Skip to main content
Log in

Deterministic seismic hazard assessment of a long mountainous road tunnel: a case study of Lowari Tunnel, Pakistan

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed to perform a comprehensive Deterministic Seismic Hazard Assessment (DSHA) to quantify the Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) values for the Lowari Tunnel region. Twelve thrust faults in the vicinity of the tunnel were evaluated using an updated earthquake catalog from 25AD to 2022. The PGA values were calculated for each thrust fault and compared with the designed value of 0.5 g from the feasibility stage of the tunnel. The study demonstrated that all twelve thrust faults exhibited PGA values below 0.5 g, indicating a low-to-moderate seismic hazard in the region. The maximum PGA value obtained in this study was 0.4 g, which is well below the maximum designed value, indicating that the tunnel is expected to withstand the ground motion values projected to result from high-magnitude earthquakes in the region. These findings hold significant importance as they provide crucial insights into assessing the long-term sustainability of the Lowari Tunnel, situated in one of the world's most seismically active zones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data sets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Abrahamson N, Silva W (2008) Summary of the Abrahamson & Silva NGA ground-motion relations. Earthq Spectra 24(1):67–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamson NA, Silva WJ, Kamai R (2014) Summary of the ASK14 ground motion relation for active crustal regions. Earthq Spectra 30(3):1025–1055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad ME, Khan FZ, Ahmad N (2021) Seismic performance assessment of confined adobe masonry structures. NED Univ J Res 18:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed A, Shahzada K, Ali SM, Khan AN, Shah SAA (2019) Confined and unreinforced masonry structures in seismic areas: validation of macro models and cost analysis. Eng Struct 199:109612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansari A, Rao KS, Jain A (2022) Damage assessment of tunnels in seismic prone zone during earthquakes: a part of hazard evaluation. Earthquakes and structures: select proceedings of 7th ICRAGEE 2021. Springer, pp 161–169

  • Atkinson GM, Boore DM (1995) Ground-motion relations for eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 85(1):17–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aygar EB, Karahan S, Gullu S, Gokceoglu C (2022) Analytical and numerical analyses of the support system for a large-span tunnel in challenging and seismically active ground conditions. Transp Infrastruct Geotechnol 10:1–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Baeza-Faundez S (2022) Use of deterministic and probabilistic slope stability analyses to evaluate tunnel location in landslide-prone areas. 2022-Mines Theses & Dissertations

  • Bazzurro P, Allin Cornell C (1999) Disaggregation of seismic hazard. Bull Seismol Soc Am 89(2):501–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilham R (2006) Dangerous tectonics, fragile buildings, and tough decisions. Science 311(5769):1873–1875

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bilham R, Gaur VK, Molnar P (2001) Himalayan seismic hazard. Science 293(5534):1442–1444

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM, Stewart JP, Seyhan E, Atkinson GM (2014) NGA-West2 equations for predicting PGA, PGV, and 5% damped PSA for shallow crustal earthquakes. Earthq Spectra 30(3):1057–1085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bothara J, Ingham J, Dizhur D (2022) Qualifying the earthquake resilience of vernacular masonry buildings along the Himalayan arc. J Build Eng 52:104339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burchfiel B, Royden LH (1985) North-south extension within the convergent Himalayan region. Geology 13(10):679–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell KW, Bozorgnia Y (2003) Updated near-source ground-motion (attenuation) relations for the horizontal and vertical components of peak ground acceleration and acceleration response spectra. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93(1):314–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell KW, Bozorgnia Y (2014) NGA-West2 ground motion model for the average horizontal components of PGA, PGV, and 5% damped linear acceleration response spectra. Earthq Spectra 30(3):1087–1115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee A, Igonin N, Trugman DT (2023) A real-time and data-driven ground-motion prediction framework for earthquake early warning. Bull Seismol Soc Am 113(2):676–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Shi C, Li T, Yuan Y (2012) Damage characteristics and influence factors of mountain tunnels under strong earthquakes. Nat Hazards 61(2):387–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Shen J, Bao X, Wu X, Tang W, Cui H (2023) A review of seismic resilience of shield tunnels. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 136:105075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiou BS-J, Youngs RR (2014) Update of the Chiou and Youngs NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra. Earthq Spectra 30(3):1117–1153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danciu L, Şeşetyan K, Demircioglu M, Gülen L, Zare M, Basili R et al (2018) The 2014 earthquake model of the Middle East: seismogenic sources. Bull Earthq Eng 16:3465–3496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowding CH, Rozan A (1978) Damage to rock tunnels from earthquake shaking. J Geotech Eng Div 104(2):175–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekström G, Nettles M, Dziewoński A (2012) The global CMT project 2004–2010: centroid-moment tensors for 13,017 earthquakes. Phys Earth Planet Inter 200:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geoconsult/Typsa (2005) Bid documents. II-A, 109-121

  • Idriss I (2014) An NGA-West2 empirical model for estimating the horizontal spectral values generated by shallow crustal earthquakes. Earthq Spectra 30(3):1155–1177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaramillo CA (2017) Impact of seismic design on tunnels in rock-case histories. Undergr Space 2(2):106–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazmi AH, Jan MQ (1997) Geology and tectonics of Pakistan. Graphic publishers, West Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan S, Waseem M, Khan MA, Ahmed W (2018) Updated earthquake catalogue for seismic hazard analysis in Pakistan. J Seismol 22(4):841–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lisa M, Khan SA, Khwaja AA (2004) Focal mechanism study of north Potwar deformed zone, Pakistan. Acta Seismol Sin 17(3):255–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire RK (1995) Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and design earthquakes: closing the loop. Bull Seismol Soc Am 85(5):1275–1284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Highway Board Pakistan, P. E. I. N. Y., London, The Hague (1988) Lowari Tunnel, Final Feasibility Report. Part I, 252

  • Petersen MD, Moschetti MP, Powers PM, Mueller CS, Haller KM, Frankel AD et al (2015) The 2014 United States national seismic hazard model. Earthq Spectra 31(1_suppl):S1–S30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossetto T, Peiris N (2009) Observations of damage due to the Kashmir earthquake of October 8, 2005 and study of current seismic provisions for buildings in Pakistan. Bull Earthq Eng 7(3):681–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy N, Sarkar R (2017) A review of seismic damage of mountain tunnels and probable failure mechanisms. Geotech Geol Eng 35(1):1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-016-0091-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schirripa Spagnolo G, Mercuri M, Billi A, Carminati E, Galli P (2021) The segmented campo felice normal faults: seismic potential appraisal by application of empirical relationships between rupture length and earthquake magnitude in the Central Apennines, Italy. Tectonics 40(7):e2020TC006465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle MP, Khan MA, Fraser JE, Gough SJ, Jan MQ (1999) The tectonic evolution of the Kohistan-Karakoram collision belt along the Karakoram Highway transect, north Pakistan. Tectonics 18(6):929–949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Şeşetyan K, Danciu L, Demircioğlu Tümsa MB, Giardini D, Erdik M, Akkar S et al (2018) The 2014 seismic hazard model of the Middle East: overview and results. Bull Earthq Eng 16:3535–3566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha R, Li X, Yi L, Mandal AK (2020) Seismic damage and possible influencing factors of the damages in the Melamchi tunnel in Nepal due to Gorkha earthquake 2015. Geotech Geol Eng 38:5295–5308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun B, Deng M, Zhang S, Wang C, Cui W, Li Q et al (2023) Optimal selection of scalar and vector-valued intensity measures for improved fragility analysis in cross-fault hydraulic tunnels. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 132:104857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tahirkheli RK (1979) Geology of kohistan, karakoram, himalaya, northern. Geol Bull Univ Peshawar 11:1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Pan C (2022) Review of seismic damage characteristics and influence factors of mountain tunnels. Arab J Geosci 15(6):478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang T-T, Kwok O-LA, Jeng F-S (2021) Seismic response of tunnels revealed in two decades following the 1999 Chi–Chi earthquake (Mw 7.6) in Taiwan: a review. Eng Geol 287:106090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waseem M, Lai CG, Spacone E (2018) Seismic hazard assessment of northern Pakistan. Nat Hazards 90(2):563–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84(4):974–1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang H, Wang D, Guo R, Xie M, Zang Y, Wang Y et al (2022) Rapid report of the 8 January 2022 MS 6.9 Menyuan earthquake, Qinghai, China. Earthq Res Adv 2(1):100113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng G, Yang P, Zhou H, Zeng C, Yang X, He X et al (2019) Evaluation of the earthquake induced uplift displacement of tunnels using multivariate adaptive regression splines. Comput Geotech 113:103099

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, J.K, I.I, Q.R., M.W., W.A.; methodology, J.K, I.I, S.T.S, S.K, Q.R., M.W., W.A.; software, J.K, W.A, M.W, S.K, S.T.S, I.I, H.T.J, G.K.; validation, J.K, Q.R., M.W., W.A., I.I, H.T.J., G.K.; formal analysis, Q.R.; investigation, Q.R., M.W., W.A., I.I, H.T.J., G.K.; resources, M.W., W.A.; data curation, Q.R., M.W., W.A.; writing—original draft preparation, J.K, W.A.; writing—review and editing, J.K, S.K, Q.R., M.W., W.A.; I.I, H.T.J., G.K.; visualization, Q.R., M.W., W.A, I.I, H.T.J, G.K.; supervision, M.W., W.A. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Waqas Ahmed.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khan, J., Ahmed, W., Waseem, M. et al. Deterministic seismic hazard assessment of a long mountainous road tunnel: a case study of Lowari Tunnel, Pakistan. Environ Earth Sci 83, 303 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-024-11625-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-024-11625-y

Keywords

Navigation