Abstract
Dissolved oxygen (DO) is a vital water quality parameter with significant implications for aquatic life, serving as a key indicator of water pollution. The current research introduces two hybrid models utilizing Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, integrating the preprocessing methods of Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) and Complementary Empirical Mode Decomposition with Adaptive Noise (CEEMDAN). These models aim to efficiently model the DO process across five consecutive hydrologic stations situated along the Savannah River. Initially, a wavelet coherence (WTC) analysis was conducted to identify influential parameters for modeling, revealing that water temperature, discharge, mean water velocity, and turbidity exhibited the strongest correlations with dissolved oxygen. In single-gauge temporal modeling, the outcomes demonstrated that the T (IV) model, incorporating all the specified input parameters, achieved superior performance across all stations. Within all gauges, the fourth gauge exhibited the most favorable results using the hybrid CEEMDAN-LSTM method, attaining evaluation criteria of R = 0.991, DC = 0.976, and RMSE = 0.016. Furthermore, it was observed that the dissolved oxygen values from one day before the upstream gauge had a significant impact on predicting the dissolved oxygen concentration in the downstream gauge. In this strategy, the implementation of the CEEMDAN method results in a 35% increase in the modeling accuracy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and materials
The data and materials that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.
References
Adamowski J, Chan HF (2011) A wavelet neural network conjunction model for groundwater level forecasting. J Hydrol 407(1–4):28–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.06.013
Alizadeh MJ, Kavianpour MR (2015) Development of wavelet-ANN models to predict water quality parameters in Hilo Bay, Pacific Ocean. Mar Pollut Bull 98(1–2):171–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.06.052
Antanasijević D, Pocajt V, Povrenović D, Perić-Grujić A, Ristić M (2013) Modelling of dissolved oxygen content using artificial neural networks: Danube River, North Serbia, case study. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:9006–9013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-1876-6
Ay M, Kisi O (2012) Modeling of dissolved oxygen concentration using different neural network techniques in Foundation Creek, El Paso County. Colorado J Environ Eng 138(6):654–662. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000511
Azma A, Liu Y, Azma M, Saadat M, Zhang D, Cho J, Rezania S (2023) Hybrid machine learning models for prediction of daily dissolved oxygen. J Water Process Eng 54:103957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.103957
Barzegar R, Fijani E, Moghaddam AA, Tziritis E (2017) Forecasting of groundwater level fluctuations using ensemble hybrid multi-wavelet neural network-based models. Sci Total Environ 599:20–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.189
Bayram A, Uzlu E, Kankal M, Dede T (2015) Modeling stream dissolved oxygen concentration using teaching–learning based optimization algorithm. Environ Earth Sci 73:6565–6576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3876-3
Bengio Y, Simard P, Frasconi P (1994) Learning long-term dependencies with gradient descent is difficult. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 5(2):157–166. https://doi.org/10.1109/72.279181
Boano F, Revelli R, Ridolfi L (2006) Stochastic modelling of DO and BOD components in a stream with random inputs. Adv Water Resour 29(9):1341–1350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.10.007
Carpenter SR, Caraco NF, Correll DL, Howarth RW, Sharpley AN, Smith VH (1998) Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogen. Ecol Appl 8(3):559–568. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0559:NPOSWW]2.0.CO;2
Chapra SC (2008) Surface water-quality modeling. Waveland press
Chen L, Xu J, Wang G, Liu H, Zhai L, Li S, Sun C, Shen Z (2018a) Influence of rainfall data scarcity on non-point source pollution prediction: Implications for physically based models. J Hydrol 562:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.04.044
Chen M, Pennington J, Schoenholz S (2018) Dynamical isometry and a mean field theory of RNNs: Gating enables signal propagation in recurrent neural networks. In Int Conf ML pp 873–882 PMLR. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v80/chen18i.html
Chou CM (2014) Complexity analysis of rainfall and runoff time series based on sample entropy in different temporal scales. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 28:1401–1408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-014-0859-6
Chow-Fraser P, Lougheed V, Le Thiec V, Crosbie B, Simser L, Lord J (1998) Long-term response of the biotic community to fluctuating water levels and changes in water quality in Cootes Paradise Marsh, a degraded coastal wetland of Lake Ontario. Wetl Ecol Manag 6:19–42. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008491520668
Cox BA (2003) A review of currently available in-stream water-quality models and their applicability for simulating dissolved oxygen in lowland rivers. Sci Total Environ 314:335–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(03)00063-9
Dehghani R, Torabi Poudeh H, Izadi Z (2022) Dissolved oxygen concentration predictions for running waters with using hybrid machine learning techniques. Model Earth Syst Environ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-021-01253-x
Dixit P, Londhe S, Deo MC (2016) Review of applications of neuro-wavelet techniques in water flows. INAE Letters 1:99–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41403-016-0015-3
Elhatip H, Kömür MA (2008) Evaluation of water quality parameters for the Mamasin dam in Aksaray City in the central Anatolian part of Turkey by means of artificial neural networks. Environ Geol 53:1157–1164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-007-0705-ypalani
El-Sadek A (2007) Upscaling field scale hydrology and water quality modelling to catchment scale. Integrated Assessment of Water Resources and Global Change: a North-South Analysis. 149–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-9046-y
Emamgholizadeh S, Kashi H, Marofpoor I, Zalaghi E (2014) Prediction of water quality parameters of Karoon River (Iran) by artificial intelligence-based models. Int J Environ Sci Technol 11:645–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-013-0378-x
Fang X, Yuan Z (2019) Performance enhancing techniques for deep learning models in time series forecasting. Eng Appl Artif Intell 85:533–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2019.07.011
Garcia A, Revilla JA, Medina R, Alvarez C, Juanes JA (2002) A model for predicting the temporal evolution of dissolved oxygen concentration in shallow estuaries. In Nutrients and Eutrophication in Estuaries and Coastal Waters: Proceedings of the 31st Symposium of the Estuarine and Coastal Sciences Association (ECSA), held in Bilbao, Spain, 3–7 July 2000 pp 205–211 Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2464-7_17
Grossmann A, Morlet J (1984) Decomposition of Hardy functions into square integrable wavelets of constant shape. SIAM J Math Anal 15(4):723–736. https://doi.org/10.1137/0515056
Gümrah F, Öz B, Güler B, Evin S (2000) The application of artificial neural networks for the prediction of water quality of polluted aquifer. Water Air Soil Pollut 119:275–294. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005165315197shi
Haidary A, Amiri BJ, Adamowski J, Fohrer N, Nakane K (2013) Assessing the impacts of four land use types on the water quality of wetlands in Japan. Water Resour Manag 27:2217–2229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0284-5
Ho R, Hung K (2020) A comparative investigation of mode mixing in EEG decomposition using EMD, EEMD and M-EMD. In 2020 IEEE 10th Symposium on Computer Applications & Industrial Electronics (ISCAIE) pp 203–210 IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCAIE47305.2020.9108817
Huan J, Cao W, Qin Y (2018) Prediction of dissolved oxygen in aquaculture based on EEMD and LSSVM optimized by the Bayesian evidence framework. Comput Electron Agric 150:257–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.04.022
Huan J, Li M, Xu X, Zhang H, Yang B, Jianming J, Shi B (2022) Multi-step prediction of dissolved oxygen in rivers based on random forest missing value imputation and attention mechanism coupled with recurrent neural network. Water Supply 22(5):5480–5493. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2022.154
Hull V, Parrella L, Falcucci M (2008) Modelling dissolved oxygen dynamics in coastal lagoons. Ecol Modell 211(3–4):468–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.09.023
Iglesias C, Martínez Torres J, García Nieto PJ, Alonso Fernández JR, Díaz Muñiz C, Piñeiro JI, Taboada J (2014) Turbidity prediction in a river basin by using artificial neural networks: a case study in northern Spain. Water Resour Manag 28:319–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0487-9
Ji X, Shang X, Dahlgren RA, Zhang M (2017) Prediction of dissolved oxygen concentration in hypoxic river systems using support vector machine: a case study of Wen-Rui Tang River, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:16062–16076. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9243-7
Keshtegar B, Heddam S, Hosseinabadi H (2019) The employment of polynomial chaos expansion approach for modeling dissolved oxygen concentration in river. Environ Earth Sci 78:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-8028-8
Khani S, Rajaee T (2017) Modeling of dissolved oxygen concentration and its hysteresis behavior in rivers using wavelet transform-based hybrid models. Clean: Soil, Air, Water. https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.201500395
Kisi O, Alizamir M, Docheshmeh Gorgij A (2020) Dissolved oxygen prediction using a new ensemble method. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 27:9589–9603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07574-w
Kuhn M, Johnson K (2013) Applied predictive modeling, vol 26. Springer, New York, p 13. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6849-3
Kumar MS, Priya PC, Shaik R, Singh SK (2023) Environmental flows allocation for a tropical reservoir system by integration of water quantity (SWAT) and quality (GEFC, QUAL2K) models. Water Resour Manag 37(1):113–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03358-z
Lau KM, Weng H (1995) Climate signal detection using wavelet transform: how to make a time series sing. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 76(12):2391–2402. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1995)076%3C2391:CSDUWT%3E2.0.CO;2
Liu Y, Zhang Q, Song L, Chen Y (2019) Attention-based recurrent neural networks for accurate short-term and long-term dissolved oxygen prediction. Comput Electron Agric 165:104964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.104964alizadeh
Mallat S (1999) A wavelet tour of signal processing. Elsevier
Marce R, Rodríguez-Arias MÀ, García JC, Joan A (2010) El Niño Southern Oscillation and climate trends impact reservoir water quality. Glob Change Biol 16(10):2857–2865. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02163.x
Najah A, El-Shafie A, Karim OA, El-Shafie AH (2013) Application of artificial neural networks for water quality prediction. Neural Comput Appl 22:187–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-012-0940-3
Nazir HM, Hussain I, Ahmad I, Faisal M, Almanjahie IM (2019) An improved framework to predict river flow time series data. PeerJ 7:e7183. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7183
Nemati S, Fazelifard MH, Terzi Ö, Ghorbani MA (2015) Estimation of dissolved oxygen using data-driven techniques in the Tai Po River, Hong Kong. Environ Earth Sci 74:4065–4073. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4450-3
Nong X, Lai C, Chen L, Shao D, Zhang C, Liang J (2023) Prediction modelling framework comparative analysis of dissolved oxygen concentration variations using support vector regression coupled with multiple feature engineering and optimization methods: a case study in China. Ecol Indic 146:109845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109845
Palani S, Liong SY, Tkalich P (2008) An ANN application for water quality forecasting. Mar Pollut Bull 56(9):1586–1597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2008.05.021
Partal T, Kişi Ö (2007) Wavelet and neuro-fuzzy conjunction model for precipitation forecasting. J Hydrol 342(1–2):199–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.05.026
Pelletier GJ, Chapra SC, Tao H (2006) QUAL2Kw–a framework for modeling water quality in streams and rivers using a genetic algorithm for calibration. Environ Model Softw 21(3):419–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.07.002
Quilty J, Adamowski J (2018) Addressing the incorrect usage of wavelet-based hydrological and water resources forecasting models for real-world applications with best practices and a new forecasting framework. J Hydrol 563:336–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.05.003
Raheli B, Aalami MT, El-Shafie A, Ghorbani MA, Deo RC (2017) Uncertainty assessment of the multilayer perceptron (MLP) neural network model with implementation of the novel hybrid MLP-FFA method for prediction of biochemical oxygen demand and dissolved oxygen: a case study of Langat River. Environ Earth Sci 76:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6842-z
Rajwa-Kuligiewicz A, Bialik RJ, Rowiński PM (2016) Wavelet characteristics of hydrological and dissolved oxygen time series in a lowland river. Acta Geophys 64:649–669. https://doi.org/10.1515/acgeo-2016-0023
Ranković V, Radulović J, Radojević I, Ostojić A, Čomić L (2010) Neural network modeling of dissolved oxygen in the Gruža reservoir. Serbia Ecol Modell 221(8):1239–1244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.12.023
Roushangar K, Shahnazi S (2019) Bed load prediction in gravel-bed rivers using wavelet kernel extreme learning machine and meta-heuristic methods. Int J Environ Sci Technol 16:8197–8208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-019-02287-6
Roushangar K, Shahnazi S (2020) Prediction of sediment transport rates in gravel-bed rivers using Gaussian process regression. J Hydroinform 22(2):249–262. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2019.077
Roushangar K, Shahnazi S, Azamathulla HM (2022) Partitioning strategy for investigating the prediction capability of bed load transport under varied hydraulic conditions: application of robust GWO-kernel-based ELM approach. Flow Meas Instrum 84:102136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2022.102136
Roushangar K, Shahnazi S, Sadaghiani AA (2023) An efficient hybrid grey wolf optimization-based KELM approach for prediction of the discharge coefficient of submerged radial gates. Soft Comput 27(7):3623–3640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-022-07614-7
Sagheer A, Kotb M (2019) Time series forecasting of petroleum production using deep LSTM recurrent networks. Neurocomputing 323:203–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2018.09.082
Schaefer SC, Hollibaugh JT (2017) Temperature decouples ammonium and nitrite oxidation in coastal waters. Environ Sci Technol 51(6):3157–3164. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03483
Schmidhuber J, Hochreiter S (1997) Long short-term memory. Neural Comput 9(8):1735–1780. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735
Shi S, Cao J, Feng L, Liang W, Zhang L (2014) Construction of a technique plan repository and evaluation system based on AHP group decision-making for emergency treatment and disposal in chemical pollution accidents. J Hazard Mater 276:200–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.05.034
Shi B, Wang P, Jiang J, Liu R (2018) Applying high-frequency surrogate measurements and a wavelet-ANN model to provide early warnings of rapid surface water quality anomalies. Sci Total Environ 610:1390–1399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.232
Shukla JB, Misra AK, Chandra P (2008) Mathematical modeling and analysis of the depletion of dissolved oxygen in eutrophied water bodies affected by organic pollutants. Nonlinear Anal Real World Appl 9(5):1851–1865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nonrwa.2007.05.016
Singh KP, Basant A, Malik A, Jain G (2009) Artificial neural network modeling of the river water quality—a case study. Ecol Modell 220(6):888–895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.01.004
Song C, Yao L (2022) A hybrid model for water quality parameter prediction based on CEEMDAN-IALO-LSTM ensemble learning. Environ Earth Sci 81(9):262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-022-10380-2
Song C, Yao L, Hua C, Ni Q (2021) Comprehensive water quality evaluation based on kernel extreme learning machine optimized with the sparrow search algorithm in Luoyang River Basin, China. Environ Earth Sci 80(16):521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09879-x
Soyupak S, Karaer F, Gürbüz H, Kivrak E, Sentürk E, Yazici A (2003) A neural network-based approach for calculating dissolved oxygen profiles in reservoirs. Neural Comput Appl 12:166–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-003-0378-8
Sun M, Hassan SG, Li D (2016) Models for estimating feed intake in aquaculture: a review. Comput Electron Agric 127:425–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2016.06.024
Tiyasha T, Tung TM, Bhagat SK, Tan ML, Jawad AH, Mohtar WHMW, Yaseen ZM (2021) Functionalization of remote sensing and on-site data for simulating surface water dissolved oxygen: development of hybrid tree-based artificial intelligence models. Mar Pollut Bull 170:112639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112639
Torrence C, Compo GP (1998) A practical guide to wavelet analysis. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 79(1):61–78. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079%3c0061:APGTWA%3e2.0.CO;2
Tromans D (1998) Oxygen solubility modeling in inorganic solutions: concentration, temperature and pressure effects. Hydrometallurgy 50(3):279–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-386X(98)00060-7
Verma AK, Singh TN (2013) Prediction of water quality from simple field parameters. Environ Earth Sci 69:821–829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-1967-6
Wool T, Ambrose RB Jr, Martin JL, Comer A (2020) WASP 8: the next generation in the 50-year evolution of USEPA’s water quality model. Water 12(5):1398. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12051398
Xu C, Chen X, Zhang L (2021) Predicting river dissolved oxygen time series based on stand-alone models and hybrid wavelet-based models. J Environ Manage 295:113085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113085
Zolfaghari M, Golabi MR (2021) Modeling and predicting the electricity production in hydropower using conjunction of wavelet transform, long short-term memory and random forest models. Renew Energ 170:1367–1381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.02.017
Funding
No funding was received for conducting this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
KR conceived the study and were in charge of overall direction and planning. SD carried out the modeling and SS took the lead in writing the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethical approval
Not applicable, because this article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Roushangar, K., Davoudi, S. & Shahnazi, S. Temporal prediction of dissolved oxygen based on CEEMDAN and multi-strategy LSTM hybrid model. Environ Earth Sci 83, 158 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-024-11453-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-024-11453-0