Skip to main content
Log in

To What Extent is Mindfulness as Presented in Commonly Used Mindfulness Questionnaires Different from How it is Conceptualized by Senior Ordained Buddhists?

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Mindfulness Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current study responded to the need for more empirical investigations into differences in the conceptualization of mindfulness between Buddhism and Western psychology. Five senior clergy from three branches of Buddhism were interviewed for their opinion on the Mindfulness Attention and Awareness Scale (MAAS), Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills (KIMS), Five Factor Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ), and Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory-30 (FMI-30). The interviewees also rated the questionnaire items for an ideal Buddhist in their tradition, in order to provide a stimulus for discussion and to collect quantitative data along with the qualitative data. Eight themes in relation to the elements and features of Buddhist mindfulness emerged from thematic analysis. The themes indicated that there are considerable differences between Buddhist mindfulness and mindfulness as presented by items in the questionnaires. While mindfulness in psychology is frequently conceptualized as non-judgmental, present-centered awareness, Buddhist mindfulness contains elements of attentional flexibility, skillfulness, purposefulness, wisdom, and ethics. Buddhist mindfulness not only involves awareness of the present but also the past and future. It not only focuses on self but also on others. The quantitative results revealed that the MAAS and the FMI-30 appeared less incongruent with Buddhist mindfulness than the KIMS and the FFMQ. Any conceptual differences highlighted in the present study provide avenues for future research as aspects unique to Buddhist mindfulness practice may be linked to psychological benefits also in secular contexts, thus assisting efforts to investigate to what extent secularization of mindfulness practice may have resulted in loss of some potentially beneficial characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altman, D. G. (1991). Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anālayo. (2003). Satipaṭṭhāna – the direct path to realization. Cambridge: Windhorse Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, R. A. (2003). Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: A conceptual and empirical review. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 125–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, R. A. (2011). Measuring mindfulness. Contemporary Buddhism, 12(1), 241–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., & Allen, K. B. (2004). Assessment of mindfulness by self–report: The Kentucky inventory of mindfulness skills. Assessment, 11(3), 191–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13(1), 27–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, R. A., Lykins, E. L. B., & Peters, J. R. (2012). Mindfulness and self-compassion as predictors of psychological wellbeing in long-term meditators and matched nonmeditators. Journal of Positive Psychology, 7(3), 230–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Lykins, E., Button, D., Krietemeyer, J., Sauer, S.,...Williams, J. M. G. (2008). Construct validity of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in meditating and nonmeditating samples. Assessment, 15(3), 329–342.

  • Belzer, F., Schmidt, S., Lucius-Hoene, G., Schneider, J. F., Orellana-Rios, C. L., & Sauer, S. (2013). Challenging the construct validity of mindfulness assessment–a cognitive interview study of the Freiburg mindfulness inventory. Mindfulness, 4(1), 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhikkhu, T. (2010). Head & heart together: Essays on Buddhist path. CA: Metta Forest Monastery.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thanissaro Bhikkhu (2012). The Sikkha Sutta, AN 4:245, translated from the Pali. http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/an/an04/an04.245.than.html

  • Bhikkhu, T. (2013). Discernment – The Buddha’s strategies for happiness: II. CA: Metta Forest Monastery.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnie, K., Speca, M., & Carlson, E. L. (2010). Exploring self-compassion and empathy in the context of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR). Stress and Health, 26(5), 359–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., et al. (2004). Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11(3), 230–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block-Lerner, J., Salters-Pedneault, K., & Tull, M. T. (2005). Assessing mindfulness and experiential acceptance: Attempt to capture inherently elusive phenomena. In S. M. Orsillo & L. Roemer (Eds.), Acceptance and mindfulness-based approaches to anxiety: Conceptualization and treatment (pp. 71–99). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bodhi, B. (2006). The Noble eightfold path: The way to the end of suffering. Kandy: Buddhist Publication Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodhi, B. (2011). What does mindfulness really mean? A canonical perspective. Contemporary Buddhism, 12(1), 19–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822–848.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Perils and promise in defining and measuring mindfulness: Observations from experience. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11(3), 242–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. W., Ryan, R. M., & Creswell, J. D. (2007). Addressing fundamental questions about mindfulness. Psychological Inquiry, 18(4), 272–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchheld, N., Grossman, P., & Walach, H. (2001). Measuring mindfulness in insight meditation (Vipassana) and meditation-based psychotherapy: The development of the Freiburg mindfulness inventory (FMI). Journal for Meditation and Meditation Research, 1, 11–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calderwood, C., Ackerman, P. L., & Conklin, E. M. (2014). What else do college students “do” while studying? An investigation of multitasking. Computers & Education, 75, 19–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, P., Hember, M., Mead, S., Lilley, B., & Dagnan, D. (2005). Responding mindfully to unpleasant thoughts and images: Reliability and validity of the Mindfulness Questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Chiesa, A., & Malinowski, P. (2011). Mindfulness-based approaches: Are they all the same? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 67(4), 404–424.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, M. S., Woodrich, L. E., & Tiernan, K. A. (2014). Using cognitive interviews to assess the cultural validity of state and trait measures of mindfulness among Zen Buddhists. Mindfulness, 5(2), 145–160.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chwasan. (2012). The principle and training of the mind. Iksan: Residence of the Prime Dharma Master Emeritus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, M. (2011). Mindfulness-based interventions: An emerging phenomenon. Mindfulness, 2(3), 186–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorjee, D. (2010). Kinds and dimensions of mindfulness: Why it is important to distinguish them. Mindfulness, 1(3), 152–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, G. (2011). Is mindfulness present-centred and non-judgmental? A discussion of the cognitive dimensions of mindfulness. Contemporary Buddhism, 12(1), 41–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, G. C., Hayes, A. M., Kumar, S. M., Greeson, J. G., & Laurenceau, J. P. (2007). Mindfulness and emotion regulation: The development and initial validation of the cognitive and affective mindfulness scale-revised (CAMS-R). Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 29, 177–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, J. A., Quaranto, B. R., & Schwartz, C. E. (2014). Threats to the internal validity of spinal surgery outcome assessment: Recalibration response shift or implicit theories of change? Applied Research in Quality of Life, 9(2), 215–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fusch, P. I., & Ness, L. R. (2015). Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 20(9), 1408–1416.

  • Gethin, R. (1998). The foundations of Buddhism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gethin, R. (2001). The Buddhist path to awakening. Oxford: Oneworld Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gethin, R. (2011). On some definitions of mindfulness. Contemporary Buddhism, 12(1), 263–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gethin, R. (2014). Buddhist conceptualizations of mindfulness. In K. W. Brown, J. D. Creswell, & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of mindfulness – Theory, research, and practice (pp. 9–41). New York: Guilford Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, R. (2008). The use of Theravāda Buddhist practices and perspective in mindfulness-based cognitive therapy. Contemporary Buddhism, 9(2), 227–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J. (2002). One dharma: The emerging western Buddhism. San Francisco: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P. (2008). On measuring mindfulness in psychosomatic and psychological research. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 64(4), 405–408.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P. (2011). Defining mindfulness by how poorly I think I pay attention during everyday awareness and other intractable problems for psychology’s (re)invention of mindfulness: Comment on Brown et al. (2011). Psychological Assessment, 23(4), 1034–1040.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P., & Van Dam, N. T. (2011). Mindfulness, by any other name…: Trials and tribulations of sati in western psychology and science. Contemporary Buddhism, 12(1), 219–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough?: An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunaratana, B. (2012). The four foundations of mindfulness in plain English. Boston: Wisdom Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwet, K. L. (2014). Handbook of inter-rater reliability: The definitive guide to measuring the extent of agreement among raters (4th ed.). Gaithersburg: Advanced Analytics Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, E., Lundh, L.-G., Homman, A., & Wångby-Lundh, M. (2009). Measuring mindfulness: Pilot studies with the Swedish versions of the mindful attention awareness scale and the Kentucky inventory of mindfulness skills. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 38(1), 2–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, P. (2015). Mindfulness in Theravāda Samatha and Vipassanā meditations, and in secular mindfulness. In E. Shonin, W. V. Gordon, & N. N. Singh (Eds.), Buddhist foundations of mindfulness (pp. 115–138). Switzerland: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. M., & Feldman, G. (2004). Clarifying the construct of mindfulness in the context of emotion regulation and the process of change in therapy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11(3), 255–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabat-Zinn, J. (1994). Wherever you go, there you are. New York: Hyperion Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabat-Zinn, J. (1996). Mindfulness Meditation. What it is, what it Isn't, and its role in health care and medicine. In Y. Haruki & M. Suzuki (Eds.), Comparative and psychological study on meditation (pp. 161–170). Eburon: Delft, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003). Mindfulness-based interventions in context: Past, present, and future. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 144–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabat-Zinn, J. (2011). Some reflections on the origins of MBSR, skillful means, and the trouble with maps. Contemporary Buddhism, 12(1), 281–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabat-Zinn, J. (2013). Full catastrophe living: How to cope with stress, pain and illness using mindfulness meditation (Revised ed.). London: Piatkus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keng, L. S., Smoski, J. M., Robins, J. C., Ekblad, G. A., & Brantley, G. J. (2012). Mechanisms of change in mindfulness-based stress reduction: Self-compassion and mindfulness as mediators of intervention outcomes. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 26(3), 270–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krägeloh, C. U. (2016). Importance of morality in mindfulness practice. Counseling and Values, 61(1), 97–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krägeloh, C. U., Czuba, K. J., Billington, D. R., Kersten, P., & Siegert, R. J. (2015). Using feedback from patient-reported outcome measures in mental health services: A scoping study and typology. Psychiatric Services, 66(3), 224–241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krägeloh, C. U., Billington, D. R., Hsu, P. H.-C., Feng, X. J., Medvedev, O. N., Kersten, P., Landon, J., & Siegert, R. J. (2016). Ordinal-to-interval scale conversion tables and national items for the New Zealand version of the WHOQOL-BREF. PloS One, 11(11), e0166065.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kuan, T.-F. (2012). Cognitive operations in Buddhist meditation: Interface with western psychology. Contemporary Buddhism, 13(1), 35–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, M. A., Bishop, S. R., Segal, Z. V., Buis, T., Anderson, N. D., Carlson, L. E., Shapiro, S., Carmody, J., Abbey, S., & Devins, G. (2006). The Toronto mindfulness scale: Development and validation. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(12), 1445–1467.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leigh, L., Bowen, S., & Marlatt, G. A. (2005). Spirituality, mindfulness and substance abuse. Addictive Behaviors, 30(7), 1335–1341.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Linehan, M. M. (2015). DBT skills training manual. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomas, T., & Jnanavaca. (2015). Types of mindfulness, orders of conditionality, and stages of the spiritual path. In E. Shonin, W. Van Gordon, & N. N. Singh (Eds.), Buddhist foundations of mindfulness (pp. 287–310). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Matlin, M. W. (2009). Cognitive psychology. New Jersey: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2007). Prospective memory: An overview and synthesis of an emerging field. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medvedev, O. N., Siegert, R. J., Feng, X. J., Billington, D. R., Jang, J. Y., & Krägeloh, C. U. (2016a). Measuring trait mindfulness: How to improve the precision of the mindful attention awareness scale using a Rasch model. Mindfulness, 7(2), 384–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medvedev, O. N., Siegert, R. J., Kersten, P., & Krägeloh, C. U. (2016b). Rasch analysis of the Kentucky inventory of mindfulness skills. Mindfulness, 7(2), 466–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monteiro, L. M., Musten, R. F., & Compson, J. (2015). Traditional and contemporary mindfulness: Finding the middle path in the tangle of concerns. Mindfulness, 6(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neff, K. D. (2003). Self-compassion: An alternative conceptualization of a healthy attitude toward oneself. Self and Identity, 2(2), 85–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyanaponika, T. (1989). Satipatthána, Geistestraining durch Achtsamkeit. Konstanz: Verlag Christiani.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyanaponika, T. (2005). The heart of Buddhist meditation: A handbook of mental training based on the Buddha’s way of mindfulness. Kandy: Buddhist Publication Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purser, R. (2015). The myth of the present moment. Mindfulness, 6(3), 680–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuel, G. (2015). The contemporary mindfulness movement and the question of nonself. Transcultural Psychiatry, 52(4), 485–500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, S., Walach, H., Schmidt, S., Hinterberger, T., Lynch, S., Büssing, A., & Kohls, N. (2013). Assessment of mindfulness: Review on state of the art. Mindfulness, 4(1), 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayādaw, M. (1990). Satipatthana Vipassana-insight through mindfulness. Kandy: Buddhist Publication Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, S. (2011). Mindfulness in east and west - is it the same? In H. Walach, S. Schmidt, & W. B. Jonas (Eds.), Neuroscience, consciousness and spirituality (pp. 23–38). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Segal, Z. V., Williams, J. M. G., & Teasdale, J. D. (2002). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression: A new approach to preventing relapse. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shonin, E., Van Gordon, W., & Singh, N. N. (2015). Buddhist foundations of mindfulness. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, R. D., Germer, C. K., & Olendzki, A. (2009). Mindfulness: What is it? Where did it come from? In F. Didonna (Ed.), Clinical handbook of mindfulness (pp. 17–35). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dam, N. T., Earleywine, M., & Danoff-Burg, S. (2009). Differential item function across meditators and non-meditators on the five facet mindfulness questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(5), 516–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, B. A. (2006). The attention revolution: Unlocking the power of the focused mind. Boston: Wisdom Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, B. A. (2008). A mindful balance. Tricycle, 17(3), 109–111.

  • Wilson, J. (2014). Mindful America: The mutual transformation of Buddhism meditation and American culture. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are very grateful for the participants’ generosity in taking their time to provide insightful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian U. Krägeloh.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Standards

The manuscript does not contain clinical studies or patient data.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feng, X.J., Krägeloh, C.U., Billington, D.R. et al. To What Extent is Mindfulness as Presented in Commonly Used Mindfulness Questionnaires Different from How it is Conceptualized by Senior Ordained Buddhists?. Mindfulness 9, 441–460 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-017-0788-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-017-0788-9

Keywords

Navigation