Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Variable Filler Composition on Tensile Properties and Impact Toughness of GTA-Welded Incoloy 800HT Superalloy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Incoloy 800HT is the candidate material used for the 4th generation of the nuclear industry and high-temperature gas-cooled nuclear reactors. In the present study, the effects of varying nickel content and heat input on the microstructural and mechanical properties of GTA-welded superalloy Incoloy 800HT welds were evaluated. The microstructure analysis showed that all the weld metals had various dendritic and cellular morphologies with maximum precipitation of the γ phase. The compatible filler that is Incoloy 800HT reduced the precipitation of γʹ and γʹʹ phases in the welded joints. However, the higher nickel content on the use of IN82 exhibited higher impact toughness and UTS as compared to other welds. So, owing to the higher nickel content in IN82 the weld metal of this joint exhibited the lowest corrosion rate of 1.547 mpy, whereas Incoloy 800HT filler exhibited the highest corrosion rate of 4.668 mpy. Based upon this work, it is recommended that if higher corrosion resistance is required, then the use of IN82 is recommended for welding of Incoloy 800HT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rahmel A, Grabke H J, and Steinkusch W, Werkstoffe und Korrosion 49 (1998) 221. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1521-4176(199804)49:4%3c221::aid-maco221%3e3.3.co;2-o

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sam Infant Jones P G, Rajakumar S, Kavitha S, and Balasubramanian V, Welding International 36 (2022) 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/09507116.2022.2151386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rajakumar S, Balasubramanian V, and Razalrose A, Materials and Design 49 (2013) 267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.01.051

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rajakumar S, Vimal Kumar P, Kavitha S, and Balasubramanian V, Metallography, Microstructure, and Analysis 9 (2020) 337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13632-020-00645-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu F, et al., Optics and Laser Technology 99 (2018) 342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2017.09.022

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Janaki Ram G D, Venugopal Reddy A, Prasad Rao K, Reddy G M, and Sarin Sundar J K, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 167 (2005) 73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.09.081

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Vellaichamy L, Gerard PBT, and Paulraj S, Materials Research 21 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5373-mr-2017-0911

  8. Sharma A, Prabhakar V, and Sandhu S S, Metallurgical and Materials Engineering 27 (2021) 489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Doomra A, Singh B, and Singh S, Metallography, Microstructure, and Analysis 10 (2021) 219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13632-021-00735-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Doomra A, Singh B, and Sandhu SS, International Journal of Manufacturing, Materials, and Mechanical Engineering (IJMMME) 11 (2021) 55. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJMMME.2021040104.

  11. Kumar A, Singh B and Singh S, Fusion Engineering and Design 161 112092

  12. Kumar A and Singh, S Metallography, Microstructure, and Analysis (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13632-021-00804-z

  13. Kumar S A, and Sathiya P, Archives of Metallurgy and Materials 62 (2017) 1673. https://doi.org/10.1515/amm-2017-0256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Vellaichamy L and Paulraj S, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 314 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/314/1/012023

  15. ASTM E8, A4nnual Book of ASTM Standards 4 (2010) 1. https://doi.org/10.1520/E0008

  16. ASTM E 23–12c, Standards 3 (2012) 1. https://doi.org/10.1520/E0023-12C.2.

  17. Bhanu V, Fydrych D, Gupta A, and Pandey C, Materials 14 (2021) 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14195876

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lippold JC, Kiser SD, DuPont JN, Welding metallurgy and weldability of nickle based alloys (2009)

  19. Srirangan A K, and Paulraj S, Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal 19 (2016) 811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2015.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mourad A H I, Khourshid A, and Sharef T, Materials Science and Engineering A 549 (2012) 105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2012.04.012

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gurinder Singh.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singh, G., Sharma, J.D. & Sandhu, S.S. Effect of Variable Filler Composition on Tensile Properties and Impact Toughness of GTA-Welded Incoloy 800HT Superalloy. Trans Indian Inst Met 76, 3229–3239 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-023-02950-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-023-02950-0

Keywords

Navigation