Skip to main content
Log in

Monitoring Welded Joints of Steel Pressure Vessels Using Acoustic Emission: Case Study

  • Review
  • Published:
Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Acoustic Emission (AE) monitoring was conducted to detect and assess crack initiation and/or growth activity at welded joints of a steel pressure vessel. AE characteristics and source localization were dynamically monitored during normal vessel operation in a refinery environment. Possible noise sources were identified and related signals were filtered out. A signal-parameter approach used to analyze AE data generated from flawless and defective welded joints showed that AE energy is a reliable feature to confirm crack activity in a high-noise environment. Crack growth rate was evaluated from changing rates in AE parameters which were correlated to ultrasonic measurements. Sensors placement at seven times the vessel wall thickness is recommended as optimal spacing between sensors and an experimental equation for crack growth evaluation is proposed. This procedure is a cost-effective AE nondestructive examination method to confirm or deny cracking activities, classify damage related to failure mechanisms and assess structural integrity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

source location accuracy

Fig. 6

source location for online monitoring before filtering

Fig. 7
Fig. 8

source location for online monitoring after filtering using FE100

Fig. 9

source location for online monitoring after filtering using FE1000

Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ASTM E1316, Standard Terminology for Nondestructive Examinations, (2019).

  2. Miller R K, Kill E V K, and Moore P O, in Acoustic Emission Testing, Nondestructive Testing Handbook, American Society for Non-destructive Testing, 3rd edition, Vol. 6, (2005).

  3. Rajaprakash B M, Suresha, Rachappa C N, and Upadhya S, Application of Acoustic Emission Technique for Online Monitoring of Friction Stir Welding Process during Welding of AA6061-T6 Aluminum Alloy, TMS2014, Annual Meeting Supplemental Proceedings, Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, (2014), pp 731–739.

  4. S.K. Aljumaili, M.R. Pearson, K.M. Holford, M.J. Eaton, and R. Pullin, 2016 Acoustic Emission Source Location in Complex Structures Using Full Automatic Delta T Mapping Technique. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 72-73, pp. 513-524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. W.A. Megid, M.A. Chainey, P. Lebrun, and D.R. Hay, 2019 Monitoring Fatigue Cracks on Eyebars of Steel Bridges Using Acoustic Emission: a Case Study. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 211, pp. 198-208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Carpinteri, G. Lacidogna, and N. Pugno, 2007 Structural Damage Diagnosis and Life-Time Assessment by Acoustic Emission Monitoring. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 74, pp. 273-289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Kopac and S. Sali, 2006, Acoustic Emission in Drilling Carbon Steel and Nodular Gray Iron. Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, 19, pp. 91-95.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kaewkongka T, Bearing Condition Monitoring Using Acoustic Emission and Vibration: the Systems Approach, Ph.D. dissertation, (2002).

  9. J. Shiroishi, Y. Li, S. Liang, T. Kurfess, and S. Danyluk, 1997 Bearing Condition Diagnostics via Vibration and Acoustic Emission Measurements. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 11, pp. 693-705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Miettinen J and Pataniitty P Acoustic Emission in Monitoring Extremely Slowly Rotating Rolling Bearing, Proceedings of COMADEM ‘99, Oxford, (1999) pp 289–297.

  11. X. Chen and B. Li, 2007, Acoustic Emission Method for Tool Condition Monitoring Based on Wavelet Analysis, Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 33, pp. 968-976.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. K. Jemielniak and J. Kossakowska, 2010 Tool Wear Monitoring Based On Wavelet Transform of Raw Acoustic Emission Signal, Advances in Manufacturing Science and Technology, 34, pp. 5-17.

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Sundaram, P. Senthilkumar, A. Kumaravel, N. Manoharan, 2008 Study of Flank Wear in Single Point Cutting Tool Using Acoustic Emission Sensor Techniques. Asian Research Publishing Network, Engineering and Applied Sciences, 3, pp. 32-36.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zacharias B, Binu K K E-J Nondestructive Test, 20, (2015)

  15. C.S. Lee, J.H. Huh, D.M. Li, and D.H. Shin, 1999, Acoustic Emission Behavior during Tensile Tests of Low Carbon Steel Welds. Iron and Steel Institute of Japan, 39, pp. 365-370.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. S.V. Ranganayakulu, R.J. Shiva, A. Kuchedludu, and K.B. Ramesh, 2014, Acoustic Emission Studies on Weld Bead Defects in Nuclear Grade SS 316L Materials. Open Journal of Acoustics, 4, pp. 115-130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaphle M, Analysis of Acoustic Emission Data for Accurate Damage Assessment for Structural Health Monitoring Applications, Ph.D. Dissertation, Queensland University of Technology, (2012).

  18. Lozev M G, Clemena G G, Duke J C, Sison M F, and Horne M R, Acoustic Emission Monitoring of Steel Bridge Members, Virginia transportation research council, (1997).

  19. C.U. Grosse and M. Ohtsu, Acoustic Emission Testing: Parameter analysis, Springer, 2008.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code, Section V: Nondestructive Examination, (2010) pp 227, 246 and 250.

  21. Spencer B B and Bruffey S H, Evaluation of a Zirconium Recycle Scrubber System, Report, NTRD-MRWFD-2017–000307, ORNL/TM-2017/233, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee, USA, (2017).

  22. ASTM E2374, Standard Guide for Acoustic Emission System Performance Verification, (2016).

  23. ASTM E1419/E1419M, Examination of Seamless, Gas-Filled, Pressure Vessels Using Acoustic Emission, (2015).

  24. ASTM E976, Standard Guide for Determining the Reproducibility of Acoustic Emission Sensor Response, (2015).

  25. M. Bayray, 2000, Acoustic Emission due to Cyclic Pressurization of Vessels with Partially Penetrated Longitudinal Seams. Journal of Acoustic Emission, 18, pp. 131-137.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Z. Han, , H. Luo, and H. Wang, 2011, Effects of Strain Rate and Notch on Acoustic Emission during the Tensile Deformation of a Discontinuous Yielding Material, Materials Science and Engineering, 528, pp. 4372-4380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wael A. Megid.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Megid, W.A., Mejia, J., Modwel, R. et al. Monitoring Welded Joints of Steel Pressure Vessels Using Acoustic Emission: Case Study. Trans Indian Inst Met 75, 2199–2209 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-022-02599-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-022-02599-1

Keywords

Navigation