Abstract
The paucity of mindfulness-based interventions and research in Estonia motivated the development of an Estonian Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS). Unlike most languages, the Estonian language lacks a distinctive present tense. This provides a potential challenge for assessing mindfulness, a psychological construct characterized by present-moment awareness. We outline the process of overcoming linguistic differences during translation. The Estonian MAAS showed a single-factor structure and strong internal consistency. A cross-cultural comparison showed factorial invariance between the Estonian and the original scale. In an Estonian adult student sample, MAAS scores were invariant across genders and education levels, positively related to subjective well-being and self-esteem and inversely related to public self-consciousness and social anxiety. Item response theory analyses (IRT) revealed seven items of the Estonian version carrying most of the information load. We discuss how translating the MAAS into a unique linguistic context could inform an understanding of mindfulness itself.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arbuckle, J. L. (2009). AMOS 18 [computer software]. Crawfordville: AMOS Development Corp.
Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., & Allen, K. B. (2004). Assessment of mindfulness by self-report: the Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills. Assessment, 11(3), 191–206.
Black, D. S., Sussman, S., Johnson, C. A., & Milam, J. (2012). Psychometric assessment of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) among Chinese adolescents. Assessment, 19(1), 42–52.
Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 822–848.
Brown, K. W., Ryan, R. M., & Creswell, J. D. (2007). Mindfulness: theoretical foundations and evidence for its salutary effects. Psychological Inquiry, 18, 211–237.
Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Catak, P. D. (2012). The Turkish version of Mindful Attention Awareness Scale: preliminary findings. Mindfulness, 3, 1–9.
Cebolla, A., Luciano, J., DeMarzo, M., Navarro-Gil, M., & Campayo, J. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) in patients with fibromyalgia. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11(6), 1–7.
Chen, K. (2013). The effect of language on economic behavior: evidence from savings rates, health behaviors, and retirement assets. American Economic Review, 103(2), 690–731.
Deng, Y. Q., Li, S., Tang, Y. Y., Zhu, L. H., Ryan, R., & Brown, K. (2012). Psychometric properties of the Chinese translation of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS). Mindfulness, 3(1), 10–14.
Erelt, T., Leemets, T., Mäearu, S., & Raadik, M. (2006). Eesti õigekeelsus sõnaraamat. Tallinn: Eesti Keele Sihtasutus.
Ellis, B. B., & Mead, A. D. (2002). Item analysis: Theory and practice using classical and modern test theory. In S. G. Rogelberg (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 324–344). Malden: Blackwell.
Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Fenigstein, A., Scheier, M. F., & Buss, A. H. (1975). Public and private self-consciousness: assessment and theory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 522–527.
Hambleton, R. K., Sawinathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory: Measurement methods for the social science. Newbury Park: Sage.
Hambleton, R. K. (2004). Issues, design, and technical guidelines for adapting tests into multiple languages. In R. K. Hambleton, P. F. Merenda, & D. Spielperger (Eds.), Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment (pp. 3–38). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hansen, E., Lundh, L. G., Hommans, A., & Wångby-Lundh, M. (2009). Measuring mindfulness: pilot studies with the Swedish versions of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale and the Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills. Cognitive Behavior Therapy, 38, 2–15.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.
Jermann, F., Laroi, F., Bondolfi, G., Billieux, J., d’Argembeau, A., Zermatten, A., et al. (2009). Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS): psychometric properties of the French translation and exploration of its relation with emotional regulation strategies. Psychological Assessment, 21(4), 506–514.
Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003). Mindfulness-based interventions in context: past, present, and future. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 144–156.
Kay, P., & Kempton, W. (1984). What is the Sapir‐Whorf hypothesis? American Anthropologist, 86(1), 65–79.
Lucy, J. A. (1997). Linguistic relativity. Annual Review of Anthropology, 26, 291–312.
Mantzios, M., Wilson, J.C., & Giannou, K. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Greek versions of the Self-Compassion and Mindful Attention Awareness Scales. Mindfulness. doi:10.1007/s12671-013-0237-3.
Michalak, J., Heidenreich, T., Ströhle, G., & Nachtigall, C. (2008). Die deutsche version der Mindful Attention and Awareness Scale (MAAS). Psychometrische Befunde zu einem Achtsamkeitsfragebogen. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 37(3), 200–208.
Pullmann, H., & Allik, J. (2000). The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: its dimensionality, stability, and personality correlates in Estonian. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 701–715.
Quaglia, J. T., Brown, K. W., Lindsay, E. K., Creswell, J. D., & Goodman, R. J. (2014). From conceptualization to operationalization of mindfulness. In K. W. Brown, J. D. Creswell, & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of mindfulness: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Guilford.
R Development Core Team. (2010). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved March 01, 2011, from http://www.R-project.org.
Realo, A., & Allik, J. (1998). The Estonian Self-Consciousness Scale and its relation to the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 70(1), 109–124.
Rizopoulos, D. (2006). ltm: an R package for latent variable modelling and item response theory analyses. Journal of Statistical Software, 17, 1–25. Retrieved from http://www.jstatsoft.org/v17/i05/.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Seema, R., & Sircova, A. (2013). Mindfulness—a time perspective? Estonian study. Baltic Journal of Psychology, 14, 1–2.
Sisask, M., Värnik, A., Kõlves, K., Konstabel, K., & Wasserman, D. (2008). Subjective psychological well-being (WHO-5) in assessment of the severity of suicide attempt. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 62, 431–435.
Soler, J., Tejedor, R., Feliu-Soler, A., Pascual, J. C., Cebolla, A., Soriano, J., et al. (2012). Psychometric proprieties of Spanish version of Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS). Actas Españolas de Psiquiatría, 40(1), 19.
Van Dam, N. T., Earleywine, M., & Borders, A. (2010). Measuring mindfulness? An item response theory analysis of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(7), 805–810.
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Acknowledgments
We thank translators Kristiina Alas and Külli Nõmme. We also thank consultant professor Mare Pork and Estonian philologist Kristina Kask.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Seema, R., Quaglia, J.T., Brown, K.W. et al. The Estonian Mindful Attention Awareness Scale: Assessing Mindfulness Without a Distinct Linguistic Present Tense. Mindfulness 6, 759–766 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-014-0314-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-014-0314-2