer T (2005) Failure to exclude false negative bias: a fundamental flaw in the trial of Shang et al. J Altern Complement Med 11:783

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Walach H, Jonas W, Lewith G (2005) Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? Lancet 366:2081–2086

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Bellavite P, Pitari G, Italiano M (2006) Homeopathy and placebo. Homeopathy 95:51

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Rutten L, Stolper E (2006) ‘Proof’ against homeopathy in fact supports Homeopathy. Homeopathy 95:57–61

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Ludtke R, Rutten AL (2008) The conclusions on the effectiveness of homeopathy highly depend on the set of analyzed trials. J Clin Epidemiol 61:1197–1204

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Hahn RG (2013) Homeopathy: meta-analyses of pooled clinical data. Forsch Komplementmed 20:376–381

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. El Dib RP, Atallah AN, Andriolo RB (2007) Mapping the Cochrane evidence for decision making in health care. J Eval Clin Pract 13:689–692

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. White A, Ernst E (2001) The case for uncontrolled clinical trials: a starting point for the evidence base for CAM. Complement Ther Med 9:111–115

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Muscari-Tomaioli G, Allegri F, Miali E, Pomposelli R, Tubia P, Targhetta A, Castellini M, Bellavite P (2001) Observational study of quality of life in patients with headache, receiving homeopathic treatment. Brit Hom J 90:189–197

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Pomposelli R, Bellavite P (2013) Clinical Roundup: selected tretment options for peripheral neuropathy–homeopathy. Altern Complement Ther 19:165–166

    Google Scholar 

  84. Pomposelli R, Piasere V, Andreoni C, Costini G, Tonini E, Spalluzzi A, Rossi D, Quarenghi C, Zanolin ME, Bellavite P (2009) Observational study of homeopathic and conventional therapies in patients with diabetic polyneuropathy. Homeopathy 98:17–25

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Walach H, Falkenberg T, Fonnebo V, Lewith G, Jonas WB (2006) Circular instead of hierarchical: methodological principles for the evaluation of complex interventions. BMC Med Res Methodol 6:29

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Witt CM, Luedtke R, Baur R, Willich SN (2005) Homeopathic medical practice: long-term results of a cohort study with 3,981 patients. BMC Public Health 5:115

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Witt CM, Ludtke R, Mengler N, Willich SN (2008) How healthy are chronically ill patients after 8 years of homeopathic treatment?–Results from a long term observational study. BMC Public Health 8:413

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. World Health Organization (2001) Legal status of traditional medicine and complementary/alternative medicine: a worldwide review. WHO, Geneva document reference WHO/EDM/TRM/2001.2

    Google Scholar 

  89. Wiesener S, Falkenberg T, Hegyi G, Hok J, di Roberti SP, Fonnebo V (2012) Legal status and regulation of complementary and alternative medicine in Europe. Forsch Komplementmed 19(Suppl 2):29–36

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Falkenberg T, Lewith G, di Roberti SP, von Ammon K, Santos-Rey K, Hok J, Frei-Erb M, Vas J, Saller R, Uehleke B (2012) Towards a pan-European definition of complementary and alternative medicine–a realistic ambition? Forsch Komplementmed 19(Suppl 2):6–8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. von Ammon K, Frei-Erb M, Cardini F, Daig U, Dragan S, Hegyi G, di Roberti SP, Sorensen J, Lewith G (2012) Complementary and alternative medicine provision in Europe–first results approaching reality in an unclear field of practices. Forsch Komplementmed 19(Suppl 2):37–43

    Google Scholar 

  92. Menniti-Ippolito F, Gargiulo L, Bologna E, Forcella E, Raschetti R (2002) Use of unconventional medicine in Italy: a nation-wide survey. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 58:61–64

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Bornhoft G, Wolf U, Ammon K, Righetti M, Maxion-Bergemann S, Baumgartner S, Thurneysen AE, Matthiessen PF (2006) Effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness of homeopathy in general practice–summarized health technology assessment. Forsch Komplementarmed 13(Suppl 2):19–29

    Google Scholar 

  94. Trichard M, Chaufferin G, Nicoloyannis N (2005) Pharmacoeconomic comparison between homeopathic and antibiotic treatment strategies in recurrent acute rhinopharyngitis in children. Homeopathy 94:3–9

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Witt C, Keil T, Selim D, Roll S, Vance W, Wegscheider K, Willich SN (2005) Outcome and costs of homoeopathic and conventional treatment strategies: a comparative cohort study in patients with chronic disorders. Complement Ther Med 13:79–86

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Rossi E, Crudeli L, Endrizzi C, Garibaldi D (2009) Cost-benefit evaluation of homeopathic versus conventional therapy in respiratory diseases. Homeopathy 98:2–10

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Frenkel M, Mishra BM, Sen S, Yang P, Pawlus A, Vence L, Leblanc A, Cohen L, Banerji P, Banerji P (2010) Cytotoxic effects of ultra-diluted remedies on breast cancer cells. Int J Oncol 36:395–403

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Banerji P, Campbell DR, Banerji P (2008) Cancer patients treated with the Banerji protocols utilising homoeopathic medicine: a best case series program of the National Cancer Institute USA. Oncol Rep 20:69–74

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Johannessen H, von Bornemann HJ, Pasquarelli E, Fiorentini G, Di CF, Miccinesi G (2008) Prevalence in the use of complementary medicine among cancer patients in Tuscany, Italy. Tumori 94:406–410

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Rossi E, Baccetti S, Firenzuoli F, Belvedere K (2008) Homeopathy and complementary medicine in Tuscany, Italy: integration in the public health system. Homeopathy 97:70–75

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Plasschaert AI, Rovers MM, Schilder AG, Verheij TJ, Hak E (2006) Trends in doctor consultations, antibiotic prescription, and specialist referrals for otitis media in children: 1995–2003. Pediatrics 117:1879–1886

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Fixsen A (2013) Should homeopathy be considered as part of a treatment strategy for otitis media with effusion in children? Homeopathy 102:145–150

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Eizayaga JE, Eizayaga JI (2012) Prospective observational study of 42 patients with atopic dermatitis treated with homeopathic medicines. Homeopathy 101:21–27

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Witt CM, Brinkhaus B, Pach D, Reinhold T, Wruck K, Roll S, Jackel T, Staab D, Wegscheider K, Willich SN (2009) Homoeopathic versus conventional therapy for atopic eczema in children: medical and economic results. Dermatology 219:329–340

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Smith R (2001) Restoring the soul of medicine (Editorial). BMJ 322:117

    Google Scholar 

  106. Fayeton S, Van Wassenhoven M (2001) Clinical verification of symptom pictures of homeopathic medicines. Br Homeopath J 90:29–32

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Van Wassenhoven M (2004) Towards an evidence-based repertory: clinical evaluation of Veratrum album. Homeopathy 93:71–77

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Rutten AL, Stolper CF (2009) Diagnostic test evaluation by patient-outcome study in homeopathy: balancing of feasibility and validity. J Eval Clin Pract 15:1230–1235

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Rutten AL, Stolper CF, Lugten RF, Barthels RW (2009) Statistical analysis of six repertory rubrics after prospective assessment applying Bayes’ theorem. Homeopathy 98:26–34

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Kotaska A (2004) Inappropriate use of randomised trials to evaluate complex phenomena: case study of vaginal breech delivery. BMJ 329:1039–1042

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Kiene H (1996) A critique of the double-blind clinical trial. Altern Ther 2:59–64

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. Kiene H, Kienle GS, Schon-Angerer T (2006) Bias in meta-analysis. Homeopathy 95:54

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Associazione Giovanni Scolaro per la Medicina Integrata (Verona, I) for the contribution in translation and editing of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

Giulio Viganò certifies that there is no actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Italian Society of Homeopathy and Integrative Medicine, Milan, Italy

    Giulio Viganò & Paola Nannei

  2. Department of Pathology and Diagnostics, University of Verona, Verona, Italy

    Paolo Bellavite

Authors
  1. Giulio Viganò
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paola Nannei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paolo Bellavite
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giulio Viganò.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Viganò, G., Nannei, P. & Bellavite, P. Homeopathy: from tradition to science?. J Med Pers 13, 7–17 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12682-014-0197-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12682-014-0197-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation