Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison between four electrode arrays in delineating sedimentary layers of alluvial fan deposits in eastern Iraq using a 2D imaging technique

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A resistivity survey is performed in the northern Badra area, eastern Iraq, using a two-dimensional (2D) imaging technique. The mean goal is to compare four electrode arrays (Dipole–Dipole, Wenner–Schlumberger, Schlumberger reciprocal, and Wenner) to examine their resolution and ability in delineating the layers in complex sedimentary deposits. Six 2D imaging stations applied in the study area. The first two stations (2DS1 and 2DS2) are selected to make the comparison. The comparison results showed that Wenner–Schlumberger’s inverse models provide optimal results corresponding to the deep subsurface layers and they show the best resolution with depth compared to the other arrays. Therefore, it is useful in determining the layers, especially in areas with high inhomogeneity and also with the long survey line. The Wenner array presents a high sensitivity to high background noise and/or a long survey line. Its inverse model is incapable of recognizing the layers (in 2DS1), but it gives good images when the noise level becomes small and/or a shorter long survey line is used. However, its resolution is still less than that of the Wenner–Schlumberger array. The Schlumberger reciprocal array successfully delineates the layers, but its inverse models do not show optimal matching with the lithology sections of the boreholes (BH1 and BH2). The Dipole–Dipole array is incapable of determining the underlying layers due to the decrease in its vertical resolution when there is an increase in depth and/or noise contamination. However, it is suitable to use in very shallow investigations (no more 30–40 m depth) and needs high-quality data measurements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alfouzan F.(2008) Optimization strategies of electrode arrays used in numerical and field 2D resistivity imaging survey. unpublished, Ph.D. thesis.University Sains Malaysia

  • AL-Jiburi H (2006) Hydrogeological and hydrochemical study of Mandali quadrangle. State company of geological survey and mining, 56p

  • AL-Zubedi AS, Thabit JM (2014) Comparison between 2D imaging and vertical electrical sounding in aquifer delineation: a case study of the south and south west of Samawa City (IRAQ). Arab J Geosci 7:174–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayolabi EA, Folorunso AF, Eleyinimi AF (2009) Applications of 1D and 2D electrical resistivity methods to map aquifers in a complex geologic terrain of foursquare camp, Ajebo, Southwestern Nigeria. The Pacif J Sci Technol 10(2):657–666

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley LR, Gharibi M (2004) Two- and three-dimensional electrical resistivity imaging at a heterogeneous remediation site. Geophysics 69:674–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlin T (2001) The development of DC resistivity imaging techniques. Computer Geosciences 27(9):1019–1029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlin T,   Bernstone C (1997) A roll-along technique for 3D resistivity data acquisition with multi-electrode array. In: Bell RS (ed) Proceedings of SAGEEP, EEGS, March 1997, vol 2. Reno, Nevada, pp 927–935

  • Dahlin T, Zhou B (2004) Numerical comparison of 2D resistivity imaging with ten electrode arrays. Geophys Prospect 52:379–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlin T, Bernstone C, Loke MH (2002) A 3-D resistivity investigation of a contaminated site at Lernacken. Sweden Geophys 67(6):1692–1700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geotomo Software (2008) RES2DINV version 3.57. Rapid 2D resistivity and IP inversion using the least squares method. Penang, Malaysia, 148

  • Griffiths DH, Barker RD (1993) Two-dimension resistivity imaging and modeling in area of complex geology. J Appl Geophys 29:211–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunther T, Rucker C, Spitzer K (2006) Three-dimensional modeling and inversion of dc resistivity data incorporating topography-II. Invers Geophys J Int 166:506–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jassim HK (2009) Petrography, and sedimentology of AL-Mukdadiya formation in badra area eastern-Iraq. Unpublished, M.S, Thesis. University of Baghdad, 142

  • Jassim SZ, Goof JC (2006) Geology of Iraq. Prague and Moravian Museum, Brno, Czech Republic, Dolin, p 337

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller GV, Frischknecht FC (1966) Electrical methods in geophysical prospecting. Pergamon Press, Oxford, p 517

  • Koefoed O (1979) Geosounding principles 1: resistivity sounding measurements. Elsevier scientific publishing company, Amsterdam, p 276

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunetz G (1966) Principle of direct current resistivity prospecting. Borntrager, Berlin, p 103

    Google Scholar 

  • Loke MH (2012) Tutorial: 2-D and 3-D electrical imaging surveys. http://www.geotomosoft.com

  • Loke MH, Barker RD (1996a) Rapid least-squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudo sections by a quasi-Newton method. Geophys Prospect 44:131–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loke MH, Barker RD (1996b) Practical techniques for 3D resistivity surveys and data inversion. Geophys Prosp 44:499–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loke MH, Alfouzan FA, Nawawi MN (2007) Optimization of electrical array used in 2D resistivity imaging survey. ASEG Ext Abst 1:4

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza A, Bjelm L, Dahlin T (2000) Resistivity imaging as a tool for groundwater studies at Santo Domingo, central Nicaragua. Procs, EEGS, p 4

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyquist JE, Peake JS, Roth MS (2007) Comparison of an optimized resistivity array with dipole-dipole sounding in karst terrain. Geophysics 72:139–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiser F, Dalsegg E, Dahlin T, Guri V GanerØd, RØnning JS (2009) Resistivity modeling of fracture zones and horizontal layers in bedrock. Norway Geological Survey, 120

  • Satarugsa P, Nulay P, Meesawat N, Thongman W (2004) Applied two-dimension resistivity imaging for detection of subsurface cavities in Northeastern Thailand: a case study at Ban nonsa bang, Mphoe Ban muung, changwadStakonnakhon. In: International conference on applied geophysics, 26–27 November 2004, Chiang Mai, Thailand, pp 187–202

  • Stanton GP, Kress WH, Teeple AP, Greenslate ML, Clark AK (2007) Geophysical analysis of the salmon peak formation near Amistad reservoir dam, Val Verde County, Texas, and Coahuila, Mexico. March 2006, to aid in piezometer placement. U.S. geophysical survey, Reston, p 76

    Google Scholar 

  • State company of geological survey and mining (1996) Geological map of Iraq. Baghdad, Iraq

  • Thabit JM, AL-Hameedawi MM (2014) Delineation of groundwater aquifers using VES and 2D imaging techniques in north Badra area, Eastern Iraq. Iraqi J Sci 55:174–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Nostrand RG, Cook KL (1966) Interpretation of resistivity data. U.S. Geological survey, Reston, p 310

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou W, Beck BF, Adams AL (2002) Effective electrode array in mapping karst hazards in electrical resistivity tomography. Environ Geol 42:922–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the General Commission for Groundwater, Ministry of Water Resources; therefore, we want to express our sincere thanks. Also, our deepest thanks to all those who helped us during the field survey and office work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammed M. AL-Hameedawi.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 100 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

AL-Hameedawi, M.M., Thabit, J.M. Comparison between four electrode arrays in delineating sedimentary layers of alluvial fan deposits in eastern Iraq using a 2D imaging technique. Environ Earth Sci 76, 525 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6853-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6853-9

Keywords

Navigation