Abstract
To study the effect of hydrogen isotopes on the delayed hydride cracking (DHC) behavior, Zr-2.5Nb pressure tube (PT) material was charged with about 100wppm hydrogen or deuterium and DHC tests were carried out between 202 and 283 °C. At 202 °C, DHC velocity ratio of hydrogen- and deuterium-charged Zr-2.5Nb PT material was less than the ideal value of √2. The lower velocity ratio was explained on the basis of terminal solid solubility for dissolution (TSSD) and residual hydrogen (HR) present in deuterium-charged PT material. Using TSSD and HR, a mixture rule was developed to predict the DHC velocity of deuterium-charged material (\({V}_{DHC}^{D}\)) as well as DHC velocity ratio of hydrogen- and deuterium-charged material. The mixture rule was evaluated using present data and data reported in literature.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
wppm reported throughout this manuscript is in the term of hydrogen equivalent (Heq.).
wppm(Heq.) = wppm(H) + wppm(D)/2.
Abbreviations
- ASTM:
-
American Society for Testing and Materials
- CCT:
-
Curved compact tension
- DCPD:
-
Direct current potential drop
- DHC:
-
Delayed hydride cracking
- EDM:
-
Electrodischarge machining
- H R :
-
Residual hydrogen concentration
- K :
-
Stress intensity factor
- OD:
-
Outside diameter
- PHWR:
-
Pressurized heavy water reactor
- PT:
-
Pressure tube
- Q :
-
Activation energy associated with DHC
- R :
-
Gas constant
- T :
-
Temperature in degree kelvin
- t oper :
-
Operator response time
- TSSD :
-
Terminal solid solubility for dissolution
- UTM:
-
Universal testing machine
- V DHC :
-
DHC velocity
- \({V}_{DHC}^{D}\) :
-
DHC velocity of deuterium-charged material
- \({\left({V}_{DHC}^{D}\right)}_{P}\) :
-
Predicted \({V}_{DHC}^{D}\) using the rule of mixture
- \({V}_{DHC}^{H}\) :
-
DHC velocity of hydrogen-charged material
- \(\left(\frac{{V}_{DHC}^{H}}{{V}_{DHC}^{D}}\right)\) :
-
VDHC Ratio of hydrogen- and deuterium-charged material
- \({\left(\frac{{V}_{DHC}^{H}}{{V}_{DHC}^{D}}\right)}_{P}\) :
-
Predicted VDHC ratio of hydrogen- and deuterium-charged material
- wppm:
-
Weight part per million
References
Dietz W, Structural materials, in: R.W. Cahn, P. Haasen, E.J. Kramer, (Eds.), Materials Science and Technology: A Comprehensive Treatment, 10B Nuclear Materials, Chapter 8 (1994) 56.
Lemaignan C, Motta A T, Structural materials, in: R.W. Cahn, P. Haasen, E.J. Kramer, (Eds.), Materials Science and Technology: A Comprehensive Treatment, 10B Nuclear Materials, Chapter 7, (1994) 1.
C.E. Coleman, B.A. Cheadle, C.D. Cann, J.R. Theaker, ASTM STP 1295 (1996) 884.
D. O. Northwood, and U. Kosasih, Int. Met. Rev. 28(2) (1983) 92.
Cheadle B A, J. ASTM Int. 7 (2010), Paper ID JAI103057.
R.N. Singh, U.K. Viswanathan, P.M. Sunil Kumar, S. Satheesh, Per Stahle, Anantharaman, Nucl. Eng. Des. 241 (2011) 2425.
R.N. Singh, A.K. Bind, N.S. Srinivasan, P. Ståhle, J. Nucl. Mater. 432 (2013) 87.
A.K. Bind, R.N. Singh, H.K. Khandelwal, S. Sunil, J.K. Chakravartty, A. Ghosh, P. Dhandharia, D. Bachawatand, S. Vijayakumar, Mater. Perform. Charact. 3 (2014) 322.
L.A. Simpson, C.D. Cann, J. Nucl. Mater. 87 (1979) 303.
P.H. Davies, C.P. Sterns, ASTM STP 905 (1986) 379.
F.H. Huang, ASTM STP 1204 (1993) 182.
S.I. Honda, Nucl. Eng. Des. 81 (1984) 159.
U.K. Viswanathan, R.N. Singh, C.B. Basak, S. Anantharaman, K.C. Sahoo, J. Nucl. Mater. 350 (2006) 310.
Rishi K. Sharma, A.K. Bind, G. Avinash, R.N. Singh, Asim Tewari, B.P. Kashyap, J. Nucl. Mater. 508 (2018) 546.
A. K. Bind, R. N. Singh, H. K. Khandelwal, S. Sunil, G. Avinash, J. K. Chakravartty and P. Ståhle (2015), J. Nucl. Mater. 465 (2015) 177.
R.N. Singh, A.K. Bind, H.K. Khandelwal, B.N. Rath, S. Sunil, P. Ståhle, J.K. Chakravartty, Mater. Sci. Eng., A 621 (2015) 190
Rishi K. Sharma, Saurav Sunil, B.K. Kumawat, R.N. Singh, Asim Tewari, B.P. Kashyap, J. Nucl. Mater. 488 (2017) 231.
A. K. Bind, R. N. Singh, Saurav Sunil, J. Chattopadhyay, J. Nucl. Mater.496 (2017) 182.
H.K. Khandelwal, R.N. Singh, A.K. Bind, S. Sunil, J.K. Chakravartty, A. Ghosh, P. Dhandharia, D. Bhachawat, R. Shekhar, Sunil Jai Kumar, Nucl. Eng. Des. 293 (2015) 138.
Gopalan A, Bind A K, Sunil S, Murty T N, Sharma R K, Samanta A, Soren A, Singh R N, J. Nucl. Mater. (2020) 152681.
A.K. Bind, R.N. Singh, Int. J. Fract. 227 (2021) 193.
Sawatzky A, Atomic Energy Can. Ltd, 1964. Report No. AECL-(1986).
Z.L. Pan, I.G. Ritchie, M.P. Puls, J. Nucl. Mater. 228 (1996) 227.
R.N. Singh, S. Roychowdhury, V.P. Sinha, T.K. Sinha, P.K. De, S. Banerjee, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 374(1) (2004) 342.
Dutton R, Woo C H, Nuttall K, Simpson L A, Puls M P, Hydrogen in Metals, (Pergamon Oxford) 1 (1978) 3C6 1.
R. Dutton, K. Nuttall, M.P. Puls, L.A. Simpson, Metall. Trans. A 8 (1977) 1553.
R.N. Singh, N. Kumar, R. Kishore, S. Roychaudhury, T.K. Sinha, B.P. Kashyap, J. Nucl. Mater. 304 (2002) 189.
S.S. Kim, Y.S. Kim, J. Nucl. Mater. 279 (2000) 286.
L.A. Simpson, M.P. Puls, Metall. Trans. A 10 (1979) 1093.
Choubey R, FC-IAEA-02 T1.20.13-CAN-273 (1998) 63.
Sagat S, Puls M P, SMiRT 17, Prague, Czech Republic, (2003): Paper G06–4.
S. Sagat, C.E. Coleman, M. Griffiths, B.J.S. Wilkins, ASTM STP 1245 (1994) 35.
Y.S. Kim, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 468 (2007) 281.
J. Ambler, ASTM STP 824 (1984) 653.
S.Q. Shi, G.K. Shek, M.P. Puls, J. Nucl. Mater. 218 (1995) 189.
M.P. Puls, J. Nucl. Mater. 165 (1989) 128.
S.S. Kim, S.C. Kwon, Y. Suk Kim, J. Nucl. Mater. 273(1) (1999) 52.
C.E. Coleman, ASTM STP 754 (1984) 393.
L.A. Simpson, C.D. Cann, J. Nucl. Mater. 126 (1984) 70.
Ambler J, Coleman C, Proc. Second International Congress on Hydrogen in Metals, (1977); Paper 3C10.
Nuttall K, Proc. Second International Congress on Hydrogen in Metals, (1977); Paper 3C7.
J.I. Mieza, G.L. Vigna, G. Domizzi, J. Nucl. Mater. 411 (2011) 150.
R.N. Singh, P. Ståhle, J.K. Chakravartty, A.A. Shmakov, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 523 (2009) 112.
S. Sunil, A.K. Bind, H.K. Khandelwal, R.N. Singh, J.K. Chakravartty, J. Nucl. Mater. 467 (2015) 273.
M.E. De Las Heras, S.A. Parodi, L.M.E. Ponzoni, J.I. Mieza, S.C. Müller, S.D. Alcantar, G. Domizzi, J. Nucl. Mater. 509 (2018) 600.
S. Sunil, A.K. Bind, H.K. Khandelwal, R.N. Singh, J.K. Chakravartty, J. Nucl. Mater. 466 (2015) 208.
Shek G K and Seahra H, 18th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, ICONE18, China (2010), Paper ID - ICONE18–29786.
A.K. Bind, S. Sunil, R.N. Singh (2016), J. Nucl. Mater. 476 (2016) 5.
Standard test method for measurement of fracture toughness – Designation: ASTM E1820–15.
M. Puls, Metall. Trans. A 19 (1988) 1507.
IAEA-TECDOC-1410, Vienna: IAEA, 2004.
Yuan Gou, Yanrong Li, Yanzhang Liu, Hongtong Chen, Shihao Ying, Mater. Des. 30 (2009) 1231.
R.N. Singh, P. Ståhle, A.R. Massih, A.A. Shmakov, J. Alloy. Compd. 436 (2007) 150.
Acknowledgements
Authors are grateful to Dr. Madangopal Krishnan, former Director, Materials Group, for his constant support and encouragement. Technical assistance provided by Shri Sandeep A. Chandanshive of MMD is acknowledged. This work was funded under XII plan project No. XII-N-R&D2501. Part of this work has been compiled in the form of BARC Report No. BARC/2021/E/007.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
1.1 Rule of Mixture for Prediction of \({\varvec{V}}_{{{\varvec{DHC}}}}^{{\varvec{D}}}\) and \({\varvec{V}}_{{{\varvec{DHC}}}}^{{\varvec{H}}} /{\varvec{V}}_{{{\varvec{DHC}}}}^{{\varvec{D}}}\).
As mentioned in subsection 4.2, when HR is equal to TSSD, all the HR would be in solution and there would be no deuterium in solution. When TSSD is more than the HR, both hydrogen and deuterium would be in solution. In this case, hydrogen and deuterium present in the solution would be HR and TSSD-HR, respectively. As per the rule of mixture, the \({V}_{DHC}^{D}\) would be governed by hydrogen and deuterium present in solution as a fraction of TSSD.
Let us assume a temperature such that TSSD ≥ HR.
Hydrogen in solution as a fraction of TSSD = HR/TSSD
Deuterium in solution as a fraction of TSSD = (TSSD-HR)/TSSD
So, the predicted \({V}_{DHC}^{D}\) in terms of \({V}_{DHC}^{H}\) would be given by:
And predicted \({V}_{DHC}^{H}/{V}_{DHC}^{D}\) would be given by:
Equation (A2) can also be written as follows:
The values of TSSD were obtained from Eq. A4 [23]. The TSSD at 202, 250 and 283 °C is 14, 28 and 50 Wppm, respectively.
It must be noted that Equations (A1) to (A3) are applicable only when TSSD ≥ HR. When TSSD < HR, only hydrogen would be in solution, and hence, the \({V}_{DHC}^{D}\) would be fully controlled by residual hydrogen present in the form of solution and \({V}_{DHC}^{D}\) is going to be same as \({V}_{DHC}^{H}\) and \({V}_{DHC}^{H}/{V}_{DHC}^{D}\) would be one.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bind, A.K., Sunil, S. & Singh, R.N. Effect of Hydrogen Isotopes on Delayed Hydride Cracking Behavior of Zr-2.5Nb Pressure Tube Material. Trans Indian Inst Met 75, 2767–2775 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-022-02647-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-022-02647-w