Abstract
In mountainous areas, topographic shading effects exert significant influence on the spatial distribution of solar irradiance on the land surface, which should be considered in estimating and modeling physical, biological, and hydrological processes. Various algorithms have been proposed for quantitative assessment of the impact of topography on the arriving solar radiation on slopes in mountainous area based on digital elevation model (DEM). However, different algorithms tend to produce different results even based on the same DEM. In this study, two algorithms for determining the maximum horizontal viewing angle of terrain obstruction were compared in a catchment in the Qilian Mountains, Northwest China, which were identical except for the way in interpreting DEM. Two algorithms for calculating sky view factor were also compared. Then, different algorithm combinations were compared and their sensitivities to the horizontal resolution of DEM were investigated. Results showed that the differences in outputs of different algorithms and combinations were significant and cannot be ignored in estimating the spatial distribution of solar irradiance in mountainous areas. A simple ground validation concluded that the algorithm assuming a linear variation in elevation was a little better than that assuming a stepped variation in elevation in and among neighboring DEM cells. For calculating diffuse solar radiation, the algorithm based on a sloped coordinate system was theoretically better than that based on a horizontal coordinate system. It is worth noting that even though the estimated annual mean of solar irradiance over the study area was almost the same among some algorithm combinations, the difference in spatial distribution was significant, which may lead to consequent difference in assessing or modeling some other environmental variables relevant to surface energy exchange, e.g., evaporation, snowmelt, and ground temperature. However, the analysis in this study was mainly theoretical, and further ground-based validations should be made in future.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen RG, Trezza R, Tasumi M (2006) Analytical integrated functions for daily solar radiation on slopes. Agric For Meteorol 139(1–2):55–73. doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.05.012
Batlles FJ, Bosch JL, Tovar-Pescador JB, Marti´nez-Durba´ MC, Ortega RD, Miralles IE (2008) Determination of atmospheric parameters to estimate global radiation in areas of complex topography: generation of global irradiation map. Energy Convers Manag 49:336–345
Chen RS, Kang E, Ji XB et al (2007) An hourly solar radiation model under actual weather and terrain conditions: a case study in heihe river basin. Energy 32(7):1148–1157. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2006.07.006
Chen X, Su Z, Ma Y, Sunt F (2012) Analysis of land-atmosphere interactions over the north region of mt. Qomolangma (mt. Everest). Arct Antarct Alp Res 44(4):412–422. doi:10.1657/1938-4246-44.4.412
Chen X, Su Z, Ma Y, Yang K, Wang B (2013) Estimation of surface energy fluxes under complex terrain of mt. Qomolangma over the tibetan plateau. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17(4):1607–1618. doi:10.5194/hess-17-1607-2013
Diodato N, Bellocchi G (2007) Modelling solar radiation over complex terrains using monthly climatological data. Agric For Meteorol 144(1–2):111–126. doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.02.001
Dozier J (1980) A clear-sky spectral solar-radiation model for snow-covered mountainous terrain. Water Resour Res 16(4):709–718
Dubayah R (1992) Estimating net solar radiation using landsat thematic mapper and digital elevation data. Water Resour Res 28(9):2469–2484. doi:10.1029/92WR00772
Dubayah RC (1994) Modeling a solar radiation topoclimatology for the rio grande river basin. J Veg Sci 5(5):627–640. doi:10.2307/3235879
Dubayah R, Rich PM (1995) Topographic solar radiation models for gis. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 9(4):405–419. doi:10.1080/02693799508902046
Fu P, Rich PM (2000) The Solar Analyst 1.0. User Manual. Helios Environmental Modeling Institute, Vermont
Garen DC, Marks D (2005) Spatially distributed energy balance snowmelt modelling in a mountainous river basin: estimation of meteorological inputs and verification of model results. J Hydrol 315(1–4):126–153. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.03.026
Helbig N, Löwe H (2014) Parameterization of the spatially averaged sky view factor in complex topography. J Geophys Res: Atmos 119(8):4616–4625. doi:10.1002/2013JD020892
Helbig N, Löwe H, Lehning M (2009) Radiosity approach for the shortwave surface radiation balance in complex terrain. J Atmos Sci 66(9):2900–2912. doi:10.1175/2009JAS2940.1
Kumar L, Andrew KS, Knowles E (1997) Modelling topographic variation in solar radiation in a gis environment. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 11(5):475–497
Kumar L, Skidmore AK (2000) Radiation-vegetation relationships in a eucalyptus forest. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 2:193–204
Li X, Cheng GD, Chen XZ et al (1999) Modification of solar radiation model over rugged terrain. Chin Sci Bull 44(15):1345–1350
Liu BYH, Jordan RC (1960) The interrelationship and characteristic distribution of direct, diffuse and total solar radiation. Sol Energy 4(3):1–19. doi:10.1016/0038-092X(60)90062-1
McVicar TR, Van Niel TG, Li L et al (2007) Spatially distributing monthly reference evapotranspiration and pan evaporation considering topographic influences. J Hydrol 338(3–4):196–220. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.02.018
Meza F, Varas E (2000) Estimation of mean monthly solar global radiation as a function of temperature. Agric For Meteorol 100(2–3):231–241. doi:10.1016/S0168-1923(99)00090-8
Moore ID, Grayson RB, Ladson AR (1991) Digital terrain modelling: a review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications. Hydrol Process 5(1):3–30. doi:10.1002/hyp.3360050103
Pang Y, Chen E, Liu Q et al. (2008) WATER: Dataset of airborne LiDAR mission in the Dayekou flight zone. Doi:10.3972/water973.0221.db
Raaflaub LD, Collins MJ (2006) The effect of error in gridded digital elevation models on the estimation of topographic parameters. Environ Model Softw 21(5):710–732. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.02.003
Reuter HI, Kersebaum KC, Wendroth O (2005) Modelling of solar radiation influenced by topographic shading—evaluation and application for precision farming. Phys Chem Earth, Parts A/B/C 30(1–3):143–149. doi:10.1016/j.pce.2004.08.027
Susong D, Marks D, Garen D (1999) Methods for developing time-series climate surfaces to drive topographically distributed energy- and water-balance models. Hydrol Process 13(12–13):2003–2021
Tian YQ, Davies-Colley RJ, Gong P et al (2001) Estimating solar radiation on slopes of arbitrary aspect. Agric For Meteorol 109(1):67–74. doi:10.1016/S0168-1923(01)00245-3
Tovar J, Olmo FJ, Alados-Arboledas L (1995) Local-scale variability of solar radiation in a mountainous region. J Appl Meteorol 34(10):2316–2322. doi:10.1175/1520-0450(1995)034<2316:LSVOSR>2.0.CO;2
Williams TJ, Quinton WL (2013) Modelling incoming radiation on a linear disturbance and its impact on the ground thermal regime in discontinuous permafrost. Hydrol Process 27(13):1854–1865. doi:10.1002/hyp.9792
Wilson JP, Gallant JC (2000) Terrain analysis: principles and applications. Wiley, New York
Yang K, He J, Tang W et al (2010) On downward shortwave and longwave radiations over high altitude regions: observation and modeling in the tibetan plateau. Agric For Meteorol 150(1):38–46. doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.08.004
Zakšek K, Oštir K, Kokalj Ž (2011) Sky-View Factor as a Relief Visualization Technique. Remote Sens 3 (12):398–415
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their critical review and comments on drafts of this manuscript. This research was funded by the Chinese National Fund Projects (No.41401028, 41671059) and by the State Key Laboratory of Frozen Soils Engineering (Project No. SKLFSE201201).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, Y., Chang, X. & Liang, J. Comparison of different algorithms for calculating the shading effects of topography on solar irradiance in a mountainous area. Environ Earth Sci 76, 295 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6618-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6618-5