Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Tracer test to constrain CO2 residual trapping and plume evolution

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

CO2 residual trapping, post-injection plume extent, and time for plume stabilization for CO2 geological storage highly depend on the hysteresis process which is the discrepancy between drainage and imbibition processes. CO2 flow in the injection zone during the injection period is mainly controlled by the drainage process during which the non-wetting CO2-rich phase replaces the wetting aqueous phase. Using data collected over the injection period may be insufficient in constraining the hysteresis parameters required to predict the post-closure plume evolution. Long-term data collection over the post-injection period to determine the residually trapped CO2 and to predict the CO2 plume evolution and stabilization can be very expensive. Here, we introduce a tracer test to enable the determination of the residually trapped CO2 and prediction of the CO2 plume evolution and stabilization in a temporal manner. The tracer test is introduced at the end of an injection period to obtain information on the residual trapping parameters including imbibition/drainage discrepancy (hysteresis) and critical CO2-rich phase saturation. The sensitivity of the proposed tracer test to residual trapping parameters is evaluated with respect to the tracers’ peak times at the injection well (which serves as observation well during post-injection period) as well as an offset location at an updip distance from the injection well. The effect of residual trapping on the plume evolution and tracer test response is studied considering reservoir properties representative of a real project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bennion B, Bachu S (2005) Relative permeability characteristics for supercritical CO2 displacing water in a variety of potential sequestration zones. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Dallas

  • Bennion B, Bachu S (2008) Drainage and imbibition relative permeability relationships for supercritical CO2/brine and H2S/brine systems in intergranular sandstone, carbonate, shale, and anhydrite rocks. SPE Reservoir Eval Eng. doi:10.2118/99326-PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkholzer JT, Zhou Q (2009) Basin-scale hydrogeologic impacts of CO2 storage: capacity and regulatory implications. Int J Greenh Gas Control 3:745–756. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catlett RD, Spencer JD, Lolon E, Bucior D (2013) Evaluation of two horizontal wells in the eagle ford using oil-based chemical tracer technology to optimize stimulation design. SPE-163846, SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, 4–6 February, The Woodlands, Texas, USA

  • CMG-GEM (2013) CMG-GEM Version 2013 user’s guide. Computer Modelling Group Ltd., Calgary

    Google Scholar 

  • Corey AT (1954) The interrelation between gas and oil relative permeabilities. Prod Mon 19:38–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Doughty C (2007) Modeling geologic storage of carbon dioxide: comparison of non-hysteretic and hysteretic characteristic curves. Energy Convers Manag 48:1768–1781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EPA US (2010) Federal requirements under the Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program for Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Geologic Sequestration (GS) Wells Final Rule

  • Freifeld BM, Trautz RC, Kharaka YK, Phelps TJ, Myer LR, Hovorka SD, Collins DJ (2005) The U-tube: a novel system for acquiring borehole fluid samples from a deep geologic CO2 sequestration experiment. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 1978–2012:110

    Google Scholar 

  • Goswick R, LaRue J (2014) Utilizing oil soluble tracers to understand stimulation efficiency along the lateral. SPE-170929, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 27–29 October, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  • Haghighat SA, Mohaghegh SD, Gholami V, Shahkarami A (2013) Pressure History Matching for CO2 Storage in Saline Aquifers: Case Study for Citronelle Dome. Carbon Management Technology Conference, Alexandria

  • Hepple RP, Benson SM (2002) Implications of surface seepage on the effectiveness of geologic storage of carbon dioxide as a climate change mitigation strategy

  • Hovorka SD, Meckel TA, Trevino RH, Lu J, Nicot J-P, Choi J-W, Freeman D, Cook P, Daley TM, Ajo-Franklin JB, Freifeild BM, Doughty C, Carrigan CR, Brecque DL, Kharaka YK, Thordsen JJ, Phelps TJ, Yang C, Romanak KD, Zhang T, Holt RM, Lindler JS, Butsch RJ (2011) Monitoring a large volume CO2 injection: year two results from SECARB project at Denbury’s Cranfield, Mississippi, USA. Energy Procedia 4:3478–3485. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2005) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage

  • Jerauld G, Mohammadi H, Webb KJ (2010) Interpreting single well chemical tracer tests. SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium. Society of Petroleum Engineers

  • Killough JE (1976) Reservoir simulation with history-dependent saturation functions. Soc Petrol Eng J. doi:10.2118/5106-PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Koperna GJ (2013) Anthropogenic Test simulation results joint citronelle—Cranfield SECARB technical meeting. Austin, TX

    Google Scholar 

  • LaForce T, Ennis-King J, Boreham C, Paterson L (2014) Residual CO2 saturation estimate using noble gas tracers in a single-well field test: the CO2CRC Otway project. Int J Greenh Gas Control 26:9–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Land CS (1968) Calculation of imbibition relative permeability for two-and three-phase flow from rock properties. Soc Petrol Eng J 8:149–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu JM, Kharaka YK, Thordsen JJ, Horita J, Karamalidis A, Griffith C, Hakala JA, Ambats G, Cole DR, Phelps TJ, Manning MA, Cook PJ, Hovorka SD (2012) CO2–rock–brine interactions in Lower Tuscaloosa Formation at Cranfield CO2 sequestration site, Mississippi, USA. Chem Geol 291:269–277. doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2011.10.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matter JM, Takahashi T, Goldberg D (2007) Experimental evaluation of in situ CO2–water–rock reactions during CO2 injection in basaltic rocks: implications for geological CO2 sequestration. Geochem Geophys Geosyst. doi:10.1029/2006GC001427

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercado M, Perez CE, Asadi M, Casas DR (2003) Gas flood-flow pattern evaluation: a successful interwell field study. SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference. SPE-81005, SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, 27–30 April, Port-of-Spain, Trinidad and Tobago

  • Nghiem L, Shrivastava V, Kohse B, Hassam M, Yang C (2010) Simulation and optimization of trapping processes for CO2 storage in saline aquifers. J Can Petrol Technol. doi:10.2118/139429-PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemi A, Bensabat J, Fagerlund F, Sauter M, Ghergut J, Licha T, Fierz T, Wiegand G, Rasmusson M, Rasmusson K (2012) Small-scale CO2 injection into a deep geological formation at Heletz, Israel. Energy Procedia 23:504–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauwels H, Kloppmann W, Foucher J-C, Martelat A, Fritsche V (1998) Field tracer test for denitrification in a pyrite-bearing schist aquifer. Appl Geochem 13:767–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrusak RL, Cyphers S, Bumgardner SB, Hills D, Pashin J, Esposito RA (2010) Saline reservoir storage in an active oil field: extracting maximum value from existing data for initial site characterization; Southeast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (SECARB) Phase III. SPE Paper 139700, SPE International Conference on CO2 Capture, Storage, and Utilization, New Orleans

  • Ptak T, Piepenbrink M, Martac E (2004) Tracer tests for the investigation of heterogeneous porous media and stochastic modelling of flow and transport—a review of some recent developments. J Hydrol 294:122–163. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.01.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stalker L, Boreham C, Underschultz J, Freifeld B, Perkins E, Schacht U, Sharma S (2015) Application of tracers to measure, monitor and verify breakthrough of sequestered CO2 at the CO2CRC Otway Project, Victoria, Australia. Chem Geol 399:2–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDOE (2007) Carbon sequestration technology roadmap and program plan: ensuring the fossil energy systems through the successful deployment of carbon capture and storage technologies. US Department of Energy, Washington, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • USDOE (2011) Carbon Sequestration Program: Technology Program Plan. National Energy Technology Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Meer LB, Yavuz F (2009) CO2 storage capacity calculations for the Dutch subsurface. Energy Procedia 1:2615–2622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Genuchten MT (1980) A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:892–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Freifeld B, Finsterle S, Leahy M, Ennis-King J, Paterson L, Dance T (2011) Estimating CO2 residual trapping from a single-well test: experimental design calculations. Energy Procedia 4:5044–5049. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.477

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Chevron Innovative Research Fund (CIRS) from College of Engineering at Louisiana State University provided financial support for this work. We thank the three anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments that helped improve the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Craft and Hawkins Department of Petroleum Engineering, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA

    Mehdi Zeidouni & Kewei Shi

  2. Bureau of Economic Geology, Jackson School of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78758, USA

    Susan D. Hovorka

Authors
  1. Mehdi Zeidouni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Susan D. Hovorka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kewei Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehdi Zeidouni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zeidouni, M., Hovorka, S.D. & Shi, K. Tracer test to constrain CO2 residual trapping and plume evolution. Environ Earth Sci 75, 1451 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-6261-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-6261-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation