Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of alkali–silica reaction potential of quartz-rich rocks by alkaline etching of polished rock sections

  • Thematic Issue
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rock sections mainly composed of quartz (coming from orthoquartzite, quartz metagreywacke, pegmatite quartz, vein quartz, chert, and flint) were subjected to experimental etching in 1 M NaOH solution at 80 °C. After 4 h–14 days, the rock sections were analysed using a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) combined with energy-dispersive spectrometer. Representative areas were documented in backscattering mode and analysed using fully automatic petrographic image analysis (PIA). Specific features connected to alkaline etching were observed on the surface of the rock sections: dissolution gaps, accentuation of pre-existing microcracks, etched out parts of aggregates, and the formation of altered silica-rich layer, and alkali–silica gels, all influencing the greyscale spectrum of the BSE microphotographs. Using SEM-PIA, it was possible to quantify the area affected by alkaline etching (etched area) and to express it as a percentage of the total area analysed. A very good correlation was found between the etched area and alkali–silica reaction potential of investigated rocks measured according to an accelerated mortar bar test.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrade T, Silva JJR, da Silva CM, Hasparyk NP (2008) History of some AAR cases in the Recife region of Brazil. In: Broekmans MATM, Wigum BJ (eds) Proceedings of the 13th international conference on alkali–aggregate reaction. Trondheim, Norway, pp 730–743

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM C1260-07 (2007) Standard test method for potential alkali reactivity of aggregates (mortar-bar Method). ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM C289 (2007) Standard test method for potential alkali–silica reactivity of aggregates (chemical method). ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  • Bažant ZP, Steffens A (2000) Mathematical model for kinetics of alkali–silica reaction in concrete. Cement Concrete Res 30(3):419–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bektas F, Topal T, Goncuoglu MC, Turanli L (2008) Evaluation of the alkali reactivity of cherts from Turkey. Constr Build Mater 22(6):1183–1190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broekmans MATM, Jansen JBH (1998) Silica dissolution in impure sandstone: application to concrete. J Geochem Explor 62(1–3):311–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulteel D, Rafaï N, Degrugilliers P, Garcia-Diaz E (2004) Petrography study on altered flint aggregate by alkali–silica reaction. Mater Charact 53(2–4):141–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chace FM (1956) Abbreviations in field and mine geological mapping. Econ Geol 51:712–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chappex T, Scrivener KL (2012) The influence of aluminium on the dissolution of amorphous silica and its relation to alkali silica reaction. Cement Concrete Res 42(12):1645–1649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ČSN 72 1179 (1968) Determination of reactivity of aggregates in connection with alkalis (in Czech). Czech Normalization Institute, Prague

    Google Scholar 

  • Dove PM (1995) Kinetic and thermodynamic controls on silica reactivity in weathering environments. In: White AF, Brantley SL (eds) Chemical weathering rates of silicate minerals, vol 31. Mineralogical Society of America, Short Course, pp 236–290

  • Dreyer W (1973) The science of rock mechanics. Part I. The strength properties of rocks, second ed. Series on rock and soil mechanics. Trans Tech Pub, Clausthal, Germany

  • Dunant CF, Scrivener KL (2012) Effects of aggregate size on alkali–silica-reaction induced expansion. Cement Concrete Res 42(6):745–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes I (2009) Composition of alkali–silica reaction products at different locations within concrete structures. Mater Charact 60(7):655–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes I (2015) Role of granitic aggregates in the deterioration of a concrete dam. B Eng Geol Environ 74(1):195–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes I, Broekmans MATM (2013) Alkali–silica reactions: an overview. Part I. Metallogr Microstruct Anal 2(4):257–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García del Amo D, Calvo Pérez B (2001) Diagnosis of the alkali–silica reactivity potential by means of digital image analysis of aggregate thin sections. Cement Concrete Res 31(10):1449–1454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie MR, Styles MT (1999) BGS rock classification scheme. Volume 1. Classification of igneous rocks. British Geological Survey, Report No. RR 99-06, Nottingham, UK

  • Jensen V (2012) The controversy of alkali carbonate reaction: state of art on the reaction mechanisms and behaviour in concrete. In: Drimalas T, Ideker JH, Fournier B (Eds.) Proceedings of the 14th international conference on alkali-aggregate reaction, Austin, USA, p 10

  • Khouchaf L, Boinski F, Tuilier MH, Flank AM (2006) Characterization of heterogeneous SiO2 materials by scanning electron microscope and micro fluorescence XAS techniques. Nucl Instrum Meth B 252(2):333–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kretz R (1983) Symbols for rock-forming minerals. Am Miner 68(1–2):277–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuchařová A, Götze J, Šachlová Š, Pertold Z, Přikryl R (2016) Microscopic and CL spectroscopic characterization of quartz exhibiting different ASR potential. Microsc Microanal. doi:10.1017/S1431927615015524

    Google Scholar 

  • Leemann A, Holzer L (2005) Alkali-aggregate reaction—identifying reactive silicates in complex aggregates by ESEM observation of dissolution features. Cement Concrete Comp 27(7–8):796–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindgård J, Nixon PJ, Borchers I, Schouenborg B, Wigum BJ, Haugen M, Åkesson U (2010) The EU “PARTNER” Project—European standard tests to prevent alkali reactions in aggregates: final results and recommendations. Cement Concrete Res 40(4):611–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu D, Fournier B, Grattan-Bellew PE (2006) Evaluation of accelerated test methods for determining alkali–silica reactivity of concrete aggregates. Cement Concrete Comp 28(6):546–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukschová Š, Přikryl R, Pertold Z (2009) Petrographic identification of alkali–silica reactive aggregates in concrete from 20th century bridges. Constr Build Mater 23(2):734–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxford Instruments (2015) http://www.oxford-instruments.com. Accessed 16 Oct 2015

  • Passchier CW, Trouw RAJ (2005) Microtectonics, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Petruk W (1986) Image analysis: an overview of developments. CANMET Report 86-4E, pp 1–5

  • Pettijohn FJ, Potter PE, Siever R (1972) Sand and sandstone. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponce JM, Batic OR (2006) Different manifestations of the alkali–silica reaction in concrete according to the reaction kinetics of the reactive aggregate. Cement Concrete Res 36(6):1148–1156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Přikryl R (2006) Assessment of rock geomechanical quality by quantitative rock fabric coefficients: limitations and possible source of misinterpretations. Eng Geol 87(3–4):149–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajabipour F, Giannini E, Dunant C, Ideker JH, Thomas MDA (2015) Alkali–silica reaction: current understanding of the reaction mechanisms and the knowledge gaps. Cement Concrete Res 76:130–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos VIM (2013) Characterization of the potential reactivity to alkalis of Portuguese aggregates for concrete. PhD Thesis, University of Porto, Porto, p 417

  • Robertson S (1999) BGS rock classification scheme. Volume 2. Classification of metamorphic rocks. British Geological Survey, Report No.: RR 99-02, Nottingham, UK

  • Šachlová Š (2013) Microstructure parameters affecting alkali–silica reactivity of aggregates. Constr Build Mater 49:604–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Šachlová Š, Přikryl R, Pertold Z (2010) Alkali–silica reaction products: comparison between samples from concrete structures and laboratory test specimens. Mater Charact 61(12):1379–1393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Šachlová Š, Burdová A, Pertold Z, Přikryl R (2011) Macro- and micro-indicators of ASR in concrete pavement. Mag Concrete Res 63(8):553–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Šachlová Š, Kuchařová A, Pertold Z, Přikryl R, Fridrichová M (2015) Quantitative assessment of alkali silica reaction potential of quartz-rich aggregates: comparison of chemical test and accelerated mortar bar test improved by SEM-PIA. B Eng Geol Environ. doi:10.1007/s10064-015-0812-z

    Google Scholar 

  • SPSS Software (2015) SigmaScan®Pro 5.0.0. http://www.sigmaplot.com/index.php. Accessed 22 Jul 2015

  • St John DA, Poole AB, Sims I (1998) Concrete petrography. A handbook of investigative techniques, Arnold

    Google Scholar 

  • Šťastná A, Nekvasilová Z, Přikryl R, Šachlová Š (2013) Microscopic examination of alkali-reactive volcanic rocks from the Bohemian Massif (Czech Republic). The 3rd international conference on sustainable construction materials and technologies, Kyoto, Japan, p 10

  • SPI Supplies (2015). http://www.2spi.com. Accessed 10 Sept 2015

  • Tescan (2015). http://www.tescan.com. Accessed 10 Sept 2015

  • TP 137 (2015) Elimination of alkaline reaction of aggregates in concrete structures (in Czech). Road and Motorway Directorate of the Czech Republic, Prague, p 29

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigum BJ, French WJ, Howarth RJ, Hills C (1997) Accelerated tests for assessing the potential exhibited by concrete aggregates for alkali-aggregate reaction. Cement Concrete Comp 19(5–6):451–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was financially supported from Research Project P104/12/0915 provided by the Czech Science Foundation. Financing is also acknowledged from the OPPK Project CZ.2.16/3.1.00/21516. Special thanks belong to Professor Karel Miskovsky from Envix Nord AB for his assistance with the selection of Swedish samples and to M. Fridrichová for her assistance with the SEM imaging.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Geochemistry, Mineralogy, and Mineral Resources, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Albertov 6, 128 43, Prague 2, Czech Republic

    Šárka Šachlová, Aneta Kuchařová, Zdeněk Pertold & Richard Přikryl

Authors
  1. Šárka Šachlová
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aneta Kuchařová
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zdeněk Pertold
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Richard Přikryl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Šárka Šachlová.

Additional information

This article is part of a Topical Collection in Environmental Earth Sciences on “Geomaterials used as construction raw materials and their environmental interactions” guest edited by Richard Přikryl, Ákos Török, Magdalini Theodoridou, and Miguel Gomez-Heras.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Šachlová, Š., Kuchařová, A., Pertold, Z. et al. Evaluation of alkali–silica reaction potential of quartz-rich rocks by alkaline etching of polished rock sections. Environ Earth Sci 75, 730 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5519-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5519-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation