Abstract
Enhanced recoveries of gold-bearing minerals, namely pyrite, chalcopyrite and arsenopyrite, are essential to meet the ever-increasing demand for the precious metal. Since flotation is the 1st step in the recovery of these minerals, a detailed understanding of their surface structure as well as the interaction of the collector molecules with these surfaces is essential to not only rationalize experimental observations but also design new task specific collector molecules. In the present work, we have employed density functional theory (DFT) simulations to understand the surface characteristics of pyrite, arsenopyrite and chalcopyrite and to evaluate the adsorption of a commonly used collector, 2-mercaptobenzothazole (MBT), on these surfaces. DFT calculations reveal that (001) and (100) surfaces of chalcopyrite undergo significant reconstruction, while (110) and (112) surfaces of chalcopyrite, (100) surface of pyrite and (001), (100), (011), (110) and (111) surfaces of arsenopyrite undergo only atomic relaxations. MBT (both the thione and thiol tautomers) chemisorbs on all the three minerals, with the adsorption strength varying in the following order: pyrite > arsenopyrite > chalcopyrite. A stronger adsorption of MBT on pyrite over chalcopyrite explains the experimentally observed selectivity of MBT for the former. Furthermore, results from these simulations provide detailed atomic scale insights into the bonding mechanisms at the surfaces, that are crucial for a rational design of novel flotation collectors with enhanced efficiencies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jones R S and Fleischer M, Gold in minerals and the composition of native gold (No. 612) (1969). [US Dept. of the Interior, Geological Survey],
Cepedal A, Fuertes-Fuente M, Martin-Izard A, Gonzalez-Nistal S, and Barrero M, Can Miner 46 (2008) 233. https://doi.org/10.3749/canmin.46.1.233
Wen S, Liu J & Deng J, Component release of fluid inclusions in sulfide mineral, Fluid Inclusion Effect In Flotation Of Sulfide Minerals. (2021) pp 97–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-819845-2.00005-3
Askarova G, Shautenov M, and Nogaeva K, E3S Web of Conf 168 (2020) 00004. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202016800004
Petersen J, and Dixon D G, Hydrometallurgy 83 (2006) 40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2006.03.036
Zachariáš J, Frýda J, Paterová B, and Mihaljevič M, Mineral Mag 68 (2004) 31. https://doi.org/10.1180/0026461046810169
Hazarika P, Mishra B, and Pruseth K L, Mineral Mag 81 (2017) 661. https://doi.org/10.1180/minmag.2016.080.128
Hilmy M, and Osman A, Mineralium Deposita 24 (1989) 244. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00206386
Allan G, and Woodcock J, Miner Eng 14 (2001) 931. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0892-6875(01)00103-0
Castellón C, Toro N, Gálvez E, Robles P, Leiva W, and Jeldres R, Materials 15 (2022) 6536. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15196536
Sirkeci A, Int J Miner Process 60 (2000) 263–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-7516(00)00023-5
Kohad V, Flotation of sulphide ores - HZL experience. In: Workshop on Froth Flotation: Recent Trends, September 22–24,1998, RRL Bhubaneswar. (https://eprints.nmlindia.org/4352/1/18-41.pdf)
Fairthorne G, Fornasiero D, and Ralston J, Int J Miner Process 50 (1997) 227. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-7516(97)00048-3
Forson P, Zanin M, Wood G A, Skinner W, and Asamoah R, Miner Eng 181 (2022) 107524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2022.107524
Nagaraj D, Basilio C, and Yoon R, Process Complex Ores (1989). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-037283-9.50019-6
Young TL, Greene MG, Bauer K, Reber NR, Young SK, Flotation of sulfide mineral species with oils, Ecolab USA Inc., US6827220B1(2004).
Numata Y, Takahashi K, Liang R, and Wakamatsu T, Int J Miner Process 53 (1998) 75.
Numata Y & Wakamatsu T, Fundamental study of sulfide mineral flotation using 2-mercaptobenzothiazole as a collector. Preprint SME Annual Meeting (1990), Salt Lake City
Giannozzi P, Baroni S, Bonini N, Calandra M, Car R, Cavazzoni C, and Ceresoli D, J Phys Condens Matter 21 (2009) 395502. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/21/39/395502
Perdew J, and Wang Y, Phys Rev B 45 (1992) 13244. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.45.13244
Methfessel M, and Paxton A, Phys Rev B 40 (1989) 3616. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.40.3616
Monkhorst H, and Pack J, Phys Rev B 13 (1976) 5188. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.13.5188
Kumar D, Srinivasan S G, Jain V, and Rai B, Appl Surf Sci 579 (2022) 152112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.152112
Fletcher, R., Practical methods of optimization, 1st Edition, Wiley, 55 pp, Print ISBN:9780471915478
Valiev M, Bylaska E J, Govind N, Kowalski K, Straatsma T P, Van Dam H J, Wang D, Nieplocha J, Apra E, Windus T L, and De Jong W A, Comput Phys Commun 181 (2010) 1477.
Hanwell M D, Curtis D E, Lonie D C, Vandermeersch T, Zurek E, and Hutchison G R, J Cheminf 4 (2012) 1.
Lee C, Yang W, and Parr R G, Phys Rev B 37 (1988) 785.
Ditchfield R H W J, Hehre W J, and Pople J A, J Chem Phys 54 (1971) 724.
Silva J, De Abreu H & Duarte H, Electronic and structural properties of bulk arsenopyrite and its cleavage surfaces – a DFT study, RSC Advances, 5 (2015) 2013–2023. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ra13807d.
Bindi L, Moelo Y, Leone P, Suchaud M., Stoichiometric Arsenopyrite, Feass, From La Roche-Balue Quarry, Loire- Atlantique, France: Crystal Structure and Mossbauer Study, The Canadian Mineralogist, 50 (2012) 471–479. https://doi.org/10.3749/canmin.50.2.471.
Corkhill CL, Wincott PL, Lloyd JR & Vaughan DJ, The oxidative dissolution of arsenopyrite (FeAsS) and enargite (Cu3AsS4) by Leptospirillum ferrooxidans, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 72 (23) (2008) 5616–5633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2008.09.008.
Ford M, and Ferguson C, Geology 7 (1985) 217. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8141(85)90133-6
Corkhill C, Warren M, and Vaughan D, Mineral Mag 75 (2011) 45. https://doi.org/10.1180/minmag.2011.075.1.45
https://aradi.bitbucket.io/nanocut/index.html, accessed 11st July 2022
Klauber C, Surf Interface Anal Int J Devoted Dev Appl Tech Anal Surf Interfaces Thin Films 35 (5), (2003) 415.
Thinius S, Islam M, and Bredow T, Surf Sci 669 (2018) 1.
Hope G, Buckley F, Woods R, and Watling K, ECS Trans 2 (3), (2006) 49.
Funding
This research was supported by the TCS-CTO organization under the SWON number 1009292.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to declare.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, D., Goverapet Srinivasan, S., Jain, V. et al. Understanding Surface Characteristics and 2-Mercaptobenzothiazole Adsorption on Pyrite, Arsenopyrite and Chalcopyrite Surfaces Using DFT Approach. Trans Indian Inst Met (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-023-03004-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-023-03004-1