Skip to main content
Log in

Psychometric Properties of the Korean Version of the Mindfulness in Teaching Scale

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Mindfulness Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Mindfulness in Teaching Scale (MTS) is a self-report measure of teacher mindfulness. The purpose of the present study was to explore the factor structure and the psychometric properties of the Korean version of the MTS (MTS-K). First, as in the original measure, two distinct factors measuring teacher interpersonal mindfulness and teacher intrapersonal mindfulness were found in a sample of Korean teachers (n = 161; age range = 22–60 years). Second, confirmatory factor analysis with a second sample of Korean teachers (n = 243; age range = 22–62 years) showed that the two-factor structure is appropriate, and each sub-factor revealed a good internal consistency. Third, both subscales of the MTS-K correlated positively with dispositional mindfulness, teacher efficacy, and job satisfaction, and negatively with job stress and teacher burnout. The data suggest that MTS and MTS-K have a similar conceptual organization regarding teacher mindfulness in the school context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13, 27–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Benn, R., Akiva, T., Arel, S., & Roeser, R. W. (2012). Mindfulness training effects for parents and educators of children with special needs. Developmental Psychology, 48, 1476–1487.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, L. G., Coatsworth, J. D., & Greenberg, M. T. (2009). A model of mindful parenting: implications for parent–child relationships and prevention research. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 12, 255–270.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Flook, L., Goldberg, S. B., Pinger, L., Bonus, K., & Davidson, R. J. (2013). Mindfulness for teachers: a pilot study to assess effects on stress, burnout, and teaching efficacy. Mind, Brain, and Education, 7(3), 182–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, J. L., Reibel, D., Broderick, P., Cantrell, T., & Metz, S. (2015). The effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction on educator stress and well-being: results from a pilot study. Mindfulness, 6, 208–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, J. L., Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2016). Validation of the mindfulness in teaching scale. Mindfulness, 7(1), 155–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J. J. (1998). Antecedent-and response-focused emotion regulation: divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: a global perspective (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heppner, W. L., Spears, C. A., Vidrine, J. I., & Wetter, D. W. (2015). Mindfulness and emotion regulation. In B. D. Ostafin, M. D. Robinson, & B. P. Meier (Eds.), Handbook of mindfulness and self-regulation (pp. 107–120). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Herman, K., & Reinke, W. (2015). Stress management for teachers: a proactive guide. New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, P. A. (2014). Early childhood teachers’ well-being, mindfulness, and self-compassion in relation to classroom quality and attitudes towards challenging students. Mindfulness, 6, 732–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2009). The prosocial classroom: teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student and classroom outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 491–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, P. A., Frank, J. L., Snowberg, K. E., Coccia, M. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2013). Improving classroom learning environments by Cultivating Awareness and Resilience in Education (CARE): results of a randomized controlled trial. School Psychology Quarterly, 28(4), 374.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990). Full catastrophe living: using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and illness. New York: Dell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003). Mindfulness-based interventions in context: past, present, and future. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 144–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, A., & Kim, M. (2004). Validation of teacher-efficacy scale. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 18(1), 37–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korea Labor Institute. (2014). Korean labor and income panel study. Korea Labor Institute.

  • Lhospital, A. S., & Gregory, A. (2009). Changes in teacher stress through participation in pre-referral intervention teams. Psychology in the Schools, 46(10), 1098–1112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, J. Y. (2011). The effects of teachers’ emotional labor and emotion regulation on job stress, burnout and teacher-efficacy. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul.

  • Medsker, G. J., Williams, L. J., & Holahan, P. J. (1994). A review of current practices for evaluating causal models in organizational behavior and human resources management research. Journal of Management, 20, 429–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Napoli, M. (2004). Mindfulness training for teachers: a pilot program. Complementary Health Practice Review, 9, 31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuenschwander, R., Friedman-Krauss, A., Raver, C., & Blair, C. (2017). Teacher stress predicts child executive function: moderation by school poverty. Early Education and Development, 28(7), 880–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prilleltensky, I., Neff, M., & Bessell, A. (2016). Teacher stress: what it is, why it is important, how it can be alleviated. Theory Into Practice, 55, 104–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roeser, R. W., Skinner, E., Beers, J., & Jennings, P. A. (2012). Mindfulness training and teachers’ professional development: an emerging area of research and practice. Child Development Perspectives, 6, 167–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roeser, R. W., Schonert-Reichl, K. A., Jha, A., Cullen, M., Wallace, L., Wilensky, R., Oberle, E., Thomson, K., Taylor, C., & Harrison, J. (2013). Mindfulness training and reductions in teacher stress and burnout: results from two randomized, waitlist-control field trials. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 787–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schussler, D. L., Jennings, P. A., Sharp, J. E., & Frank, J. L. (2016). Improving teacher awareness and well-being through CARE: a qualitative analysis of the underlying mechanisms. Mindfulness, 7, 130–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simbula, S., Panari, C., Guglielmi, D., & Fraccaroli, F. (2012). Teachers’ well-being and effectiveness: the role of the interplay between job demands and job resources. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 729–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, N. N., Lancioni, G. E., Winton, A. S. W., Karazsia, B. T., & Singh, J. (2013). Mindfulness training for teachers changes the behavior of their preschool students. Research in Human Development, 10(3), 211–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, M., & Yang, N. (2015). Development and validation of Korean elementary school teacher burnout scale. Korean Journal of Counseling, 16(3), 195–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C., Harrison, J., Haimovitz, K., Oberle, E., Thomson, K., Schonert-Reichl, K., & Roeser, R. W. (2016). Examining ways that a mindfulness-based intervention reduces stress in public school teachers: a mixed-methods study. Mindfulness, 7, 115–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Won, D., & Kim, K. (2006). Validation of the Korean version of five-factor mindfulness questionnaire. The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 11(4), 871–886.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Preparation of this article was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant (NRF-2010-361-A00008) funded by the Korean Government (MEST). The MTS-K is available from the first author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eunjin Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Statement

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Wonkwang University research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, E., Singh, N.N. Psychometric Properties of the Korean Version of the Mindfulness in Teaching Scale. Mindfulness 9, 344–351 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-017-0871-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-017-0871-2

Keywords

Navigation