Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Assessment of groundwater nitrate vulnerability using DRASTIC and modified DRASTIC in upper catchment of Sabarmati basin

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Contamination from agriculture diffuse particularly nitrate is an important concern due to its impact on groundwater quality and human health. To ensure the protection of groundwater and effectively improve the quality of life, an overlay index-based method is proposed by taking into consideration of all pollution sources that causes potential risk to the resource in this study. A comparison had been presented between the original DRASTIC and DRASTIC-L (land use) to identify the suitability of model for probability of pollution occurrence which help in optimizing the drilling activities and safeguarding the resources. The outcome of the result is categorized into five vulnerability classes which shows that 25.9% of the total study area is extremely sensitive due to overdraft of groundwater and contamination from agriculture and industrial diffuse. The effectiveness of model was validated with correlation (r2) among water quality parameters and DRASTIC index (DI). Moreover, to exhibit better finding in terms of the specific vulnerability to agriculture contamination (NO3−) in the aquifers, DRASTIC-L was adopted in which above 50% samples exceeded WHO water quality permissible limit. The efficiency of both methods was quantitatively assessed based on the correlation of nitrate, which was improved from r2 of 0.40–0.57. The finding suggests that though the depth of water is relatively shallow as compared to central Gujarat, future overexploitation at vulnerable zones should be carefully monitored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data will be made available on request.

References

  • Alam F, Umar R, Ahmed S, Dar FA (2014) A new model (DRASTIC-LU) for evaluating groundwater vulnerability in parts of central Ganga Plain, India. Arab J Geosci 7(3):927–937. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0796-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aller L, Bennett T, Lehr JH, Petty RJ, Hackett G (1987) DRASTIC : a Standardized method for evaluating ground water pollution potential using hydrogeologic settings. NWWA/Epa-600/2-87-035 455

  • Anderson JR (1976) A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data (Vol. 964). US Government Printing Office

  • Arya S, Subramani T, Vennila G, Roy PD (2020) Groundwater vulnerability to pollution in the semi-arid Vattamalaikarai river basin of South India thorough DRASTIC index evaluation. Geochemistry 80(4):125635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bera A, Mukhopadhyay BP, Chowdhury P, Ghosh A, Biswas S (2021) Groundwater vulnerability assessment using GIS-based DRASTIC model in Nangasai River Basin, India with special emphasis on agricultural contamination. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 214:112085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordbar M, Neshat A, Javadi S, Pradhan B, Aghamohammadi H (2020) Meta-heuristic algorithms in optimizing GALDIT framework: A comparative study for coastal aquifer vulnerability assessment. J Hydrol 585:124768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulabeiz M, Klebingat S, Agaguenia S (2019) A GIS-based GOD model and hazard index analysis: the quaternary Coastal Collo Aquifer (NE-Algeria). Groundwater 57:166–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buczko U, Kuchenbuch RO (2010) Environmental indicators to assess the risk of diffuse nitrogen losses from agriculture. Environ Manage 45(5):1201–1222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Central Groundwater Board, Ground Water Brochure and Profile of Sabarkantha District. Nayak, K.M. 2014

  • Dassargues RCGA (2000) art%3A10.1007%2Fs002540050466.pdf 39.

  • Elzain HE, Chung SY, Venkatramanan S, Selvam S, Ahemd HA, Seo YK, Bhuyan MS, Yassin MA (2022) Novel machine learning algorithms to predict the groundwater vulnerability index to nitrate pollution at two levels of modeling. Chemosphere 137671

  • Ghiglieri G, Barbieri G, Vernier A, Carletti A, Demurtas N, Pinna R, Pittalis D (2009) Potential risks of nitrate pollution in aquifers from agricultural practices in the Nurra region, northwestern Sardinia, Italy. J Hydrol 379(3–4):339–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh A, Tiwari AK, Das S (2015) A GIS based DRASTIC model for assessing groundwater vulnerability of Katri Watershed, Dhanbad, India. Model Earth Syst Environ 1:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-015-0009-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goyal D, Haritash AK, Singh SK (2021) A comprehensive review of groundwater vulnerability assessment using index-based, modelling and coupling methods. J Environ Manage 296:113161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidu I, Nistor MM (2020) Groundwater vulnerability assessment in the Grand Est region, France. Quat Int 547:86–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasan M, Islam MA, Hasan MA, Alam MJ, Peas MH (2019) Groundwater vulnerability assessment in Savar upazila of Dhaka district, Bangladesh—a GIS-based DRASTIC modeling. Groundw Sustain Dev 9:100220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heiß L, Bouchaou L, Tadoumant S, Reichert B (2020) Index-based groundwater vulnerability and water quality assessment in the arid region of Tata city (Morocco). Groundw Sustain Dev 10:100344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussain Y, Ullah SF, Hussain MB, Aslam AQ, Akhter G, Martinez-Carvajal H, Cárdenas-Soto M (2017) Modelling the vulnerability of groundwater to contamination in an unconfined alluvial aquifer in Pakistan. Environ Earth Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6391-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahromi MN, Gomeh Z, Busico G, Barzegar R, Samany NN, Aalami MT, Tedesco D, Mastrocicco M, Kazakis N (2021) Developing a SINTACS-based method to map groundwater multi-pollutant vulnerability using evolutionary algorithms. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:7854–7869. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11089-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenifer MA, Jha MK (2018) Comprehensive risk assessment of groundwater contamination in a weathered hard-rock aquifer system of India. J Clean Prod 201:853–868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia Z, Bian J, Wang Y, Wan H, Sun X, Li Q (2019) Assessment and validation of groundwater vulnerability to nitrate in porous aquifers based on a DRASTIC method modified by projection pursuit dynamic clustering model. J Contam Hydrol 226:103522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2019.103522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazakis N, Voudouris KS (2015) Groundwater vulnerability and pollution risk assessment of porous aquifers to nitrate: Modifying the DRASTIC method using quantitative parameters. J Hydrol 525:13–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.03.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khosravi K, Sartaj M, Tsai FTC, Singh VP, Kazakis N, Melesse AM, Prakash I, Tien Bui D, Pham BT (2018) A comparison study of DRASTIC methods with various objective methods for groundwater vulnerability assessment. Sci Total Environ 642:1032–1049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kundu MC, Mandal B (2009) Nitrate enrichment in groundwater from long-term intensive agriculture: its mechanistic pathways and prediction through modeling. Environ Sci Technol 43(15):5837–5843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machiwal D, Jha MK, Singh VP, Mohan C (2018) Assessment and mapping of groundwater vulnerability to pollution: current status and challenges. Earth-Science Rev 185:901–927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.08.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLay CDA, Dragten R, Sparling G, Selvarajah N (2001) Predicting groundwater nitrate concentrations in a region of mixed agricultural land use: a comparison of three approaches. Environ Pollut 115(2):191–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muhammetoǧlu H, Muhammetoǧlu A, Soyupak S (2002) Vulnerability of groundwater to pollution from agricultural diffuse sources: a case study. Water Sci Technol 45:1–7. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2002.0191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadiri AA, Norouzi H, Khatibi R, Gharekhani M (2019) Groundwater DRASTIC vulnerability mapping by unsupervised and supervised techniques using a modelling strategy in two levels. J Hydrol 574:744–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.04.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nanou EA, Zagana E (2018) Groundwater vulnerability to pollution map for karst aquifer protection (Ziria karst system, Southern Greece). Geosciences 8:15–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8040125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC) (1993) Groundwater vulnerability assessment: predictive relative contamination potential under conditions of uncertainty. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, p 211p

    Google Scholar 

  • Nekkoub A, Baali F, Hadji R, Hamed Y (2020) The EPIK multi-attribute method for intrinsic vulnerability assessment of karstic aquifer under semi-arid climatic conditions, case of Cheria Plateau, NE Algeria. Arab J Geosci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05704-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neshat A, Pradhan B, Dadras M (2014) Groundwater vulnerability assessment using an improved DRASTIC method in GIS. Resour Conserv Recycl 86:74–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.02.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patel DP, Srivastava P, Gupta M, Nandhakumar N (2015) Decision Support System integrated with Geographic Information System to target restoration actions in watersheds of arid environment: a case study of Hathmati watershed, Sabarkantha district, Gujarat. J Earth Syst Sci 124(1):71–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pathak DR, Hiratsuka A, Awata I, Chen L (2009) Groundwater vulnerability assessment in shallow aquifer of Kathmandu Valley using GIS-based DRASTIC model. Environ Geol 57:1569–1578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-008-1432-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray JA, O’dell PW (1993) DIVERSITY: a new method for evaluating sensitivity of groundwater to contamination. Environ Geol 22:345–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00767508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rebolledo B, Gil A, Flotats X, Sánchez JÁ (2016) Assessment of groundwater vulnerability to nitrates from agricultural sources using a GIS-compatible logic multicriteria model. J Environ Manage 171:70–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.01.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rina K, Datta PS, Singh CK, Mukherjee S (2013) Characterization and evaluation of processes governing the groundwater quality in parts of the Sabarmati basin, Gujarat using hydrochemistry integrated with GIS. Hydrol Process 26(10):1538–1551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saha D, Alam F (2014) Groundwater vulnerability assessment using DRASTIC and Pesticide DRASTIC models in intense agriculture area of the Gangetic plains, India. Environ Monit Assess 186(12):8741–8763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma A, Shukla A, Attri K, Kumar M, Kumar P, Suttee A, Singh G, Barnwal RP, Singla N (2020) Global trends in pesticides: a looming threat and viable alternatives. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheikh MA, Azad C, Mukherjee S, Rina K (2017) An assessment of groundwater salinization in Haryana state in India using hydrochemical tools in association with GIS. Environ Earth Sci 76:465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shirazi SM, Imran HM, Akib S, Yusop Z, Harun ZB (2013) Groundwater vulnerability assessment in the Melaka State of Malaysia using DRASTIC and GIS techniques. Environ Earth Sci 70:2293–2304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2360-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha S, Semkuyu DJ, Pandey VP (2016) Assessment of groundwater vulnerability and risk to pollution in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Sci Total Environ 556:23–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha MK, Verma MK, Ahmad I, Baier K, Jha R, Azzam R (2016) Assessment of groundwater vulnerability using modified DRASTIC model in Kharun Basin, Chhattisgarh, India. Arab J Geosci 9(2):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • State Agriculture Plan (2017–2020) http://rkvy.nic.in/static/SAIDP/GJ/For%20this%20Period(2017-18%20to%202019-20)/SAP_SAIDP_GUJARAT.pdf

  • Suthar S, Bishnoi P, Singh S, Mutiyar PK, NemaPatil AKNS (2009) Nitrate contamination in groundwater of some rural areas of Rajasthan, India. J Hazardous Mater 171(1–3):189–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanushree KR (2021) A hydrochemical and remote sensing approach to decrypt the groundwater salinization in the coastal district of Sabarmati basin, Gujarat. Groundw Sustain Dev 15:100673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thapa R, Gupta S, Guin S, Kaur H (2018) Sensitivity analysis and mapping the potential groundwater vulnerability zones in Birbhum district, India: a comparative approach between vulnerability models. Water Sci 32(1):44–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vias J, Andreo B, Ravbar N, Hotzl H (2010) Mapping the vulnerability of groundwater to the contamination of four carbonate aquifers in Europe. J Environ Manag 91(7):1500–1510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voutchkova DD, Schullehner J, Rasmussen P, Hansen B (2021) A high-resolution nitrate vulnerability assessment of sandy aquifers (DRASTIC-N). J Environ Manage 277:111330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei A, Bi P, Guo J, Lu S, Li D (2021) Modified DRASTIC model for groundwater vulnerability to nitrate contamination in the Dagujia river basin, China. Water Supply 21(4):1793–1805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (World Health Organization) (2014) Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality Recommendations, fourth ed., vol. 1, pp. 491–493

Download references

Acknowledgements

The present research is a part of ECR/2015/000202 project sanctioned by Science and Engineering Research Board. The authors are grateful to the authorities of Groundwater Resource Development Corporation for providing data and permission to publish the present work and SERB for providing research grant for the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Environment and Sustainable Development, Central University of Gujarat, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, 382030, India

    Tanushree Gupta & Rina Kumari

Authors
  1. Tanushree Gupta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rina Kumari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

T: data interpretation and analysis, and manuscript drafting. RK: conceptualization, supervision, and manuscript editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rina Kumari.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

There is no competing interest between the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gupta, T., Kumari, R. Assessment of groundwater nitrate vulnerability using DRASTIC and modified DRASTIC in upper catchment of Sabarmati basin. Environ Earth Sci 82, 216 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-023-10880-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-023-10880-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation