Skip to main content
Log in

How Exposure to Personal Distress With and Without Self-compassion Affects Distress Tolerance: Results from a Two-Sample Randomized Trial

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Mindfulness Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Self-compassion is a caring way of relating to personal distress that has known soothing physiological effects characterized by feelings of safeness. Individuals low in distress tolerance feel threatened by negative emotions and believe that they are unable to tolerate them. We tested the theory that for this population, experiencing negative emotions with self-compassion, as compared to without self-compassion, would allow individuals to feel safer and more soothed, thereby increasing their distress tolerance, our primary outcome.

Method

We tested this hypothesis in a randomized controlled trial involving Canadian undergraduate students (n = 150) and international community adults (n = 298) with below-average distress tolerance levels. In an online session, participants brought to mind a distressing situation and then completed one of three interventions: writing about their negative emotions (pure exposure); writing about their negative emotions from a compassionate perspective (self-compassionate exposure); writing about a neutral topic (placebo control).

Results

In both samples, self-compassionate exposure yielded higher self-reported post-intervention distress tolerance than pure exposure (d = 0.37–0.55, p < 0.05) but not compared to placebo control (d = 0.10–0.34, p > 0.05). The relative effect of self-compassionate exposure over pure exposure occurred indirectly via greater levels of self-reported soothing affect during the intervention (proportion mediated, 0.53–0.67). Between-condition differences were absent at 1-week follow-up.

Conclusions

Findings suggest that exposure to negative emotions with self-compassion, as compared to without, may be a more effective way to momentarily increase distress tolerance due to its effects on soothing affect.

Preregistration

US Clinical Trials Registry #NCT05284578

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data can be made available upon request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express our gratitude to Giselle Kraus for her invaluable assistance in conducting this research project. The study is conducted in accordance with the 2010 CONSORT statement (Moher et al., 2010). The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist is provided in Supplementary Materials Table S3.

Funding

This work draws on research supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (Jenessa Shaw, Allison Kelly).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Jenessa Shaw: conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, writing – original draft. Allison Kelly: conceptualization, methodology, writing – review and editing, supervision, funding acquisition.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jenessa L. Shaw.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Ethics approval was granted by a University of Waterloo Research Ethics Board (#42863).

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.

Use of Artificial Intelligence Statement

No AI was used.

Preregistration

US Clinical Trials Registry #NCT05284578, registered March 17, 2022.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 43.8 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shaw, J.L., Kelly, A.C. How Exposure to Personal Distress With and Without Self-compassion Affects Distress Tolerance: Results from a Two-Sample Randomized Trial. Mindfulness 15, 570–585 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-024-02312-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-024-02312-x

Keywords

Navigation