Abstract
Objectives
Qualitative methods come along with specific methodological backgrounds and related empirical strengths and weaknesses. Research is lacking addressing the question of what it precisely means to study mindfulness practices from a particular methodological point of view. The aim of this paper is to shed light on what qualities of mindfulness different qualitative methods can elucidate.
Methods
Based on interviews stemming from participants of a consumer-focused mindfulness training (BiNKA), we undertook a comparison of four different analyses, namely content analysis (CA), grounded theory (GT), interpretative-phenomenological analysis (IPA), and discourse analysis (DA).
Results
Independently applying the four methods on our data material led to the following findings: CA demonstrated that the training had effects on self-awareness, well-being, and the development of ethical qualities and influenced pre-consumptive stages of participants; GT revealed the complex set of conditions determining whether and how the mindfulness training influenced the attendees; IPA highlighted the subjectivity of the mindfulness experience, suggesting that (1) different training elements have varying effects on participants and (2) it is often not the meditation practice, but other course elements that cause the effects experienced by the attendees; DA demonstrated that the course experience was influenced by subjective theories held by the participants. In particular, they showed typical strategies of rationalizing their consumption.
Conclusions
A pluralistic qualitative research assists in identifying blind spots and limitations of a single method, increases the self-reflexivity, and helps to arrive at a more comprehensive understanding of mindfulness practice or other processes of covert lived experience.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, M., Bromley, A., Kuyken, W. & Sonnenberg, S.J. (2009). Participants’ experiences of mindfulness based cognitive therapy: “It changed me in just about every way possible”. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 37, 413–430.
Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2017). Reflexive methodology. New vistas for qualitative research. London: Sage.
Bannirchelvam, B., Bell, K. L., & Costello, S. (2017). A qualitative exploration of primary school students’ experience and utilisation of mindfulness. Contemporary School Psychology, 21(4), 304–316.
Bergomi, C., Tschacher, W., & Kupper, Z. (2013). The assessment of mindfulness with self-report measures: Existing scales and open issues. Mindfulness, 4(3), 191–202.
Birrer, D., Röthlin, P., & Morgan, G. (2012). Mindfulness to enhance athletic performance: Theoretical considerations and possible impact mechanisms. Mindfulness, 3(3), 235–246.
Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., Segal, Z. V., Abbey, S., Speca, M., Velting, D. & Devins, G. (2004). Mindfulness: A Proposed Operational Definition. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11(3), 230–241
Black, D. S., & Slavich, G. M. (2016). Mindfulness meditation and the immune system: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1373, 13–24.
Bodhi, B. (2013). What does mindfulness really mean? A canonical perspective. In J. M. G. Williams & J. Kabat-Zinn (Eds.), Mindfulness. Diverse perspectives on its meaning, origins and applications (pp. 19–39). London: Routledge.
Bühlmayer, L., Birrer, D., Röthlin, P., Faude, O., & Donath, L. (2017). Effects of mindfulness practice on performance-relevant parameters and performance outcomes in sports: A meta-analytical review. Sports Medicine, 47(11), 2309–2321.
Chatzidakis, A., Hibbert, S., & Smith, A. P. (2007). Why people don’t take their concerns about fair trade to the supermarket: The role of neutralisation. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(1), 89–100.
Chavez, C. (2008). Conceptualizing from the inside: Advantages, complications, and demands on insider positionality. The Qualitative Report, 13(3), 474–494.
Christopher, J. C., Chrisman, J. A., Trotter-Mathison, M. J., Schure, M. B., Dahlen, P., & Christopher, B. (2011). Perceptions of the long-term influence of mindfulness training on counselors and psychotherapists: A qualitative inquiry. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 51(3), 318–349.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques to developing grounded theory (3rd Ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
Deady, R. (2011). Reading with methodological perspective bias: A journey into classic grounded theory. Grounded Theory Review, 1(10).
Didonna, F. (Ed.). (2009). Clinical handbook of mindfulness. New York: Springer.
Eberth, J., & Sedlmeier, P. (2012). The effects of mindfulness meditation: A meta-analysis. Mindfulness, 3(3), 174–189.
Fischer, D., Stanszus, L., Geiger, S., Grossman, P., & Schrader, U. (2017). Mindfulness and sustainable consumption: A systematic literature review of research approaches and findings. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 544–558.
Frank, P. (2017). Warum wir Tiere essen (obwohl wir sie mögen) – sozialpsychologische Erklärungsansätze für das Fleischparadox. In J. Straub, & P.S. Ruppel (Ed.), Kerosinfrei und vegan: das ökologische Selbst. Psychosozial, 40(2), 1–21.
Fritzsche, J., Fischer, D., Böhme, T., & Grossman, P. (2018). Education for sustainable consumption through mindfulness. Images and objects - active methodology toolkit 9. Hedmark, PERL – Partnership for Education and Research about Responsible Living.
Frost, N. (Ed.) (2011). Qualitative methods in psychology: Combining Core approaches. Open University Press.
Frost, N. (2016). Practising research. Roulston: Palgrave.
Garland, E., & Gaylord, S. (2009). Envisioning a future contemplative science of mindfulness: Fruitful methods and new content for the next wave of research. Complementary Health Practice Review, 14(1), 3–9.
Geiger, S., Fischer, D., & Schrader, U. (2017). Measuring what matters in sustainable consumption: An integrative framework for the selection of relevant behaviors. Sustainable Development, 26(1), 18–33.
Germer, C. K., Siegel, R. D., & Fulton, P. R. (Eds.). (2016). Mindfulness and psychotherapy (2nd Ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
Goulding, C. (2005). Grounded theory, ethnography and phenomenology. A comparative analysis of three qualitative strategies for marketing research. European Journal of Marketing, 39(3/4), 294–308.
Goyal, M., Singh, S., Sibinga, E. M. S., Gould, N. F., Rowland-Seymour, A., Sharma, R., & Shihab, H. M. (2014). Meditation programs for psychological stress and well-being. JAMA Internal Medicine, 174(3), 357–368.
Groeben, N., Wahl, D., Schlee, J., & Scheele, B. (1988). Das Forschungsprogramm Subjektive Theorien. Eine Einführung in die Psychologie des reflexiven Subjektes. Tübingen: Francke.
Grossman, P. (2008). On measuring mindfulness in psychosomatic and psychological research. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 64, 405–408.
Grossman, P. (2015). Mindfulness: Awareness informed by an embodied ethic. Mindfulness, 6(1), 17–22.
Grossman, P. (2019). On the porosity of subject and object in “mindfulness” scientific study: Challenges to “scientific” construction, operationalization and measurement of mindfulness. Current Opinion in Psychology, 28, 102–107.
Haydicky, J., Wiener, J., & Shecter, C. (2017). Mechanisms of action in concurrent parent-child mindfulness training: A qualitative exploration. Mindfulness, 8(4), 1018–1035.
Herbrik, R., & Kanter, H. (2016). Nachhaltigkeit - eine mächtige, normative, soziale Fiktion. Swissfuture, 43(1), 12–13.
Hill, C. L. M., & Updegraff, J. A. (2012). Mindfulness and its relationship to emotional regulation. Emotion, 12(1), 81–90.
Himmelstein, S., Hastings, A., Shapiro, S., & Heery, M. (2012). A qualitative investigation of the experience of a mindfulness-based intervention with incarcerated adolescents. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 17(4), 231–237.
Hugh-Jones, S., Rose, S., Koutsopoulou, G.Z., & Simms-Ellis, R. (2017). How is stress reduced by a workplace mindfulness intervention? A qualitative study conceptualising experiences of change. Mindfulness, 474-487.
Hyland, T. (2017). McDonaldizing spirituality: Mindfulness, education, and consumerism. Journal of Transfomative Education, 15(4), 334–356.
Ie, A., Ngnoumen, C. T., & Langer, E. J. (2014). The Wiley Blackwell handbook of mindfulness. New Jersey: Wiley.
Jha, A. P., Morrison, A. B., Dainer-Best, J., Parker, S., Rostrup, N., & Stanley, E. A. (2015). Minds “at attention”: Mindfulness training curbs attentional lapses in military cohorts. PLoS One, 10(2), 1–19.
Kabat-Zinn, J. (1991). Full catastrophe living: Using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain and illness. New York: Delta.
Keller, R. (2011). The sociology of knowledge approach to discourse (SKAD). Human Studies, 34(1), 43–65.
Keller, R., Hornidge, A.-K., & Schünemann, W. J. (Eds.). (2018). The sociology of knowledge approach to discourse: Investigating the politics of knowledge and meaning-making. London, New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Kerr, C. E., Josyula, K., & Littenberg, R. (2011). Developing an observing attitude: An analysis of meditation diaries in an MBSR clinical trial. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 18(1), 80–93.
Klöckner, C. A., & Matthies, E. (2004). How habits interfere with norm-directed behaviour: A normative decision-making model for travel mode choice. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(3), 319–327.
Kuckartz, U. (2014). Qualitative text analysis (1st Ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Levesque, C., & Brown, K. W. (2007). Mindfulness as a moderator of the effect of implicit motivationalself-concept on day-to-day behavioral motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 31(4), 284–299.
Luberto, C. M., Shinday, N., Song, R., Philpotts, L. L., Park, E. R., Fricchione, G. L., & Yeh, G. Y. (2017). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of meditation on empathy, compassion, and prosocial behaviors. Mindfulness, 9(3), 708–724.
Malis, F. R., Meyer, T., & Gross, M. M. (2017). Effects of an antenatal mindfulness-based childbirth and parenting programme on the postpartum experiences of mothers: A qualitative interview study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 17(1), 57–68.
Malpass, A., Carel, H., Ridd, M., Shaw, A., Kessler, D., Sharp, D., Bowden, M., & Wallond, J. (2011). Transforming the perceptual situation: A meta-ethnography of qualitative work reporting patients‘ experiences of mindfulness-based approaches. Mindfulness, 3(1), 60–75.
Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 1(2).
Mayring, P., Huber, G. L., Gürtler, L., & Kiegelmann, M. (2007). Mixed methodology in psychological research. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Mehra, B. (2002). Bias in qualitative research: Voices from online classroom. The Qualitative Report, 7(1), 1–19.
Morse, J. M., & Chung, S. E. (2003). Toward holism: The significance of methodological pluralism. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(3), 13–20.
Nightingale, A. J. (2016). Adaptive scholarship and situated knowledges? Hybrid methodologies and plural epistemologies in climate change adaptation research. Area, 48(1), 41–47.
Norris, N. (1997). Error, bias and validity in qualitative research. Educational Action Research, 5(1), 172–176.
Nowogrodzki, A. (2016). Power of positive thinking skews mindfulness studies trials of mindfulness to improve mental health selectively report positive results. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2016.19776.
Petticrew, M., Egan, M., Thomas, H., Hamilton, V., Kunkler, R., & Roberts, H. (2008). Publication bias in qualitative research: What becomes of qualitative research presented at conference? Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 62, 552–554.
Pietkiewicz, I., & Smith, J. A. (2012). A practical guide to using interpretative phenomenological analysis in qualitative research psychology. Czasopismo Psychologiczne, 18(2), 361–369.
Schellekens, M. P., Jansen, E. T., Willemse, H. H., van Laarhoven, H. W., Prins, J. B., & Speckens, A. E. (2016). A qualitative study on mindfulness-based stress reduction for breast cancer patients: How women experience participating with fellow patients. Supportive Care in Cancer, 24, 1813–1820.
Schonert-Reichl, K. A., & Roeser, R. W. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of mindfulness in education. Integrating theory and research into practice. New York: Springer.
Silverman, D. (2000). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. London: Sage.
Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2008). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 53–80). London: Sage.
Stanszus, L., Fischer, D., Böhme, T., Frank, P., Fritzsche, J., Geiger, S., Schrader, U. (2017). Education for sustainable consumption through mindfulness training: Development of a consumption-specific intervention. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 19(1), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.1515/jtes-2017-0001.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1997). Grounded theory in practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Sweeney, T.B. (2016). A convergent parallel mixed-methods investigation into the role of mindfulness in moderate to severe, persistent depression. PhD thesis. University of Nottingham.
Vago, D. R. (2014). Mapping modalities of self-awareness in mindfulness practice: A potential mechanism for clarifying habits of mind. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 1307, 28–42.
Valerio, A. (2016). Owning mindfulness: A bibliometric analysis of mindfulness literature trends within and outside of buddhist contexts. Contemporary Buddhism, 17, 157–183.
Van Dam, N., van Vugt, M., Vago, D. R., Schmalzl, L., Saron, C. D., Olendzki, A., Meissner, T., Lazar, S. W., Kerr, C. E., Gorchov, J., Fox, K. C., Field, B. A., Britton, W. B., Brefczynski-Lewis, J., & Meyer, D. E. (2018). Mind the hype: A critical evaluation and prescriptive agenda for research on mindfulness and meditation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(1), 36–61.
Williams, M. J., McManus, F., Muse, K., & Williams, J. M. G. (2011). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for severe health anxiety (hypochondriasis): An interpretative phenomenological analysis of patients’ experiences. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 50, 379–397.
Zenner, C., Herrnleben-Kurz, S., & Walach, H. (2014). Mindfulness-based interventions in schools - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(603), 1–12.
Funding
The present study has been made possible through funding received from the German Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF) in the project BiNKA (Education for Sustainable Consumption through Mindfulness Training) under grants 01UT1416 and 01UT1416B.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
PF: designed and executed the study, coordinated and participated in the data analyses, and wrote the paper. LS: co-designed and co-executed the study, participated in the data analyses and wrote the sub-sections on qualitative content analysis, DF: co-designed the study and participated in writing the paper, KK: undertook the DA analysis, wrote the corresponding sub-sections and supported in formatting the manuscript, PG: supervised the execution the study and the data analysis and participated in writing the paper. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript for submission.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study before their inclusion in the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Frank, P., Stanszus, L., Fischer, D. et al. Cross-Fertilizing Qualitative Perspectives on Effects of a Mindfulness-Based Intervention: An Empirical Comparison of Four Methodical Approaches. Mindfulness 10, 2452–2467 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-019-01227-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-019-01227-2