Abstract
The present article briefly examines attention and mindfulness in the way the functions of these two mental qualities emerge in selected Pāli discourse passages and their extant parallels. The survey shows that, alongside a considerable degree of affinity between the two, attention and mindfulness also differ in several respects. Early Buddhist mental analysis considers attention a constantly present mental quality, whereas mindfulness is intermittent, in the sense of needing to be aroused and, at least when cultivated by itself, stands for a more receptive quality of the mind. Descriptions of the deployment of attention cover a range of different functions, ranging from the more conceptual tasks of storing teachings in memory and later recalling them to the supportive role of facilitating experiences of deep concentration and liberating insight. In meditation-related contexts, attention is explicitly mentioned as a foundation for the cultivation of mindfulness. With later Buddhist traditions, understandings of attention and mindfulness evolved, leading to an increased similarity in function between these two qualities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- AN:
-
Aṅguttara-nikāya
- EĀ:
-
Ekottarika-āgama (T 125)
- MĀ:
-
Madhyama-āgama (T 26)
- MN:
-
Majjhima-nikāya
- Ps:
-
Papañcasūdanī
- SĀ:
-
Saṃyukta-āgama (T 99)
- SN:
-
Saṃyutta-nikāya
- T:
-
Taishō edition
- Up:
-
Abhidharmakośopāyikā-ṭīkā
References
Anālayo, Bh. (2003). Nimitta. In W. G. Weeraratne (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of Buddhism, 7(1) (pp. 177–179). Colombo: Department of Buddhist Affairs.
Anālayo, Bh. (2009). Yonisomanasikāra. In W. G. Weeraratne (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of Buddhism, volume 8 (pp. 809–815). Colombo: Department of Buddhist Affairs.
Anālayo, Bh. (2012). The historical value of the Pāli discourses. Indo-Iranian Journal, 55, 223–253. https://doi.org/10.1163/001972412X620187.
Anālayo, Bh. (2017). Early Buddhist meditation studies. Barre: Barre Center for Buddhist Studies.
Anālayo, Bh. (2019a). Ancient Indian education and mindfulness. Mindfulness, 10(5), 964–969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-019-01145-3.
Anālayo, Bh. (2019b). The emphasis on the present moment in the cultivation of mindfulness. Mindfulness, 10(3), 571–581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-018-1074-1.
Anālayo, Bh. (2019c). How mindfulness came to plunge into its objects. Mindfulness, 10(6), 1181–1185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-019-01152-4.
Anālayo, Bh. (2019d). Meditation on the breath: mindfulness and focused attention. Mindfulness, 10(8), 1684–1691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-019-01169-9.
Anālayo, Bh. (2019e). The role of mindfulness in the cultivation of absorption. Mindfulness, 10(11), 2341–2351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-019-01206-7.
Anālayo, Bh. (2020a). A brief history of Buddhist absorption. Mindfulness, 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-019-01268-7.
Anālayo, Bh. (2020b). Clear knowing and mindfulness. Mindfulness, 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-019-01283-8.
Anālayo, Bh. (2020c). Mindfulness in early Buddhism, characteristics and functions. Cambridge: Windhorse Publications.
Anālayo, Bh. (2020d). The myth of mcmindfulness. Mindfulness, 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-019-01264-x.
Cox, C. (1992/1993). Mindfulness and memory: the scope of smṛti from early Buddhism to the Sarvāstivādin Abhidharma. In J. Gyatso (Ed.), In the mirror of memory, reflections on mindfulness and remembrance in Indian and Tibetan Buddhism (pp. 67–108). Delhi: Sri Satguru.
Grant, J. A. (2014). Meditative analgesia: the current state of the field. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1307, 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12282.
Higgins, D. (2006/2008). On the development of the non-mentation (amanasikāra) doctrine in Indo-Tibetan Buddhism. Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies, 29(2), 255–303.
Hirakawa, A. (1997). Buddhist Chinese-Sanskrit dictionary. Tokyo: Reiyukai.
Klaus, K. (1993). On the meaning of the root smṛ in Vedic literature. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Südasiens, 36, 77–86.
Lindsay, E. K., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Mechanisms of mindfulness training: monitor and acceptance theory (MAT). Clinical Psychology Review, 51, 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2016.10.011.
Mejor, M. (2001). Controversy on the mutual conditioning of avidyā and ayoniśomanas(i)kāra in Vasubandhu’s Abhidharmakośa. Journal of the International College for Advanced Buddhist Studies, 4, 292–263.
Olendski, A. (2011). The construction of mindfulness. Contemporary Buddhism, 12(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/14639947.2011.564817.
Sharf, R. H. (2016). Is Yogācāra phenomenology? Some evidence from the Cheng weishi lun. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 44, 777–807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-015-9282-7.
Sīlananda, U. (1990). The four foundations of mindfulness. Boston: Wisdom Publications.
Skilling, P. (1994). Mahāsūtras: great discourses of the Buddha. Oxford: Pali Text Society.
Wang, Y., Qi, Z., Hofmann, S. G., Si, M., Liu, X., & Xu, W. (2019). Effect of acceptance versus attention on pain tolerance: dissecting two components of mindfulness. Mindfulness, 10(7), 1352–1359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-019-1091-8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
This article does not contain any studies performed by the author with human participants or animals.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anālayo, B. Attention and Mindfulness. Mindfulness 11, 1131–1138 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-019-01286-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-019-01286-5