Skip to main content
Log in

Landslide-risk zonation along mountainous highway considering rock mass classification

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Landslide and especially rockfall hazard widely occurs along cut slopes in mountainous regions. The risk assessment of mass movements is still one of most challenging problems in slope engineering geology. We propose a routine method to assess rock slide and rockfall risk of cut slopes essentially based on slope properties and rock mass structure. The method is a lean low-cost path to a risk estimate. Rock block size is simplified into two classes, {small} with a volume less than 1.0 m3 and {large}, greater than 1.0 m3. Studies indicate that for a slope with n small-medium rock blocks, the possibility of rockfalls can be estimated by 1 − (1 − P)n, in which P is the likelihood of one {small} rock block fall. The possibility of other types of mass movement can be determined by the first-order second-moment (FOSM) method. Based on this, an exponent equation was adopted to evaluate the consequence and the risk. The methodology is demonstrated by a case study from the mountains of Mentougou district, Beijing, China. Based on the investigations of geological conditions (i.e., lithology, weathering and rock mass structure) and some historical mass movement data of the cut slopes, a zonation map for rockfall and rock slide risk along a 17-km section of a road is presented. The result is supported by mass movement event observations in the recent 2 years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barton N (1991) Scale effects or sampling bias? Publikasjon-Norges Geotekniske Institutt 182:1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Budetta P (2004) Assessment of rockfall risk along roads. Natural Hazards Earth Sys Sci 4(1):71–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chau KT, Wong RHC, Wu JJ (2002) Coefficient of restitution and rotational motions of rockfall impacts. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39:69–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christian JT, Ladd CC, Baecher GB (1994) Reliability applied to slope stability analysis. J Geotech Eng 120(12):2180–2207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosta GB, Agliardi F (2004) Parametric evaluation of 3D dispersion of rockfall trajectories. Natural Hazards Earth Sys Sci 4(4):583–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruden DM (1993) The multilingual landslide glossary: Richmond, British Columbia, Canada, Bitech Publishers, for the UNESCO Working Party on World Landslide Inventory

  • Cruden DM, Varnes DJ (1996) Landslide types and processes. In: Turner AK, Schuster RL (eds) Landslides: investigation and mitigation. Transportation research board special report 247 National Academy Press, Washington, D. C., pp 37–75

  • Dai FC, Lee CF, Ngai YY (2002) Landslide risk assessment and management: an overview. Eng Geol 64(1):65–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan CW, Christopher WM (2004) Rock slope engineering: civil and mining. Spon Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dussage-Peisser C, Helmstetter A, Grasso JR, Hantz D, Desvarreaux P, Jeannin M, Giraud A (2002) Probabilistic approach to rock fall hazard assessment: potential of historical data analysis. Natural Hazards Earth Sys Sci 2(1–2):15–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fell R (1994) Landslide risk assessment and acceptable risk. Can Geotech J 31:261–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fell R, Ho KKS, Lacasse S, Leroi E (2005) A framework for landslide risk assessment and management. In: Hungr O, Fell R, Couture R, Eberthardt E (eds) Landslide Risk Management. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 3–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Frattini P, Crosta GB, Carrara A, Agliardi F (2008) Assessment of rockfall susceptibility by integrating statistical and physically-based approaches. Geomorphology 94(3–4):419–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frattini P, Crosta GB, Agliardi F (2012) Rockfall characterization and modeling. In: Clague JJ, Stead D (eds) Landslides types, mechanisms and modeling. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 267–281

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Glade T (2003) Vulnerability assessment in landslide risk analysis. Erde 134(2):121–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F (2000) Landslide fatalities and the evaluation of landslide risk in Italy. Eng Geol 58(2):89–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P, Wieczorek GF (2003) Rockfall hazard and risk assessment in the Yosemite Valley, California, USA. Natural Hazards Earth Sys Sci 3(6):491–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Highland L, Bobrowsky PT (2008) The landslide handbook: a guide to understanding landslides. US Geological Survey, Reston, p 129

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Brown ET (1997) Practical estimates of rock mass strength. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34(8):1165–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hungr O, Evans SG, Hazzard J (1999) Magnitude and frequency of rock falls and rock slides along the main transportation corridors of South Western British Columbia. Can Geotech J 36(2):224–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISRM (1978) Suggested methods for the quantitative description of discontinuities in rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci Geomech Abs 15(6):319–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISRM (1981) Basic geotechnical description of rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci Geomech Abs 18(1):87–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lan H, Derek Martin C, Lim CH (2007) RockFall analyst: a GIS extension for three-dimensional and spatially distributed rockfall hazard modeling. Comput Geosci 33(2):262–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lan H, Martin CD, Zhou C, Lim CH (2010) Rockfall hazard analysis using LiDAR and spatial modeling. Geomorphology 118(1):213–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee EM, Jones DKC (2004) Landslide risk assessment. Thomas Telford, London, p 454

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leroi E (1996) Landslide hazard—risk maps at different scales: objectives, tools and development. In: Senneset K (ed) Landslides—Glissements de Terrain, 7th International symposium on landslides. Balkema, Trondheim, pp 35–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin Z (1996) Manual of geotechnical engineering test and monitor Beijing. Liaoning Science and Geotechnique Press (In Chinese)

  • Marinos P, Hoek E (2000) GSI-A geologically friendly tool for rock mass strength estimation. Proceedings of the GeoEng2000 at the international conference on geotechnical and geological engineering. Technomic publishers, Lancaster, Melbourne, pp 1422–1446

    Google Scholar 

  • Marinos P, Hoek E (2001) Estimating the geotechnical properties of heterogeneous rock masses such as flysch. Bull Eng Geol Environ 60:85–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michoud C, Derron MH, Horton P, Jaboyedoff M, Baillifard FJ, Loye A, Queyrel A (2012) Rockfall hazard and risk assessments along roads at a regional scale: example in Swiss Alps. Natural Hazards Earth Sys Sci 12:615–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmstrom A (2005) Measurements of and correlations between block size and rock quality designation (RQD). Tunn Undergr Space Technol 20(4):362–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson LA, Davis SA, Van Vickle R (1990) Rockfall Hazard Rating System – Implementation Manual, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Report FHWA-OR-EG-90–01, FHWA. Department of Transportation, U.S

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonmez H, Ulusay R (2002) A discussion on the Hoek-Brown failure criterion and suggested modifications to the criterion verified by slope stability case studies. Yerbilimleri 26:77–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Westen CJ, Van Asch TW, Soeters R (2006) Landslide hazard and risk zonation—why is it still so difficult? Bull Eng Geol Environ 65(2):167–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varnes DJ (1978) Slope movement. types and processes. In: Schuster RL, Krizek RJ (eds) Landslides—analysis and control: transportation research board special report 176. National Research Council, Washington, D.C, pp 11–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Varnes DJ (1984) Landslide hazard zonation: a review of principles and practice. UNESCO, Natural Hazards vol 3, p 10

  • Wu TH, Kraft LM (1970) Safety analysis of slopes. J Soil Mech Found Div 96(2):609–630

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by funds from National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 41030749, 41172272 and 41322020 and Ministry of Science and Technology, People’s Republic of China for foundation under Grant of No. 2010CB732001.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shengwen Qi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qi, S., Li, X., Guo, S. et al. Landslide-risk zonation along mountainous highway considering rock mass classification. Environ Earth Sci 74, 4493–4505 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4453-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4453-0

Keywords

Navigation