Skip to main content
Log in

Mindfulness, Conflict Strategy Use, and Relational Satisfaction: a Dyadic Investigation

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Mindfulness Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research suggests that the capacity to be mindful is positively associated with constructive conflict strategy use and negatively associated with destructive conflict strategy use when individuals experience disagreement with a romantic partner. Conflict interactions are inherently dyadic however, signifying the importance of investigating whether a person’s own capacity for mindfulness is associated with their partner’s choice of conflict strategy. This exploratory study investigated whether individual’s mindful awareness had an association with partner conflict strategy use for 169 heterosexual couples. We assessed couple member’s mindfulness, conflict strategy use, and relational satisfaction. Actor-partner interdependence models (APIM) suggested that male mindfulness positively predicted their likelihood of compromising during conflict. Male mindfulness was also positively associated with female relationship satisfaction. Female mindfulness, on the other hand, predicted a lower likelihood of male dominance and reactivity during conflict. Actor-partner mediation models (APIMeM) suggested significant actor-actor effects such that mindfulness was positively associated with one’s own use of compromise, which in turn positively predicted one’s own relationship satisfaction. In addition, female mindfulness predicted lower male reactivity, which predicted higher male satisfaction. Implications and future research are discussed from a dyadic perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold, H. J., & Feldman, D. C. (1981). Social desirability bias in self-report choice situations. The Academy of Management Journal, 24(2), 377–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13, 27–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, S., Brown, K. W., Krusemark, E., Keith Campbell, W., & Rogge, R. D. (2007). The role of mindfulness in romantic relationship satisfaction and responses to relationship stress. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 33, 482–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2007.00033.x.

  • Bevan, J. (2014). Dyadic perceptions of goals, conflict strategies, and perceived resolvability in serial arguments. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 31, 773–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block-Lerner, J., Adair, C., Plumb, J. C., Rhatigan, D. L., & Orsillo, S. M. (2007). The case for mindfulness-based approaches in the cultivation of empathy: does nonjudgmental present-moment awareness increase capacity for perspective-taking and concern? Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 33(4), 501–516. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2007.00034.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. M., & Gilligan, C. (1993). Meeting at the crossroads: women’s psychology and development. Feminism and Psychology, 3, 11–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 822–848. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K., Berger, C. R., & Waldron, V. R. (2000). Mindfulness and interpersonal communication. Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 105–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlo, G., Raffaelli, M., Laible, D. J., & Meyer, K. A. (1999). Why are girls less physically aggressive than boys? Personality and parenting mediators of aggression. Sex Roles, 40, 711–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, J. W., Carson, K. M., Gil, K. M., & Baucom, D. H. (2004). Mindfulness-based relationship enhancement. Behavior Therapy, 35, 471–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-79=894(04)80028-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fruzzetti, A. E., & Worrall, J. M. (2004). Accurate expression and validating responses: a transactional model for understanding individual and relationship distress. In S. F. Hayes, V. M. Follette, & M. M. Linehan (Eds.), Mindfulness and acceptance (pp. 121–150). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. M. (1994). What predicts divorce? New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. M. (1995). Why marriages succeed or fail. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (2000). The timing of divorce: predicting when a couple will divorce over a 14-year period. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 737–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, M. A., & Guerrero, L. K. (2000). Appropriateness and effectiveness of organizational conflict styles: an application of the competence model to Rahim’s conflict inventory. International Journal of Conflict, 11, 200–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P. (2011). Defining mindfulness by how poorly I think I pay attention during everyday awareness and other intractable problems for psychology’s (re)invention of mindfulness: comment on Brown et al. (2011). Psychological Assessment, 23(4), 1034–1040. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haase, C. M., Bloch, L., Holley, S. R., Verstaen, A., & Levenson, R. W. (2016). Interpersonal emotional behaviors and physical health: a 20-year longitudinal study of long-term married couples. Emotion, 16(7), 965–977. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040239.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey-Knowles, J. A., Manusov, V., & Crowley, J. (2015). Minding your matters: predicting satisfaction, commitment, and conflict strategies from trait mindfulness. Interpersona, 9, 44. https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.v9il.168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hocker, J. L., & Wilmot, W. W. (1998). Interpersonal conflict (5th ed.). Dubuque: Brown & Benchmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. M., Bodie, G. D., & Hughes, S. D. (2016). The impact of mindfulness on empathy, active listening, and perceived provisions of emotional support. Communication Research, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215626983.

  • Karremans, J. C., Schellekens, M. P. J., & Kappen, G. (2017). Bridging the sciences of mindfulness and romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21, 29–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoury, B., Sharma, M., Rush, S. E., & Fournier, C. (2015). Mindfulness-based stress reduction for healthy individuals: a meta-analysis. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 78(6), 519–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychores.2015.03.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kiken, L. G., Garland, E. L., Bluth, K., Palsson, O. S., & Gaylord, S. A. (2015). From a state to a trait: trajectories of state mindfulness in meditation during intervention predict changes in trait mindfulness. Personality and Individual Differences, 81, 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.12.044.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • La Valley, A. G., & Guerrero, L. K. (2012). Perceptions of conflict behavior and relational satisfaction in adult parent-child relationships: a dyadic analysis from an attachment perspective. Communication Research, 39(1), 48–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledermann, T., Macho, S., & Kenny, D. A. (2011). Assessing mediation in dyadic data using the actor-partner interdependence model. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 18, 595–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2011.607099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lennon, R., & Eisenberg, N. (1987). Gender and age differences in empathy and sympathy. In N. Eisenber & J. Strayer (Eds.), Empathy and its development (pp. 195–217). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, T. D., Rhemtulla, M., Gibson, K., & Schoemann, A. M. (2013). Why the items versus parcels controversy needn’t be one. Psychological Models, 18, 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGill, J., Adler-Baeder, F., & Rodriguez, P. (2016). Mindfully in love: a meta-analysis of the association between mindfulness and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Human Sciences and Extension, 4(1), 89–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reevy, G. M., & Maslach, C. (2001). Use of social support: gender and personality differences. Sex Roles, 44, 437–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, D. R., Hammock, G. S., & Smith, S. M. (1994). Empathy as a cognitive inhibitor of interpersonal aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 24, 275–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rizkalla, L., Werheim, E. H., & Hodgson, L. K. (2008). The roles of emotion management and perspective-taking in individuals’ conflict management styles and disposition to forgive. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1594–1601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roloff, M. E., & Ifert, D. E. (2000). Conflict management through avoidance: withholding complaints, suppressing arguments, and declaring topics taboo. In S. Petronio (Ed.), Balancing the secrets of private disclosures (pp. 151–163). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The investment model scale: measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 353–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, S., Walach, H., Schmidt, S., Hinterberger, T., Lynch, S., Bussing, A., & Kohls, N. (2013). Assessment of mindfulness: review on the state of the art. Mindfulness, 4, 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-012-0122-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sillars, A., Canary, D. J., & Tafoya, M. (2004). Communication, conflict, and the quality of family relationships. In A. L. Vangelisti (Ed.), Handbook of family communication (pp. 413–446). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wachs, K., & Cordova, J. V. (2007). Mindful relating: exploring mindfulness and emotion repertoires in intimate relationships. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 33(4), 464–481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2007.00032.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, S. Y., Chan, F. W., Wong, R. L., Chu, M. C., Kitty, L., Mercer, S. W., & Ma, S. H. (2011). Comparing the effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction and multidisciplinary intervention programs for chronic pain: a randomized controlled trial. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 27(8), 724–734. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0b013e3182183c6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zacchilli, T. L., Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. (2009). The romantic partner conflict scale: a new scale to measure conflict in dating relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26, 1073–1096. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407509347936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeidan, F., Johnson, S. K., Gordon, N. S., & Goolkasian, P. (2010). Effects of brief and sham mindfulness m9editation on mood and cardiovascular variables. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 16(8), 867–873. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2009.0321.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JH: designed and executed the study, assisted with data analyses, created Tables 1 and 2, wrote and edited portions of the manuscript

JC: wrote the introduction, assisted in data collection, and edited versions of the manuscript

AW: ran the dyadic analyses, wrote the results section, and created the graphs

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacquelyn Harvey.

Ethics declarations

All procedures performed involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. IRB approval for this study was obtained at the University of Minnesota-Duluth and the University of Washington. Informed consent was obtained from all participants in the study. Data for this study have not been reported elsewhere, nor used in prior research.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harvey, J., Crowley, J. & Woszidlo, A. Mindfulness, Conflict Strategy Use, and Relational Satisfaction: a Dyadic Investigation. Mindfulness 10, 749–758 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-018-1040-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-018-1040-y

Keywords

Navigation