Skip to main content
Log in

Volatile and semi-volatile organic compound patterns in flowback waters from fracturing sites within the Marcellus Shale

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gas shale fracturing relies on a method known as horizontal fracturing to remove gas trapped within the impermeable facies. Conventional vertical and unconventional horizontal fracturing requires a large amount of water to be injected downhole under high pressure. These fracturing fluids can contain high concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons with known adverse health effects. The development of reuse technologies that reduce the need of potable water requires an accurate understanding of petroleum hydrocarbon loading during key points in the fracturing process. In this study, flowback water quality from both horizontally and vertically fractured wells within the Marcellus Shale region in Pennsylvania and West Virginia were analyzed. Flowback data made available by the Shale Network were collected using geographic information systems. Flowback sample analytes of interest were diesel range organic (DRO) and gasoline range organic (GRO) compounds. Noticeable patterns were present in DRO and GRO flowback data. Flowback water results showed differences between horizontally and vertically fractured well DRO patterns. Vertically fractured wells showed a sharp decrease in DRO concentrations following fracture events. Horizontally fractured wells exhibited a peak in loading when flowback water shifted to produced water. This pattern suggests the method of completion may affect DRO loading. GRO loadings appeared to not be effected by the method of completion. A horizontally fractured well and vertically fractured well within 16 km showed similar loading patterns. GRO data suggest factors such as geographic location may be responsible for VOC loading trends.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ames DP, Horsburgh JS, Cao Y et al (2012) HydroDesktop: web services-based software for hydrologic data discovery, download, visualization, and analysis. Environ Model Softw 37:146–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbot E, Vidic NS, Gregory KB, Vidic RD (2013) Spatial and temporal correlation of water quality parameters of produced waters from Devonian-age shale following hydraulic fracturing. Environ Sci Technol 47:2562–2569. doi:10.1021/es304638h

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carothers WW (1976) Aliphatic acid anions and stable carbon isotopes of oil field waters in the San Joaquin Valley. San Jose State University

  • Davies R, Foulger G, Bindley A, Styles P (2013) Induced seismicity and hydraulic fracturing for the recovery of hydrocarbons. Mar Pet Geol 45:171–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiGiulio DC, Jackson RB (2016) Impact to underground sources of drinking water and domestic wells from production well stimulation and completion practices in the pavillion, Wyoming, Field. Environ Sci Technol. doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b04970

  • Fakhru’l-Razi A, Pendashteh A, Abdullah LC et al (2009) Review of technologies for oil and gas produced water treatment. J Hazard Mater 170:530–551. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.05.044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorody AW (2012) Factors affecting the variability of stray gas concentration and composition in groundwater. Am Assoc Pet Geol 1:17–31. doi:10.1306/eg.12081111013

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross SA, Avens HJ, Banducci AM et al (2013) Analysis of BTEX groundwater concentrations from surface spills associated with hydraulic fracturing operations. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 63:424–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes T (2009) Sampling and analysis of water streams associated with the development of Marcellus Shale Gas. Marcellus Shale Coalition, Des Plaines, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan NA, Engle M, Dungan B et al (2016) Volatile-organic molecular characterization of shale-oil produced water from the Permian Basin. Chemosphere 148:126–136. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.12.116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King GE (2012) Hydraulic fracturing 101: what every representative, environmentalist, regulator, reporter, investor, university researcher, neighbor, and engineer should know about hydraulic fracturing risk. J Pet Technol 64:34–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lester Y, Ferrer I, Thurman EM et al (2015) Characterization of hydraulic fracturing flowback water in Colorado: implications for water treatment. Sci Total Environ 512–513:637–644. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li M, Jiang B, Lin S et al (2013) Structural controls on coalbed methane reservoirs in Faer coal mine, Southwest China. J Earth Sci 24:437–448. doi:10.1007/s12583-013-0340-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire-Boyle SJ, Barron AR (2014) Organic compounds in produced waters from shale gas wells. Environ Sci Process Impacts 16:2237–2248. doi:10.1039/C4EM00376D

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thacker J, Carlton D, Hildenbrand Z et al (2015) Chemical analysis of wastewater from unconventional drilling operations. Water 7:1568–1579. doi:10.3390/w7041568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Energy Information Administration (2013) Annual energy outlook 2013 with projections to 2040. Department of Energy, Washington, DC

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karl Oetjen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oetjen, K., Thomas, L. Volatile and semi-volatile organic compound patterns in flowback waters from fracturing sites within the Marcellus Shale. Environ Earth Sci 75, 1043 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5847-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5847-3

Keywords

Navigation