Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Behaviour of Hydrogen During the Manufacture of Rail Steels

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

JSW Steel Ltd. supplies hydrogen-sensitive rail steels blooms for the manufacture of steel rails for Euro-rail application through AFERPI, Lucchini. The hydrogen distribution in the production of two high-carbon near-eutectoid rail steel grades VAR89S (typically, 0.70%C–0.3%Si–1.1%Mn–0.015%S) and VAR101 (typically, 0.80%C–0.42%Si–1.01%Mn–0.65%Cr–0.005%S) has been examined from the steel making stage to the as-cast blooms. In the steel grade VAR89S, the hydrogen distribution has been examined in the hot-rolled steel rails at different locations. The steel making involves primary steel making using energy optimizing furnace, ladle furnace followed by vacuum degassing. The hydrogen content before secondary steel making varies between 3 and 5.5 ppm H, which decreases to less than 1.5 ppm H after vacuum degassing. The steel picks up hydrogen, when transferred to tundish to a value, less than 2.5 ppm, associated with moisture in spray mass and tundish compound. On solidification in continuous casting, the hydrogen level decreases to less than 1.6 ppm H, which is associated with lowering of hydrogen solubility associated phase transformation of molten steel to solid. When the bloom is converted to steel rails, the hydrogen level further decreases due to the increased surface area-to-volume ratio. The final hydrogen levels in steel rails are < 1.6 ppm H, which is safe enough against defects such as shatter crack or Tache Ovales in steel rails.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mishra N S, Ramaswamy Y, and Mishra S, Sadhana9 (1986) 345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bold P E, in International Conference on Rail Quality and Maintenance for Modern Railway Operation, Delft, (eds) Frederick C O, Kalker J J, Cannon D F, and Orringer O, Kluwer Academic Publishers (1992) p 397.

  3. Li P, Xian A, Wang Y, Chen R, and Mei D, Acta Metall Sin (Eng) Ser A, 6 (1993) 415.

  4. Agarwal A, and Rai A K, in Rail Steel, Indian Railway Institute of Civil Engineering, Pune (2007), p 26.

  5. Rail Defects Handbook, TMC 226, Engineering manual Track, Ver 1.2, NSW Rail Transport Corporation, Chapter-6 (2012) p 49.

  6. Cabrera-Marrero J M, Coarreno-Galindo V R, Morales R D, and Chavez-Alcala F, ISIJ Int38 (1998) 812.

  7. Thapliyal V, Inclusion engineering in Mn-Si de-oxidized steel for thin-strip casting, Doctoral Dissertations, Department: Materials Science and Engineering, Missouri University Of Science and Technology (2015), p 28. https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3399&context=doctoral_dissertations.

  8. Shekari E, Shishesaz M R, Rashed Gh., Farzam M, and Khayer E, Iran J Oil Gas Sci Technol2 (2013) 65.

  9. Fruehan R J, in Fundamentals of Iron and Steel Making, 11th ed, (eds) Turkdogan E T, Freuhan R J, AISE Foundation, Pittsburgh, Chapter-2, The AISE Steel Foundation, Pittsburgh (1998) p 141.

  10. Niyogi A, IIM Metal News12 (2009) 17.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ravichandar D, Balusamy T, Gobinath R, and Balachandran G, Trans Indian Inst Met71 (2018) 2505.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Braganca S R, Hohemberger J M, Vicenzi J, Marques C M, Basegio T, Lima A N C, and Bergmann C P, Steel Res Int77 (2006) 400 https://doi.org/10.1002/srin.200606405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen C Y, and Lin K J, China Steel Tech Rep24 (2011) 7.

    Google Scholar 

  14. De Bruycker E, De Vroey S, Huysmans S, and Stubbe J M P, Mater Test56 (2014) 439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Key to Metals in Hydrogen in Steel. https://www.totalmateria.com/page.aspx?ID=CheckArticle&site=kts&NM=206.

  16. Sigworth G K, and Elliott J F, Metal Sci, 8 (1974) 298.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pawłowski B, JAMME49 (2011) 332.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ghosh A, Sadhana26 (2001) 5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ravichandar D, Balusamy T, and Balachandran G, Trans IIM (2019) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-019-01747-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Luu W C, and Wu J K, Mater Lett24 (1995) 175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. To Y I, Yonezawa N, and Matsubara K, Trans ISIJ20 (1988) 301.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Heller E, Weber L, Hammerschmid P, and Schwitzer R, Sathl Eisen92 (1972) 934.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support rendered by Mrs Alessandra Merigo and Mr T Mohan Babu of AFERPI, Piombino, Italy, for sharing some of the process and product information of rails made using steel supplied by JSW Steel, Salem Unit. The authors thank the assistance rendered by Mr M Vidhyasagar of R&D, Mr S Selvakumar and Mr G Tamilselvan of QAD at JSW Steel Limited, Salem works.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Ravichandar.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ravichandar, D., Balusamy, T. & Balachandran, G. Behaviour of Hydrogen During the Manufacture of Rail Steels. Trans Indian Inst Met 72, 3285–3294 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-019-01798-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-019-01798-7

Keywords

Navigation