Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Simulation of groundwater flow system in alluvium and fractured weathered bedrock zone: Sand Lick watershed, Boone County, West Virginia, USA

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Appalachian Plateau is characterized by relatively flat-laying but intensely eroded bedrock, comprising cyclical sequences of Pennsylvanian age sedimentary bedrock dominated by sandstone, siltstone, shale, coal, claystone and occasionally limestone. Fractured/weathered sandstone is potentially the main groundwater transmitting zone. Conventional field or laboratory methods of estimating the hydraulic properties in selected points within such fractured and weathered bedrock groundwater transmitting zones are seldom representative or feasible because of their heterogeneity, anisotropy and irregular aquifer geometry. Therefore, the objectives of our study is to determine the “bulk” hydraulic properties of a weathered/fractured zone in a valley located within the Appalachian Plateau Geomorphic Province as well as recharge and evapotranspiration rates by inverse numerical simulation of groundwater flow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abate C (1993) A numerical modeling approach to estimation of parameters describing groundwater flow in coal-bearing rocks of the Allegheny Plateau. PhD Dissertation. Penn. State University, Department of Geosciences, p 140

  • Anderson MP, Woessner W (1992) Applied groundwater modeling. Simulation of Flow and Advective Transport Academic Press Inc, San Diego, New York, Boston, p 381

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquaveo (2010) GMS 6.5 Tutorials. MODFLOW—Conceptual Model Approach. Available on-line: http://aquaveo.com/software/gms-81tutorials

  • Banks D (1997a) Hydrogeochemistry of millstone grit and coal measures groundwaters, south Yorkshire and north Derbyshire, UK. Quat J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 30(3):237–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks D (1997b) Hydrogeochemistry of coal mine drainage and other ferruginous waters in north Derbyshire and south Yorkshire, UK. Quart J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 30:257–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becek K (2008) Investigation of elevation bias of the SRTM C- and X-Band digital elevation models. The international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences, vol XXXVII, Part B1, Beijing

  • Bruhn RW (1985) A note on ground movements and associated ground water responses at an underground Appalachian mine. SME-AIME Preprint 85-63, p 10. Available on-line: http://www.dep.state.pa.us/dep/deputate/minres/districts/cmdp/chap02.html

  • Carillo R, Ortega G (2008) Groundwater flow understanding from local to regional scale. International association of hydrogeologists selected papers. ISBN-13 (e-book): 978-0-203-94579-7, p 202

  • Davies C, Allen MB, Buslov MM, Safonova I (2010) Deposition in the Kuznetsk Basin, Siberia: insights into the Permian-Triassic transition and the Mesozoic evolution of Central Asia. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 295(1–2):307–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis RW (1987) Movement of ground water in coalbearing rocks near Fishtrap Lake in Pike County, Kentucky: US. Geol Surv Water Resour Investig Rep 87–4084:24

    Google Scholar 

  • Domenico PA, Schwartz FW (1998) Physical and chemical hydrogeology. John Wiley and Sons, New York, p 824

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumpleton S, Robins NS, Walker JA, Merrin PD (2001) Mine water rebound in South Nottinghamshire: risk evaluation using 3-D visualization and predictive modelling. Quart J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 34:307–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Modeling Research Laboratory (1999) Groundwater modeling system v5.0, reference manual: Department of Defense, Brigham Young University

  • Fenneman NM (1938) Physiography of Eastern United States. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenneman NM, Johnson DW (1946) Physical divisions of the United States: US. Geological Survey Special Maps Series, 1 sheet

  • Halford KJ, Kuniansky EL (2002) Documentation of spreadsheets for the analysis of- aquifer-test and slug-test data: US Geological Survey Open-File Report 02-197, p 51. Available at: http://www.pubs.usgs.gov/of/2002/ofr02197

  • Hawkins JW, Aljoe WW (1990) Hydrologic characterization and modeling of a heterogeneous acid-producing surface coal mine spoil, Upshur County, West Virginia. In: Proceedings of the national 1990 symposium on mining, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, pp 43–51. Available at the UKY Library, Lexington, KY

  • Independence Coal Co., Inc (2000) Geologic cross-section and borehole data in Sand Lick Watershed

  • Isioye OA, Jobin E (2011) TS05I—Spatial information processing I

  • Isioye OA, Jobin E (2011) An assessment of digital elevation models (DEMs) from different spatial data sources FIG working week 2011 bridging the gap between cultures, Marrakech, Morocco, 18–22 May 2011, p 17

  • Kipp JA, Dinger JS (1987) Stress-relief fracture control of groundwater movement in the Appalachian Plateaus: focus conference on Eastern regional ground-water issues, National Water Well Association, July 15, 1987, Burlington, Vermont, p 423–438

  • Kozar MD, Mathes MV (2001) Aquifer-characteristics data for West Virginia. Water-resources investigations report 01-4036; US Geological Survey, p 74. Available on-line at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/wri/wri01-4036/pdf/wri014036.pdf

  • Kozar MD, McCoy KJ, Britton JQ, Blake BM Jr (2012) Hydrogeology, groundwater flow, and groundwater quality of an abandoned underground coal-mine aquifer, Elkhorn Area West Virginia: Morgantown, West Virginia, West Virginia geological and economic survey, Bulletin Number B-46, p 103

  • Kuskovskii VS, Kashevarov AA, Rasskazov NM, Rybakova ST (2001) The hydrogeological conditions in the Kuznetsk Coal Basin and prediction of their changes caused by mine flooding. Water Resour 28(3):257–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandle RJ (2002) Groundwater modeling guidance (Draft 1.0), Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Michigan

  • Masaratto et al (2005) Anisotropic permeability characterization of Permian colas

  • McCulloch CM (2012) Investigations into alleged groundwater problems around Seth and Prenter, West Virginia, technical report, ARCADIS, p 55

  • Mercer WJ, Faust RC (1981) Ground-water modeling: national water well association, p 60

  • Reilly TE, Harbaugh AW (2004) Guidelines for evaluating groundwater flow models, US geological surveys scientific investigations report 2004–5038, Version 1.01, Reston, VA, p 30

  • Rodríguez E, Morris CS, Belz JE, Chapin EC, Martin JM, Daffer W, Hensley S (2005) An assessment of the SRTM topographic products. Technical Report JPL D-31639, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California, p 143

  • Shepley MD, Pearson AD, Smith GD, Banton CJ (2008) The impacts of coal mining subsidence on groundwater resources management of the East Midlands Permo-Triassic Sandstone aquifer, England. Quart J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 41:425–438

  • Stoner JD (1983) Probable hydrologic effects of subsurface mining. Ground Water Monit Rev 3(1):128–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang X, Zhang J, Shan Y, Xiong J (2012) Upper Paleozoic coal measures and unconventional natural gas systems of the Ordos Basin, China. Geosci Front 3(6):863–873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor RK (1988) Coal Measures mudrocks: composition, classification and weathering processes. Quat J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 21(1):85–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varma S (2002) Hydrogeology and groundwater resources of the Collie Basin, Western Australia, water and rivers commission, hydrogeological record series, Report HG 5, p 80

  • Wanless HR, Weller JM (1932) Correlation and extent of Pennsylvanian cyclothems. Geol Soc Am Bull 43:1003–1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss JS, Razem AC (1984) Simulation of ground-water flow in a mined watershed in Eastern Ohio. Ground Water 22(5):549–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White F (2009) Fluid mechanics, 6th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood SC, Younger PL, Robins NS (1999) Long-term changes in the quality of polluted minewater discharges from abandoned underground coal workings in Scotland. Quart J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 32:69–79

  • Wyrick GC, Borchers JW (1981) Hydrologic effects of stress relief fracturing on an Appalachian Valley: US Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2177, p 51. Available at: http://openlibrary.org/books/OL13606056M/Hydrologic_effects_of_stress-relief_fracturing_in_an_Appalachian_valley

  • Yao Yanbin, Liu Dameng, Tang Dazhen, Tang Shuheng, Che Yao, Huang Wenhui (2009) Preliminary evaluation of the coalbed methane production potential and its geological controls in the Weibei Coalfield, Southeastern Ordos Basin, China. Intern J Coal Geol 78(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge invaluable help rendered to us in field work by Bobby Mitchell of Charleson WV.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoram Eckstein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jazi, R.S., Eckstein, Y. Simulation of groundwater flow system in alluvium and fractured weathered bedrock zone: Sand Lick watershed, Boone County, West Virginia, USA. Environ Earth Sci 74, 2247–2258 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4216-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4216-y

Keywords

Navigation