Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Desert channel erosion, accretion characteristics and their implications for aeolian–fluvial interactions: a case study in a desert watershed in the Ordos Plateau, China

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The significance of aeolian–fluvial interactions in controlling the geomorphology of the landscape in semi-arid desert dune fields has long been appreciated, but limited field data are available to examine how these modern aeolian–fluvial processes interact with the desert channel. In this study, based on desert channel changes and flash flood monitoring during a field survey, we characterize the responses of the desert channel to interactions between fluvial and aeolian processes in an ephemeral desert river in the ten kongduis region in the Hobq Desert in the Ordos Plateau (China). We find that the desert channel is the key place for interactions between aeolian and fluvial processes and has a significant impact on erosion and sediment yield. The pattern of aeolian–fluvial interactions in this area is that aeolian processes can move dunes and narrow the channels in the dry season, but storm floods can cause hyper-erosion of dune-covered banks and widen the channels, which are characterized by hyper-concentration flows during the flood season. Based on the cross-sections, the results show that the channel cross-section accretion area in the dry season was 0.4 times and 0.2 times the channel erosion area in the flood seasons of 2011 and 2012, respectively, of which the left bank accretion area in the dry season was 0.3 times and 0.1 times the left bank erosion in the flood seasons of 2011 and 2012, respectively. In the flood season, the dune-covered left bank erosion and sediment yield were 3.5 times those of the right bank on average. For channel lateral movement, the channel narrowing width caused by aeolian dune accretion in the dry season was 1/6 of the channel widening induced by storm-flood erosion in the flood season. Therefore, aeolian–fluvial interactions control the landform and landscape evolution in this desert area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aich V, Zimmermann A, Elsenbeer H (2014) Quantification and interpretation of suspended-sediment discharge hysteresis patterns: how much data do we need? CATENA 122:120–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Masrahy MA, Mountney NP (2015) A classification scheme for fluvial–aeolian system interaction in desert-margin settings. Aeol Res 17:67–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews S (1981) Sedimentology of Great Sand Dunes, Colorado. In: Ethridge FG, Flores RM (eds) Recent and ancient nonmarine depositional environments. SEPM (Society for Sedimentary Geology), Tulsa, pp 279–291

  • Ardıçlıoğlu M, Kuriqi A (2019) Calibration of channel roughness in intermittent rivers using HEC-RAS model: case of Sarimsakli creek, Turkey. SN Appl Sci 1(9):1080

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagnold RA (1936) The movement of desert sand. Geogr J 157(4):342–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Belnap J, Munson SM, Field JP (2011) Aeolian and fluvial processes in dryland regions: the need for integrated studies. Ecohydrology 4(5):615–622

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourke MC, Ewing RC, Finnegan D, Mcgowan HA (2009) Sand dune movement in the Victoria Valley, Antarctica. Geomorphology 109(3–4):148–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Breshears DD, Whicker JJ, Johansen MP, Pinder JE (2003) Wind and water erosion and transport in semi-arid shrubland, grassland and forest ecosystems: quantifying dominance of horizontal wind-driven transport. Earth Surf Process Landf 28(11):1189–1209

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullard JE, McTainsh GH (2003) Aeolian-fluvial interactions in dryland environments: examples, concepts and Australia case study. Prog Phys Geogr 27(4):471–501

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen D, Wang Z, He Y (2002) Experimental study on the fluvial process of debris flow discharging into a river. J Sedim Res 6(3):22–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppus R, Imeson AC (2002) Extreme events controlling erosion and sediment transport in a semi-arid sub-andean valley. Earth Surf Process Landf 27(13):1365–1375

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan X, Shi C, Zhou Y, Shao W (2012) Sediment rating curves in the Ningxia-Inner Mongolia reaches of the upper Yellow River and their implications. Quat Int 282:152–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Field JP, Breshears DD, Whicker JJ (2009) Toward a more holistic perspective of soil erosion: why aeolian research needs to explicitly consider fluvial processes and interactions. Aeol Res 1(1–2):9–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao P (2008) Understanding watershed suspended sediment transport. Prog Phys Geogr 32:243–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao P, Josefson M (2012) Event-based suspended sediment dynamics in a central New York watershed. Geomorphology 139–140:425–437

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao P, Pasternack G (2007) Dynamics of suspended sediment transport at field-scale drain channels of irrigation-dominated watersheds in the Sonoran Desert, south-eastern California. Hydrol Process 21:2081–2092

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollands CB, Nanson GC, Jones BG, Bristow CS, Price DM, Pietsch TJ (2006) Aeolian–fluvial interaction: evidence for Late Quaternary channel change and wind-rift linear dune formation in the northwestern Simpson Desert, Australia. Quat Sci Rev 25(1–2):142–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones LS, Blakey RC (1997) Eolian-fluvial interaction in the Page Sandstone (Middle Jurassic) in south-central Utah, USA - a case study of erg-margin processes. Sedim Geol 109(1–2):181–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein M (1984) Anti clockwise hysteresis in suspended sediment concentration during individual storms: Holbeck Catchment; Yorkshire, England. CATENA 11(2):251–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuriqi A, Koçileri G, Ardiçlioğlu M (2020) Potential of Meyer-Peter and Müller approach for estimation of bed-load sediment transport under different hydraulic regimes. Model Earth Syst Environ 6(1):129–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-019-00665-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langford RP (1989) Fluvial-aeolian interactions: part I, modern systems. Sedimentology 36(6):1023–1035

    Google Scholar 

  • Langford RP (2010) Aeolian-fluvial interactions: part I, modern systems. Sedimentology 36(6):1023–1035

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold LB, Wolman MG (1957) River channel patterns - braided, meandering and straight. Prof Geogr 9:39–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold LB, Wolman MG (1970) River channel patterns. Palgrave Macmillan

    Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Dong G, Shen J, Yang P, Liu X, Wang Y, Jin H, Wang Q (1999) Formation mechanism and development pattern of aeolian sand landform in Yarlung Zangbo River valley. Sci Sin Terrae 42(3):272–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Wang H, Ma Q (2018) Responses of the braided channel to reduced discharge and lateral inputs of aeolian sand in the Ulan Buh Desert Reach of the Upper Yellow River. Environ Earth Sci 77(10):379

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu B, Coulthard TJ (2015) Mapping the interactions between rivers and sand dunes: Implications for fluvial and aeolian geomorphology. Geomorphology 231:246–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Loope DB, Swinehart JB, Mason JP (1995) Dune-dammed paleovalleys of the Nebraska Sand Hills: intrinsic versus climatic controls on the accumulation of lake and marsh sediments. Geol Soc Am Bull 107(107):396–0406

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Tarazon JA, Batalla RJ, Vericat D, Francke T (2009) Suspended sediment transport in a highly erodible catchment: the River Isábena (southern Pyrenees). Geomorphology 109:210–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Mano V, Nemery J, Belleudy P, Poirel A (2009) Assessment of suspended sediment transport in four alpine watersheds (France): influence of the climatic regime. Hydrol Process 23:777–792

    Google Scholar 

  • Maroulis JC, Nanson GC, Price DM, Pietsch T (2007) Aeolian–fluvial interaction and climate change: source-bordering dune development over the past ∼100 ka on Cooper Creek, central Australia. Quat Sci Rev 26(3–4):386–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason JP, Swinehart JB, Loope DB (1997) Holocene history of lacustrine and marsh sediments in a dune-blocked drainage, Southwestern Nebraska Sand Hills, U.S.A. J Paleolimnol 17(1):67–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Mountney N, Howell J, Flint S, Jerram D (1998) Aeolian and alluvial deposition within the Mesozoic Etjo Sandstone Formation, nortwest Namibia. J Afr Earth Sc 27(2):175–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid I, Frostick LE (2011) Channel form, flows and sediments of endogenous ephemeral rivers in deserts. Arid zone geomorphology: process, form and change in drylands, Third Edition, pp 301–332

  • Rosgen DL (1994) A classification of natural rivers. CATENA 22(3):169–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Rovira A, Batalla RJ (2006) Temporal distribution of suspended sediment transport in a Mediterranean basin: the lower Tordera (NE Spain). Geomorphology 79:58–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Sankey JB, Draut AE (2014) Gully annealing by aeolian sediment: field and remote-sensing investigation of aeolian–hillslope–fluvial interactions, Colorado River corridor, Arizona, USA. Geomorphology 220:68–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Sankey JB, Caster J, Kasprak A, East AE (2018) The response of source-bordering aeolian dunefields to sediment-supply changes 2: controlled floods of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon, Arizona, USA. Aeol Res 32:154–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarma JN (2005) Fluvial process and morphology of the Brahmaputra River in Assam, India. Geomorphology 70(3–4):226–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumm S (1985) Patterns of alluvial rivers. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 13:5

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeger M, Errea M-P, Beguería S, Arnáez J, Martí C, García-Ruiz JM (2004) Catchment soil moisture and rainfall characteristics as determinant factors for discharge/suspended sediment hysteretic loops in a small headwater catchment in the Spanish Pyrenees. J Hydrol 288:299–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith HG, Dragovich D (2009) Interpreting sediment delivery processes using suspended sediment-discharge hysteresis patterns from nested upland catchments, south-eastern Australia. Hydrol Process 23(17):2415–2426

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith ND, Smith DG (1984) William River: an outstanding example of channel widening and braiding caused by bed-load addition. Geology 12(2):78–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Ta W, Jia X, Wang H (2013) Channel deposition induced by bank erosion in response to decreased flows in the sand-banked reach of the upstream Yellow River. CATENA 105:62–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Ta W, Wang H, Jia X (2014) Aeolian process-induced hyper-concentrated flow in a desert watershed. J Hydrol 511:220–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Ta W, Wang H, Jia X (2015) The contribution of aeolian processes to fluvial sediment yield from a desert watershed in the Ordos Plateau, China. Hydrol Process 29(1):80–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Tooth S (2000) Process, form and change in dryland rivers: a review of recent research. Earth Sci Rev 51(1–4):67–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Trask ID (1932) Origin and environment of source sediments of petroleum. Gulf Pub. Co., p 323

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Wu Y, Kou Q, Min D, Chang Y, Zhang R (2007) Definition of arsenic rock zone borderline and its classification. Sci Soil Water Conserv 5(01):14–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams GP (1989) Sediment concentration versus water discharge during single hydrologic events in rivers. J Hydrol 111:89–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams M (2015) Interactions between fluvial and eolian geomorphic systems and processes: examples from the Sahara and Australia. CATENA 134:4–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu J (2014) The influence of dilution on downstream channel sedimentation in large rivers: the Yellow River, China. Earth Surface Process Landf 39(4):450–462

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang G (2005) Symposia on blown-sand disaster. Ocean Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang H, Shi C (2018) Spatial and temporal variations of aeolian sediment input to the tributaries (the Ten Kongduis) of the upper Yellow River. Aeol Res 30:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang G, Liu Y, Shi P (1987) Discussion on Blown-sand along the Bank of Yellow River from Beichangtan to Hequ. J Desert Res 7(1):46–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang G, Liu Y, Shi P (1988) Estimation of the infusion of blown-sand along the Bank into Yellow River. Chin Sci Bull 13:1017–1021

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeshaneh E, Eder A, Blöschl G (2013) Temporal variation of suspended sediment transport in the Koga catchment, North Western Ethiopia and environmental implications. Hydrol Process 28(24):5972–5984

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC0402401), Jiangsu Province High-level Innovative and Entrepreneurial Talent Introduction Program, Doctor of Innovative and Entrepreneurial (NO. (2020)31015), the opening Fund of Key Laboratory of Desert and Desertification, Chinese Academy of Sciences (KLDD-2017-001). We thank springer nature research editing service group (https://authorservices.springernature.cn/) for editing the language of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yongshan Li.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jia, X., Wang, H. & Li, Y. Desert channel erosion, accretion characteristics and their implications for aeolian–fluvial interactions: a case study in a desert watershed in the Ordos Plateau, China. Environ Earth Sci 80, 371 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09656-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09656-w

Keywords

Navigation