Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Modeling fate and transport of ammonium, nitrite, and nitrate in a soil contaminated with large dose of urea

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Soil or groundwater potential contamination generated by urea spills during its manufacture process is unknown. The aim of this work is determining the fate and transport of Nitrogen (N) species (ammonia, nitrites, and nitrates) when high doses of urea are spilled on to the soil surface. Fertilizer concentrations applied to soil surface were in the range from 167 to 301 g N m−2. HYDRUS 2D was applied to simulate N-species transport in the unsaturated zone. Simulated soil water contents correctly represent field measurements during the period March 2018–December 2019 (rRMSE = 0.099). Measured and simulated concentrations of N–NH4+, N–NO2, and N–NO3 presented a general r2 of 0.76 and RMSE of 0.0435 mg g−1 (rRMSE = 0.096). A considerable decrease in soil pH was observed after urea application. Simulated N losses by volatilization were found in the range of 7.9–13.3% of total urea-N input, in agreement with field measured quantities. According to N mass balance the predominant species are ammonium and nitrate. After hydrolysis of urea, nitrification is the dominant process in soil. At the end of the experiment, ammonium corresponded to 22% of total urea-N input, majorly concentrated in the first forty centimeters of soil profile. Otherwise, nitrate represented 52.7% of total urea-N input. Although simulated quantities of N–NO3 leached into the aquifer are negligible (0.23 g m−2), a significant solute load remains in soil, which could be mobilize in the future. Numerical modeling of N transport is a fundamental tool to predict and evaluate the characteristics of a pollutant event of this nature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code availability

HYDRUS 2D/3D (https://www.pc-progress.com/en/Default.aspx?hydrus-3d).

Abbreviations

(CO(NH2)2):

Urea

N–NH3 :

Ammonia

N–NH4 :

Ammonium

N–NO2 :

Nitrite

N–NO3 :

Nitrate

N:

Nitrogen

UZ:

Unsaturated zone

δb :

Soil bulk density

θ:

Volumetric soil water content

h:

Pressure head

θr :

Residual water content

θs :

Saturated water content

α:

Inverse of the air-entry suction

n:

Porosity distribution index

m:

van Genuchten empirical parameter

l:

Pore conductivity

Ks :

Saturated hydraulic conductivity

DL :

Longitudinal dispersivity

Dt :

Transverse dispersivity

Kh :

Henry’s constant

Kd :

Soil–water partitioning coefficient

μh :

Hydrolysis first order decay constant

μnit :

Nitrification first order decay constant

μdenit :

Denitrification first order decay constant

AVr :

Ammonia volatilization rate

C:

Dissolved phase concentration

S:

Solid phase concentration

Cg :

Gaseous phase concentration

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank PROFERTIL S.A. for allowing field trials to be carried out in their facilities and for the financial support to realize chemical analyzes.

Funding

Research was supported by PROFERTIL S.A. The financial support was used to realize chemical analyzes in soil samples. The research was also supported by Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) and Universidad Nacional del Sur (UNS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SLE conceptualization, methodology, software, validation, and writing—original draft. ZV formal analysis, writing—review and editing, and visualization. LD writing—review and editing. LC conceptualization, resources, supervision, and project administration.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leonardo E. Scherger.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Scherger, L.E., Zanello, V., Lafont, D. et al. Modeling fate and transport of ammonium, nitrite, and nitrate in a soil contaminated with large dose of urea. Environ Earth Sci 80, 539 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09814-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09814-0

Keywords

Navigation